*** Well I put up a very extensive Vatic Note analysis on this one and just discovered they have gutted it along with some other elements we had up here. I am going to have to reconstruct the Vatic Note, and that will take some time.... so please bear with us as we redo the whole thing.
It may not get up until tomorrow sometime, so check back since we covered the illegality of what has happened with NSA and our government in general. It is illegal, according to the Constitution, to have these foreign occupiers controlling our government when they have a conflict of interest based on their conflicted citizenship as dual Israeli citizens and I went into that in depth, showing the cost to the USA of their treason, or is it treason if you are a dual citizen? I also pointed out that was why congress did not vote on their appointment, rather they were hired on as Czars. Its still illegal.
You get the drift.....so it will be worth the revisit. Thank you for your patience and they also gutted my fundraising appeal. We hope this won't deter you from donating. They may have found a way to finally shut us up. Without the donations we are toast. Thanks for your patience.
Vatic Note: Have we merged with Israel? Its beginning to not only sound like it, but it looks like it as well.
NSA, Sexual Politics, and Intellectual Whores
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/12/09/nsa-sexual-politics-and-intellectual-whores/
by Jonas E. Alexis, Veterans Today
Facts are still piling up against the Israeli-run NSA. The Washington Post finally came out and admitted a few days ago that the NSA is not just monitoring the major countries around the world, but is “tracking cell phone locations worldwide.”[2]
The
New York Times, the
Los Angeles Times, and other news outlets reported the same thing.
[3] The
Los Angeles Times said:
“Well, whaddaya know: ‘NSA [is] tracking cell phone locations worldwide…”[4]
The agency actually tracks the location of almost 5 billion cell phones every single day overseas.
[5] The
New York Times went so far as to say that nearly all the major online communications companies are under the supervision of the NSA.
[6] Forbes has declared that the NSA literally damaged over 50,000 computer networks with malware already.
[7]
How long has this program been monitoring Americans? Since the Bush aministration. In fact, the
New York Times was going to break that story back in 2005, but the administration told them not to publish anything relating to the NSA.
[8]
But what if you live in the jungle? It doesn’t matter. As long as you
have a cell phone, the NSA still can track you down. What if you live
in places like Australia, Canada, or even in a small country with more
sheep than people such as New Zealand?
[9] Still, the NSA has enough spy agencies and technological advantage in those countries to know your whereabouts.
[10]
“Analysts can find cell-phones anywhere in the world, retrace their
movements and expose hidden relationships among the people using them.”[11]
The agency also has the ability to know whether Muslim radicals are having sex or watching pornography.
[12] In fact, preying on human weaknesses has been a central goal of the Israeli Mossad.
[13] Sex, in that context, inexorably plays a major role.
[14]
But this was not the first time the political process used sex as a weapon.
[15] And to do justice to the issue here, we must go back to the French Revolution (which was essentially Masonic in ideology).
[16] Then we will see how sexual politics and revolutionary or covert activity go hand and hand.
—————————————-
Friedrich Nietzsche
Leading Enlightenment figures such as Diderot provided
“philosophical” justifications for sexual liberation in
eighteenth-century France,
[17] and those justifications largely became the
weltanschauung of that entire culture.
[18]
When sexual liberation is supreme, genuine love between man and woman
is out of the equation, and sexual lust, unbridled passion, and
uncontrolled promiscuity take over.
As an alternative to Western monogamy—and for Diderot monogamy was
clearly imbedded in Christianity—Diderot presented Tahiti’s sexual
mores, where permanent fidelity was a relic of the past.
“Tahitian marriage consists only of ‘a mutual consent to live in the
same hut and to share the same bed, for as long as we find it good to do
so.’ Thus, as soon as spouses grow bored of each other, they simply
separate amicably, pursuing new sexual liaisons…With no expectations to
fidelity, Tahitians happily pursue numerous sexual relationships.”
[19]
Tahitians
“welcome not only fornication and adultery but also incest.”[20] For Diderot, Tahiti was a utopian sexual paradise. But according to Scholar Sharon A. Stanley, Tahiti
“...utterly fails to live up to these expectations. We find shame,
guilt, envy, secrecy, and deceit on Tahiti, just as in Europe. We find
lawbreakers and miserable Tahitians who struggle to suppress their
sexual desires. We also find…undesirable things…disease, war, hunger,
and slavery.”
[21]
Diderot could not solve the sexual calculus without appealing to
sexual liberation, which includes things like incest. Marquis de Sade
understood people like Diderot very well and read their works avidly.
Sade took off where Diderot left off. But Sade’s sexual ideology lay
dormant for centuries until other philosophers began to articulate
similar principles.
At the end of the nineteenth century, Friedrich Nietzsche captured
that Enlightenment principle and spiced things up a little by calling on
a
transvaluation of all values—be they sexual, political, or
intellectual—at all cost. Nietzsche was not simply positing those sexual
claims. He got syphilis because of his own sexual liberation.
Nietzsche, like Diderot before him, thought that Christianity largely
holds the West together and if sexual liberation is to take place, then
Christian morals with respect to sexuality has to go. As he put it,
“the fight against Christianity is merely a special case.”[22] Nietzsche elaborated further:
D. H. Lawrence
“This eternal accusation against Christianity I shall write upon all
walls, wherever walls are to be found…I call Christianity the one great
curse, the one great intrinsic depravity, the one great instinct of
revenge, for which no means are venomous enough, or secret, subterranean
and small enough—I call [it] the one immoral blemish upon the human
race…
“And mankind reckons time from the [evil day] when this fatality
befell—from the first day of Christianity!—Why not rather from its
last?—From today?—The transvaluation of all values.”[23]
Nietzsche, an original astute philologist and metaphysician who was
well versed in pagan Greek cults and who later had a strong and abiding
influence in writers such as D. H. Lawrence, wrote in
The Birth of Tragedy:
“Almost everywhere an excess of sexual indiscipline, which flooded in
waves over all family life and its vulnerable statutes, lay at the
heart of such [Dionysian] festivals. Here the very wildest of nature’s
beats were unleashed, up to an including that repulsive mixture of
sensuality and cruelty which has always struck me as the true ‘witches’
brew’.”[24]
Here Nietzsche aspired that Western culture would return to the
Dionysian cult with all its sexual burst unbridled passion. Lawrence was
right in line with Nietzsche when he said,
“We are tempted, like
Nietzsche, to return to the old pagan Infinite.”[25]
————————————————–
Anton Lavey
Years after Nietzsche,
Jewish cultist Antorn Lavey made it quite clear:
“Free love, in the Satanic concept, means exactly that—freedom…to
indulge your sexual desires with as many others as you feel is necessary
to satisfy your particular needs.
Therefore, the most simplified description of the Satanic belief is: Indulgence instead of abstinence.”[26]
In short, sexual liberation and Enlightenment doctrines were two
sides of the same coin. Scholar Caroline Weber, who reviews Michel
Delon’s new book
The Libertine: The Art of Love in Eighteenth-Century France, puts it this way:
“According to the playwright Pierre de Marivaux, ‘one still said to a
woman: ‘I love you,’ but this was a polite way of saying: ‘I desire
you…’ [This] infused every genre from fiction to poetry, theater to
philosophy, memoir to popular song (all well represented in short,
artfully selected excerpts). It also preoccupied Frenchmen and women
from every walk of life…”[27]
Libertine culture simply means
“the sexually free behavior and norms
of upper-class men, and in particular, of the French aristocracy during
the decline of the ancient regime, as well as the writing which
celebrates it—namely the erotic novels of Crebillon fils, Duclos,
Diderot, Prevost and Laclos, and the obscene philosophical writing of de
Sade and others.”[28]
This libertinage, argue two scholars, became the
“dissident freedoms of everyday life” in France.
[29]
The same scholars agree that
“sexual behavior, and writing about sexual
behavior, came to have philosophical, political and cultural context.
These contexts ranged beyond rarefied courtly cultures to the newer
print communities that thrived upon the dissemination of politicized
forms of sexual gossip, pornography, and scandal.”[30]
What Weber didn’t mention was that leading Enlightenment writers such as Voltaire, Diderot and others, were Freemasons.
[31] Rousseau himself was certainly aware of Freemasons and Rosicrucians in one of his essays.
[32]
Keep also in mind that both Freemasonry and the Illuminati came into
existence long before the French Revolution, and the Illuminati in
particular operated under the banner or pretension of materialism and
atheism,
[33] though it was essentially Jewish.
Like Marquis de Sade, Adam Weishaupt, who founded the Illuminati, was
heavily influenced by Enlightenment writers such as d’Holbach,
Helvitius, Jean-Baptiste Robinet, etc.
[34] Those writers had an enormous influence in other places such as Germany “in the pre-1789 period.”
[35]
————————————————–
Many scholars do not want to fully address the sexual component of the leading writers of Enlightenment for political reasons.
For example, Peter Cryle and Lisa O’Connell, while making important
contribution to eighteen-century France, declare that “libertinism, as a
form of sexuality associated with free-thinking, is constitutionally
insubstantial. It is not what enlightened philosophers would have called
a ‘clear and distinct idea.’ Theirs was the anti-dogma of
inconsistency, understood as freedom from preconceived ideas and
emotional attachment.”
[36]
Perhaps it is time for both scholars to reread Sade’s
Philosophy in the Bedroom and 120 Days of Sodom again.
If Cryle and O’Connell misread the Enlightenment era—at least in this
instance—Michel Foucault philosophically and practically did not.
Foucault saw himself and others
“as beings who are historically
determined, to a certain extent, by the Enlightenment.”[37]
But Foucault ended up proving that you simply cannot embrace sexual
liberation without political and intellectual consequences. In 1983,
“after he had already collapsed and less than a
year before his own death, [Foucault] could still be found in the baths
and bars. He laughed and talked of ‘safe sex’ and reportedly said, ‘To
die for the love of boys: What could be more beautiful?’”[38]
Foucault, after many years of teaching and practicing sexual liberation, died of AIDS in 1984.
—————————————————-
Yet
no one would have believed that the sexual economy of the
Enlightenment, which can easily be traced back to the disputatious
thesis of Freemasonry and the Illuminati, would revive once again in our
modern age in different languages and contexts, most particularly in
the modern music industry.
[39]
It certainly was quite a surprise for some when the British newspaper the
Daily Mail
mentioned people like Jimmy Page of Led Zeppelin, Jay Z, among others,
as part of the OTO, which is Crowleyan, which is Masonic, and which is
essentially Jewish.
[40]
Moreover, no one would have believed that Wilhelm Reich’s sexual
principles would make a great surge in the music industry. Reich
postulated that
“Sexual potency and physical vigor and beauty must become the permanent ideals of the revolutionary freedom movement.”
Right was right. Robin Thicke, who simulated sex with Miley Cyrus on
stage, sounded like Marquis de Sade and Wilhelm Reich and Anton Lavey
and Aleister Crowley when he said:
“We tried to do everything that was taboo. Bestiality, drug
injections, and everything that is completely derogatory towards women.”[41]
The prodigious and erudite scholar Hugh B. Urban of Ohio State University would certainly equate that with sex magic.
[42] Thicke continued,
“People say, ‘Hey, do you think this is degrading
to women?’ I’m like, ‘Of course it is. What a pleasure it is to degrade
a woman. I’ve never gotten to do that before.”[43]
Whether he likes it or not, Thicke was fulfilling one of Crowley’s sexual principles, which he articulated in
The Book of the Law:
Aleister Crowley
“Take your fill and will of love as ye will, when, where, and with whom ye will!"
“Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.
“Thou hast no right but to do thy will. Do that, and no other shall say nay.”[44]
Myley Cyrus, the seemingly innocent Hannah Montana girl who started
her career at a very young age, has now turned into what Sade would have
called a sexual machine pimping the system, pornifying young people and
corrupting or destroying real intimacy.
[45]
“Pop music is intimately with the pornography industry as today’s pop
stars embrace and exalt the joys of porn. Eminem, Kid Rock, Blink 182,
Metallica, Everclear, and Bon Jovi have all featured porn performers in
their music videos.
“Trying to keep up, Britney Spears, Lil’ Kim, and Christina Aguilera
emulate porn star moves in their videos and live concerts. Pornography
has not only seeped into televised music videos; musicians have crossed
over into the adult film industry.”[46]
Obviously Cyrus is responsible for her actions, but the forces behind her sexual imagery are none other than
Jewish (VN: Khazar Zionist) handlers:
“Miley is simply one in a long chain of good Christian girls turned
bad. Hollywood needs to turn a good girl bad every three or four years.
It is part of the system of corruption and control that Hollywood has
created to keep us all in line."
“The
Corriere places Miley in a list of Selena Gomez, Lindsay
Lohan, Brittney Spears, Christina Aguilera and Rihanna, all good girls
gone bad. The
Corriere did not note that these stars, in turn, by
internalizing the commands of their oppressors, help their masters to
corrupt large segments of the populatiuon. And Miley seems to be aware
of this much. As she said in her interview with
Hunger Magazine,
“‘With magazines, with movies, it’s always weird when things are
targeted for young people yet they’re driven by people that are like 40
years too old. It can’t be like this 70-year-old Jewish man that doesn’t
leave his desk all day, telling me what the clubs want to hear. I’m
going out. I know what they want to hear.’
In the interview, Miley describes her relationships with the various
Jewish handlers that have helped her along in her career. And, from the
statement quoted in the
Corriere, she has clearly internalized their commands.
“Now, she can promote their agenda without them appearing to have an
influence. And, she can, just as they do, claim that it is simply about
money.”[47]
————————————————–
Now it is time to return to the sexual politics of the Mossad.
Throughout the late 1960s, Israeli officials quickly discovered that
sex could be used as a form of control in the political war. For
example, chief Israeli intelligence Meir Amit, who participated in the
1967 war, “pioneered the use of female agents, the ‘honey trap’” in
order to politically disarmed enemies or perceived enemies.
[48]
Mit put it quite bluntly that the “honey trap” was another weapon. A woman has skills a man simply does not. She
knows how to listen. Pillow talk is not a problem for her. The history
of modern intelligence is filled with accounts of women who have used
their sex for the good of their country. To say that Israel has not done
the same would be foolish…
“It is not so much a question of sleeping with someone. It is to lead
a man to believe you will do so in return for what he has to tell you.”[49]
Last year, one Mossad agent by the name of Yael, which could be a
pseudonym, declared that women have “advantage” over men in many
branches in the Mossad because
“A man who wants to gain access to a
forbidden area has less chance of being allowed in… A smiling woman has a
bigger chance of success.”[50]
Efrat, “the most senior female operational commander in the Mossad”
pronounced: “We use our femininity because any means is valid.”
[51]
Efrat added that the agent would not allow them to sleep with an
enemy, but Rabbi Yediot Aharonot argued that it is legitimate to sleep
even with terrorists “in order to obtain information leading to their
arrest.”
[52]
