Vatic Note: Has mind control been going on a lot longer than MKULTRA? If so, how did it happen and can it be done today by others without MKULTRA involved? Good Questions and a very interesting answer lies within this article and probably a lot of other writings we have not been exposed to. This surprised me about Emily Dickinson, but once I reread her poety in light of this information.... this makes perfect sense. So how far back does it go?
Well this author tries to give us a sense of just how far back "brainwashing" goes, since that is what its been called prior to mind control. After this blog, I intend to put up a blog on how to break mind control in victims or how to protect from any brainwashing that Haarp, or the digital TV may be trying to do. It was an interesting way to block those attempts that we can do ourselves in our own homes. Just another nail in the evil ones agenda, and as many as we can insert, is to our advantage.
I hope this series has been beneficial, as it certainly has to me. I am now able to tell when something, or someone is trying to get into my mind, instead of just my blog. I have figure a way to thwart it, and it usually works. But it did take some experimenting and learning before I found a system that seemed to work. I now understand why they had to do GITMO, since being in your own home environment is a handicap for the mind control manipulator.
Once you know its going on you can tell how you think is different than your normal way of thinking and seeing. AT that point you can address it directly and make it stop, there is no such ability when you are in a controlled physical environment such as GITMO, I now call it the manufacturing plant for Assassins.
Alice In Wonderland - An historical Perspective, pre MKULTRA - Part 3 of 3
by Tim Baber, Bibliotecapleyades
Thus far we have followed a paper and celluloid trail of the use of mind
control techniques that can all too easily affect our children.
The
possibility exists that these techniques, discovered by the CIA in Operation
Often, were well used many, many years earlier. Assuming similarities will
have persisted over time perhaps we should investigate the past some more,
before the appearance of Lewis Carroll and the CIA.
The library of Nazareth College (yes, the one with its tunnel system) came
to your editors attention just for the book on its fully indexed catalogue,
"Emily Dickinson, Monarch of Perception" (2000), by
Domhnall Mitchell.
Not
having the book to hand a poem by Emily was consulted at random, given the
name of the first line.
"He fumbles at your spirit".
Most of her poems are
untitled, their themes and contexts tantalizingly doubly obscure.
Emily's poem goes:
He fumbles at your spirit
As players at the keys
Before they drop full music on;
He stuns you by degrees,
Prepares your brittle substance
For the ethereal blow,
By fainter hammers, further heard,
Then nearer, then so slow
Your breath has time to straighten,
Your brain to bubble cool,--
Deals one imperial thunderbolt
That scalps your naked soul.
Now, what I know about literary criticism could just about fill an empty
glass, and be just as useful, but this screams at you if you know about
Monarch programming of a tortured soul who has had some sort of "Imperial
conditioning".
Even children's cartoons (in another contemporary context)
use for their triggers apparently the motif of a large if silent hammer.
Even the word Imperial is used, the "Marionette Syndrome" is there for
anyone to see if they know what to look for. A psychologist, no doubt
unaware of Monarch-type programming, offers the suggestion she is simply
depressed! Other critics think only of God as the subject of these lines.
But this is someone who died in 1886!
Before the CIA trawl for methods of
mind control could be put into action. So let us (briefly) look at Emily's
biography in case she qualifies as a candidate for mental interference.
Today, as she is surrounded by rumor and legend you are best left to
discover for yourself her story and see what fits. Nevertheless, a minute or
two on the internet reveals that Emily was born in 1830 in New England, USA.
Given a progressive and challenging non-conformist education, she was given
access to eminent speakers and thinkers of the day; especially in the
Church, the law and the media (and vice versa). At 17 years she suddenly
left her female seminary and stayed for most of her life a recluse at her
parental home. Her surviving letters include many to an unidentified
'Master' who is addressed in a tone of intense and often masochistic
devotion.
Nothing was published in her lifetime, many poems were found
hidden - even sewn into her clothing, not even discovered until after her
death. Her letters and poems are famous for their tortured originality. It
was as if she was programmed but the programmer never followed through.
One biographer suggests her poetry was one,
"of supposed persons, of
multiple, imaginative identities..."
I do not know yet if the rumor and
legend surrounding her, which I have not the time to pursue just now,
entertains the possibility she was a victim of pre-CIA esoteric
traumatization at an early age.
This may be an original perspective in her
regard worth pursuing for it's own sake never mind for the sake of trawling
for any forensic clues.
So, remembering the early pre-Project Monarch case of Emily Dickinson, is
Multiple Personality Disorder (or Dissociative Identity Disorder) a reality,
a deliberately created state, to split and control the mind, or is it an
accident, an illness. In other words is it a false state of mind where the
abuse never happened?
Certainly there are organizations like the Landmark
Forum who seek to tell people their memories are a "racket" and their
memories of for example child abuse should be treated as steering them
falsely in their future lives.
Founder Werner Erhardt claims it is possible
to peel back the layers and start again (in a television documentary). I
call that brainwashing, he says "so what"? The history of his movement
repays close scrutiny for it's origins in the intelligence community.
And if brainwashing has, in my lifetime, been created with military
ruthlessness, why not before CIA involvement by adepts and sages for their,
or even perhaps Arts sake? A distinction may be that here Emily's supposed
programmers were not so systematic in destroying everything of beauty and
value in life.
Perhaps if she had not become a recluse and poured forth her
frustrations in poetry she would have been betrayed further?
Today it seems the intention stops , maybe, at the production and
distribution of porn and drugs and blackmail. The intelligence role seems to
have been subverted along the way if the claims made in part 1 are true.
The
victims are insensible of their fate by being "over the rainbow" thanks to
the programming if it uses the Wizard of Oz script , or "Through The looking
Glass" if it was Alice in Wonderland. I will not go into the techniques to
achieve this state, although they can be found for those keen to discover
such 'seeds of learning'. A few choice search words will reveal my sources.
See especially "Svali
Speaks" a turned programmer for the illuminati story. You couldn't
make this stuff up.
At least the programmers seem on occasion to have a sense of mischievous
humor in their choice of symbols and matrices, a tradition I hope that
reveals their works to others. Maybe they are behind the symbolic messages
left behind each time I have been burgled at my insecure premises in the
last year? Somehow I doubt I'm going to find out.
A mother who recently returned my day-job library's copy of a video of Alice
in Wonderland remarked intuitively it seemed very strange. Perhaps Monarch
programming is not as seamless as the programmers would wish it to be? Maybe
I will see it in the next few days when this text is put to bed.
Throwing more fuel on the fire, consider George Klawitter (no known
relation to John Klawitter of the ASA) of St Edwards University, of Austin,
Texas.
Poet, author of for example, Let Orpheus Take Your Hand, a serious
cultured academic, he organized a 2001 Renaissance Conference at St Louis
University, Missouri (Yes, there again).
One academic area of interest
amongst many others was the Renaissance Satan and amongst many others Plays
within Plays.
For the educated and sophisticated this must have been a real
draw. Topics covered witchcraft, ritual-symbolic actions, spectral displays
of drama, esoteric learning and the psychology of power.
Now, admittedly
this was probably a false lead thrown up by the internet, caused by his
helpfully unusual name, but it throws up the possibility of Bambi not being
enough for the more sophisticated candidate for programming. In other words,
programming scripts have to be as sophisticated, or as simple as the
audience over their lifetime, and Alice in Wonderland, whilst it might be
admirable for what is called base-conditioning may need enhancement... a
textual matrix already extant or perhaps created especially?
There are
commentators on the internet and in the press who have claimed the authors
of Grimms' Fairy Tales, Alice in Wonderland and The Wizard of Oz have been
esoterically or even Satanically inspired in their literary output.
But
steady on, since even symbols such as are obtained by basic calligraphy may
have been used in the past to focus the mind , it need not be much of a
cultural production, perhaps?
If the tradition is very old, then a dimly lit cave with a few paintings
would do. In Time Magazine for February 13, 1995 Robert Hughes suggests the
powerful paintings in Avignon's long hidden cave system offer us a glimpse
into the minds of our early ancestors.
He wrote:
..."the caves may have been places of initiation and trial, in which
consciousness was tested to an extent we can only dimly imagine, so utterly
different is our grasp of the Cro-Magnons.
Try to imagine an art gallery
that could only be entered by crawling on your belly through a hole in the
earth, that ramified into dark tunnels, a fearful maze in the earth's bowels
in which the gallery goer could, at any moment, disturb one of the bears
whose claw marks can still be seen on the walls, where the only light came
from flickering torches, and the bones of animals littered the uneven floor.
These are the archaic conditions, that, one may surmise, produced the array
of cave fears implanted in the human brain - fears that became absorbed into
a later, more developed culture in such narratives as that of the mythical
Cretan labyrinth in whose core the terrible Minotaur waited.
Further
metabolized, and more basically misunderstood, these sacred terrors of the
deep under gird the Christian myth of hell. Which may in fact be the
strongest Cro-Magnon element left in modern life".
In case you are wondering the CIA in monarch programming do or did
utilize
monsters and demons in their scenarios. Hence perhaps the choice of Satanic
Ritual Abuse. Whatever works best, remember.
Yet another possible false lead led to the Newberry Library (USA) [which
contains the "Monckton letter"] with its texts of our forebears (or at least
the ruling elite) showing their great interest in esoteric writings which
touch upon these matters.
Which leads us to a consideration of the scripts used in the past, before
modern times.
Ruth E. Richardson in the English Review for February 2001 has written an
article called
The Early History Of Drama.
She sees drama as coming from
religious ritual using any appropriate techniques of music, dance or
drama
to obtain on occasion a slow, rhythmic almost hypnotic progression to
enhance and dramatize the ongoing teaching. Our forebears at Stonehenge
or Avebury in their processions may have done just this.
The author of the book Virtual Reality in his chapter "Cyberspace and human
nature" suggests the caves and their art were later used as a sacred space
to imprint in the mind of the initiate the secrets of fire and metal, the
connections between seeds and the stars.
He argues:
..."one way for preparing people for imprinting has been known a long time
by tribes everywhere, modern as well as prehistoric: bring them into
unfamiliar, alien and unpleasant places , part of the procedure known in
recent times as brainwashing.
This is designed to undermine the candidates
everyday world as completely as possible, apparently to serve as an
effective preliminary to making him or her remember..."
On the other hand Rogan Taylor has suggested that whilst our later
manifestation of the same thing, drama, both conceals and reveals a secret,
he agrees that the complete repertoire of popular entertainment is like a
secret code... it is a reference system.
But, he argues, far from confining
people it proclaims liberation from the confines of normality through
ecstatic religion in performance! For him it can effect esoteric change
rather than brainwashing. As John Lennon said, remember it was the CIA who
gave us LSD.
So it seems the fault lies with the intent of the change desired... or the
use to which it is put. Whom does it serve? The main point here is that,
according to Frederick Mann, "it is absolutely vital you understand that the
primary means terrocrats use to subjugate, control and dominate their
victims is words". (Not forgetting violence and money, he later adds).
Words persist because they are cheaper.
But what entreaties, threats or
rewards would I respond to if others did not want you to read this
newspaper? (Once I offered to sell out my principles to a couple of eminent
local politicians...the reply? - "You haven't any to sell!") I will say here
and now, if you think this research is worthwhile make a donation... cheques
payable to Tim Baber.
If you want me to stop whatever you subscribe will
have to be more than what I and any supporters are prepared to muster to
continue with this research. I prefer greenmail to the alternatives.
In the
course of writing this the end of a routine 1996 film by Director Peter
Segal has been on the television in the background, called My Fellow
Americans, starring Jack Lemmon and James Garner. I was transfixed when one
after another motifs I now know are part of Monarch programming appeared on
the screen.
In My Fellow Americans, heads were severed from everyday fast food giant
(ubiquitous) storefront models. (In the manner of Alice's "Off with her
head" ).
The phrase "being pushed from the train" was made which would
consciously or unconsciously remind a Monarch victim being thrown from the
freedom train means to be killed.
A character dressed as Dorothy actually
says to one of the President's of the USA in the film they have met "over
the rainbow". If it is tongue in cheek it is at best only an in-joke in the
worst possible taste. Last night a 1996 film called Grumpier Old Men staring
Jack Lemmon and my favorite Walter Matthau started with a motif of a
diamond encrusted winged angel or butterfly in the shot.
To an insider this
suggests that the female lead might be a monarch controlled 'presidential'
model - apparently! It also suggests that the Monarch program is alive and
well.
Richard Dorment in the Daily Telegraph 18/12/02 suggests of Disney films for
example, that,
"art in fancy dress, art that is in good taste, so unserious, and so loosed
from reality couldn't possibly offend anyone"
...and of Alice in Wonderland:
"...even the spookiest of Rackham Woods illustrations for Alice in Wonderland
would barely trouble a modern child".
Maybe. It is what I have always believed.
I have read a review by reporter Ellen Futterman of the (Disney) film
Monsters Inc. It appears in the St Louis Post-Dispatch (which is owned by
Disney). Bizzarely the plot is that monsters need children's screams to
power the city of Monstropolis.
What we may need are critical reviews that dissect cultural productions in
so far as they incorporate Monarch themes. An excellent example is to be
found on the internet by Adam Gorightly on Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut. (search
term Konformist).
A mere glance at American comics on Tom Morrow's DC Universe Who's Who
website suggests this format has been employed by the programmers. Just take
a look at "Force of July" and imagine what it might mean to a programmed
individual and yes, there is a suicide link and the moral is the country
survives but at the cost of Lady Liberty and Silent Majority losing their
lives.
See in this context the website http://www.illuminati-news.com/field-of-art.htm
on the internet for more.
A most recent candidate for a mind controlling text is the 1950's East
German television program, "The Singing Ringing Tree".
This was a cold-war
fairy tale the BBC claims it only bought because it was cheap, but it had
thousands of children trembling behind the sofa. (Radio 4 Documentary,
presented by Chris Bowlby, broadcast 28/12/2002).
Chris Bowlby notes that
today there is often no more space behind the sofa, and perhaps we should
make sure of that for our children.
"This one gave me dreams and made me think about things right through my
life" said one of his contacts.
Traumatizing music and fear apparently
lingered in the mind of British children, but the BBC insisted after taking
a psychologists advice) that as long as the surroundings were not too
familiar some fear was actually a good thing for children. It is still shown
in Germany every Christmas holiday time.
This leads to another concern and goes back to asking the right questions of
who, what, where, when and why?
Namely WHEN are these programs shown?
Bournemouth University now has available to the public an archive of all the
old Radio Times. It is a concern that if Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA) is in
play and the programmers have a distinct matrix of programming to follow,
they are likely to seek the broadcasting schedules should reflect their
agenda.
We know from SRA victims that abuse happens increasingly according
to the prominent dates of the occult calendar and birthdays. Although videos
are now common I would expect to see, if the programmers are truly organized,
the TV schedules showing increased use of known programming texts on
relevant dates. And what do I see.
Approaching the winter solstice we have
just had the programs have been more than suitable.
On solstice Eve The
Wizard of Oz was broadcast starting every 40 minutes on one cable channel.
What would ordinarily be regarded as innocent programming is actually rich
in Monarch themes over the entire solstice weekend. This is surely more than
usual...once you know them you can recognize them.
There appeared to be a
softening up of the darker themes later, especially the following Christmas
day, presumably as some kind of reward to the abused minds. Or, am I missing
something and the reported SRA flows from the programs themselves? No.
Sadly readers of this newspaper will know the children's show Xena: Warrior
Princess is one of my favorite programs. It can be surprisingly dark
which can scare even me.
But if you try to watch the program not as a normal
person, but as if you were someone (or more correctly as one of their
alters) programmed to respond to certain stimuli, unconsciously, you may
glimpse in a moment what it must be to be a Monarch programmed victim. For
you see, films and even computer games are now working to the beat of
another drum, thanks in part to the recognition archetypes play on our
psyche.
Christopher Vogler has written an excellent book, "The Writer's Journey,
Mythic Structure For Storytellers and Screenwriters".
In it the Wizard Of Oz
is held to be an example to mimic. Like a monarch programmed mind, a film or
TV program should consist of many archetypical features. These include
gatekeepers, mentors, shadows, tricksters and shape shifters. All of these
feature in Monarch programming as you might by now expect.
Fritz Springmeier
suggests that the key elements of Alice in Wonderland cryptic language are
logical contradictions, inversions and reversals which unsettle and bedazzle
the mind providing an alternate reality that has it's own attractions.
Fritz writes of the difficulty of de-programming:
"as the slave breaks away from the programming, life becomes a bewildering
confusion as the slave is pulled between two worlds. The internal world has
everything the alter needs, the external world is a harsh cold reality that
doesn't have much to offer.
People in the external world can help make it
real for the slave. The handlers will never do this".
Deprogramming expert Mary Jo Schneller says,
"learn what the truth is, investigate without getting yourself in trouble or
putting yourself in danger,
[It is a necessary admission to make that the normal practice of going to
the primary sources has not been undertaken in this case for reasons of the
security of this investigation being compromised prior to publication.]
but she says, learn what the truth is. Replace the lies with the truth. As
Mark Phillips has written, Knowledge is our only defence against mind
control."
I would add a good family and bags of self esteem will also go a long way.
Rowan Williams adds a religious dimension:
"Can you at least refuse to settle down in the hall of mirrors, and go on
asking where truth really lies?" [2]
To be fair deprogrammers are often Christian and maintain a caring religious
faith appears to work miracles in their de-programming.
Remember this drawing together of these paper trail threads, (some of what
is termed 'casual evidence' in that it is there for all to see) has been
done with some reluctance and no malice.
A little pride in making sense of
so slippery a subject may be a mistake, for the Japanese have a saying,
"the nail that stands proud is the first to
be hit".
But what is published here is done so in the belief that it is true, that it
is fair comment and that it is justified.
It has been published because it
is in the public interest for you to know this. A right of reply exists in
this newspaper for any individual or organization that feels maligned.
I rest my case.
Notes
-
Operation Mind Control - Walter Bowart's
seminal work on covert programs under the umbrella of
MKULTRA used to
precipitate Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD (or Dissociative Disorder -
DID - as it is now more commonly known), for the military, special
operations and espionage purposes.
-
Rowan Williams' Christmas day Meditation, 2002 on Radio 4
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
