Reading this makes me realize just how these khazars managed to gain control of our nation, especially, that which relates to foreign policy, but also digging into domestic law enforcement. I keep thinking about The storm troopers of Nazi Germany, and that leads to thinking about the USS Liberty and other terrorist attacks against the USA done with Israel's Mossad, involved and then blamed upon some innocent arab nation.
With the USS Liberty it was intended to sink the ship and kill all the survivors, so then the attack could be blamed on Eygpt, and then America would attack Eygpt for the sake of Israel, who actually did the attack. If it had not been for a Russian ship, that saved survivors and the ship, it would have been fully sunk and no survivors, but they did survive and reported it was an Israeli attack against our ship for political reasons. That forced Pres. Johnson to recall the US planes heading to Egypt in retaliation for the attack.
I also keep remembering who created these various intel agencies who do not work for nor report to their sovereign nations governments. Truman stated that when he left office. He said
After that JFK had problems with them as well. In fact, a case has been made that the CIA were involved in his assassination, along with Mossad, also created by Britain, and MI6, the head agency for the globalists.
Lets not forget that the Royal family are descendants of the migrating Khazars. In 1919, they changed their name to Windsor to sound more British, instead of the German background they came from using their German name, Goethe Saxe Coberg. And recently Prince Charles made a public statement to the world, that he was a descendant of Val the Impaler, also known as
Further, when you compare Homeland Security, run by dual Khazar citizens, and a citizens board occupied by SPLC and Mossads arm in America, the ADL, then you have to consider that the agency reflects the interests of Rothschilds Khazar Interests, rather than USA interests and how coincidental that its reflects the same organization that was cover for the Nazi Storm troopers of WW II Germany.
If there should happen to be an al-Qaeda attack in Calhoun County Alabama,
Sheriff Larry Amerson will presumably know what to do. That is because he and
a number of colleagues in law enforcement have received paid trips to Israel
to learn how to deal with the terrorist threat.
The Washington-based Jewish
Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA)
sponsors
a Law Enforcement Exchange Program
"in order to learn how to better protect
the U.S. communities from terrorist attacks." The program takes law enforcement
officials from the United States and sends them to Israel for training in the
"strategies and techniques perfected by Israeli law enforcement."
Amerson, past president of the National Sheriff’s Association, made his trip
in 2012. Along the way, he reportedly benefited from a
"greater understanding
of the situation in Israel as it relates to terrorist threats." JINSA also
hosts conferences in the U.S. where Israeli officers are brought over to brief
American law enforcement officials.
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is also involved in the
effort to
indoctrinate the U.S. law enforcement community. Its website’s
Homeland
Security Monitor chronicles numerous meetings between Israeli intelligence
and police officials and their U.S. counterparts, to include numerous trips
to Israel to learn from the masters of the craft about various aspects of security,
including controlling borders and airports. Even firemen have made the journey,
presumably to learn how a fire in Israel differs from a fire in the United States.
Ironically, American law enforcement and emergency services are every bit
as capable as those in Israel and really have nothing to learn. The difference
in practice is that Israel uses extensive profiling to identify threats, which
means Arabs are regularly stopped and questioned. Exposure to that dubious technique
is often paid for by the U.S. taxpayer as much of the travel to Israel is funded
by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which provides billions of dollars
in
training
grants to cover the expenses.
Marc Kahlberg of International Security Consulting
offers a package that
is called
"Eye of the Storm." He promises
"an exclusive learning
tour into the heart of Hebron. You will have the opportunity to see first-hand
how the police there are dealing with a daily volatile situation. You will feel
the adrenalin, but be completely safe and will be the guests of the Israeli
Police Commander." As
Hebron
is the largest Arab city on the West Bank with a population of 250,000 that
against its will hosts an illegal Israeli settlement of 1,000 protected by the
police and army, it promises to be an interesting experience.
It has been reported that when the United States was attacked on 9/11 Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was
pleased
because he understood that Washington and Tel Aviv would now be joined at the
hip in their mutual response to what Israel has been defining as terrorism.
When Netanyahu
spoke
before congress shortly afterwards he said "We are all targets" before
engaging in a number of meetings instructing Washington regarding what must
be done.
Netanyahu’s Israel succeeded beyond its wildest dreams, exploiting
the incident to such an extent that the United States has adopted wholesale
Israeli perceptions of Middle Eastern politics. As Scott McConnell has
observed,
there exists
"a transmission belt, conveying Israeli ideas on how the United
States should conduct itself in a contested and volatile part of the world.
To a great extent, a receptive American political class now views the Middle
East and their country’s role in it through Israel’s eyes."
Beyond that political assessment, the Israel-terrorism nexus operates on a
number of levels. It has been sometimes noted that the United States has adopted
the Israeli model to deal with terrorism, so much so that American politicians
sometimes consider Israel a component of U.S. national security. Republican
Vice Presidential candidate Paul Ryan’s website
included
"Israel" under the category "Homeland Security."
The federal bureaucracy has also been changed to accommodate the new reality.
Since the Clinton Administration, every senior diplomat or official dealing
with the Middle East region has had to pass through a vetting process to ensure
full support of and deference to Israeli interests, which include its view of
the terrorist threat. Non-compliance is career ending. Chas Freeman, who was
named to head the National Security Council in 2009, was quickly forced to
step
down when it was determined that he was not sufficiently pro-Israel.
Since 2001, many senior appointees throughout the federal government have gone
one step farther, no longer making any effort to hide their strongly pro-Israel
sentiments. Witness the ascendancy of Paul Wolfowitz, Doug Feith, William Boykin,
and Eric Edelman at the Defense Department under George W. Bush. Given the openly
expressed identification with Israel at the Pentagon and National Security Council
it is no surprise that Washington and Tel Aviv appear to align completely on
how to combat terrorism.
Both claim the right to engage in preemptive warfare
and to assassinate people in other countries without any transparent legal process.
Both operate lethal drones to kill suspected militants on the ground, both have
engaged in torture, and both operate high security prisons containing numerous
suspects who are described as terrorists but who have never been and quite likely
never will be tried. Many of the detainees have been confined for years and
will undoubtedly die in prison without ever being charged with a crime. Some
of them are surely innocent.
The Israeli-American model for dealing with terrorism is itself unusual. Historically
speaking, countries that have been plagued with a terrorism problem have focused
on countering that specific threat without seeking to expand the conflict. But
that has not been the case for post 9/11 America, with George W. Bush grandiloquently
proclaiming a global war on terror which was later euphemized into a "global
freedom mission" under Bush and as "overseas contingency operations"
under Barack Obama.
Bush set the United States up as an international policeman
with the rest of the world relegated to being either "with us or against
us." Israel meanwhile set the framework for the program, defining the terrorist
threat against itself and Washington as "radical Islam," a phrase
that has been readily picked up by American politicians and the media. Radical
Islam implies a worldwide struggle that is frequently conflated into a complete
rejection of political Islam and suspicion regarding the intentions of anyone
who is a practicing Muslim, a predisposition that is playing out currently vis-a-vis
Egypt.
Israel has also done much to name the players and define the playing field.
The hypocrisy of the process is evident when groups like Hezbollah and Hamas
are thereby identified by Washington as "terrorists" even though they
do not threaten the United States and see themselves as national liberation
movements for the Palestinian and Lebanese people. Meanwhile, groups like the
Mujaheddin e Khalq (MEK), which have actually killed Americans, have been
removed
from the State Department list because they are perceived as enemies of the
regime in Iran and are therefore by extension friends of Israel and its allies
in Congress and the media.
Less visible is Israel’s hand in shaping and profiting from the domestic agenda
against terrorism, which is where Sheriff Amerson comes in. The Lobby and its
friends are intent on projecting a positive image of Israel as a bulwark against
terrorism and the "only democracy in the Middle East." The disparate
groups that make up The Lobby are active in creating the tie that binds regarding
the perception of terrorism on the ground and they do it through exchange programs
and the actual involvement of Israeli security companies and contractors in
the lucrative homeland security marketplace.
Israel is a militarized state and
the United States over the past twelve years has also moved in the same direction
vis-a-vis its own police forces, a development that again reflects the priorities
of national and local governments and the predilection to deal with the perceived
terrorism threat through the use of overwhelming force and intimidation. New
York City’s unconstitutional "stop and frisk" police activity is a
preemptive doctrine modeled on Israeli counter-terrorism practice and it should
be no surprise that the New York Police Department has an overseas office in
Tel Aviv.
It has been noted that the terrorism threat itself is greatly exaggerated,
with more Americans killed by falling television sets than by terrorist action,
but this has not stopped the proliferation of state level departments of homeland
security, fusion centers for sharing information, and the introduction of consultants
and security service providers at all levels. Much of the activity is either
wasteful, redundant, or completely unnecessary. America’s seventy-two fusion
centers, where many of the Israeli contractors and advisers wind up, have been
denounced in a
Senate
report as useless, ineffective, and frequently engaged in spying on American
citizens, particularly Arabs, but also including anti-abortionists and Ron Paul
supporters.
This effort to turn a buck from the woefully mismanaged Department of Homeland
Security is multifaceted. The Israeli newspaper
Haaretz reports
that fully
97% of DHS discretionary grants are given to Jewish organizations
even though Janet Napolitano has admitted that
there is no "specific, credible
threat" against Jewish targets. And the flow of money is combined with
similar efforts being undertaken by other elements in the Israel Lobby to influence
opinion and create an American national consensus unshakably favorable to Israel.
The Israeli
arms
and security industry, which is partially "covert" so it can sell
to countries and rulers on arms embargo lists, is a partner to the process.
It is now the fourth largest weapons exporter in the world, behind only the
U.S., Russia, and France. It has 6,800 licensed arms and security services providers,
making it the largest industry in Israel. Israeli companies can and do bid on
federal and local government contracts in the U.S. and they are also able to
export their products freely to America thanks to the Israel-United States Free
Trade Agreement of 1985 and the Counterterrorism Cooperation Accord Between
the Government of the State of Israel and the Government of the United States
of America of 1996. This direct involvement of Israel in American security has
been recently expanded through passage of 2012’s United States-Israel Enhanced
Security Cooperation Act.
Israeli companies dominate the international airline security industry, frequently
doing double duty as the covert, local Mossad station, but their failures are
better known than their successes, including the case of the Nigerian underwear
bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab who was ultimately detected by an alert passenger.
Israeli technology companies also produce many of the devices used by police
departments and the FBI to tap telephone conversations and record call data.
And the employment of their high tech telecommunications equipment comes at
a national security price as, for example, they
exploited
a back door in the technology to listen in to White House phone conversations
during the Clinton Administration.
Israeli contractors and companies dot the homeland security landscape but
only rarely attract any attention. One notable exception to that rule was the
2002
attempt by New
Jersey governor Jim McGreevey to appoint an Israeli Golan Cipel, who was also
his lover, as his Homeland Security adviser. The companies sometimes boast about
their role in the occupation of the Palestinian West Bank. They claim to provide
what they describe as "real" experience and expertise based on their
recurring conflict with their Arab neighbors.
They often combine that narrative
with proselytizing their point of view about the politics of the Middle East.
The Israel Law Center (Shurat HaDin) is currently
offering
an October "Israeli Adventure of a Lifetime – the Ultimate Mission to Israel,"
which includes meetings with Mossad officials, observing a trial of a Hamas
terrorist, riding an ATV on the Golan Heights, and a briefing by Israeli soldier
heroes, all experienced while residing in five star accommodations. It is something
like Disneyland with guns and real live Arabs to shoot at.
If one starts looking, scores or even hundreds of Israeli companies and consultants
pop up nearly everywhere in U.S. national security while a search of the Israel-America
Chamber of Commerce
website did not identify
even a single American security company operating in Israel attempting to obtain
Israeli government and private sector contracts. Israel’s Security Solutions
International
offers
U.S. taxpayer funded training courses using "Israeli veterans" as
instructors.
Defense contractor Elbit Systems is
providing
spy towers on the Arizona border with Mexico. Magal Security Systems, which
has four subsidiary companies in the U.S., has a
contract
for security at American nuclear power plants. Rozin Security Consulting
provides
security at Mall of America, using its trademarked Suspicion Indicators Recognition
and Assessment System, which is basically profiling. Global Security International,
with offices in New York City,
offers
consulting services relating to counter-terrorism operations.
The broader question American taxpayers should be asking themselves is whether
the hundreds of billions of dollars being spent on national security is money
well spent. Israel has a vested interest in making the terrorist threat appear
more real than it actually is and also to present itself as the only reliable
partner of the United States in the war against global terror. It also profits
substantially as its companies and former security officers have exploited their
"real experience" credentials to entrench themselves in U.S. homeland
security at all levels.
With the aid of the domestic Israel Lobby, Tel Aviv
has become adept at selling a product, which includes the false depiction of
Israel as the victim in the Middle East. This victimhood has apparently obtained
traction in the United States, where politicians and the mainstream media persist
in describing the nation with the world’s largest economy and most powerful
military and security forces as somehow threatened. As a result, as Professor
Steven Walt has
described
it, Washington is "chasing spooks and ghosts all over the world,"
convinced that it is "very, very vulnerable." Israel has certainly
done its best to encourage that mindset.
Read more by Philip Giraldi
A JEWISH POLICE STATE IS COMING
