Holocaust and Holodomor 'Origins of Anti Semitism' - Part 2 of 2

Vatic Note: Now THIS was a fascinating read, in fact, the most fascinating and educational read in all my travels through this research we have been doing for the past 12 years.  What this below proves with serious documentation that can be retrived and followed up on, is that all wars against Israel are intentionally provocated by Israel so as to keep the Jewish Identity alive and well, and coherantly preserved.

I could not believe how long this has been their main focus of all their actions against the arab world.  Read it and see for yourselves.   "AND BY DECEPTION, WE WILL CONDUCT WAR".  If you TRULY want to know the REAL history of anti-semitism, then this below is a must read.  This is no FAST FOOD junk information....this is the real thing.

The very first sentence of this part 2 is speaking about the khazars that became the Ashkenazi's and makes that distinction from the Sephardic Jews, since the latter had no hatred toward the Christians, rather only the vengeful Ashkenazi's who lost their land by the invasion of the Christians from the west.  We have done several posts making this connection.

If you are Christian, you will be surprised at the venom and hatred these ashkenazi's hold for us and its in writing for the Rabbinical Khazars to use to teach their young and to study and make a full part of their philosophy and history, thereby ensuring this position within the religion (pagan as it is), never changes and is with their culture forever.  That now appears to be the case.

I believe, if you read the "protocols of the Elders of Zion", you will see the connection of this below to our current situation that has been in the works for centuries now.  They actually wrote in the protocols to use anti-semitism, to promote it, foster it and nurture it, in order to control their people, and the globe working toward global domination of all goyim and the planet.

I also believe this confirms the reason for the massacres of Christians in both World Wars to date and the plans to continue that genocide after the take over of America in WW III.   If we want to preserve both our race and our culture, then we best fight like devils to stay viable and alive.

They will show us absolutely no mercy of any kind and after reading all of this and their writings, I am even more sure that their plans for us are horrific.  I am always amazed to find out that history is not what we have been taught, but then we know who controls the publishing companies, don't we? 

Holocaust and Holodomor 'Origins of Anti Semitism'
http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2009/05/26/holocaust-holodomor-origins-of-anti-semi?page=2
by Nicholas Lyssson, The Peoples Voice. org

(CON'T from Part I) - A related matter is Ashkenazic—though not Sephardic—eschatological doctrine, which in the “late antique” period followed Jeremiah 46:28 (“Fear thou not, O Jacob [i.e., Israel], my servant, saith the Lord: . . . for I will make a full end of all the nations whither I have driven thee: but I will not make a full end of thee. . .” ) and Psalms 110:6 and 94:1. See Adiel Schremer, of Bar Ilan University, “Eschatology, Violence and Suicide: An Early Rabbinic Theme and its Influence in the Middle Ages,” at research. yale.edu/ ycias/database/Files/MESV6-2.pdf: At p. 4, Schremer says:
                                                       

[T]he construction of the eschatological redemption in terms of the total eradication of the nations, or at least in association with such an expectation, has a potential of shaping a violent personality and might contribute to. . . a violent mind-setting.

For if one is hoping for God’s redemption soon to come, and is inspired by the idea of a total vanquish-ing of Israel’s enemies as an essential part of that redemption, one’s violent inclinations are not entirely suppressed and in a sense they are being fostered. (Emphasis added.)

Schremer’s paper was presented on May 5, 2002 at the Yale Divinity School. The reference in his title to suicide concerns the year 1096, when large numbers of Jews in the Rhineland killed themselves and their own children, siblings and parents, rather than submit to Crusaders’ efforts to convert them by force.

By way of explanation, Schremer quotes Sigmund Freud: “No neurotic harbors thoughts of suicide which he has not turned back upon himself from murderous impulses against others.” Schremer cites many biblical passages and rabbinical exegeses that might feed such impulses.

For a much fuller discussion of this whole set of issues, see Israel Jacob Yuval, Two Nations in Your Womb(English tr., University of California Press, 2006). At pp. 120-21 Yuval tells of prayers that:

". . . demonstrate the abyss of hostility and hatred felt by medieval Jews toward Christians. And we have here not only hatred, but an appeal to God to kill indiscriminately and ruthlessly, alongside a vivid description of the anticipated horrors to be brought down upon the Gentiles.

These pleas are formulated in a series of verbs—“swallow them, shoot them, lop them off, make them bleed, crush them, strike them, curse them, and ban them. . . destroy them, kill them, smite them. . . crush them [again], abandon them, parch them”—and in the best alphabetical tradition, the string of disasters the poet wishes for the Gentiles goes on and on."

Yuval collects an abundance of such material, from both before and after the events of 1096. In agreement with Schremer, he says (p. 123) that “we are dealing here with a comprehensive religious ideology that sees vengeance as a central component in its messianic doctrine.” He repeats (p. 125) that this vengeance was to be “against the Gentiles”—most of whom, it seems safe to say, were peasants—and that the vengeance stood “at the very heart of the messianic process.” He says tellingly (p. 134) that “the Christians were not unaware of the Jewish desire to see their destruction.”[viii]

The ethnocentric hostility of the Jews—consistently commented on by the peoples who have encountered them over the millennia—can be traced ultimately to the origins of Judaism as set forth in the Torah, e.g., Genesis 9:25 (“Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren”); Exodus 17:14-16 and 34:12-13 ; Numbers 24:8 (“God. . . shall eat up the nations his enemies, and shall break their bones, and pierce them through with his arrows”), 25:6-13

(wherein God commends Phineas for his initia-tive in running a javelin through both parties to a marriage of Jew and gentile), 31:7-19 and 33:50-56; and Deuteronomy 2:33-35 (“[on God’s command] we. . . utterly destroyed the men, and the women, and the little ones, of every city, we left none to remain”), 3:4-7, 7:1-5 (“thou shalt. . . utterly destroy them”), 7:14-26 (“thine eye shall have no pity”), 20:10-17 (“thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth”) and 25:19. Disdain for ordinary labor—to be performed by Esau and Edom, but to be exploited by Israel—appears as early as Genesis 25:23-27, as discussed in note vii below.

Ethnocentric hostility has lent itself to Jewish tax-farming. This can be traced back to very early times, and has sometimes involved copious use of deadly force, put at the disposal of the tax-farmers by their noble clients. See Flavius Josephus, The Antiquities of the Jews, bk. 12, ch. 4 (1st c.), available online (Syria violently stripped to its “bones” for Ptolemy III); and Elias Bickerman, The Jews in the Greek Age, p. 120 (Harvard University Press, 1988).

See also Rabbi Simeon’s lumping of gentiles with serpents, above; Cornelius Tacitus, The Histories, bk. 5.5 (c. 109 A.D.) (“[the Jews] regard the rest of mankind with all the hatred of enemies”); Gibbon, ch. 15 (“the[ir] sullen obstinacy. . . and unsocial manners seemed to mark them out a distinct species of men, who boldly professed, or who faintly disguised, their implacable hatred to the rest of humankind”); and Emilio Gabba, “The Growth of Anti-Judaism or the Greek Attitude Toward the Jews,” in W.D. Davies and Louis Finkelstein, eds., The Cambridge History of Judaism, vol. 2 (Cam-bridge University Press, 1990).

At p. 629 Gabba attributes to Hecataeus of Abdera (early 3d c. B.C.) an observation about the hostility of the Jews. Gabba excuses that hostility, saying the Jews’ “misanthropic reserve” was understandable in light of the exodus from Egypt. But the exodus—thought by Hecataeus to have been an expulsion, and by Tacitus to have been an expulsion of lepers—was perhaps a thousand years past even when Hecataeus wrote. At p. 645 Gabba cites Posidonius (134 B.C.) on the advice given to his contemporary, King Antiochus Sidetes, to destroy the Jews, “for they alone among all peoples refused all relations with other races and saw everyone as their enemy. . . .”

Almost identical advice was given to King Ahasuerus (Xerxes I, 485-465 B.C.) in Esther 3:8-9. Some two-and-a-half millennia after Ahasuerus, the Jews still celebrate on their most joyous holiday the vengeance he allowed them: “sl[aughter] of their foes seventy and five thousand,” including “both little ones and women,” and hanging not just of the man who gave the advice, but of all ten of his sons. It was an occasion of “light, and. . . joy, and honour,” and of “gladness and feasting.” Id., 8:11-17, 9:13-28.

Martin Luther’s comments on this story, in The Jews and Their Lies (1543), fit with Yuval’s account of “a comprehensive [Jewish] religious ideology that sees vengeance as a central component in its messianic doctrine,” and Schremer’s account of Jewish hopes for “eschatological redemption in terms of the total eradication of the nations”:

Oh how [the Jews] love the Book of Esther, which so nicely agrees with their bloodthirsty, revengeful and murderous desire and hope. The sun never did shine on a more bloodthirsty and revengeful people than they, who imagine themselves to be the people of God, and who desire to, and think they must, murder and crush the heathen. And the foremost undertaking which they expect of their Messiah is that he should slay and murder the whole world with the sword.

This passage—indeed, the whole 64-page essay—is often cited as evidence of Luther’s pathological anti-Semitism, but Yuval and Schremer show that at least on this point he knew whereof he spoke. As Yuval says, “the Christians were not unaware of the Jewish desire to see their destruction.” Luther’s comments also fit with the descriptions of Jewish arendars given above—men who “found pleasure and a sort of triumphant delight in deception and cheating” (Graetz); who sowed “a terrible harvest of hatred” (Bermant); and who may have been “so moved by racist contempt for the Ukrainian and Polish peasantry as to regard them as subhuman” (Cantor).

V. THEY NEED TO HATE AND TO BE HATED

Even in the 21st century, Israeli children are taught to sing “The Whole World is Against Us”(“Ha’olam Ku’lo heg’denu”). We have not only David M. Weinberg’s defense of the “shfoch hamatcha” prayer, but even Rabbi Meir Y. Soloveichik, “The Virtue of Hate,” First Things, Feb. 2003 (available online) (“When hate is appropriate, then it is not only virtuous, but essential for Jewish well-being”).

Soloveichik is not a fringe figure. He is a member of an exceedingly eminent Orthodox rabbinical family. When he wrote the article he was resident scholar at the Jewish Center in Manhattan and a Beren fellow at Yeshiva University, and was studying the philosophy of religion at the Yale Divinity School.

Note the words “essential for Jewish well-being.” The “virtue of hate” seems to come of a positive need to be hated. The widely-published Rabbi Dr. Dan Cohn-Sher-bok, professor of Jewish history at the University of Wales (Lampeter) and author of The Paradox of Anti-Semitism (2006), says in an interview with the Independent(U.K.), March 19, 2006 (available online) that: “Jews need enemies in order to survive. . . . [I]n the absence of Jew-hatred, Judaism is undergoing a slow death. . . . We want to be loved, and we want Judaism to survive intact. . . . [T]hese are incompatible desires. . . . Why do we endure? Because we’re hated.” (Emphases added.)

Cohn-Sherbok says of a founder of Zionism, Theodor Herzl: “He warned that if our Christian hosts were to leave us in peace for two generations, the Jews would merge entirely into surrounding races.” Id. Herzl also wrote in his conclusion to Der Judenstaat (1896): “Universal brotherhood is not even a beautiful dream. Antagonism is essential to man’s greatest efforts.”

In his book (p. 209) Cohn-Sherbok says that “in the past ultra-Orthodox Jewish leaders were profoundly aware of this dynamic.” One of his examples is Schneur Zalman of Lyady, the first Lubavitch Rebbe and author of the Tanya (1796), the fundamental book of the Habbad movement, whose first chapter famously concludes by saying gentile souls “contain no good whatever.” [ix] In 1812, Zalman worked with the anti-Semitic Czar Alexander I to defeat Napoleon. He feared Napoleon would liberate the Jews, who might expect to benefit materially—although that’s a much-disputed calculation—but whose souls would be lost to assimilation and intermarriage.

 Similarly, according to Ha’aretz, June 3, 2004 (available online), “in the mid-19th century, Rabbi [Samson Raphael] Hirsch, the leader of Germany’s Orthodox Jews, wrote that anti-Semitism is the tool through which the God of Israel preserves his people.” In 1958, Rabbi Dr. Nahum Goldmann, then president of the World Jewish Congress, com-plained that the “current decline of overt anti-Semitism might constitute a new danger to Jewish survival,” one that “has had a very negative effect on our internal life.” In 1957, Leo Pfeffer, then counsel to the same organization, said much the same. As to both, see Alfred M. Lilienthal, The Zionist Connection II, p. 412 (1982). See also Charles E. Silberman, A Certain People, p. 165 (1985):

“For all that we are preoccupied by the damage once done to us by our enemies, we are still more concerned by the curse of friendship we now encounter,” Leonard Fein, editor and publisher of Moment magazine, told the Conference of Jewish Communal Service in 1980. . 

“Deep down—and sometimes not so very deep—we still believe that we are  depended on the pogroms and persecutions to keep us a people, that we have not the fiber to withstand the lures of a genuinely open society.” (Emphasis added.)

Hannah Arendt says of this whole line of thinking, in The Origins of Totali-tarianism, p. 7 (1973 ed.), that “. . . eternal anti-Semitism would imply an eternal guarantee of Jewish [corporate] existence. This superstition is a secularized travesty of the idea of eternity inherent in a faith in chosenness.”

VI. PROVOKING ANTI SEMITISM

It follows from this “superstition” (or psychological insight) that where anti-Semitism is inadequate to prevent an erosion of Jewish identity, it has to be fabricated or provoked. A seemingly encyclopedic survey of such fabrication—at least as it’s appeared in recent years—can be found in Norman Finkelstein, Beyond Chutzpah, pp. 21-85 (University of California Press, 2005).[x]

As to the other technique, provocation, see Yuval,Two Nations; Shahak, Three Thousand Years; Lindemann, Esau’s Tears; some of the other material discussed above; and the private diary of Moshe Sharett, then prime minister of Israel, for May 26, 1955.

That diary entry records the view of Sharett’s colleague Moshe Dayan that only by a strategy of endless “provocation and revenge” toward its neighbors can Israel survive. Israel, says Sharett (paraphrasing Dayan), “must. . . invent dangers” to “keep its morale high and to retain its moral tension.” Sharett even quotes David Ben Gurion: “It would be worth while to pay an Arab a million pounds to start a war.” See the extended quotation from Sharett’s diary in Livia Rokach, Israel’s Sacred Terrorism, p. 44 (1980) (available online; emphasis in original). Rokach, whose father was Sharett’s minister of the Interior, says (id., p. 8 ) that by the mid ‘50s, if not before:

"Terrorism and “revenge” were. . . to be glorified as the “moral . . . and even sacred” values of Israeli society. . . . [T]he military symbol was now Unit 101, led by Arik Sharon. . . . The lives of Jewish victims. . . had to be sacrificed to create provocations justifying subsequent reprisals. . . . A hammering, daily propaganda, controlled by the censors, was directed to feed the Israeli population with images of the monstrosity of the Enemy." (Emphasis added.)

Meanwhile, she says, Israel’s leaders never believed in any external threat to Israel’s survival. What they wanted was regional hegemony, and of course internal cohesion. In 1984, after her book had ceased to be news, Rokach was found dead in a Rome hotel room.  (VN: whats new)

Boas Evron makes some of the same points as Rokach, in Jewish State or Israeli Nation?, above. At p. 251 he says: “In the absence of a positive national bond, Ben Gurion deliberately sought to base the national consciousness on the negative foundation of terror and nightmare. . . .” According to two books by the Mossad defector Victor Ostrovsky, By Way of Deception (1990) and The Other Side of Deception (1994), Mossad doctrine is squarely in accord with the views of Dayan and Ben Gurion, as recorded by Sharett and amplified by Rokach and Evron.[xi]

For more on hostile solidarity as an essential element of Judaism, see three books by Kevin MacDonald, A People That Shall Dwell Alone (1994), Separation and its Discontents (1998), and The Culture of Critique(1998); and John Hartung’s essay “Love Thy Neighbor,” above. Hartung begins with an epigraph from Blaise Pascal’s Pensees (1670): “Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction.”

MacDonald and Hartung see Judaism as an economic strategy for competing with host populations, from whom the sharpest self-differentiation has to be maintained. One might infer from their work—as from such passages as Deuteronomy 7:14-26—a system designed to suppress the recognition of fellow humanity across ethnic and religious lines, a system still functioning millennia after its inception. Of course, any such analysis is taken as purest anti-Semitism, an occasion of “terror and nightmare” call-ing for (of all things) hostile solidarity.[xii]

See also Moses Hadas, Hellenistic Culture: Fusion and Diffusion, chs. 7 and 20 (Columbia University Press, 1959) as to the influence, via Plato, of closed, totalitarian Sparta on Judaism as far back as the Maccabean period (142-63 B.C.).[xiii]

Then there’s the widely-reprinted article that Rabbi Israel Hess, campus rabbi at Bar-Ilan University, wrote for its student magazine, Bat Kol, entitled “Genocide: A Commandment of the Torah” (Feb. 26, 1980). Rabbi Hess took as his text Deuteronomy 25:17-19 (“[T]hou shalt blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven; thou shalt not forget [to do] it”). Amalek, he said, is any people that declares war on Israel. The Israeli state rabbinate has never taken direct issue with Rabbi Hess—as it has for example with Reform Judaism.[xiv]

In 2001, Rabbi Ovadiah Yosef, formerly Sephardi chief rabbi, and founder and leader of Israel’s third largest political party, Shas, called sweepingly for “extermination of the Arabs,” saying “it is forbidden to be merciful to them.” Shas M.K. Eli Yishay (later Ehud Olmert’s vice prime minister) said Rabbi Yosef was merely echoing Ariel Sharon. BBC News, April 10 and 11, 2001, available online.

Desire to escape the Jewish condition—with its ethical double standards, its “virtue of hate,” its abhorrence of “the curse of friendship,” its obsession with “total eradication of the nations,” and the consequent esotericism of the rabbinical literature—motivated those early secular Zionists who longed for direct labor on the land and disparaged intellectual and commercial occupations reminiscent of the arendar role.

Lenni Brenner discusses such attitudes in Zionism in the Age of the Dictators, ch. 2 (1983), available online. See also Slezkine, The Jewish Century, above, pp. 327-28. That group of Zionists hoped to make Israel a “normal” nation.

But their religious successors, returning to Judaism’s roots, have countered that normality is precisely what Israel can never have, because of its unique relationship with God. See Shahak and Mezvinsky, Jewish Fundamentalism, above, p. 71:

"The Gush Emunim [Bloc of the Faithful] argument is that secular Zionists measured. . . “normality” by applying non-Jewish standards that are satan-ic. . . . [According to] one of the group’s leaders, Rabbi [Shlomo] Avner: “While God requires. . . normal nations to abide by abstract codes of justice and righteousness, such laws do not apply to Jews.” . . . Relying upon the Code of Maimonides and the Halakha, Rabbi [Israel] Ariel [of Gush Emunim] stated: “A Jew who kill[s] a non-Jew is exempt from human judgment and has not violated the [religious] prohibition of murder.”[xv] (Emphases added.)

On the other hand Shahak and Mezvinsky say (id.) that “the murder of a Jew, particularly by a non-Jew, is in Jewish law the worst possible crime.”
Such contemptuous attitudes and narcissistic double standards were very much alive at the time of the holodomor. In 1932, the first year of the famine, the great Eastern European Hebrew poet Chaim Nachman Bialik published the poem “My Father,” which Shahak (Three Thousand Years, ch. 4 n.9) says is still “taught in all Israeli schools.” The poem depicts Bialik’s “righteous and upright” father dispensing vodka in a “den of pigs like men,” to Slavic peasants “rolling in vomit” with “faces of monstrous corruption.”

Bialik calls them “scorpions” for good measure. The father’s “whispered syllables,” meanwhile, audible only to his adoring son, are “pure prayer and law, the words of the living God.” The poem nowhere acknowledges the common complaint that the Jews encouraged Slavic alcoholism, which brought in revenue, exposed peasants’ remaining assets to foreclosure, and made them easier to control.

The poem is missing from Bialik’s supposedly Complete Poetic Works (1948) published in English 14 years after his death. That brings us back to Shahak and Mezvinsky’s point, above, about books and translations that falsify by omission.

VI. SUPPRESSION OF CAUSES OF ANTI SEMITISM

A related point: A search of the Library of Congress catalog under the keyword “arenda” brings up 37 apparently relevant items, not one of which is in English. By way of comparison, a search under the combination of “United States” and “slavery” brings up more than 10,000. A search under “Ukrainian famine” brings up all of ten items. A search under “holocaust” brings up more than 10,000.

More evidence of ineradicable attitudes (“. . . I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance. . . . Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel”) was recently seen on Israeli television in the series “The Oligarchs.” The series was most definitely not shown in the U.S. Uri Avnery describes it in an article entitled “How the Virgin Became a Whore” (2004), available online:

Some of its episodes are simply unbelievable—or would have been, if they had not come straight from the horses’ mouths: the heroes of the story, who gleefully boast about their despicable exploits. The series was produced by Israeli immigrants from Russia. (VN: KHAZARS, who are "not" the Biblical Jews of the Bible or of Israel)
* * *

[The oligarchs] exploited the disintegration of the Soviet system to loot the treasures of the state and to amass plunder amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars. In order to safeguard the perpetuation of their business, they took control of the state. Six of the seven are Jews. . . . [Boris] Berezovsky boasts that he caused the war in Chechnya, in which tens of thousands have been killed and a whole country devastated. He was interested in the mineral resources and a prospective [oil] pipeline there.

. . . In the end there was a reaction: Vladimir Putin, the taciturn and tough ex-KGB operative, assumed power, took control of the media, put one of the oligarchs (Mikhail Khodorkovsky) in prison, [and] caused the others to flee (Berezovsky is in England, Vladimir Gusinsky is in Israel, [and] another, Mikhail Chernoy, is assumed to be hiding here [in Israel]).

In short, then, the history of Jewish relations with Slavic peasants—together with the much longer history of Jewish attitudes toward “the nations”—has enormous rele-vance in explaining why hereditarily-Jewish Bolsheviks in the 1930s, using supposedly scientific Marxist terminology, defined the Ukrainian peasantry as the “class enemy” and carried out a policy of genocidal starvation. In The Jewish Experience, p. 364 (1996), Norman Cantor freely admits as much:

The Bolshevik Revolution and some of its aftermath represented, from one perspective, Jewish revenge. . . . During the heyday of the Cold War, American Jewish publicists spent a lot of time denying that—as 1930s anti-Semites claimed—Jews played a disproportionately important role in Soviet and world Communism. The truth is until the early 1950s Jews did play such a role, and there is nothing to be ashamed of. In time Jews will learn to take pride in the record of the Jewish Communists in the Soviet Union and elsewhere. It was a species of striking back. (Emphases added.)

These words are part of Cantor’s introduction to a chapter by the Russian Jewish writer Arkady Vaksberg, entitled “Stalin’s Jews.” It is most unlikely that Cantor, a professor of history at New York University and a former Rhodes scholar, wrote in ignorance of the scope of Soviet state homicide. Leaving aside issues of pride, shame, and ethnic or religious loyalties, this passage puts Cantor in full agreement with Churchill, Robert Wilton, and Ambassador Levko Lukyanenko, all above.

Edwin Schoonmaker, Democracy and World Dominion, p. 211 (1939) confirms Cantor’s point:

Fifteen years after the Bolshevist Revolution was launched to carry out the Marxist program, the editor of the American Hebrew could write: “According to such information [as] the writer could secure while in Russia a few weeks ago, not one Jewish synagogue has been torn down, as have hundreds—perhaps thousands—of the Greek Catholic churches. . . .” (American Hebrew, Nov. 18, 1932, p. 12.) Apostate Jews, leading a revolution that was to destroy religion as the “opiate of the people,” had somehow spared the synagogues of Russia.[xvi] (Emphasis added.)

Anti Semitism has Respectable Pedigree

Vatic Note:  We are seeing more and more evidence as given in this and the previous post, that anti-semitism is a euphamism for truth destroying any adverse information about the Khazar Zionists.  Remember, we published videos and other posts proving these khazars intended to create and use anti-semitism as a cover for their atrocities visited upon other nations and cultures/religions. We proved that the "real Jews" had to seek asylum out of Israel, and did so in London and New York.

The brutality the Khazars visited upon the real unarmed Jews was also caught on film, that we posted,  and showed why these real Jews had to seek that asylum.  We also published more than once a link to a letter written in 1948 by a traditional religious rabbi, to the Zionists in Switzerland, which proved that the Swiss based Zionist banker leaders of that movement, had positively assisted Hilter in his  efforts to removed Jews from Germany.  

Anti Semitism has Respectable Pedigree
http://henrymakow.com/2014/06/Anti-Semitism-has-Respectable-Pedigree.html
by Henry Makow

The Nazis gave anti Semitism a bad name. Perhaps this was their purpose. 


                                            

 
Their crude propaganda, racism and genocide made it despicable. But, anti Semitism had a long and important tradition before the Nazis. It has always represented resistance to an evil and alien political, cultural and economic domination. It deserves a rethink. 

I will begin by stating my assumptions. 

1. The truth is so simple, it staring us in the face. Yet we can't see it.  Most Jews and Christians are unaware that Judaism is not a religion, but a satanic cult masquerading as a religion.

Judaism is not defined by the Old Testament but by the Cabala which says God is formless and unknowable. This is the essence of Satanism. The essence of any true religion is that God is knowable. How else do we obey his voice in our soul/conscience? 

The Cabalist says god is unknowable because he wants to be God.  "The Jew" is the physical manifestation of God. The "unknowable" God filters down until His Will manifests with the Rabbi. Cabala is the basis of Satanism and the Occult throughout history. Increasingly, Satanism is replacing Christianity as society's moral reference point.

The goal of Cabalist (i.e. Illuminati) Jews has been to destroy Christian civilization and they are succeeding. No Jew living today should be blamed for the crucifixion of Christ. But, after the crucifixion until the present, the goal of Cabalist-controlled organized Jewry continued to be the eradication of Christianity. They defined Christian resistance  as "anti Semitism," inverting good and evil as Satanists do.

The Illuminati plan to create a world "superstate" dedicated to their wealth, power and perversions. With the help of non-Jewish Freemasons, they have taken over the West and are inducting humanity into their satanic cult. I have listed many ways humanity is satanically possessed.

2. As I have said, in a satanic cult, the rank and file is not told the true agenda. It is manipulated and degraded with specious arguments and platitudes (i.e. "tolerance", "diversity,""sexual liberation.") In a satanic cult, people are coerced. People of conscience are smeared as "self-haters." Increasingly people have become Jews or "haters" if they haven't. In a cult, the truth doesn't matter. Only political correctness. Society is beginning to resemble a cult.

When I speak of reviving "anti Semitism," I don't mean discriminating against or persecuting individual Jews like myself. I mean opposing anyone -- Jew or non Jew-- who represents the Cabalist (Illuminati) agenda, now espoused by the whole economic, political and cultural establishment in the West, controlled by organized Judaism and Freemasonry. Desmond Tutu. Mikael Gorbachev, the Bilderberg attendees. Many are Jews. Most aren't. But most are Cabalists, Satanists or sell-outs.

There are really only two sides in the New World Order: The Cabalists (Illuminati, their agents and constituency) versus the rest of humanity. (All the rest is obfuscation.) The Cabalists include Freemasons on both the Right and Left, liberals, socialists, radical feminists, Neocons, Communists, Zionists, homosexual activists- you get the picture. As you can tell, these movements are all Jew-created and Jew-creating.

3. I believe Jews would find it liberating to disassociate with Judaism. Many already have. Judaism is the source of anti Semitism. In addition, often it is personally dysfunctional. The agenda of organized Jewry, proven by its record-to-date, is to re-engineer the human race to serve the Illuminati. They do this by destroying the four legs of our human identity - religion (God); nationhood, race and family (gender).  Their goal is one race, one religion, one gender and one world all in the service of the Illuminati. A recent example of their one-world-ism is organized Jewry's opposition to nationalist movements in Europe.

THE FIRST ANTI SEMITE

The first anti Semite was God himself. When Moses told him the Jews were worshiping a golden calf, "The LORD said to Moses, "I have seen this people, and behold, they are an obstinate people. "Now then let Me alone, that My anger may burn against them and that I may destroy them..." (Exodus 32: 9-10)

I'm not sure what Abe Foxman would say about God's genocidal tendencies. In any case, the Baal worshipers are now in charge and God would face a Human Rights Tribunal for his rash statements.

The great prophets of the Old Testament were also anti Semites. Jeremiah said Jews "will not speak the truth; they have taught their tongue to speak lies..." (Jeremiah 9:5). Isaiah says the lord will smite "the daughters of Zion [who] are haughty, and walk with stretched forth necks and wanton eyes..." (Isaiah 3:16)

Jesus joined the noble ranks of anti Semites when he told the Pharisees, "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John 8:44) 

Throughout history, Jews were criticized by a Who's Who of Western civilization. The Roman historian Tacitus condemned them for subverting religion, country and family and said they were "enemies of all races but their own." George Bernard Shaw said, "The Jews had better stop being Jews and start being human beings."

The Hungarian musician Franz Liszt said, "They sell ...the crowbars and the projectiles that destroy the foundations of faith and morals."

The great German poet, Goethe said, "This crafty race has one great principle; as long as order prevails, there is nothing to be gained."

Voltaire, the French philosopher, said, "The Jewish nation dares to display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations, and revolts against all masters; always superstitious, always greedy for the well-being enjoyed by others, always barbarous - cringing in misfortune and insolent in prosperity."

You can't generalize about all Jews but American critic H.L. Mencken was particularly harsh about many. He said Jews are "the most unpleasant race ever heard of. As commonly encountered they lack many of the qualities that mark the civilized man: courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease, confidence. They have vanity without pride, voluptuousness without taste, and learning without wisdom...their charity is mainly a form of display."

Jews are not taught about the supremacist agenda of their cabalist leaders. Instead, they are told they are "hated for no reason" or because people need an innocent scapegoat to blame for their suffering.  Anti Semitism is an "irrational sickness in the mind of the Gentile." Increasingly in the satanist New World Order, the sane are labeled sick.

It's about time Jews realize that Judaism is not on the side of the angels, but it's not too late to get out.

It's time Christians realize that they have been had by the world's greatest tricksters. The Jews are not "the chosen people." Their leaders are megalomaniacs that destroy nations, kill millions and threaten the future of humanity.

It's time for all of us to realize that being able to criticize Jews is a litmus test of our freedom. Anti Semitism was banned and severely punished in Soviet Russia. Is that the kind of society we want to live in?

MEASURES OF THEIR SUCCESS

The political, economic and cultural conquest of the world by cabalist Jews and their allies is the true history of the last 500 years or more. (The Illuminati bankers are behind imperialism.) Yet their control of culture is such that people are totally unaware that any conquest has even taken place. "Anti Semite" is a curse that instills paralysis.

If you're not an anti-Semite, in the sense described above, you are an opportunist or dupe, or both.

People are unaware that all wars were contrived by the Masonic Jewish bankers to increase their power and wealth, destroy their rivals and advance their scheme of world-government.

People are unaware that their "leaders" are puppets and the mass media are prostitutes.  They are unaware that the Illuminati have sponsored feminism, homosexuality, promiscuity and pornography, to shred the social fabric (marriage and family) and undermine resistance. They are unaware that 9-11 etc were false flags used to rob us of our civil rights and they continue to stage fake terror to confiscate our weapons.

An ethnic Jew, the son of holocaust survivors who lost their parents, I recognize there are just causes for anti Semitism past and present. I represent those ordinary Jews who refuse to be human shields, human sacrifices and scapegoats for organized Jewry's demented, satanic, hidden agenda. 

 
 ---
In an upcoming piece, I will discuss how anti Semitism was the basis of a legitimate political movement in Germany and Austria which was unsuccessful until the illuminati used it as the basis of Nazism.


Related- 
Zionist admits "anti Semitism is a trick we use" (to portray self defense as bigotry)
Makow - Feckless Goyim Downplay Protocols of Zion
Makow -The Riddle of Anti Semitism
Newman - Is Lucifer the God of Judaism?
Gilad Atzmon - Did the Jews Just Lose Europe? - See more at: http://henrymakow.com/2014/06/Anti-Semitism-has-Respectable-Pedigree.html#sthash.JccUGBuy.dpuf

---

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Why Is this Mine-Resistant Vehicle Being Used in a Small Wisconsin Town?

Vatic Note: I fully agree with the author below, when he says that it appears these police are getting ready to treat us, the citizens who pay their salary,  as if we were the Taliban in Afghanistan. This is not unique to Wisconsin at all.  What we are seeing in almost every town is a gradual movement with police changing their primary objective from protecting the people who pay their salaries, to gradual implementation of a functional Police state.   In our little podunk town we are seeing court room actions through minor traffic infractions being turned into a police state treatment of these minor violations. It reminds me fully, of a war game and a test to see just how much we will take before we stop it all.

Normally, we have a prosecutor or Assistant prosecutor who would play the part of investigator of both the complaintant, which is the cop and the facts of the case to confirm their veracity and the testimony of the cop writing the infraction. If the DA or ADA finds exculpatory evidence for the defendant, by law, he must provide such evidence to the defense. 

That is now no longer the case.  Now the cop not only acts as the complaintant, but he also acts as the prosecutor and as the primary witness in the case, which goes against the prohibition that the prosecutor cannot testify in a case he is prosecuting since its a conflict of interest and jeopardizes the neutrality of the investigation by the such prosecutor.   That rule does not apply to the complaining officer on the ticket.   He is definitely not going to be investigating himself, now is he???  And where is it written that he, as the officer witness on the case, has to provide exculpatory evidence to the defendant? 

In other words,  we are watching our judicial system being slowly and "gradually" erroded through these changes, from a normal judicial system into a low level police state system with the average citizen becoming the loser after a 200 year history of it being one way that worked.  If its not broken, don't fix it.  This is just as dangerous to our freedoms as this huge mammoth machine is.  Its incremental and gradual changes, but changes none the less.

Just where are all these Wisconsin snipers they need protection from?  They talk about some fictious threats, but no evidence that any such behavior has ever happened.   No, this is a micro move into complete police state control.   Time for us to seriously consider what the agenda might really be and confront it now, while we can. 

Why Is this Mine-Resistant Vehicle Being Used in a Small Wisconsin Town?
http://survivaljoe.net/blog/mine-resistant-vehicle-being-used-in-small-wisconsin-town/?utm_source=140606SJ2&utm_campaign=140606SJ2
by Survival Joe, Family survival preparedness Blog

The number of local police departments acquiring previously used military vehicles continues to swell.

Just this past week the town of Neenah, Wisconsin acquired a mine-resistant multi-terrain vehicle to help with local police duties.

Keep in mind this vehicle weighs in at 37,000 pounds, stands over 11 feet tall, and was meant to patrol the dangerous streets of Afghanistan and Iraq.

Wisconsin is not exactly known for its land mines and snipers, so it stands to reason the small town would have no need of a military grade vehicle like this in their fleet.

Of course, police argue they need these vehicles to protect officers from high-powered assault rifles and to keep their cops out of the line of fire.
Yet local citizens are worried the vehicle might be used for assault offensives against the local population.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hlsDzBhkyBg#t=0

According to the Associated Press, police have actually had to defend their purchase of the new vehicle.

“We have no ability to shoot out of it,” Lt. Jeff Malcore said. “All it does is allow us to get from one place to another so we can deploy our people, or if there’s firing coming in, we can back up to a window or something to get people out.”

But the question remains: Why do they need this behemoth to do this work?
Are small municipalities like Neenah, Wisconsin really a hotbed for all-out assaults on the police?

Bear in mind, the militarization of police forces is happening all over the country.  (VN: just a reminder about the sending of NY police to Tel Aviv to train them to take down civilians with lethal force just as the IDF does in Israel against the Pals.  Bloomberg wanted his police to know how to do the same to his citizens in NY City.  Lets remember, in the protocols we just published a few days ago, that "VIOLENCE" was touted as the only  way to make the goyim behave since they are prone to violence themselves.  I just keep remembering those little children killed in WACO and no one was prosecuted for the murder of those babies.   Is that what they are trying to get ready to do here?) 

Just last week we reported that an Indiana township acquired two UH-72 Lakota helicopters for police use.

And Austin, Texas police recently ordered a LENCO BearCat, a military grade vehicle that could cost taxpayers up to $270,000.

Right now Neenah’s neighbors in Outagamie County and Appleton County are also using similar military-style vehicles for police work.

Of course, all of this is happening as returning veterans are being stripped of their 2nd amendment right to own guns by the request of the Veterans Administration.

At the end of the day, police might argue that they’re using these military vehicles to protect themselves and citizens, but it appears something much more ominous is happening right under our noses.

---

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Mich. mom incensed as new law locks out parents from nurses' sex talks with kids

Vatic Note:   Raise your hand if this below sounds familiar?  Notice its the slow gradual introduction of the state setting up our childrens sexual orientation, preferences and education.  It started very slowly with the TSA handlers touching our children in their private parts without parents permission.  In most states, that act of touching a child is actually a crime, but nothing happens to the TSA agents who do it without parents knowing or agreeing to it.  Its a perfect set up for pedophilia of small children. 

In the past, our children were raised that touching them in their private parts was a no no and to report it if it was ever done to them.  Now I would venture to say, that at the very least, these same children are confused after receiving mixed messages.   After this below, I bet it will be even worse.  My question is, "Why would a child trust an unknown nurse with little to do with her,  above  her own parents?   And what would happen, should the parents contradict and overturn what was taught or said to the child by that nurse?   Finally, what would happen if, like Child protective services,  it was discovered the nurses were pimping the children they were indoctrinating sexually?"

These are important questions we need answers to before relinquishing our responsibilities as parents, with a God given right to make those kinds of decisions for our own children.   Seems to me this issue does not belong with a cold, barren, ethically challenged government.  If anything, that is the last place such activities should be housed and such learning should take place.  Given our current governments since JFK, its a guarantee of sexual abuse, if such decisions remain with that same government. 


Mich. mom incensed as new law locks out parents from nurses' sex talks with kids
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/4/mich-mom-incensed-new-law-locks-out-parents-nurses/

By Cheryl K. Chumley, The Washington Times

A Michigan mother is outraged at a new state law posted at her medical provider’s office that forced her to stand aside and let the nurse speak privately with her minor-aged child about STDs and birth control. (VN: my question is "Why are the parents or mom's locked out of the nurses sex talk?  What is it they are going to tell the child that the parents would not like?)

The recently posted sign at the doctor’s office: “Attention parents of adolescent children age 12y-17y. New Michigan Medical Records access laws have been put in place. This will require a nurse to have a short 5 minute private conversation with your child. We will explain the purpose and process at the time of the visit and answer any questions you may have,” The Blaze reported.

Christy Duffy said in a scathing blog post that she was shocked at the notification, which she only learned when she brought in her 17-year-old daughter for treatment of a minor ailment.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1rxYpF3F4Y0

In her blog, Ms. Duffy wrote: “I asked if this policy was in effect and if so, how could I opt out. The receptionist told me it’s a new law and there is no opting out. Working to keep my cool, I said, ‘I’m sure there is.’ She said, ‘No, there isn’t.’ At which point I asked if I needed to leave and go to the urgent care center because I was not submitting my daughter to such a conversation. That did not go over well.”

Ms. Duffy then wrote how the office manager requested a private chat with her and explained how the new law would let children access their medical records on line and actually block their parents from viewing those documents.

Ms. Duffy also explained in her post what the children would be learning during their private chat with the nurse, The Blaze reported: “The nurse would also inform my children that the doctor’s office is a safe place for them to receive information about STDs, HIV and birth control. That is what the nurse would be chatting about with my children without any pesky parental oversight.”

Ms. Duffy said she demanded an opt-out provision and said in her blog post: “What they want to do is talk to your child about sex and drugs … without your input. Is it really such a stretch to imagine that a doctor who does not value abstinence before marriage would encourage your daughters — as young as 12! — to receive birth control? Is it really such a stretch to imagine a nurse telling a young boy — because a 12-year-old boy is a BOY — that she will give him condoms so he can be ‘safe?’ “

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/4/mich-mom-incensed-new-law-locks-out-parents-nurses/#ixzz34Id1OsCp
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

---

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

When the Worst Law-breakers are Those Entrusted to Uphold the Law

Vatic Note:  VN: will be coming up a bit later.  Watching and reading this, I am sure you can imagine what I will hve to say about it all.

They  are messing with my vatic note and won't let me post any up here right now.  Will try to do it in the am after a shift change. They pulled all my blogs for tonight, but I am slowly getting them back up.  Keep reading and hopefully, I will have the messes fixed by morning.

When the Worst Law-breakers are Those Entrusted to Uphold the Law
http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2014/05/29/when-the-worst-law-breakers-are-those-en

May 29th, 2014

By Ruth Hull



https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=rfGqPBKQeKE



https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2zB8i6ftPU0

Gotten used to your vote not making a difference? What if your vote determined whether your kids would be raped or killed or whether, when reporting a crime, you are imprisoned for no reason? What if judges and top cops are also the top law-breakers?

The problem is not specific to Pennsylvania. California has become known as the human trafficking and child rape capital of the nation. Observers and researchers are blaming unethical judges and district attorneys. Some of the prominent ones that are being blamed for the corruption are listed below.

The following is a recounting of information that could be looked up by any voter who takes the time to check past newspapers, web articles and appellate cases. The reason for voters’ remorse is usually that voters simply don’t think their votes count. The voters in Pennsylvania in the videos presented found that their votes did count – counted towards their children being sold to private industry or winding up dead. Is your kids life worth checking on the people for whom you vote?

ORANGE COUNTY, CA

The Lamoreaux Courthouse

Orange County is known for political corruption. From the 70’s when a sizable number of Orange County Democratic officials (including former Congressman Richard Hanna) were locked away to the 2011 incarceration of Republican Mike Corona (backed for office by the leaders of both the Democratic and Republican Parties in Orange County), corruption and politics go hand in hand.
Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas

 In Orange County, the top Cop Tony Rackauckas has long been known for selective prosecution, ties to illicitly and summarily imprisoning the county’s elderly population for sex and profit, and fronting for child molesters, rapists and child pornographers.

There are some people Tony thinks should be prosecuted, like minorities who happen to talk to others of their own race while crossing the street. Students who merely show Constitutionally-protected disrespect towards those with personal ties to Tony and others exercising their Constitutional rights.

Better watch out for the wrath of Tony – a man who frequently appears to put his interests above the U.S. Constitution, his job duties and the safety of the public. When public pressure forced Tony to prosecute officers who killed a homeless man (Kelly Thomas), Tony proved that practicing law is a skill far above his ability.

Here is an excerpt from a 2012 article in the Los Angeles Indy Media:

"In California's Orange County, District Attorney Tony Rackauckas, also known as T-Rack, allows violent criminals to get away with aggravated assaults, homicides, sex crimes, identity fraud, embezzlement and more.

Why?

Because T-Rack and his sex partner Peggy Buff have placed money above justice.

Multiple domestic violence shootings have left trails of bodies in Orange County as T-Rack has failed to prosecute violent criminals who commit violent assaults against women in his county. Prior to dying, victims have told T-Rack or his underlings they were in danger of being killed but the perpetrators have been given passes.

As predicted, helpless women have died as T-Rack did nothing to save them. As cemetery profits have gone up, T-Rack’s sex partner Peggy Buff has made grabs to gain the money of victims. Last year, she lost her job for this very reason. But T-Rack still won’t prosecute men who violate women in Orange County."

AJ Redkey speaks to Fullerton City Counsel after illegal arrest for video-taping police misconduct

More recently, Tony has been prosecuting videographers exercising their First Amendment right to record police misconduct during Constitutionally-protected public protests .Alan James Redkey was arrested in Pasadena (Los Angeles County, approximately 40 miles from OC) for video-taping a Fullerton protest regarding Tony’s failures in the Kelly Thomas case. Hmmm – personal? Don’t embarrass Tony or shed a light on the real situation by taking pictures of things you have a right to photograph or you too could be arrested.

This time, Tony has a formidable opponent in Greg Diamond, one of the few attorneys in Orange County known for integrity. Greg’s platform is, "Strike Out Corruption."

Attorney Greg Diamond respectfully attempts to educate the party leadership on Roberts Rules of Order

Greg plans to make sure those who belong in jail are prosecuted – instead of those who do not belong in jail. Prosecuting law-breakers (particularly violent criminals), instead of law-abiding-citizens, is a unique solution to lowering the violent crime rate in Orange County. Most Orange County residents would like to see Tony follow this philosophy.

Though chastising Greg for his refusal to be partisan in a non-partisan position, the Democrats have endorsed him.  Still, much of Greg's support against Tony will come from Republicans, particularly those who remember Tony’s firing of now County Supervisor Todd Spitzer.

Tony fired Spitzer after Spitzer made a phone call that Tony apparently feared would uncover a money corruption scandal linked through sex and power to the bedroom of Tony Rackauckas himself. The firing of Todd Spitzer was what exposed the public corruption scandal that led right to Tony's bedroom. Will corruption opponents kick Tony out of office? The election results will be out in less than two weeks.

Orange County Superior Court Judge Derek Johnson
Want to rape someone? If you listen to Orange County Judge Derek Johnson, it’s A-OK.    Johnson’s words:

I'm not a gynecologist, but I can tell you something: If someone doesn't want to have sexual intercourse, the body shuts down. The body will not permit that to happen unless a lot of damage is inflicted, and we heard nothing about that in this case, --- Judge Derek Johnson

The case involved a man who threatened to mutilate the face and genitals of his ex-girlfriend with a heated screwdriver before committing rape, forced oral copulation, and other crimes.

In a rare instance, California’s do-nothing Commission on Judicial Performance, known to overlook most egregious offenses by judges, has found Derek Johnson’s pro-rape comments so out of line that it voted 10-0 to impose a public admonishment upon him, saying his comments were inappropriate and a breach of judicial ethics.

In its December 13, 2012, decision, the commission concluded that Judge Johnson's remarks violated two canons in the code of judicial ethics, because the judge had undermined public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary, and because he had shown bias and prejudice against assault victims who, in effect, have suffered less than having their vaginas "shredded by the rape."

The commission also criticized Judge Johnson for relying on his own opinion about "real rape" requiring resistance and bodily injury, when there was no evidence offered in the trial to support such an opinion.

(Only three years earlier, in another highly-publicized rape case trial in Newport Beach involving a wealthy deputy sheriff's son and two other young men, the jury heard just such testimony from doctors for the defense - "that the only way an erect penis could enter a woman's vagina and rectum was if she consciously agreed to penetration." The penetration in the Haidl case included a Snapple bottle, a cigarette, and a pool cue. The jury rejected the "expert" testimony and found all three young men guilty.)

Judge Derek Johnson’s opponent is Helen Hayden, a Tea Party candidate. Democrats who have never before considered voting for a Tea party candidate are now lining up behind Helen Hayden. At the April meeting of the Democratic Party of Orange County, voting members chose not to endorse Derek Johnson . Though the Democratic Party refused to oppose Johnson, members said they planned to vote for Hayden.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY

Image of the new Parker Center building, headquarters of the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD). Construction on the facility was completed in April 2009.

Los Angeles Superior Court Commissioner Debra Losnick

Commissioner Debra Losnick has a long trail of handing sexually abused kids over to the abuser. She has handed kids to abusers of both sexes – the key appears to be her fondness for molesters.

There is a long list of cases where she was actually reversed due to giving kids to abusive parents. In one case, there reportedly was a video of a son being directed to play with his father’s erect private part 40 times while the boy begged to stop and while the father’s 1 year old daughter looked on. Though Losnick felt forcing oral sex on a boy wasn’t a problem, the court of appeals reversed her in 1996, took the case from her and told Commissioner Losnick that her job was to protect children.

In 2006, another reversal occurred in the case of Los Angeles County Dept. of Children & Family Services v. Superior Court (David P.) (2006)145 Cal.App.4th 692, 51 Cal.Rptr.3d 816, wherein Losnick did not feel there was a problem with an adoptive father sexually abusing his son and so she allowed the alleged child molester back into the home of the boy he had allegedly molested.

These are just two of the many cases wherein Commissioner Losnick, reportedly, has endangered children. One case brought to my attention was one where

Commissioner Losnick apparently knowingly allowed a young boy to be placed with a child molester who forced the boy to repeatedly lick the private part and has reportedly placed kids into situations where alleged schizophrenics are allowed to provide them with visible torture burn marks and into many other dangerous situations according to a document I’ve received. See also, rewowned family law attorney Patricia Barry’s comments regarding Commissioner Losnick. Among her comments is the statement : “Comm’r Losnick is not fit to serve as a judge.

Commissioner Losnick’s opponents include Shannon Knight, a gang homicide prosecutor.

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

Where Tammy Rief was tried in a kangaroo trial

San Diego County District Attorney: Bonnie Dumanis

Bonnie Dumanis has been accused by San Diego residents of selective prosecution and of promoting child abuse.

Recently, she rendited an Alabama single mom so that a Colorado man could grab her child, though he denied being the father and another man reportedly is the father. According to the boy's statements to police and others, the man Dumanis gave the child to allegedly used the kid in Satanic rituals.

The boy said that, in these rituals he was forced to drink blood, was hung by the ankles with ropes and had objects stuck up his rectum. Yes, if you want some single mom’s child, contact Bonnie Dumanis and she can arrange it. Prosecuting unwed mothers and giving away their children seems to be Bonnie's specialty.

She has been accused by people in her office and elsewhere of selective prosecution, ties to baby selling and other practices that pit her against the interests of the people she claims to represent.

According to ex-prosecutor Dave Stutz, those who play along get special dispensation, as did former Sheriff Bill Kolender.

Within 3 hours of making a call to Sycuan to ask about a $25,000 contribution to “Kolender for Sheriff”‘, which would be illegal, I was called into her office and told to stop the investigation. No one knew about my call except Sycuan and myself. Either Kolender or Sycuan called her and she stopped an investigation without knowing what is was about nor did she ask. For the next year Dumanis was led by a leash by Kolender endorsing right wing candidates on a “law and Order” ticket. She has been in their bag since day one

Former prosecutor Terro Wyatt, via the La Jolla Light, talking about the demotions and transfers of police officers who dare to speak up about decisions involving prosecutions, stated:

So the message becomes, just keep your mouth shut, go along with the program,” Wyatt said. “All the lawyers feel that they have to be very careful what they say all the time, and that impacts public safety, because you want deputy district attorneys not worrying about politics. You want them concentrating on prosecuting their cases and doing it in the right way.

In a race with other candidates, voters have a choice. They can go for corruption, satanic rituals and continued prosecution of unwed mothers or they can go for a district attorney who will put the people first and private agendas last.

Conclusion:

Do we really want prosecutors using targeted prosecutions in their quest for money, power and sex? Or are voters finally ready to go out of their comfort zone by voting for somebody new? In the case of most voters, voting is outside the comfort zone. The price for not voting could be oppression, tyranny and loss of rights.

How about judges? Some judges seem to have a fondness for child molesters and pornographers. Are these the people we really want determining the fate of America's children?

Above are just four of the public officials who are serving themselves rather than the public, all while ignoring the Constitution of the United States. There may be other corrupt officials up for election/re-election in your district this year. If you choose to vote, choose wisely or the life and freedom lost could be yours.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LvXUzpYRfVU

---

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

BBC News - 'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists

Vatic Note: If your wondering why this is up,  check out this link and see the connection.  They are collecting our DNA for no reason that is rational, or even within their scope of caring.  Its certainly not to protect us, given what we are learning about the tortured Iraqi's being groomed and used for acts of terror by our government intel agencies. 

I brought that up years ago under Bush when we found out so many of them were innocent.  Then, why are we torturing them?  I asked if it was to build assassins for internal upheavel to prevent the population from unifying which would kick our butts.    So why are they massively collecting DNA from our prisoners?? 

 Read this aticle and maybe we can figure it out.   Saves them from having to do it the hard way.  They can just hardwire in what they need.  I swear, you have to rent the movie "The Soldier" with Kurt Russell.   Its exactly what they did with the second generation soldiers, after doing what we are doing with the first generation soldiers.   It lays out for you what they have planned.  They always tell us in movies, books etc.  Its part of their satanic religion to tell their victims in advance what they plan.  

Just listen to this scientist and see the seriousness and danger of this in the hands of the wrong people.   Remember, he admits he is funded by private foundations and we already know many of those foundations are either controlled, funded or run by various nasty organizations like the Tavistock group,  CIA, Mossad, etc.

My question is how will they do this?  Through those vaccines they talked about that they made mandatory?  If globalized under this new fascist system, we will literally have no say in any of it.

This is truly getting out of hand and out of the realm of reality as we have known it. Watch his video and listen in light of what we already know and you will see it for yourself.  I said a long time ago, they were coming after our DNA and now here it is.  

BBC News - 'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science_and_environment/10132762.stm
By Victoria Gill Science reporter, BBC News
Thursday, 20 May 2010
Provided to vatic by Gypsy, Australia

The synthetic cell looks identical to the 'wild type' Scientists in the US have succeeded in developing the first living cell to be controlled entirely by synthetic DNA.

The researchers constructed a bacterium's "genetic software" and transplanted it into a host cell. The resulting microbe then looked and behaved like the species "dictated" by the synthetic DNA.

The advance, published in Science, has been hailed as a scientific landmark, but critics say there are dangers posed by synthetic organisms.

Some also suggest that the potential benefits of the technology have been over-stated.

But the researchers hope eventually to design bacterial cells that will produce medicines and fuels and even absorb greenhouse gases.

The team was led by Dr Craig Venter of the J Craig Venter Institute (JCVI) in Maryland and California.

Craig Venter defends the synthetic living cell
BBC Media Player      

BBC Media Player v.2.18.13034.142078696148 vp6 AK 3.5 (1) 512x288
(if this does not show as a video, please go to live link above to the article and play this video.  It will show his total lack of understanding of what he is doing or his deflection while knowing what he is doing, we are not sure which,  remember, those that fund these things control how its used, not the scientist who created it.)
 
He and his colleagues had previously made a synthetic bacterial genome, and transplanted the genome of one bacterium into another.

Now, the scientists have put both methods together, to create what they call a "synthetic cell", although only its genome is truly synthetic.

Dr Venter likened the advance to making new software for the cell.

The researchers copied an existing bacterial genome. They sequenced its genetic code and then used "synthesis machines" to chemically construct a copy.

How a synthetic cell was created

The scientists "decoded" the chromosome of an existing bacterial cell - using a computer to read each of the letters of genetic code.

They copied this code and chemically constructed a new synthetic chromosome, piecing together blocks of DNA.

The team inserted this chromosome into a bacterial cell which replicated itself. Synthetic bacteria might be used to make new fuels and drugs.

Dr Venter told BBC News: "We've now been able to take our synthetic chromosome and transplant it into a recipient cell - a different organism.

"As soon as this new software goes into the cell, the cell reads [it] and converts into the species specified in that genetic code."

The new bacteria replicated over a billion times, producing copies that contained and were controlled by the constructed, synthetic DNA.

"This is the first time any synthetic DNA has been in complete control of a cell," said Dr Venter. (VN: Oh, my Gawd, that is a scary thought since its within the cells that "consciousness" exists)

'New industrial revolution'

Dr Venter and his colleagues hope eventually to design and build new bacteria that will perform useful functions.

"I think they're going to potentially create a new industrial revolution," he said.

"If we can really get cells to do the production that we want, they could help wean us off oil and reverse some of the damage to the environment by capturing carbon dioxide."

WATTS WHAT...

Continue reading the main story Even some scientists worry we lack the means to weigh up the risks such novel organisms might represent, once set loose

Susan Watts BBC Newsnight Read Susan Watts's thoughts Analysis from around the world Send us your comments

Dr Venter and his colleagues are already collaborating with pharmaceutical and fuel companies ( VN: the two worst offenders owned by the international bankers who have killed more people and animals with their products and false flags (oil blow and tainted vaccines & drugs,  than the combined wars we are in) to design and develop chromosomes for bacteria that would produce useful fuels and new vaccines.

But critics say that the potential benefits of synthetic organisms have been overstated.

Dr Helen Wallace from Genewatch UK, an organisation that monitors developments in genetic technologies, told BBC News that synthetic bacteria could be dangerous.

"If you release new organisms into the environment, you can do more harm than good," she said.
"By releasing them into areas of pollution, [with the aim of cleaning it up], you're actually releasing a new kind of pollution.

(VN:  my emphasis in the bold of this comment he made below, we don't know how these organisms will behave in the human body either or on our DNA or our brain or our consciousness, especially in the hands of the satanists running our globe.)

"We don't know how these organisms will behave in the environment."

The risks are unparalleled, we need safety evaluation for this kind of radical research and protections from military or terrorist misuse

Julian Savulescu Oxford University ethics professor Profile: Craig Venter Q&A: The meaning of synthetic life Ethics concern over synthetic cell

Dr Wallace accused Dr Venter of playing down the potential drawbacks.

"He isn't God," she said, "he's actually being very human; trying to get money invested in his technology and avoid regulation that would restrict its use."

But Dr Venter said that he was "driving the discussions" about the regulations governing this relatively new scientific field and about the ethical implications of the work.

He said: "In 2003, when we made the first synthetic virus, it underwent an extensive ethical review that went all the way up to the level of the White House.

"And there have been extensive reviews including from the National Academy of Sciences, which has done a comprehensive report on this new field.

"We think these are important issues and we urge continued discussion that we want to take part in."

Ethical discussions

Dr Gos Micklem, a geneticist from the University of Cambridge, said that the advance was "undoubtedly a landmark" study.

But, he said, "there is already a wealth of simple, cheap, powerful and mature techniques for genetically engineering a range of organisms. Therefore, for the time being, this approach is unlikely to supplant existing methods for genetic engineering".

The ethical discussions surrounding the creation of synthetic or artificial life are set to continue.

Professor Julian Savulescu, from the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics at the University of Oxford, said the potential of this science was "in the far future, but real and significant".

"But the risks are also unparalleled," he continued. "We need new standards of safety evaluation for this kind of radical research and protections from military or terrorist misuse and abuse.

"These could be used in the future to make the most powerful bioweapons imaginable. The challenge is to eat the fruit without the worm."

The advance did not pose a danger in the form of bio-terrorism, Dr Venter said.

"That was reviewed extensively in the US in a report from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and a Washington defence think tank, indicating that there were very small new dangers from this.

"Most people are in agreement that there is a slight increase in the potential for harm. But there's an exponential increase in the potential benefit to society," he told BBC's Newsnight.

"The flu vaccine you'll get next year could be developed by these processes," he added

---

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Israel Faces Child-Abuse Claims (Sexual)

Vatic Note:  This speaks for itself, ONE CAN SEE WHAT WE CAN EXPECT IF TOTAL CONTROL IS GIVEN TO THESE KHAZARS AND THE IMPACT ON OUR CHILDREN.  

Just a reminder about the blogs we have put up here about satanism and the use of pedophilia to split the mind of the child for mind control purposes, is what underlies these acts rather than sexual, althought there could be some of that involved given the fact that the Illuminati families literally do this to thier own children, so its possible there are multiple agendas for it.   

A child once pedophiled will generally become an abuser of children when he/she becomes an adult.   Below Israel says they are treating the child prisoners in compliant with international standards, but then they have ignored most international laws on almost every other area of being a good neighbor in an international setting.  

So who knows and with it being military tribunals instead of transparency in civil court, we can only imagine the worst since we have lost all trust in their word which is good for nothing.  

They are Khazar Satanists and the Babylonian Talmud they use for their laws says they are forgiven in advance for lying to goyims since goyims are simply cattle.  Remember, they are not Jewish, they are khazars and hate the Jews as much as they hate Christians and Muslims.

My final observation on this is "Where is justice and fairness in this Israeli system?"   If this is an example of new International law that we will experience under the NWO,  then I want no part of it.   These people who do this to little children are animals and no more than that.  

Israel Faces Child-Abuse Claims (Sexual)
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2010/05/201053082239109343.html

An international children's rights charity has said it has evidence that Palestinian children held in Israeli custody have been subjected to sexual abuse in an effort to extract confessions from them.

The Geneva-based Defence for Children International (DCI) has collected 100 sworn affadavits from Palestinian children who said they were mistreated by their Israeli captors.

Fourteen of the statements say they were sexually abused or threatened with sexual assault to pressure them into confessions.

Al Jazeera's correspondent in the West Bank, Nour Odeh, met one of the children, identified only as "N", who said he suffered sexual abuse at the hands of his interrogators.

Dismissive attitude

DCI officials say that when they complain to the Israeli military about the treatment of the children, their allegations are dismissed as untrue.

Now the organisation has submitted its evidence to the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture to try and increase pressure on Israel to stamp out the alleged abuse.

According to our correspondent, Israel has two sets of laws: one for its citizens and another for Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza.

All Palestinians, minors and adults, are tried in military courts.  Children between the ages of 12 and 16 are tried in Israeli military courts as children.  From 16 years onwards, Palestinians are tried as adults.

Human-rights groups have criticised Israel's detention policy with regard to children, which denies them access to their families or lawyers during the detention process.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=gKuqGOiBQIE

Palestinian children arrested by Israel are not permitted to see their lawyers until they are in court.

There are currently 340 Palestinian children in Israeli jails, mostly convicted of throwing stones.

An Israeli military order stipulates that stone throwing carries a maximum jail sentence of 20 years, and there is no appeals process for decisions by Israeli military courts.

Israeli reaction

The Israeli military, in a written response, rejected DCI's allegations, saying the detention of minors is consistent with international law.

It said all court hearings involving minors in the West Bank were conducted before a special military court which specialises in dealing with issues pertaining to minors.

"Allegations regarding violence in the course of questioning should be raised during the trial or in a formal complaint," the military said.

"Regarding the presence of a lawyer during questioning of a minor, the Youth Law does not require such a presence, even within the state of Israel."

Bana Shoughry-Badarne, head of the legal department at the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel, an Israeli human-rights group, says there is a huge issue of impunity in Israel with regard to complaints against the security services.

"Our latest report, from 2009, shows that from the 600 complaints that were submitted to Israel's attorney-general, all of them were dismissed," she told Al Jazeera from Jerusalem.

"There was not even one criminal investigation."

---

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.