Vatic note: What shocked me in reading this is the entire article never addresses the real "Home Grown" terrorists proven by Video, who threatened our congress with martial law if they did not pass the bail out. Criminally before 9-11 this would have been labelled "EXTORTION" and treated as a crime, but since 9-11 this should have been then treated as terrorism which it is by definition. It was a wall street banker turned Sec of the Treasury. It was pure economic terrorism and home grown. Homeland security did nothing when we wrote to them asking them to investigate and prosecute. The entire admin should have been thrown in jail for what they did, then they did it again the second time around.
Notice this comes from "PoliceOne.com" News. What this shows us that as "concerned" citizens you want to get out there, find a way to make contact "causally" with local police and feel them out off duty where they stand if given orders to take down dissenters and resisters and protestors. follow them from work, into a bar, a grocery store, etc, it really has to be casual. Gather that intel and get it out regionally and everyone esle do the same and get all the details into one data base protected that is, bury it if you have to, then do the research on every single member of your sheriff, state police and local cops as to who they are etc...... you know what etc means. Then if things begin to come down that is the first place you go and take control of as soon as possible because without them, the feds have no foundation and they know it. That is why they militarized them and why I knew the minute they did that "why" they were doing it and what the long term plan was going to be. We in my town, now know who is what and who is not. And the Law enforcement people individually also know what it means for them to pick wrong. No one can protect them except us.
Report: US must address homegrown radical terrorists
9-10-10, By Lolita C. Baldor
According to a new report compiled by the former heads of the Sept. 11 Commission, the U.S. has failed to put systems in place to deal with homegrown radicals
Associated Press
WASHINGTON — The U.S. was slow to take seriously the threat posed by homegrown radicals and the government has failed to put systems in place to deal with the growing phenomenon, according to a new report compiled by the former heads of the Sept. 11 Commission.
The report says U.S. authorities failed to realize that Somali-American youths traveling from Minnesota to Mogadishu in 2008 to join extremists was not an isolated issue. Instead, the movement was one among several instances of a broader, more diverse threat that has surfaced across the country.
"Our long-held belief that homegrown terrorism couldn't happen here has thus created a situation where we are today stumbling blindly through the legal, operational and organizational minefield of countering terrorist radicalization and recruitment occurring in the United States," said the report.
Showing posts with label Violation of BOR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Violation of BOR. Show all posts
2010-09-05
$115M lawsuit launched against G20 police
Vatic Note: This shows the difference between the Canadians willing to fight for their freedoms and the US victims who did not do this that they could have done. It will be interesting to see how this turns out, but at least it has the dept, the higher ups and those in control on notice that the canadians will not take the abuse and confiscation of their civil liberties under any cirumstances and they are also suing for all 1150 people put under arrest. Can you imagine??? 1,150 people arrested. This is the NWO we have to look forward too. Control freaks to the extreme. That is a major symptom of fear. Maybe that is good information for us to have. In any case its fascist tyranny to do what they did and nothing less. We had arrests for doing nothing and our people were beat, brutalized, gased, chased, and otherwise treated like we lived in a police state and no accountability for any of it.
$115M lawsuit launched against G20 police
http://cnews.canoe.ca:80/CNEWS/Canada/2010/09/02/15229716.html?cid=ETF
By SHEENA GOODYEAR, QMI Agency
September 2, 2010
TORONTO – Two Torontonians are launching a $115-million class-action lawsuit against police on behalf of everyone detained during the G20 protests in July.
Miranda McQuade and Mike Barber, who were both arrested during the Summit, are suing on behalf of 1,150 people who were detained.
The statement of claim filed Thursday names the Toronto Police Services Board, the Attorney-General of Canada and the Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board as co-defendants.
QMI Agency's requests for comment from the co-defendants were not immediately returned.
"The wholesale violation of civil liberties which occurred during the G20 must be addressed by the courts to preserve our democracy,” said lawyer David Midanik in a statement. “These violations will escalate unless and until people are willing to stand up for their rights in a court of law.”
The international Summit in Toronto on July 26 and 27 sparked massive protests in the streets that saw cops cars torched, windows smashed, and more than 1,000 people arrested and held in makeshift detention centres overnight.
Erin Cauchi, who was detained outside during a rainstorm by armed riot cops for three hours on July 27, isn't convinced suing for million is the answer. She'd rather see an inquiry.
“I don't think money's going to prevent this from happening again,” said Cauchi. “It's about getting the awareness out there so people don't just forget about this.
Cauchi is the president of Canadian University Press, a co-operative of student newspapers. She turned up at the intersection of Queen and Spadina on July 27 to vouch for a pair of student journalists who were being held by police.
But she ended up being among 400 protesters and bystanders "kettled" by police for four hours. She said she had a rifle pointed at her and that she kept hearing rumblings that cops were going to use rubber bullets. She was eventually released, and told that she'd been arrested for breach of peace and cleared of all charges.
“I'm in support of the class-action suit, but skeptical it'll amount to anything if the government won't even approve an inquiry, which is ridiculous considering the clear violation of rights, particularly of the freedom of the press,” Cauchi told QMI Agency.
“It's scary to think of the precedent the G20 sets wherein any high-profile or controversial event is cause to eradicate civil liberties.”
The stated goal of the lawsuit is “to deter the defendants and any other public authority from acting in a manner which arbitrarily limits the democratic and constitutional rights of the people.”
The statement of claim accuses the defendants of “assault, battery, abuse of power, abuse of process, false arrest, false imprisonment, infliction of mental suffering, invasion of privacy, trespass, abuse of public office, harassment and intimidation.”
The Ontario Provincial Police, the RCMP and the Integrated Security Unit were also named in the statement.
None of the allegations have been proven in court and a response to the statement of claim has not been filed.
sheena.goodyear@sunmedia.ca
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
$115M lawsuit launched against G20 police
http://cnews.canoe.ca:80/CNEWS/Canada/2010/09/02/15229716.html?cid=ETF
By SHEENA GOODYEAR, QMI Agency
September 2, 2010
TORONTO – Two Torontonians are launching a $115-million class-action lawsuit against police on behalf of everyone detained during the G20 protests in July.
Miranda McQuade and Mike Barber, who were both arrested during the Summit, are suing on behalf of 1,150 people who were detained.
The statement of claim filed Thursday names the Toronto Police Services Board, the Attorney-General of Canada and the Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board as co-defendants.
QMI Agency's requests for comment from the co-defendants were not immediately returned.
"The wholesale violation of civil liberties which occurred during the G20 must be addressed by the courts to preserve our democracy,” said lawyer David Midanik in a statement. “These violations will escalate unless and until people are willing to stand up for their rights in a court of law.”
The international Summit in Toronto on July 26 and 27 sparked massive protests in the streets that saw cops cars torched, windows smashed, and more than 1,000 people arrested and held in makeshift detention centres overnight.
Erin Cauchi, who was detained outside during a rainstorm by armed riot cops for three hours on July 27, isn't convinced suing for million is the answer. She'd rather see an inquiry.
“I don't think money's going to prevent this from happening again,” said Cauchi. “It's about getting the awareness out there so people don't just forget about this.
Cauchi is the president of Canadian University Press, a co-operative of student newspapers. She turned up at the intersection of Queen and Spadina on July 27 to vouch for a pair of student journalists who were being held by police.
But she ended up being among 400 protesters and bystanders "kettled" by police for four hours. She said she had a rifle pointed at her and that she kept hearing rumblings that cops were going to use rubber bullets. She was eventually released, and told that she'd been arrested for breach of peace and cleared of all charges.
“I'm in support of the class-action suit, but skeptical it'll amount to anything if the government won't even approve an inquiry, which is ridiculous considering the clear violation of rights, particularly of the freedom of the press,” Cauchi told QMI Agency.
“It's scary to think of the precedent the G20 sets wherein any high-profile or controversial event is cause to eradicate civil liberties.”
The stated goal of the lawsuit is “to deter the defendants and any other public authority from acting in a manner which arbitrarily limits the democratic and constitutional rights of the people.”
The statement of claim accuses the defendants of “assault, battery, abuse of power, abuse of process, false arrest, false imprisonment, infliction of mental suffering, invasion of privacy, trespass, abuse of public office, harassment and intimidation.”
The Ontario Provincial Police, the RCMP and the Integrated Security Unit were also named in the statement.
None of the allegations have been proven in court and a response to the statement of claim has not been filed.
sheena.goodyear@sunmedia.ca
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)