Does America Have a Right to Exist?

Vatic Note:   There is no doubt, after reading these stats, that we are on the wrong road.  Illegals are also easier to handle and manage compared to Americans.  They are so grateful for the dramatic uplift in their financial situation that they would make "no waves" on anything the cabal would try to do to take control of this nation and the globe as a matter of fact.

They have a history of that compliance for years, as Mexico has proven.  Did you know that Wal Mart in Mexido, does not pay their baggers?  They get paid by the people they bag for, through tips.  I almost croaked when I found that out.  

So, I went to Wal Marts Board of directors and guess what I found? A Rothschild sits on that board.  You can check it out for yourselves.  Its a cheaper and more effective way for the ptb to gain compliance and lower resistance to their take over grab. That does not include their agenda to dilute the blood lines as well.

Does America Have a Right to Exist?
http://henrymakow.com/2016/03/does-america-have-a-right.html

by Andrew Smith (henrymakow.com), March 13, 2016

(Israel border fence)

Isn't it inconsistent and even bizarre so many Democrats call Trump a NAZI 

for proposing the same thing Bibi's doing in Israel at this very minute?  

America has already taken in 1/4 of Mexico's entire population.

Surely Israel has a right to exist. If so, why wouldn't America have the same national right? 

Even if you favor boycotting, divesting and sanctioning Israel, you have to respect Benjamin Netanyahu for defending his country's interests. Bibi took heat for his recent decisions to restrict illegal immigration to Israel.  Israel built fences. They are still building them. And they work.

When illegal Africans or Arabs enter, they are quickly arrested and placed on the next bus or plane to their country of origin.

What if the country of origin is completely NO GO? In that case, Israel keeps illegals in crowded detention facilities with really bad food. When bleeding hearts complain, Bibi shrugs his shoulders and says ISRAEL HAS A RIGHT TO EXIST. His logic is flawless. Immigrants from Syria, Somalia or Libya could be dangerous terrorists. But even if they are truly desperate refugees, Bibi explains they cannot remain in Israel BECAUSE their foreign presence would alter the demographic and ethnic character of Israel.

Last September, Netanyahu announced construction of new fence along Israel's border with Jordan after international calls form UN and Jordan for Israel to take Syrian refugees too. Syria, Turkey, Iraq and EU have taken them. But when he said NO, we heard no sentimental apologies from Bibi. He countered that he would not allow Israel to be "submerged by a wave of illegal migrants and terrorist activists".

"Israel is not indifferent to the human tragedy of Syrian and African refugees... [] Yet we must control our borders".

 But if Obama were Prime Minister of Israel instead of putting illegal on busses away, he would provide bus service to Israel. And he would give children free education and give all immigrants to Israel welfare support. Obviously Israel would be subverted nationally and corrupted ethnically and drowned in debt. Why is it OK for Israel to survive as a nation, but not America.

In this connection, isn't it inconsistent and even bizarre so many Democrats call Trump a NAZI for proposing the same thing Bibi's doing in Israel at this very minute? 

Actually Bibi acted more like a NAZI when he ordered the unmerciful artillery destruction of Gaza in August 2014 where Israel killed over 2000 and maimed another 10,000 Palestinians. Sort of reminiscent of 1943 NAZI artillery bombardment of the Jewish Warsaw Ghettos. So how can Hillary Clinton's MoveOn.org PAC organize the Chicago riots that closed the Donald Trump Rally Friday, March 11, 2016 like NAZI troopers, whileTrump can't propose building a fence along America's southern border without being labeled a NAZI?

Initially cautious about Donald Trumps' candidacy, I viewed his surging popularity with disbelief. How could New York Billionaire, REAL ESTATE TYCOON, Reality TV Host, but political outsider virtually overnight capture first place Republican Party FRONTRUNNER?

I was clueless until a close friend explained IT'S THE IMMIGRATION ISSUE. He proceeded to tell me why everyone was getting behind Trump 's candidacy. He was Jewish Democrat but he urged me to read Ann Coulter's ADIOS AMERICA. I didn't like her when Mass Media allowed her on TV programming as TALKING HEAD. Hate her abrasive style, so I would never have read her book until I realize that Trump was surging ahead primarily upon his proposal to build a fence on our southern border. So I got her book and read it.

ADIOS AMERICA's main points:

-- With no welfare state to support them, about a third of pre-1965 immigrants returned to the places they came from. British and Jewish immigrants were the least likely to go home -- less than 10 percent did. That all changed in 1965 when Democrats held Super Majorities in House and Senate.

-- Teddy Kennedy's 1965 Immigration Act cut caucasian and European quotas in favor of AFRICAN, ASIAN, LATIN AMERICAN more primitive people. It was expressly designed to change America's demographics to be poorer, stupider and more inclined to vote Democratic. (It worked! Post 1970 immigrants vote 80% Democratic.) Citing this dramatic shift in the Democratic Party's fortunes, Democratic consultant Patrick Reddy called the 1965 Immigration Act "the Kennedy family's greatest gift to the Democratic Party."

-- Immigrants admitted before 1970 made more money, bought more houses and were more educated than Americans. HOWEVER post-1975 Kennedy immigrants are astronomically less-educated, poorer and more likely to go immediately on welfare than Americans.

-- Mass Media makes US citizenship ANCHOR BABY birth right sound like an express US Constitutional privilege. IT'S NOT! Anchor babies are "citizens" only because of a phony constitutional principle cooked up by Justice William Brennan in 1982 decision. Just like constitutional rights for abortion, sodomy, gay marriage, and unicorns--it's NOT WRITTEN in the Constitution! If Americans want to be so generous as to provide for millions upon millions of illegal aliens, they ought to at least be asked. Instead, American taxpayers are forced to support foreign born poor through BOGUS legal fictions AND ARE CALLED RACISTS IF THEY ASK ANY QUESTIONS.

-- Although America is admitting more immigrants, they are coming from fewer countries than they did before 1970. On liberals' own terms, the country is becoming less "diverse," but a lot poorer and a lot more Latin.

-- America HAS ALREADY TAKEN IN 1/4 of Mexico's entire population.

-- In 1970, there were almost no Nigerian immigrants in the United States. Our country is now home to more Nigerians than any country in the world except Nigeria.

-- America takes more immigrants from Nigeria than from England.

-- The government refuses to tell us how many prisoners in the United States are immigrants. That information is not officially available. But CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE suggests the number is astronomical.

-- And last but not least important WHY CAN AMERICA'S IMMIGRATION POLICIES BE LIKE ISRAEL'S?

There are more foreign inmates in New York state prisons from Mexico than from the entire continent of Europe.

-- Hispanics are less likely to be in the military than either whites or blacks, and a majority of Hispanic troops are women. On the other hand, Hispanics are overrepresented in U.S. Prisons.

-- In Denmark, actual Danes come in tenth in criminals' nationality, after Moroccans, Lebanese, Yugoslavians, Somalis, Iranians, Pakistanis, Turks, Iraqis and Vietnamese.

-- At least 15 percent of all births in Peru and Argentina are to girls between the ages of 10 and 15. In the U.S., only 2 percent of births are to girls that young, and those are mostly Hispanics, who are seven times more likely to give birth at that age than white girls are.

-- Sex with girls as young as 12 years old is legal in 31 of the 32 states of Mexico.

Does America have a right to exist? 

----

Makow comment- Westerners are just now awaking to the fact they are under racial attack by the Illuminati Jewish (VN: khazar....) bankers and their political and media lackeys. At this rate, whites will be a minority in the West; they are already a minority in corporate advertising. Do you see Japanese or Chinese or Indians or Mexicans or Iranians or South Africans becoming a minority in their countries? Why do the Masonic Jewish bankers target European-origin counties only?  Because they are shifting their focus from colonizing and oppressing the Third World to colonizing and oppressing the West. 

I am an immigrant and am not against a reasonable level of legal immigration reflecting the founding racial/cultural character of a nation along with minorities. Minorities often enrich a country. I am against Masonic jewish bankers using migrants as a weapon to subjugate a nation. 

-----

First Comment from Dan:

Advocates for mass-migration are using skewed financial claims to smear Donald Trump's popular border proposals, which actually would help revive the near-bankrupt Social Security and Medicare programs.

For every illegal migrant household that leaves the United States under Trump's plan, Americans would recoup nearly three-quarters of a million dollars ($719,350), according to 2010 data collected by Heritage scholar Robert Rector.

The lifetime savings accrued from one deported illegal household would provide funds for 125 low-income inner city students to receive the maximum Pell Grant award in 2015-2016 ($5,775); it could cover the cost of pre-kindergarten for 90 at-risk children (around $8,000 per child); or it could cover the one year cost of Medicaid for 124 enrollees ($5,790 based on FY2011 data).

Every Deported Illegal Household Saves Taxpayers $700K

- See more at: http://henrymakow.com/2016/03/does-america-have-a-right.html#sthash.NmuUlja6.dpuf

---

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.