Showing posts with label Government criminal actions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Government criminal actions. Show all posts

2016-11-08

It's Outrageous That I'm Facing 45 Years in Prison for Filming a Climate Protest

Clerk Note: Freedom of the press was written into our Constition, of course that was back in the day when printing presses were heavy to move about and conceal. It is also written into our Constitution that when the elected officials vote/sign treaties and internal laws, they become the law of the land, our land, our nation. If not our military, then military tactics deployed by the police are enforcing commerce instead of the rights of the citizens with long-standing treaties. Don't we look silly that the UN is judging the USA for not living up to things. The UN should put some election inspectors on the ground in the USA, for when the exit polls deviate (by more that 2%) from the machine counted votes.

+++

It's Outrageous That I'm Facing 45 Years in Prison for Filming a Climate Protest

Filmmaker arrested for documenting last week's #ShutItDown protests speaks out

http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/10/18/its-outrageous-im-facing-45-years-prison-filming-climate-protest

By: Deia Schlosberg
Date: 2016-10-18

My name is Deia Schlosberg and I am an independent filmmaker and climate reporter. I was arrested while filming an act of nonviolent civil disobedience in North Dakota and I'm currently facing felony charges that I believe are unjust. I am a climate reporter; my specialty is following the story of how humankind is creating a grave problem for civilization by continuing to flood the atmosphere with greenhouse gases through the burning of fossil fuels and other industrial processes. I don't think there is nearly enough reporting on climate change nor the movement of people around the world working to lessen the impacts of climate change.

When I was arrested, I was doing my job. I was reporting. I was documenting. Journalism needs to be passionately and ethically pursued and defended if we are to remain a free democratic country. Freedom of the press, guaranteed by the First Amendment, is absolutely critical to maintaining an informed citizenry, without which, democracy is impossible.

It is the responsibility of journalists and reporters to document newsworthy events, and it is particularly important for independent media to tell the stories that mainstream media is not covering. The mainstream did not break the story on fracking nor did it break the story about what is happening at the Standing Rock reservation in North Dakota, nor the stories told in my most recent film with Josh Fox, How to Let Go of the World and Love All the Things Climate Can’t Change. With this and other recent films, I have sought to portray and humanize the climate movement that is fighting for all of us with integrity, resilience and deep compassion.

Journalist and documentary filmmaker Deia Schlosberg, pictured here at the 35th College Television Awards, was arrested for filming those taking direct action against the fossil fuel industry. (Photo: Danny Moloshok / Invision)

2016-10-07

Playpen: The Story of the FBI’s Unprecedented and Illegal Hacking Operation

Playpen: The Story of the FBI’s Unprecedented and Illegal Hacking Operation

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/09/playpen-story-fbis-unprecedented-and-illegal-hacking-operation

By: Mark Rumold
Date: 2016-09-15

In December 2014, the FBI received a tip from a foreign law enforcement agency that a Tor Hidden Service site called “Playpen” was hosting child pornography. That tip would ultimately lead to the largest known hacking operation in U.S. law enforcement history.

The Playpen investigation—driven by the FBI’s hacking campaign—resulted in hundreds of criminal prosecutions that are currently working their way through the federal courts. The issues in these cases are technical and the alleged crimes are distasteful. As a result, relatively little attention has been paid to the significant legal questions these cases raise.

But make no mistake: these cases are laying the foundation for the future expansion of law enforcement hacking in domestic criminal investigations, and the precedent these cases create is likely to impact the digital privacy rights of Internet users for years to come. In a series of blog posts in the coming days and weeks, we'll explain what the legal issues are and why these cases matter to Internet users the world over.

2016-10-05

The NSA Abroad: The UK Base That Makes US Targeted Killing Possible

The NSA Abroad: The UK Base That Makes US Targeted Killing Possible

Newly revealed documents leaked by Edward Snowden and reported by The Intercept detail the inner workings of the NSA's largest overseas base

http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/09/06/nsa-abroad-uk-base-makes-us-targeted-killing-possible

By: Lauren McCauley
Date: 2016-09-06

In a damning exposé published Monday, The Intercept reporter Ryan Gallagher dives into the inner workings of National Security Agency's (NSA) largest overseas spying base, the U.K.'s Menwith Hill Station, and reveals concrete evidence that the British government is complicit in the United States' targeted killing program.

Citing top-secret documents obtained from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, Gallagher reports, "The files reveal for the first time how the NSA has used the British base to aid 'a significant number of capture-kill operations' across the Middle East and North Africa, fueled by powerful eavesdropping technology."

And given the British government's repeated assertion that activities at Menwith Hill "have always been, and continue to be" carried out with its "knowledge and consent," the findings are all the more damning.

The National Security Agency's largest overseas spying base, Menwith Hill. (Photo: Trevor Paglen via The Intercept)

2016-09-12

U.S. Army fudged its accounts by trillions of dollars, auditor finds

Clerk Note: September 10, 2001 Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld announced that the Pentagon could not account for $2.3 Billion. The next day, the investigators and records from the Office of Naval Intelligence, the only group to move into the newly remodeled Pentagon wing, were killed and destroyed by an alleged aircraft.

+++

U.S. Army fudged its accounts by trillions of dollars, auditor finds

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/19/reuters-america-us-army-fudged-its-accounts-by-trillions-of-dollars-auditor-finds.html

By: Scot J. Paltrow
Date: 2016-08-19

NEW YORK, Aug 19 (Reuters) - The United States Army's finances are so jumbled it had to make trillions of dollars of improper accounting adjustments to create an illusion that its books are balanced.

The Defense Department's Inspector General, in a June report, said the Army made $2.8 trillion in wrongful adjustments to accounting entries in one quarter alone in 2015, and $6.5 trillion for the year. Yet the Army lacked receipts and invoices to support those numbers or simply made them up.

As a result, the Army's financial statements for 2015 were "materially misstated," the report concluded. The "forced" adjustments rendered the statements useless because "DoD and Army managers could not rely on the data in their accounting systems when making management and resource decisions."

2016-08-25

Flashback: Rove Erases 22 Million White House Emails on Private Server at Height of U.S. Attorney Scandal – Media Yawns

Clerk Note: Oh the hypocrisy of it all. "Politics is the entertainment division of the military industrial complex."~Frank Zappa

+++

Flashback: Rove Erases 22 Million White House Emails on Private Server at Height of U.S. Attorney Scandal – Media Yawns

http://www.pensitoreview.com/2015/03/18/flashback-rove-erases-22-million-white-house-emails-on-private-server-at-height-of-u-s-attorney-scandal-media-yawns/

By: Jon Ponder
Date: 2015-03-18

Now that they’ve taken control of Congress, Republicans are wielding power much the same way they did in the Clinton era and for the six years afterward when they controlled the White House and Congress under George W. Bush: ineptly — examples: 1, 2 etc.

Then as now, it’s clear that the only thing Republicans do very well is inflame the media with bogus scandals — which is a handy way to distract attention from their ineptitude. They are doing this with their usual aplomb, and considerable success, in the matter of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private server to send emails.

Clinton has said she deleted about 50,000 emails that dealt with personal matters, citing her daughter’s wedding and her mother’s funeral as examples. All the correspondence pertaining to official business was turned over to and archived by State. The deletion of the emails, though perfectly legal, has excited House Republicans, including Speaker John Boehner, who has announced plans to deploy House committees to investigate what might aptly be called Servergate.

2016-08-10

The Clintons and a Crime Far Worse Than Missing Emails or Votes!

Clerk Note: H. Clinton is the annointed successor to the NWO plans. Trump is running the worst campaign ever whose purpose is to split the Republican Party and give Clinton a landslide, that will than be interpretted as a mandate to do global shit. Corrupt she is, so please avail yourself of the 3rd party options. Remember: 80% of Congress is up for re-election. Even if Green or Libertarian (the most likely options) don't take the White House, taking away from Democrat & Republican seats in Congress to 3rd parties would be a huge step forward.
A guy named Frank Giustra, who is a big resource magnate, gave $30 million to the Clinton Foundation… Then Giustra went to Kazakhstan and got the exclusive agreement to mine the uranium from Kazakhstan.

Hillary Clinton becomes Secretary of State, and [it was] discovered that there was massive bribery paid by U.S. oil companies to the president of Kazakhstan, Nursultan Nazarbayev. A Mobile executive went to prison for the bribery payments, but Nazarbayev, himself, the president of Kazakhstan who received the money, about $160 million in bribes… his name was never mentioned in the indictment of the bribers who went to jail. ... Now, why do we care about that? ... [W]as arranged by Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State… So what Hillary Clinton did was, by taking his name out of the indictment and just putting in those initials KO2, ... allow this guy to clamp down, imprison, and torture journalists in his nation who would bring up the question of bribery from oil companies. Did Hillary Clinton do that to favor the oil companies, to stroke a blood-thirsty oil potentate in the Caspian Sea? Or did she do that to make sure that her foundation kept getting pleasured by Mr. Giustra?
+++
The Clintons and a Crime Far Worse Than Missing Emails or Votes!
http://www.gregpalast.com/the-clintons-and-a-crime-far-worse-than-missing-emails-or-votes/

By: Greg Palast with Dennis J Bernstein
Date: 2016-07-12


It’s been an action-packed week in politics. Hillary Clinton has been given the official all-clear by the FBI, who have said she won’t have to face charges for the Clorox cleaning job she did on her email server. And with her path to power given the personal red carpet treatment by FBI director James Comey, the fact that a hundred thousand votes or so have yet to be counted in California has been swept under the high thread count rug — where a lot of inconvenient votes end up these days! But the missing emails and votes haven’t been forgotten by our resident sleuth, Greg Palast. In this week’s Best Democracy Money Can Buy: Election Crimes Bulletin he gives Dennis J. Bernstein the skinny on Sanders’ stolen California win, Clinton’s bleached communications — and a multi-million dollar Kazakhstan bribery and corruption scandal that got Cloroxed with them!

2016-02-11

US intelligence chief: we might use the internet of things to spy on you

Vatic Note:  I had a terrible time putting this and others up, and that is why I am late in getting this to you.  They are definitely censoring and its a true pain to post now.  But this is an important article so I waited for a shift change and it has worked.  At least for now.

This below, is exactly why these cell towers are now being placed in residential areas at ground level.  Its in conjunction with the electric companies installment of smart meters. The towers are needed to act as a conduit for the operation globally, of the smart meters in spying on Americans, but also its going global, so other nations watch for this coming to you soon.

And both smart meters and the need for the towers are part of the G-20 meeting several years ago planning for a global SPYING GRID USING SUCH EQUIPMENT. They have also had subsequent meetings to create a GLOBAL SPY GRID in order to handle any resistance to the NWO that is planned and currently being implemented as we have shown on here in various blogs.  The east west conflict is a Charade just like it was in WW II.

These guys are deadly serious about taking over our nation and depopulating globally, in the billions and spying on those remaining. This plan is in direct violation of our sovereignty and our Constitution, violating our right to privacy.   That is why the protocols were written as a blueprint for doing this planetary control.  Little did we realize that the zionists also double as the fascists since they own the majority stock in most corporations.  Check out the boards of Directors if you don't believe me and see all the banker and investment banking owners.

Are  you sure you want to live under such a system?  That question has to be answered NOW, before it is too late. Their arrogance is becoming impressive, and they are trying to get a reaction out of us and if we do not react, that is perfect for them and their plans and if we do react, then they come for our guns.  Sounds like the CONCORD situation all over again.  Its time to put our heads together and figure out how to stop them.  

 
US intelligence chief: we might use the internet of things to spy on you
http://drudgetoday.com/v2/r?n=0&s=2&c=0&pn=Anonymous&u=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/feb/09/internet-of-things-smart-home-devices-government-surveillance-james-clapper
By the Guardian and Drudge Report

2016-01-25

Top Obama Appointee: “President Knowingly and Willingly Armed ISIS”

Vatic Note:  I would like to start out this blog by asking you to notice the VN; INCLUDED BELOW IN THE TEXT OF THIS PROPOGANDA PIECE. First of all look at the photo of Obama.   That is not the real Obama, its his double.   We did a blog a while back comparing the two and the differences between them and one was Obama's ears, which lay flat against his head while the doubles are like wings out from the head and obvious.

ANOTHER WAS THE SIZE OF HIS HANDS, (See above link) and finally the area around the mouth is much different, On the double (or clone) he appears to have a puffing out of the lips going down to the middle of chin.  You can clearly see the differences, including the eyebrows. Here is a photo of Obama when he was a state senator.  Compare this one to the one in the article and see the difference, its big.  Notice the area under his bottom lip, the first photo does not have the huge massive protrusion that the other photo shows.  His ears are closer in, and his demeanour is different.

2015-12-18

Hawaii under martial law was like ‘military dictatorship’ (1941-1944)

Vatic Note:   This is up just to give us a feeling of what Martial law really is, rather than the romantic version of protecting the citizens of a nation.   This below shows that it will depend on those controlling the military that will determine the manner is which such martial law is conducted.  Or at least those "giving the orders to the soldiers in the field".  Martial Law is a complete and total lose of all rights, and freedoms, so listen, read carefully what happened in Hawaii, and keep it all in mind when they decide to bring the hammer down on us. 

This surprised me so much, since I don't ever remember being taught about this is history classes and yet, it was such a major big part of the conditions the civilians had to live under for most of WW II.  Granted, something had to be done since the attacks on Pearl Harbor cost the US Military so many lives,  but then we find out that Franklin D Roosevelt (ROSENFELD) knew all about the attack before it ever occurred and could have stopped it before it happened.... but chose not to, since the objective was to get the US into WW II on the side of Britain who actually started the war.  We did blogs on both facts stated above.

Hawaii was not a state at the time, so loyalty, with so many Japanese living there was probably an issue, so to some degree, its understandable that Martial Law was declared.  But its not understandable, the conditions the military set, while the citizens were under martial law.   It was conducted more like a military dictatorship, then as a protection for the population at large.  Was that the reason for it being used?   To establish such a dictatorship?     You read and decide.  Could this happen today now that Hawaii is offically a state of our Union???

FUND RAISING TIME AGAIN.  
We are now asking you once again, to contribute toward our deficit of $250 that we need by the 1st of the month. That is 13 days away, we are beginning now, so we make it by that time.   We are so grateful for your support in so many ways.  

If you can afford it please donate off to the right of the blog.  God Bless you and your family in all things.   So stay with us til the first and hopefully, you will be able to contribute so we can continue our work in educating, researching and informing.


Hawaii under martial law was like ‘military dictatorship’ (1941-1944)
https://alethonews.wordpress.com/2014/12/10/hawaii-under-martial-law-was-like-military-dictatorship-1941-1944/
By Admin,  Aletho News,  December 10, 2014

For three years Hawaiians lived under repressive Army rule and without any constitutional protections
Police State USA                                                        

HAWAII — Islanders suffered under nearly three years of martial law from 1941-1944; so oppressive that it was later described by a federal judge as a “military dictatorship.” All manner of civilian liberties were replaced by oppressive military orders enforced by American soldiers.
 
The dark period of Hawaiian history began on December 7, 1941, with the massive surprise attack of Japanese bombers on the U.S. Naval Base Pearl Harbor. The air raid successfully sunk or grounded 18 ships and killed 2,403 Americans.
 
As the smoke billowed from the harbor, Lieutenant General Walter Short met with Territorial Governor Joseph Poindexter to convince him to declare martial law. Being coerced through tactics discussed below, Gov. Poindexter reluctantly ceded power to the military — temporarily, or so he thought.
 
In declaring martial law, all forms of civilian law were suspended. An entire new system of justice and order was instituted and controlled at the absolute discretion of Lt. Gen. Short — the newly declared “Military Governor” of the islands.
 
The transfer of power meant that all civilian courts would be closed, and all government functions — federal, territorial, and municipal — would be placed under military control. The U.S. Constitution was suspended and civilians no longer guaranteed any individual rights or protections from the government. Civilians had no freedom of speech, self-defense, assembly, or protections from from unreasonable search and seizures, inter alia.

Lt. General Short, in his first proclamation as Military Governor on December 7th, 1941, stated that [7]:
I shall therefore shortly publish ordinances governing the conduct of the people of the Territory with respect to the showing of lights, circulation, meetings, censorship, possession of arms, ammunition, and explosives, the sale of intoxicating liquors and other subjects.
In order to assist in repelling the threatened invasion of our island home, good citizens will cheerfully obey this proclamation and the ordinances to be published; others will be required to do so. Offenders will be severely punished by military tribunals or will be held in custody until such time that the civil courts are able to function.
Poindexter relayed his decision to the mainland, which was affirmed with approval from the President of the United States [7]:
Communication between Hawaiian Civilian Governor Joseph Poindexter and President Franklin D. Roosevelt on the declaration of martial law and suspension of the write of habeas corpus.  (Source: Anthony, Joseph Garner.  Hawaii Under Army Rule, p. 128)
The Military Governor’s subsequent orders were designed to “discourage concerted action of any kind.” Saloons were ordered to be closed, as well as schools, theaters — anywhere there might be a “concentration of people.” [6]
Civilians were given strict curfews. The streets were ordered to be cleared between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. under penalty of arrest. All persons of Japanese descent had to be in their homes by 8:00 p.m. [6]

Everyone over the age of six years was fingerprinted, registered, and ordered to carry around military-issued ID cards. [11] Using the extensive registration program, the military drew up intelligence reports on 450,000 Hawaiians. [8]

Stringent censorship of the media went into immediate effect. The Military Governor required that newspapers be made illegal unless they were granted a license to operate. All newspapers and radio stations were shut down for a time. Any publication not printed exclusively in English was denied a license and considered illegal. [6]

US Army M3 Stuart light tanks roll down Beretania Street in the Honolulu business district, Hawaii, 30 August 1942.

The local telephone company was taken over by the military. [6] All outgoing mail was read and censored by the military. All long-distance telephone calls to the mainland were required to be spoken in English and censored. The military government monitored the content and morale of the population this way. [11]
Travel between the islands was restricted. Use of civilian short-wave radio was restricted. Photo materials were restricted to limit photography. [6]
 
The newspapers that were allowed to reopen with licenses were forced to print military orders and military-controlled news. The Honolulu Advertiser and the Honolulu Star-Bulletin both published an order directed at every inhabitant of the island:
The Army demands the aid and assistance of every person in the Territory… If you are ordered by military personnel to obey a certain command, that order must be obeyed instantly and without question. [9]
Days after martial law had gone into effect, the United Press reported that “cases of non-cooperation” were “severely dealt with” according to military authorities [1].

Civilian ownership of firearms was prohibited except to those specially authorized [6]. Every male islander was ordered to construct a bomb shelter [9]. Approximately 300,000 acres of private land was confiscated by the military — land, farms, buildings [8]

U.S. soldiers surround the Hawaiian Iolani Palace with barbed wire during the rule of martial law in 1942. (Image: U.S. Army Museum)

Civilians were not permitted to switch jobs, and had their wages frozen. U.S. Dollars were confiscated and new money was issued — only valid in Hawaii. Citizens were not allowed to carry more than $200 on them for any reason. [11]

The wages of Japanese nationals were capped at $200 per month, with the rest being forced into bank accounts, with weekly withdrawal limits of $50. [9]
Businesses were tightly controlled; they were ordered to shut down daily by 4:30 p.m. Goods on the shelves were inventoried by the military. [9]  Liquor sales were banned.  Gasoline was rationed. [6]
 
One of the more onerous measures was the nightly “blackout” of all civilian lights, ostensibly to mitigate the effectiveness of a potential enemy air raid. Every light bulb and every flame was ordered to be extinguished after dark. Even a lit cigarette, a kitchen stove burner, or an illuminated radio dial was grounds for an arrest. It was ordered that all residential doors and windows be covered. Car headlights were to be painted blue to dim the beams. [11]
 
“We couldn’t see each other nor anything on the table so we literally had to feel our way through the meal,” wrote Honolulu resident Richard Wrenshall wrote in a 1942 letter. “If you reached out for something you’d be liable to stick your finger in the butter or in somebody’s eye.” [11]
 
Military Governor Green reported that the Army Corps of Engineers had a roving band of armed individuals calling themselves the “vigilance committee” which frequently shot at lights wherever they could be seen and “terrorized” the public. [6]

Waikiki Beach behind barbed wire fence, during martial law.  Honolulu, Hawaii. (Image: National Archives, U.S. Navy)

Of great controversy and consequence was the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus — the common-law court doctrine requiring a party holding a prisoner to demonstrate the legal and jurisdictional basis for continuing to hold the prisoner. With all civilian due process suspended, arrestees could be held without charges or trial; without legal representation, witnesses, a defense, or a jury. [2]
 
Breaking the blackout order brought about stiff fines or jail time. Numerous violators were thrown before a military judge, Lt. Col. Neal D. Franklin, who swiftly sentenced them to 100 days in jail or minimum fines of $100. A Japanese person might be given as much as 1,000 days imprisonment or up to $1,000 fines. It was reported that a Shinto priest was fined $500 for not extinguishing the “eternal flame” on his temple altar. [9]
 
The military courts were eager to impose fines for those who broke the military governor’s general orders. However, some individuals who couldn’t pay fines were instead given a “credit” following a forced donation of their blood. The practice was jokingly referred to as being “fined a bucket of blood.” [6]

 People of Japanese descent — even American citizens — were looked at with suspicion and scorn by their government and their neighbors alike. Aside from the repressive military orders used to control their lives, thousands of Hawaiian Issei were arrested and shipped off to internment camps for the duration of the war. [13]
 
The oppression of civil rights was so thorough that it became a main theme in the 1942 platform of one of the major political parties on the islands [7]. The platform stated:
We deplore a system of government whereby the citizens of the Territory of Hawaii can be arrested and held for investigation, without bail, for offenses that have nothing to do with the operations of the military establishment.
We deplore the exercise of public authorities who are making unlawful searches and seizures in the homes of the people of the Territory of Hawaii without a search warrant…
We deplore the continued existence of the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus…
It was evident that the continued suspension of civilian law was disconcerting to some on the mainland, including Secretary of the Interior Harold L. Ickes, who wrote on January 9th, 1943:

“Civilian government has been successfully maintained and its responsibilities carried out by civilian authorities in other parts of the English-speaking world under conditions of much more severe strain than exist in Hawaii,” he wrote. “The idea that restoring the responsibility of civil government and the jurisdiction of the courts would hamper the defense of the territory by the  Army and Navy is repugnant of every concept of American democracy and reflects upon the capacity of the people of Hawaii for self-government and self-discipline.” [7]
 
“The Army went beyond the governor and set up that which was lawful only in conquered enemy territory… they threw the Constitution into the discard and set up a military dictatorship.”
 
Finally, in April 1944, Federal Judge Delbert E. Metzger overturned the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus, citing that martial law “ceases and becomes unlawful as soon as the civilian government is capable and willing to resume its normal functions.” [3]
 
Despite the ruling, martial law was enforced for six more months. General Richardson defiantly stated after the ruling that regular blackouts would continue to be enforced as of 10 p.m. that same evening. “Violations of general orders will continue to be tried in provost courts,” he pronounced.  [3]
Richardson knew he would be free of consequence, since he had already been granted an executive pardon by President Roosevelt after Judge Metzger had held him in contempt of court on a previous case involving violations of the writ of habeas corpus. [3]
 
Judge Metzger argued that civilian law should be restored and was sufficient to protect the population. He said: “If present laws do not give the nation the fullest desirable protection against subversive or suspicious Japanese aliens, clearly it is the duty of the army and navy to ask a legislative curb and procedure instead of holding by force of arms an entire population under a form of helpless and unappealable subjugation called martial law.” [4]
 
Technically, martial law was terminated in Hawaii on October 24, 1944, in Roosevelt’s Presidential Proclamation 2627. While Roosevelt granted that “the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus” was restored, his declaration maintained that civilians were still thoroughly under the control of military commanders, and civilian freedoms were still heavily restricted. It was declared:
The military commander will have authority to establish blackouts and curfew periods, organize air raid precautions, regulate the conduct of enemy aliens, take anti-espionage precautions in the military area, control the possession and use of weapons, set up ports and harbors protections, regulate travel and regulate the publication of newspapers “published in a foreign language or in duel languages.”
In addition he will have authority to regulate or prohibit the possession or use of radio transmission sets between the military area and points away from it. The authority conferred in the executive order will expire 30 days after the end of war with Japan. [5]
After the war, federal district court magistrate Judge J. Frank McLaughlin condemned the conduct of martial law, saying, “Gov. Poindexter declared lawfully martial law but the Army went beyond the governor and set up that which was lawful only in conquered enemy territory namely, military government which is not bound by the Constitution. And they… threw the Constitution into the discard and set up a military dictatorship.” [12]
Judge McLaughlin, said in a speech that “[Maj. Gen. Short] set up an unconstitutional provost court system to try, without constitutional safeguards, anybody for anything — and they did it, too.”
 
Evidence explained by Judge McLaughlin revealed that there were some dubious efforts on the part of the military to influence the “civilian” decision to declare martial law. The military’s treachery was described in Hawaii Under Army Rule [7]:
Judge McLaughlin outlined how it was done, pointing out that the proclamation of martial law was prepared by the Army months in advance of December 7, 1941, and noted that the proclamation “was in the hands of the publishers for printing that afternoon some substantial period of time before the governor’s proclamation was signed and received for publication.”
Commenting on Secretary Patterson’s letter to Representative Andrews and a public statement by General Richardson on the same subject, Judge McLaughlin said:
“…They did not, of course, mention that the Army went back on its word to the Hawaiian legislature. They did not tell you that it had said one thing while preparing to do another thing. They did not tell you that they prepared Governor Poindexter’s proclamation for him and induced him to sign it, reluctantly. They did not tell you either that he finally agreed to do as they asked with the understanding that the effect of the proclamation would be for maybe 30 days…”
Judge McLaughlin concluded:
“Yes ‘they did it.’ They did it intentionally. They did it with design aforethought. They did it knowing disregard of the Constitution. They did it because Hawaii is not a State. They did it because they did not have faith that Americanism transcends race, class, and creed.”
This period of events marked the longest period that Americans had ever been subjected to military rule, and as many commentators have pointed out, the conditions were more repressive than many actual combat zones.

Japanese Americans, including community leaders and even Buddhist monks, were among those detained at the Honouliuli internment camp on Oahu, Hawaii.  Picture taken in 1945. (Image: R.H. Lodge / Japanese Cultural Center of Hawaii)
{ Support Police State USA }


SOURCES
1. Tremaine, Frank. “Martial Law Proclaimed For Hawaii.” The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette [Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania] 11 Dec. 1941: 2. Web. [http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1129&dat=19411211&id=l5RRAAAAIBAJ&sjid=LWoDAAAAIBAJ&pg=2442,5301386]
2. Anthony, Joseph Garner. “Martial Law in Hawaii.” California Law Review, Vol. 30. May 1942. Web. [http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/californialawreview/vol30/iss4/1]
3. Associated Press. “Judge Invalidates Martial Law in Hawaiian Islands.” The Evening Independent [St. Petersburg, Florida] 14 April 1944: 9. Web. [http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=950&dat=19440414&id=GmpIAAAAIBAJ&sjid=CVUDAAAAIBAJ&pg=4284,6259680]
4. Johnston, Richard W. “Army Defies Ban On Hawaii Martial Law.”  San Jose Evening News [San Jose, California] 14 April 1944: 7. Web. [http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1977&dat=19440413&id=JygiAAAAIBAJ&sjid=FKQFAAAAIBAJ&pg=986,1109323]
5. Associated Press.  “Martial Law Ends in Hawaii.  The Deseret News [Salt Lake City, Utah] 24 Oct. 1944: 1.  Web. [http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=336&dat=19441024&id=tU5SAAAAIBAJ&sjid=xnwDAAAAIBAJ&pg=3153,5465917]
6. Green, Major General Thomas H. “Martial Law in Hawaii, December 7, 1941–April 4, 1943.” Unpublished manuscript. Library of Congress [Washington, D.C.]. Web. [http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/Martial-Law_Green.pdf]
7. Anthony, Joseph Garner. Hawaii Under Army Rule. Stanford University Press [Stanford, California] 1947. [books.google.com/books?id=V66lAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA109&lpg=PA109]
8. Polmar, Norman. “World War II: The Enclyclopedia of the War Years, 1941-1945.” Random House [New York] 1996. [books.google.com/books?id=30gRAGjXrIIC&pg=PA372&lpg=PA372]
9. Dunford, Bruce. “Blackout, Martial Law After Japanese Attack.” The Observer-Reporter [Greene County, Pennsylvania] 9 Dec. 1996: A6. Web. [http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2519&dat=19961209&id=Al5eAAAAIBAJ&sjid=2GENAAAAIBAJ&pg=2763,1190314]
10. Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians.  “Personal Justice Denied.” 1997.  Web.  [http://www.archives.gov/research/japanese-americans/justice-denied/]
11. Borreca, Richard. “Martial Law Held Sway in Isles for Three Years.” The Star Bulletin [Honolulu, Hawaii] 13 Sept. 1999. Web. [http://archives.starbulletin.com/1999/09/13/special/story5.html]
12. Borreca, Richard. “Christmas 1941 in Hawaii Was Not a Time to Rejoice.” The Star Bulletin [Honolulu, Hawaii] 13 Sept. 1999. Web. [http://archives.starbulletin.com/1999/09/13/special/]
13. Soga, Keiho. “The Untold Story: Internment of Japanese Americans in Hawaii.” University of Hawaii Press {Honolulu, Hawaii] 31 Oct. 2007. [Amazon.com]



The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

2015-12-13

NOW THE GOVERNMENT CAN LEGALLY KILL CHRISTIANS

Vatic Note:   You cannot kill anyone legally, for a crime that harms no one, nor deprives them of their property.  A death penalty requires a trial.  After you read the blog today that came up at 1 am, you will understand this below.

It is the Rothschild Khazars globally trying to destroy Muslim and Christian faiths, and to bring them all under the "Talmudic 'self worship' beliefs that these khazars have sold to their people.  The 1% torah worshipping Jews still believe and rely on their Torah,  but they are a small minority.

Our true enemy are the Rothschild/Israeli khazars who are psychopaths and that fits with their distortion of their religion.  Remember they have a law in the Talmud that says you cannot rape children under 3.5  years old....WHAT???

What about the child who is only 4 and a half years old?  This is why Israel has legalized prostitution, makes billions off of the porno industry etc and Is also a major player in the "child international sex slave trade". What does one expect with that kind of background and history of Judaism.


NOW THE GOVERNMENT CAN LEGALLY KILL CHRISTIANS
http://www.takebackourrights.org/docs/Christians-full%20page.html
By Bill Dannemeyer,  U.S. Congressman, 1979-1992


          Your U.S. government can now legally kill Christians for the “crime” of worshipping Jesus Christ!  A diabolic deception has been perpetrated on the American people by their OWN leaders, Senators and Congressmen, who have sold their soul to the devil.  

On March 5, 1991, in the House of Representatives, and March 7, 1991, in the U.S. Senate, without any knowledge of, or input by, the people of the United States, U.S. Senators and Congressmen passed a law that is so outrageous – and frankly unconstitutional – that it forces the American people to be bound by a set of monstrous rules, called the Noahide Laws, rules that make the belief in Jesus Christ a crime punishable by decapitation by guillotine!  On March 20, 1991, President George H.W. Bush, a supposed Christian, signed the bill into law.
 
          Before you respond, “NO, that cannot be – not in our free country!” let me explain.

          The passage of this law, HJ Res. 104, is especially troublesome to me because I was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives at the time it was passed.  Even worse, I was in the House Chamber the very day that is was passed, voting on other legislation.  Yet I, as a U.S. Congressman, had NO KNOWLEDGE that it had been passed or even that it was to be brought up for a vote.

          How could this be?  How could the deception be so pervasive that those of us who had sworn to uphold our country’s Constitution, particularly those of us (few, indeed) who really took our position seriously as the protectors of the people, could be totally in the dark regarding the content of this bill and its passage by the leaders of this country – by treachery and deceit?
          
Here’s how it happened!

          On January 31, 1991, an innocuous-sounding Resolution was introduced, designating March 26, 1991 as “Education Day, USA.”  It was purposely given this name to deceive the American people.  It was, in fact, a Double Deception because not only did the Resolution have nothing to do with “Education,” it was also deceptively billed as a vehicle for recognizing the eighty-ninth birthday of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson.  But in truth, the Resolution was nothing less than a secret, under-handed plot to control the American people by the Noahide Laws – a subterfuge for the elimination of Christianity, the elimination of all Christians, and the enslavement of all remaining “Gentiles.”
 
          The Resolution, first introduced by Minority Leader, Rep. Robert H. Michel of Illinois, was then referred to the House Post Office and Civil Service Committee.
          Early in March 1991, 225 members of the House had signed on as co-sponsors of this Resolution, but it is highly doubtful they were given the full text of the document.  They were probably told only that it was a Resolution in honor of Rabbi Schneerson’s birthday.  Most likely they had no knowledge that the treacherous Noahide Laws were a silent attachment.  I was not one of the co-sponsors.
          The committee referred this Resolution to the House for a vote on March 5, 1991.  But here is where the real treachery begins!  The record states that the House of Representatives passed this Resolution by “Unanimous Consent.”  But what the average American does not know is that “Unanimous Consent” is a euphemism for getting a bill passed “under the radar” with almost NO ONE present to vote AND with NO RECORD of who voted or HOW they voted.
          A Congressman’s ears prick up when he hears the words “Unanimous Consent” because he is aware that this may be a signal for skullduggery.  And in this case, it most certainly was!
          On the day this Resolution was “passed,” the entire membership of the House of Representatives had already been dismissed after having been told that the day’s work, including all the voting, was over.  We could all go home.
          It was THEN, after virtually ALL members had left, that the traitorous authors of this Resolution brought it up for a vote on the House floor – with only four hand-picked members present.  It was then deceitfully “passed” by “Unanimous Consent” on March 5, 1991, by voice vote with almost NO ONE there and NO RECORD made of their names or how they voted.
          Two days later, on March 7 1991, the U.S. Senate passed the Resolution by voice vote, also with no recorded vote.  On March 20, 1991, it was signed by President George H. W. Bush and became Public Law 102-14.
          As you read on, you will discover the identity of the evil forces that have so much control over the U.S. Government that they can accomplish these dastardly deeds under cover of darkness.

            This is the language of HJ Res. 104:
102nd CONGRESS
1st Session
H. J. RES. 104
JOINT RESOLUTION
To designate March 26, 1991, as `Education Day, U.S.A.'.
HJ 104 EH
102nd CONGRESS
1st Session
H. J. RES. 104

JOINT RESOLUTION
To designate March 26, 1991, as `Education Day, U.S.A.'.
Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;
Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;
Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos;
Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society;
Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these historical ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future;
Whereas the Lubavitch movement has fostered and promoted these ethical values and principles throughout the world;
Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and revered and his eighty-ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991;
Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, `the rebbe,' this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of `education and giving,' the year in which we turn to education and charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and
Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is designated as `Education Day, U.S.A.'. The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 1991.
Attest:
Clerk.
END

The Lubavitch movement mentioned in HJ Res. 104, began in the late 18th century and is the largest branch of orthodox Hasidic Judaism.  One of its prime goals is the enforcement of the Noahide Laws on all humanity.
          The words “Seven Noahide Laws” are mentioned twice in this Resolution.  But completely missing from this Resolution are the following:
1. WHAT IS THE SPECIFIC LANGUAGE OF THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS?
2. WHO DRAFTED THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS AND WHERE DID THEY COME FROM?
3. WHEN WERE THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS DRAFTED?
4. WHO DEFINES WHAT THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS MEAN? WHAT IS THE PENALTY FOR VIOLATING THEM? WHO WILL ADMINISTER THEM?
5. “MAN’S” SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS VS. GOD’S TEN COMMANDMENTS.
6. TO WHOM DO THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS APPLY AND WHO MAKES THAT DECISION?
7. IS HJ RES. 104, CONTAINING THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS CONSTITUTIONAL?
  
(1) WHAT IS THE SPECIFIC LANGUAGE OF THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS?
           The Encyclopedia of Judaism describes The Noachide Laws (the words Noahide and Noachide are used interchangeably) as follows:
          The Noachide Laws – The Encyclopedia of Judaism
    1. Civil justice [the duty to establish a legal system];
    2. Prohibition of blasphemy [which includes the bearing of false witness];
    3. The abandonment of idolatry;
    4. The prohibition of incest [including adultery and other sexual offenses];
    5. The prohibition of murder;
    6. Also that of theft;
    7. The law against eating flesh [a limb] cut from a living animal [ie., cruelty in any shape or form] (Babylonian Talmud. Sanh. 56A)
         Before providing answers to the other six questions, I would like to describe my analysis of the process by which this Resolution was adopted by Congress.
          When you initially read HJ Res. 104, it seems to be a vehicle for recognizing the eighty-ninth birthday and the beginning of the 90th year of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson which fell on March 26, 1991.  I have no recollection of anyone asking me to co-sponsor this Resolution so I am not familiar with what reasons were given to House of Representative members to sign on as co-sponsors.
          The language of the Resolution speaks for itself.  But the consequences of their adoption is that the Seven Noahide Laws have been recognized by the Congress of the United States and the President of America as “the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization” and the claim will be made that they are now the law of our land, the United States.  Most Americans would be shocked to learn that the Babylonian Talmud, NOT the Old Testament, is the “Holiest” book of Judaism, and is the source of these Seven Noahide Laws, which provide a specific penalty for violating any of these Seven Noahide Laws, namely death by decapitation [Sanhedrin 57A]
          Make no mistake about it, what appeared to be nothing more than a recognition of the eighty-ninth birthday of Rabbi Schneerson and the establishment of Education Day in the United States will be claimed by the proponents of this Resolution as the establishment of a law by which a Christian who worships Jesus Christ will be charged with idolatry and decapitated.
          Based on my fourteen years of service in the House of Representatives, the process by which HJ Res. 104 was adopted was a complete disregard and purposeful circumvention of a very important basis on which representative government is founded.  Namely, accountability to the people of America of how we conduct the people’s business.  Specifically, roll call votes are the means whereby members of Congress identify what laws have been passed and by whom.  When laws and resolutions pass by unanimous consent, watch out!  In this case someone or some group wanted to hide the real purpose behind a seemingly innocuous birthday recognition of Rabbi Schneerson.
          I was not part of the discussion that led to the drafting and presentation of HJ Res. 104, to members of Congress.  But based on my knowledge of how Congress works, this describes what most probably took place.
          Jews, who by their financial contributions to members of Congress, claim they control what Congress will or will not do.  A look at the recent history of U.S. politics confirms this.  “He who has the gold – rules!”
          Stephen Sizer, author of the book, Christian Zionism, first published in 2004, states:
          “The Unity Coalition for Israel (UCFI) is probably the most recent network of Christian Zionists to be formed in the US yet it is already the largest and most powerful.  The UCFI was founded by Esther Levens, a Jew, in Kansas in 1994 and now comprises a broad coalition of 200 different and autonomous Jewish and Christian organizations representing 40 million members who are ‘dedicated to a secure Israel’.  Their principal strategy is to lobby the US media and political establishment, to challenge what they term ‘disinformation and propaganda’ and to express ‘the truth about Israel’. The UCFI includes three of the largest Christian Zionist organizations: Bridges for Peace, the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem, and Christians for Israel.
          This coalition has a major influence on both the Republican and Democratic parties by providing the bulk of campaign funding to both sides.  Aluf Ben, a spokesman for Shimon Peres, was quoted in Ha’aretz, a leading newspaper in Israel, as claiming that sixty percent of all financial help to Democrats came from Jewish sources.’  According to the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, ‘most pro-Israel fund-raisers estimate that at least 60 to 90 percent of Democratic campaign funding comes from Jewish sources, which also supply perhaps 40 percent of Republican funding’.  Christian Zionists have also been influential in forging a closer relationship with Israel by facilitating solidarity pilgrimages and educational tours to the Holy Land.” (page 215)
          Jewish lobbyists were successful in enlisting Minority Leader, Congressman Bob Michael, to be the chief sponsor of this resolution purportedly to honor and recognize Rabbi Schneerson, the leader of the Lubaviteh movement, on his eighty-ninth birthday.
          These lobbyists wanted to eliminate, for obvious reasons, any chance for discussion of the seven questions written above in this report.  Specifically, the Bible, with particular reference in this instance to the Ten Commandments written by God, is the source of the ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society, not the Seven Noahide Laws, written by man.
          To avoid this debate and the recorded vote that would have followed, a strategy was devised to get Resolution 104 adopted by “unanimous consent” with no documentation that 99% of all House members were absent, and none of the four members that were present would be held accountable by a recorded vote.
          The Journal of the House of Representatives (JHR) for March 5, 1991, on page 151, describes item 30.12 H Res. 95- Unfinished Business.  This Resolution commended the President and United States and allied military forces in the success of Operation Desert Storm.  A recorded vote was taken and Item 30.13 describes the count: Yeas 410, Nays 8.  My yes vote was among the 410.  This page contains the name of each member present and how he or she voted.
          Item 30.14, on the next page (page 152) of the JHR, recorded the announcement that when the House adjourns, it will meet on Wednesday, March 6, at 12 noon.  This told all the members that there would be no more roll call votes on Tuesday, March 5, that the day’s business was over, and within minutes after this announcement, virtually all the members were off the House floor, on their way home, and totally unaware of anything thereafter that was brought up.
          Here is the subsequent record of what took place AFTER the members were gone.  Item 30.15 of the JHR was a routine announcement concerning recesses and a joint session with the President of the United States:
          But then after almost everyone was gone for the day, Item 30.16 on the agenda, HJ Res. 104, the Resolution in question, was surreptiously brought up on the House floor with only four members present, who spoke on behalf of the Resolution.  This is how it occurred:
          Congressman Thomas Sawyer (D-OH), the Chairman of the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service asked for “unanimous consent” to take up HJ Res. 104.  Congressman Thomas Ridge (R-PA) reserved the right to object, but did not object.  If he had objected, it would have stopped the process of unanimous consent.  Instead, he acknowledged the work of Minority Leader Michel who was the chief sponsor of this legislation and he then yielded to (Jewish) Congressman Benjamin Gilman (R-NY).  Congressman Gilman spoke briefly as did Minority Leader Michel.  It appears likely that these four Congressmen were the only ones present.
After assisting with the underhanded passage of HJ Res. 104, Congressman Thomas Ridge also subsequently assisted in the cover up of the truth of 9/11, claiming that flight #93 crashed in Pennsylvania, even though NO parts of an airplane or passengers or baggage were ever found.  From then on Thomas Ridge’s career blossomed!  At the time of 9/11, Ridge was Governor of Pennsylvania (1995-2001).  But in 2003, Ridge was named the First Secretary of the new Department of Homeland Security (2003-2005).  After the tragic multiple shootings at Virginia Tech on April 16, 2007, Ridge became part of the committee to cover up what actually happened in that event.
Continuing with the debacle of the “Noahide Laws” passage, the Speaker pro tempore asked if there was any objection to the request from Congressman Sawyer.  There was no objection.
30.16 EDUCATION DAY, U.S.A.
     On motion of Mr. Sawyer, by unanimous consent, the Committee on Post Office and Civil service was discharged from further consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 104) to designate March 26, 1991, as “Education Day, U.S. A.”
     When said joint resolution was considered, read twice, ordered to be engrossed and read a third time, was read a third time by title, and passed.
     A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said joint resolution was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
     Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said joint resolution.
          Their total remarks consumed no more than four or five minutes and there was not even a mention of the Seven Noahide Laws.  For the balance of the early evening these routine non-controversial items were considered by the “House” with only these four members present.
          Item 30.17 National Employ the Older Worker Week
          Item 30.18 Baltic Foreeda day
          Item 30.19 Leave of Absence
          Item 30.20 Adjournment
          The Jews claim that with their financial contributions they have bought control of the U.S. Congress, and so they have.  As proof of this statement no one needs to search further than the blunt words of Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, uttered on October 3, 2001 to his colleague, Shimon Peres:
“Every time we do something, you tell me America will do this and will do that…I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel.  We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”
Indeed, the Jews had “bought” control of the House and Senate which resulted in ignoring the whole concept of accountability that the presence of debate and a roll call vote accomplishes.  Bringing up HJ Res. 104 for passage at a time when the process selected assured that no more than four members of the House of Representatives were present, each of whom was committed to the passage of HJ Res. 104, guaranteed that when the request for unanimous consent was expressed on the floor of the House, no one was around to object.  And because no one objected, passage was obtained with no member having his or her vote recorded in favor of or against the Resolution.  By design there was no roll call vote and thus no member was held accountable for what Congress did.  This is a prime example of the fraud perpetrated on the American people by their so-called “Representatives.”  The oft quoted cliché is operating here, “With friends like these, who needs enemies?”

(2) WHO DRAFTED THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS AND WHERE DID THEY COME FROM?
          Dr. Eliezer Segal, a Jewish Associate Professor of Theology at the University of Calgary, admits that history proves that the Talmud, Mishnah (a part of the Talmud) and the seven Noahide Laws are derived from Babylonian traditions, that Jesus vehemently denounced because they nullified the teaching of Scripture.
          The Encyclopedia of Judaism identifies the Babylonian Talmud (T.B.) as the source of the Noahide Laws.
          According to “Secret Societies and Subversive Movements,” by Nesta Webster,  the Talmud, and the Kabbalah, were derived from Jewish oral Traditions which the Jews claim to have the same authority as the Laws of Moses found in Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy.
          The “Holiest” books of Judaism are the Talmud, a compendium of over 100 “books” written by Pharisees and Jewish Rabbis, that is the utter perversion of God’s Word. The Kabbalah, another Jewish “holy book,” is a book of witchcraft and licentious debauchery.
          Provisions of the Talmud, Genesis Rabbah 16: 6. Sanhedrin 56 states that the seven Noahide Laws were commanded to Adam.  Yet there is nothing in the Bible to support this claim.
The book, Judaism’s Strange Gods, by Michael A. Hoffman (2000), describes how the Talmud specifically defines all non-Jews as non-human animals.  It also distinguishes between actions by Jews against non-Jews, from actions of non-Jews against Jews.  Jews are clearly spoken of as Superior to non-Jews.
Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God
          Sanhedrin 58b.  If a gentile hits a Jew, the gentile must be killed.

Acceptable to Cheat Non-Jews
          Sanhedrin 57a.  A Jew need not pay a gentile the wages owed him.

Jews Have Superior Legal Status
          Baba Kamma 37b.  “If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite (Gentile) there is no liability, but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite…the payment is to be in full.”

Jews May Steal from Non-Jews
          Baba Mezia 24a.  If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile it does not have to be returned.  (Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b.)  Sanhedrin 76a.  God will not spare a Jew who marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a gentile…”

Jews May Rob and Kill Non-Jews
          Sanhedrin 57a.  When a Jew murders a gentile there will be no death penalty.  What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.
          Baba Kamma 37b.  The gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has “exposed their money to Israel.”
          “Relying upon the Code of Maimonides and the Halacha, the Gush Emunim leader Rabbi Israel Ariel stated:  “A Jew who killed a non-Jew is exempt from human judgment and has not violated the religious prohibition of murder.”

Jews May Lie to Non-Jews
          Baba Kamma 113a.  Jews may use lies (“subterfuges”) to circumvent a Gentile.

Non-Jewish Children are Sub-Human
          Yebamoth 98a.  All gentile children are animals.  Abodah Zarah 36b.  Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.

Insults Against Mary
          Sanhedrin 106a.  says Jesus’ mother was a whore:  “She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters.”  Also in footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b of the Soncino edition, it is stated that in the “uncensored” text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus’ mother, “Miriam the hairdresser,” had sex with many men.

Jesus is also described in the Talmud
          By 1999, certain Orthodox Jewish organizations described Jesus as a sorcerer and a demented sex freak.
          On the website of the Orthodox Jewish, Chabad-Lubavitch group, chabad.org, — one of the largest and most powerful Jewish organizations in the world and whose spiritual leader, Rabbi Menachen Mendel Schneerson, whose birthday honoring was the false flag cover-up for signing into law the authority to murder Christians for worshiping Jesus Christ — we find the following statement, accompanied by citations from the Talmud:
          “The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of ‘Jesus the Nazarene.’ 1. ‘He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a).’”
          2. “He was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned), was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent (Sanhedrin 107b; Sotah 47a).”
          3. “He learned witchcraft in Egypt…(Shabbos 104b).” (End quote from Chabad-Lubavitch).

More quotes from the Talmud about Jesus
          Gitten 57a says Jesus is in hell, being boiled in “hot excrement.”
          Sanhedrin 43 says Jesus was executed because he practiced sorcery: “It is taught that on the eve of Passover Jesus was hung, and forty days before this the proclamation was made: Jesus is to be stoned to death because he has practiced sorcery and has lured the people to idolatry…He was an enticer and of such thou shalt not pity or condone.”

Genocide Advocated by the Talmud
          Soferim 15, Rule 10.  This is the saying of Rabbi Simon ben Yohai” Tob shebe goyyim harog (“Even the best of the gentiles should all be killed”).
          This Talmudic passage has been concealed in some translations.
          The Jewish Encyclopedia states, "…in the various versions the reading has been altered, 'The best among the Egyptians' being generally substituted."  In the Soncino version: “the best of the heathens” (Monor Tractates, Soferim 41a-b).  But “heathen” is translated as “Gentile” (non-Jews) by the Jews.

Talmudic Doctrine: Non-Jews are not Human
          The Talmud specifically defines all who are not Jews as non-human animals, and specifically dehumanizes Gentiles as not being descendants of Adam. 

Moses Maimonides:
Advocate of Extermination
          The rabbinic teacher Moses Maimonides called the “Rambam” by the Jews, is revered in Judaism as a supreme “sage” of the highest stature.
          “Moses Maimonides is considered the greatest codifier and philosopher in Jewish history.  He is often affectionately referred to as the Rambam, after the initials of his name and title, Rabenu Moshe Ben Maimon, “our Rabbi, Moses son of Maimon.”
          According to the introduction to the book, Maimonides’ Principles, p. 5, Maimonides “spent twelve years extracting every decision and law from the Talmud, and arranging them all into 14 systematic volumes.  The work was finally completed in 1180, and was called Mishnah Torah, or “Code of the Torah.”
Here is what Maimonides taught concerning the saving of the life of a Gentile or Christian, and even Jews who dared to deny the “divine inspiration” of the Talmud:
          “Accordingly, if we see an idolater (gentile) being swept away or drowning in the river, we should not help him.”
          Maimonides ruled that it is a Jewish court – or a court appointed by Jewish authority—that enforces obedience and passes judgment on Gentiles, as well as promulgating legislation by court order for that purpose.  Maimonides further decreed that any non-Jewish nation “not subject to our jurisdiction” (tahaht yadeinu) will be the target of Jewish holy war.
          These courts are to be convened allegedly under the “Noahide Laws” (proscriptions against idolatry supposedly based on the covenant with Noah).  But there is nothing in the Bible to support this claim.  This claim is a preposterous FRAUD – and a sign of the anti-Christ!
          Prof. Easterly of the Southern University Law Center, a Jewish legal expert, has diabolically compared HJ Res. 104 to the “first rays of dawn” which “evidence the rising of a still unseen sun.”
          The Jewish Encyclopedia envisages a Noahide regime as a possible world order (One World Government) immediately preceding the “universal reign of the Talmud.”  A terrifying prospect, indeed!
          These provisions of the Talmud, the same Talmud that is the source of the Noahide laws, make very clear why the proponents of HJ Res. 104 used the subterfuge of obtaining the passage of this legislation without any debate or a recorded vote.  HJ Res. 104 was fraudulently and deceitfully passed by “unanimous consent” when no one was around to consider and discuss the provisions of the Talmud. If these had been brought to the attention of the members of Congress, HJ Res. 104 would never have been passed.
          The Chabad Lubavitch falsely claims that God gave the Seven Noahide Laws at Mt. Sinai with the intention that the Children of Israel should keep them and teach them to the Gentiles.  This is a deliberate lie!
          There is absolutely no support in the Bible for this fraudulent claim.
The Source of these Seven Noahide Laws was NOT, as the Jews have claimed, directions from God to Adam – or Noah – or Moses.  Their source is the Oral Traditions of the Pharisees that began in Babylon after the Israelites were captured in 586 BC.
Over 600 years later, after the Pharisees had killed Christ and the Temple in Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD, these Oral Traditions were written down and became the Babylonian Talmud.

(3) WHEN WERE THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS DRAFTED?
          The Exodus of the Israelites from Egypt took place in about 1445 BC.  Moses died in 1405 BC.  Shortly after beginning the forty year wandering in the desert, God wrote the Ten Commandments on two tablets with his own finger and they are recorded in Exodus 20: 1-17.
          The ancient nation of Israel reached its height of power and prestige during the reign of Solomon from 960-930 BC.
          After Solomon, most of the Israelite kings were corrupt or inept and the Northern ten tribes of Israel were taken captive by Assyria in 721 BC.  The Southern tribes, Judah and Benjamin, were expelled to Babylon in about 586 BC, after which the Talmud oral traditions, specifically including the Seven Noahide Laws, were produced in Babylon during this period.

(4) WHO DEFINES WHAT THE NOAHIDE LAWS MEAN?  WHAT IS THE PENALTY FOR VIOLATING THEM?  WHO WILL ADMINISTER THEM?
A Jewish website, www.NoahideNations.com, states that the worship of any deity other than God, which includes Jesus Christ, is idolatry.  The penalty for idolatry is decapitation.
          Moses Maimonides (Rabbi Moshe Ben Maimon 1138-1204) is recognized for his preeminence as a Jewish philosopher.  Maimonides’ Mishnah Torah, Chapter 10 of the English translation, states concerning Jesus Christ:
          “It is a mitzvah (religious command or duty), however, to eradicate Jewish traitors, minim (Gentiles = non-Jews), and apikorsim (secular Jews), and to cause them to descend to the pit of destruction, since they cause difficulty to the Jews and sway the people away from God, as did Jesus of Nazareth and his students, and Tzadok, Baithos, and their students.  May the name of the wicked rot.”  Sanh.57A of the Talmud states the penalty for disobedience, with these words:
          “One additional element of greater severity is that violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noahide to capital punishment by decapitation.”
          The Noahide Laws will be administered by a restored Sanhedrin, the ruling body of Jews that found Jesus Christ guilty of blasphemy on the accusations of two false witnesses according to Matthew 26:60.  Under the “Courts of Law” section of the Noahide Laws this is stated:
          “A person may be convicted in a Noahide court on the testimony of single witness, but only if the witness is known to be righteous.”
(5) “MAN’S” SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS VS. GOD’S TEN COMMANDMENTS.
          It is God’s Law, the Ten Commandments, that is the basis of civilization, NOT the Noahide Laws written by the killers of Christ – the Pharisees.
          The Ten Commandments are found in Exodus 20: 1-17 and were written by God in his own finger on two tablets of stone, to show their permanence.  God wrote these Commandments shortly after the Exodus that began in 1445 BC.
          Although false claims have been made by the Jews that the origin of the Noahide Laws began with Adam, and included Noah and Moses, Jewish Professor Segal stated that the evidence of history proves that the origin of the Seven Noahide Laws is the Babylonian Traditions!
          The captivity and removal to Babylon of the Northern tribes Judah and Benjamin occurred in 586 BC.
          In other words, at least 859 years after God gave the Ten Commandments to mankind on Mt. Sinai, the Pharisees, the cultural progeny of the killers of Christ, in exile in Babylon, drafted the Seven Noahide Laws which were written by “man,” NOT by GOD!
          In examining the history of the Seven Noahide Laws, no claim is made that God wrote them and/or that He wrote them with His own finger, as He did the Ten Commandments.
TEN COMMANDMENTS IN THE ARK OF COVENANT
          The two tablets of stone containing the Ten Commandments written by God, were housed inside the Ark of the Covenant.  (2 Chronicles 5:10, 1 Kings 8:9)  The ordinances, written by Moses, were housed in a side pocket on the outside of the Ark of the Covenant.  (Deuteronomy 31:26)
          When Jesus died on the cross He abolished the ordinances written by Moses (housed on the outside of the Ark of the Covenant) including the sanctuary-related ordinances that looked forward to the sacrificial lamb, Jesus Christ, and thus were abolished when these were fulfilled with the crucifixion of Christ.  But the ordinances did NOT include the Ten Commandments.  The ordinances were totally separate from the Ten Commandments.
          No trace of a claim by anyone has been found which asserts that the Seven Noahide Laws were inside or on the outside of the Ark of the Covenant or anywhere during the Israelites sojourn in the wilderness.  This fact is not surprising since the Seven Noahide Laws were first developed as a part of the Babylonian Talmud long after the exile of the Israelites to Babylon in 586 BC.
Exodus 20:3-17, contains the Ten Commandments:
3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
6 And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.
7 Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.
9 Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work:
10 But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:
11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
12 Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.
13 Thou shalt not kill.
14 Thou shalt not commit adultery.
15 Thou shalt not steal.
16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
17 Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.
          What God gave in these texts to the Children of Israel was clearly conditional.  In the 23rd Chapter of Matthew, Jesus properly brought to account the Scribes and Pharisees for not keeping the covenant, the Ten Commandments.  No better proof of the total rejection of the covenant was the actions of the Jews to call for the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.
          The only reason the Pharisaical leaders of the Jews did not directly order Jesus’ death, was that they did not have the legal authority to do so.  They were under Roman rule and only a Roman ruler could order the death penalty for any person.  So they pressured Pilate (who said “I find NO FAULT in this “man” (Jesus)) to order the Jews’ murderous demand.
          Many Christian leaders claim that the Ten Commandments were done away with at the Cross and only those commandments that Christ specifically mentioned in the New Testament are to be kept by “New Testament Christians.”
          This is their justification for ignoring the Fourth Commandment which is God’s command that we keep holy the Sabbath day (Saturday) as the Sabbath.  But in the following analysis, you will see that ALL Ten Commandments including the (Saturday) Sabbath Commandment are given in the New Testament.
          In addition, Jesus Himself, kept the Seventh Day Sabbath, and Jesus was NOT a Jew.  Jesus is God and God is not Jewish.
          The Christian Patriot Association of Boring, Oregon, published this document, “The Law of God” which contains a side by side scriptural reference of the Old and New Testament concerning the Ten Commandments.
 
THE LAW OF GOD
OLD TESTAMENT
1. Thou shalt have no other gods before Me.

2. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them; for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate Me; and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love Me, and keep my commandments.

3. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord they God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh His name in vain.

4. Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work; but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God, in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates; for in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day; wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day, and hallowed it.

5. Honor thy father and thy mother; that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.

6. Thou shalt not kill.

7. Thou shalt not commit adulterv.

8 Thou shalt not steal

9. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy
neighbor.

10. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife, nor his manservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor anything that is thy neighbor's.
See Exodus 20:1-18
I will not alter nor break the thing that is gone out of my
lips.
(See Psalms 89:34)
NEW TESTAMENT
1. "Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve." Matthew 4:10

2. "Little children keep yourselves from idols." "Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device." 1 John 5:21; Acts 17:29

3. "That the name of God and His doctrine be not blasphemed." 1 Timothy 6:1

4. "Pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the Sabbath day." "The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath, therefore the Son of man is Lord also of the Sabbath." "For He spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise. And God did rest the seventh day from all His works." "There remaineth therefore a keeping of a Sabbath to the people of God. For he that is entered into His rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from His." "For by Him were all things created that are in heaven, and that are in earth." Matthew 24:20, Mark 2:27;28; Hebrews 4:4, 9, 10, margin; Colossians 1:16.

5. "Honor thy father and thy mother." Matthew 19:19.

6. "Thou shalt not kill." Romans 13:9.

7. "Thou shalt not commit adultery." Matthew 19:18.

8. "Thou shalt not steal." Romans 13:9.

9. "Thou shalt not bear false witness." Romans 13:9.

10. "Thou shalt not covet." Romans 7:7.

AFTER HIS DEATH
"Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: Yea, we establish the law." Romans 3.31.
"They... rested the Sabbath day according to the commandment." Luke 23:54-56

SABBATH IN THE NEW EARTH
"For as the new heavens and the new earth, which I will make, shall remain before Me, saith the Lord, so shall your seed and your name remain, and it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one Sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before Me, saith the Lord." lsaiah 66:22,23. See Mark 2:27-28.
FOR ADDITIONAL COPIES, COMPLETE CATALOG, OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, CONTACT
CHRISTIAN PATRIOT ASSOCIATION
P.O. Box 596 Boring, OR 97009 (503)668-4941





          The words of Jesus in Matthew 5:17-19 completely disprove the idea that His death on the cross repealed the Ten Commandments:
          “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.  I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.  Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven” (NIV)
          When Jesus used the word “fulfill” He meant to convey the idea that His life was a living example of the Ten Commandments.  To reach the conclusion that His death on the cross repealed the Ten Commandments would necessitate changing the verb “fulfill” to “abolish” in total conflict with the negative expressly stated by Jesus in the use of this verb.  Jesus said, “I have not come to abolish them (the Ten Commandments).”
          In Matthew 19:18-19 Jesus mentions Commandments 5-10.  These six Commandments reveal how man is to relate to his fellow man.
          In Mark 2:27-28, Jesus uses these words to make clear that He not only recognizes and affirms the Fourth Commandment, but He has complete authority over it:
27 The Sabbath was made for man (all mankind, anthropos in Greek – the root word for anthropology - the study of humanity), and not man for the Sabbath.  28Therefore, the Son of Man is also Lord of the Sabbath. (This is the Seventh day (Saturday) Sabbath.)
          In Matthew 4:10 Jesus affirms the First Commandment with these words:
          Thou shall worship the Lord thy God and Him only shalt thou serve.
          The Apostles John, Mark and Paul made specific references to the Second and Third Commandments in 1 John 5:21; Acts 17:29 and 1 Timothy 6:1.
          Archeologists have searched for many centuries in the Christian era to find the Ark of the Covenant.  Yet no one has claimed to have found it.  In Revelation 11:19, John’s vision revealed that the ark of His covenant was still in the heavenly temple of God.  Here are John’s words:
Then the temple of God was opened in heaven, and the Ark of His covenant was seen in His temple.  And there was lightings, noises, thunderings, and earthquakes and great hail.
          The Ark of the Covenant had/has only one item in it – the Ten Commandments.  God is telling us through John, the Revelator, that the Ten Commandments are still operative now and will never be abolished.  The reason heaven will be heaven is that the Ten Commandments will be in the heart of everyone there.

(6) TO WHOM DO THE NOAHIDE LAWS APPLY AND WHO MAKES THAT DECISION?
           Proponents of the Noahide Laws claim that the Ten Commandments were given exclusively to the Nation of Israel who they incorrectly refer to as “Jews”---and the Noahide Laws were given to govern all other persons, - “non-Jews” – or goyim –Gentiles.
          Scriptural texts that are quoted to support this false view are Exodus 19:3-6 and 20:1-2 and 3:17.  But even a cursory examination of these texts will prove this claim to be utter nonsense.
Exodus 19:3-6

3And Moses went up unto God, and the LORD called unto him out of the mountain, saying, Thus shalt thou say to the house of Jacob, and tell the children of Israel; 4Ye have seen what I did unto the Egyptians, and how I bare you on eagles' wings, and brought you unto myself.  5Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth is mine: 6And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel.
The children of Israel were then – and are now – of no particular ethnicity.
The term “children of Israel” refers to the TRUE followers of Jesus Christ.

Exodus 20:1-2
1And God spake all these words, saying,  2I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
Egypt, in the Bible, is symbolic for sin.  See Rev. 11:8.

Exodus 3:17
17And I have said, I will bring you up out of the affliction of Egypt unto the land of the Canaanites, and the Hittites, and the Amorites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, unto a land flowing with milk and honey.
          There is no language in any of these texts of Scripture, or for that matter any other text of Scripture in the entire Bible, to support the claim that the Noahide Laws were given to govern all non-Jews and the Ten Commandments were given only to the Jews.
 
          The assertion that the Ten Commandments were given only to the Israelites of old (and supposedly the Jews of today) is CONTRARY to the Word of God and completely ignores the TRUTH of the New Testament.  Jesus made this clear in Matthew 5:17:

17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.
Jesus “fulfilled” the law by showing us how we must keep the law.
          Paul in Galatians 3:16, 29 made the same point:
16. Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.
29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
          The true followers of Jesus Christ, wherever they may be found, are the “seed of Abraham and heirs according to the promise.”
 
(7) IS HJ RES. 104, CONTAINING THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS CONSTITUTIONAL?
           The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides among other things, that:
 
          “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”
 
          HJ Res. 104 fraudulently claims that the Seven Noahide Laws are the “bedrock of society” from the dawn of civilization.  This is a deliberate lie and seeks to re-write history.  The Seven Noahide Laws were written by Jewish Pharisees and Rabbis about 586 BC, when the tribes of Judah and Benjamin were in exile in Babylon.
 
          The Ten Commandments were written by God in His own finger in stone approximately 1445 BC at Mt. Sinai.
 
          The Ten Commandments were written by God over 850 years BEFORE the Seven Noahide Laws were written by man.  The Ten Commandments, NOT the fraudulent Noahide Laws, are the generally acknowledged bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, but have not been designated as law by an act of Congress.

          Because the Seven Noahide Laws are obviously religious in their purpose, any act of Congress that attempts to establish them as the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization is clearly religious and in a complete and total violation of the First Amendment.

CONCLUSION
           The Noahide Laws have nothing to do with Noah, or Adam or God.  In about 1600 B.C. God directed Noah to build an ark and save his family and the animal population of the world from the flood which destroyed life on the surface of the earth.
 
          Over one thousand years later, in 586 BC, during the Babylonian captivity, diabolical laws were developed by the Pharisees and Jewish Rabbis who sought to title these laws with a name that would give them legitimacy.
          The purpose of the Jews in developing the Noahide Laws is to rule over all of the non-Jews in the world without having to suffer a mass conversion of these people to Judaism which they fear would dilute the cultural cohesion of the Jewish population.
 
          The Rabbis who produced the Talmud and the Noahide Laws claim that the Noahide Laws are the universal way of reaching God even though they privately state the Noahide Laws are only for the “Gentiles.”  Behind this false claim is the true belief of the Rabbis that it is the means whereby the Rabbis are seen as God and are to be worshiped as God by the “Gentiles.”
 
          The Noahide Laws are to become the national, though undeclared, religion of America.  The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits Congress from passing a law which establishes a religion for the United States of America.  If another 9-11 type “terrorist” incident takes place, and Martial Law is declared, it is likely that the claim would be made that since the Noahide Laws have been recognized by Congress as the “basis of our civilization” and that according to the third Noahide Law, anyone who worships Jesus Christ violates this law, he or she may be characterized as a terrorist.  Then the Talmudic penalty for violating any of the Noahide Laws, namely decapitation, would be enforced.
 
          No American should underestimate the ferocity of the commitment of the Zionist Jews to control the entire political system of the world through the One World Government now being created, and in so doing administer “Justice” as they define it.
 
          The main goal of the Zionist Jews and their New World Order is exactly the same as it was when Jesus was on earth – to exterminate Christ – and His followers!  Nothing has changed.


The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.