Vatic Note: I have a much different perspective of what Henry did that harmed this nation tremendously. First of all Henry was a Khazar of the first order. His entire career was built on advancing the khazar rothschild & Rockefeller bankers agenda, globally. He was also a member of the
CFR and the Bilderbergs
Kissinger was a major player in these globalists secret societies, that took over various governments and used them for a variety of criminal purposes, and One such example of his involvement in an international crime was
his participation in the attack on Timeron by the Indonesian government, murderinhg hundreds of thousands of Timeron civilians, that not one of these so called experts below, even bothered to mention. It was part of the overall plan to move industry out of America and into small third world countries, to lower labor costs, since slave labor was the object and the Timerons resisted.
That is only a small part of what Henry did. He negotiated an end to the Viet Nam war that resulted in our soldiers being left in North Vietnam to work as slaves to rebuilt Viet Nam from the war. That stuck in my craw for decades. Why did Nixon glom onto China as a target and not some other country? China was not a world leader at the time. Well, after Kissinger and Nixon solidified the relationship with China, Goldman Sachs, owned by Rothschild became China's international brokerage house, and began moving industries out of America and into China at slave labor wages.
Granted that act resulted in also competing in our markets and beating our pants off doing so. Our southeast states were the clothing capitals of the world in the market place, but China soon took us over with way lower labor costs and we lost almost all manufacturing of clothing to the Chinese, and that aided in China's growth economically while destroying ours at the same time.
Then our defense dept started giving weapons orders to Chinese based American companies, which then helped grow the economy for the average Chinese person, but the powers that be could not make them "spend" that money they made. Further, the quality control was never adequate to ensure the weapons systems would even work. That is for another blog, Instead, as usual, the chinese started saving and that upset the apple cart, so they had to do something to change all that, so the second revolution became the answer.
3,000 of China's leaders were trained at Oxford, which is the home of Secret Societies, and now they act as all of western world leaders act like, with pride, corruption, and arrogance. Since the 3 world wars were planned back in 1871, this all was just a step in the direction of setting up the enemies for such third world war. The rest we will find out about since we are in the middle of it right now. Russia and the United States are now both targets, so it will be interesting to see how they pull this off. Thats if they can and we don't get a pungent smell from it.
Well, I have rambled on enough. You read and decide for yourselves. Was Kissinger a good guy or a bad guy? I say bad guy. He left our Viet Nam POW's and MIA's behind and we NEVER did that until Kissinger and Nixon. Just look at his eyes in the photo provided
Henry Kissinger: Good or Evil? 10 historians assess the controversial statesman’s legacy.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/10/henry-kissinger-history-legacy-213237
By Admin, Politico, Oct 10, 2015
When Niall Ferguson’s
Henry Kissinger, 1923 to 1968: The Idealist (excerpted
here
in Politico Magazine) came out last month, it sparked a new discussion
about the controversial statesman’s role in shaping the history of the
20th century: Whether Henry Kissinger—for so long considered an iconic
realist of our era—all this time has been, as Ferguson suggests, a
misunderstood idealist.
But the book also reinvigorated another, more
timeless debate: Is Kissinger, idealist or not, worthy of the continued
praise that gets heaped on him in certain Washington and international
circles?
