OBAMA ENDORSES GLOBAL TAXES ON EVE OF U.N. SUMMIT

Vatic Note:  Rahm's idea?? Poor Chicago!!  More taxes?   Is this the one?  Trying to determine which event will shove the American people over the top and into action against the rolling train of "Fascist" globalization and repression.   The Press then spent the time on the speech by the Iranian President to cover up the fascist zionist taxation scheme so they could slip it through.   I guess Obama did not expect to get re-elected, nor did the dems controlling congress if this is how they are acting just before elections.   I find that a very interesting fact.   If they are all working on the same team then "who" is the false front for the real controllers doesn't matter does it?   Bush yesterday,  Obama today, Palin tomorrow,  no difference, the agenda will march forward.  I still can't get over how we sat and watched all this unfold over the past 10 years and we still did nothing about it.  Maybe that mind control project the gov has going really works.   Maybe we have lost already.  Naw,  we are way too powerful.   Sleeping Tiger and all. 

OBAMA ENDORSES GLOBAL TAXES ON EVE OF U.N. SUMMIT
http://www.worldviewweekend.com/worldview-times/article.php?articleid=6510
Posted: 09/16/10
Cliff Kincaid

In a classic case of misdirection, while the media are preoccupied with the fate of the Bush tax cuts, President Obama is preparing to attend a United Nations summit next week to endorse "innovative finance mechanisms"-global taxes-to drain even more wealth out of the U.S. economy.


A draft "outcome document [1]" produced in advance of the September 20-22 U.N. Summit on the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) commits the nations of the world to supporting "innovative financing mechanisms" to supplement foreign aid spending.


The term "innovative financing mechanisms" is a U.N. euphemism for global taxes. But the document actually goes further, praising the "Task Force on International Financial Transactions for Development" for its work on the subject of mobilizing additional "resources" for countries to achieve the MDGs. This is a body tasked with proposing and implementing global tax schemes.


"We consider," the document says, "that innovative financing mechanisms can make a positive contribution in assisting developing countries to mobilize additional resources for financing for development on a voluntary basis. Such financing should supplement and not be a substitute for traditional sources of financing."


In other words, the revenue from global taxes should be in addition to foreign aid spending.


The document recognized the "considerable progress" made in this area, an acknowledgement that an international tax by some nations on airline tickets is already in effect and producing several billions of dollars of revenue for world organizations to fight AIDS and other diseases.


In an article in The Christian Science Monitor, under the headline, "Small global taxes would make a big difference for world's 'bottom billion,' [2]" the foreign minister of France and other officials of foreign nations endorse various forms of "innovative development financing." One of their proposals is a tax on international currency transactions that could generate $35 billion a year.


The proposal, popular at the United Nations for decades and long-advocated by Fidel Castro, is called the Tobin Tax and named after Yale University economist James Tobin. Steven Solomon, a former staff reporter at Forbes, said in his book, The Confidence Game, that such a proposal "might net some $13 trillion a year…" because it is based on taking a percentage of money from the trillions of dollars exchanged daily in global financial markets.


He is referring to the fact that once such a tax is in place, it could be easily raised to bring in hundreds of billions of dollars or more a year to the U.N. and other global institutions.


Such financial transactions through banks and other financial institutions are commonplace on behalf of Americans who have stock in mutual funds or companies that invest or operate overseas. Hence, such a global tax could affect the stocks, mutual funds, and pensions of ordinary Americans.


The term "small global taxes" brought a stunned reaction from Senator David Vitter, when he was told of what is being proposed in advance of the U.N. summit. Vitter introduced Senate resolution 461, "Expressing the sense of the Senate that Congress should reject any proposal for the creation of a system of global taxation and regulation," to put the Senate on record against any such measure. He has vowed to maintain pressure on the world body to avoid implementing any of these schemes and thinks that the Congress has to use whatever financial leverage it has to frustrate U.N. demands for more power and authority in world affairs.


The Vitter resolution was sent to the liberal-controlled Senate Finance Committee, which declined to act on it.


Obama has been a major U.N. supporter since he was in the Senate and sponsored a bill, the Global Poverty Act (S 2433), to force U.S. compliance with the MDGs. Joseph Biden, then chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, tried to get it passed into law but ultimately failed.


As President, Obama is in a position to actively promote global taxation measures and clearly has done so. The "outcome document" his administration has already endorsed will be formally approved at next week's summit.


The document affirms the so-called "Monterrey Consensus" that committed nations to spending 0.7 percent of Gross National Product (GNP) on official development assistance (ODA), otherwise known as foreign aid. It says that "The fulfillment of all ODA commitments is crucial, including the commitments by many developed countries to achieve the target of 0.7 percent of gross national product (GNP) for ODA to developing countries by 2015…"


Over a 13-year period, from 2002, when the U.N.'s Financing for Development conference was held, to the target year of 2015, when the U.S. is expected to meet the Millennium Development Goals, this amounts to $845 billion from the U.S. alone, according to Jeffrey Sachs of the U.N.'s Millennium Project [3].


"We have fully embraced the Millennium Development Goals," Obama told the U.N. in 2009.

Distributed by www.worldviewweekend.com

By Cliff Kincaid
Email: cliff.kincaid@aim.org  
Click here for bio and archived articles


Disclaimer: Worldview Weekend, Christian Worldview Network and its columnists do not necessarily endorse or agree with every opinion expressed in every article posted on this site. We do however, encourage a healthy and friendly debate on the issues of our day. Whether you agree or disagree, we encourage you to post your feedback by using the feedback button.

---

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.