The ZIONIST Psychopathic Criminal Enterprise -

Vatic Note:  Mr Kozy is doing a great job of pointing many things out but leaves Obama out there as a naive person, when in fact he is part of the program to bring this off.  After what I just saw with the sophistication of the planning, execution and coverup of the Kennedy murder, I don't doubt that all bases were covered well before this all came about.  Its what psychopaths do best, plan and execute major criminal acts and then cover them up brilliantly.  To bad they don't use that talent for contributing to something good for the world instead of all this destruction.  There simply is no doubt in my mind and many others I am finding out, that Obama is as much a part of this as LBJ was during Kennedy assassination.  No doubt whatsoever.   Remember Obama has been described as a narcissist with little concern for much of anything to do with America or Americans. 

The ZIONIST Psychopathic Criminal Enterprise -

The Government uses the Law to Harm People
and Shield the Establishment

by Prof. John Kozy,  provided to Vatic Project by Alex James
Global Research, June 4, 2010

Most Americans know that politicians make promises they never fulfill; few
know that politicians make promises they lack the means to fulfill, as
President Obama's political posturing on the Deepwater Horizon disaster in
the Gulf of Mexico makes perfectly clear.

Obama has made the following statements:

He told his "independent commission" investigating the Gulf oil spill to
"thoroughly examine the disaster and its causes to ensure that the nation
never faces such a catastrophe again." Aside from the fact that presidential
commissions have a history of providing dubious reports and ineffective
recommendations, does anyone really believe that a way can be found to
prevent industrial accidents from happening ever again? Even if the
commissions findings and recommendations succeed in reducing the likelihood
of such accidents, doesn't this disaster prove that it only takes one? And
unlikely events happen every day.

The president has said, "if laws are insufficient, they'll be changed." But
no president has this ability, only Congress has, and the president must
surely know how difficult getting the Congress to effectively change
anything is. He also said that "if government oversight wasn't tough enough,
that will change, too." Will it?

Even if he replaces every person in an oversight position, he can't guarantee it. The people who receive regulatory positions always have ties to the industries they oversee and can look
forward to lucrative jobs in those industries when they leave governmental
service. As long as corporate money is allowed to influence governmental
action, neither the Congress nor regulators can be expected to change the
laws or regulatory practices in ways that make them effective, and there is
nothing any president can do about it. Even the Congress' attempt to raise
the corporate liability limit for oil spills from $75 million to $10 billion
has already hit a snag.

The President has said that "if laws were broken, those responsible will be
brought to justice" and that BP would be held accountable for the "horrific
disaster." He said BP will be paying the bill, and BP has said it takes
responsibility for the clean-up and will pay compensation for "legitimate
and objectively verifiable" claims for property damage, personal injury, and
commercial losses. But "justice" is rendered in American courts, not by the
executive branch. Any attempts to hold BP responsible will be adjudicated in
the courts at the same snail's pace that the responsibility for the
Exxon-Mobile Alaska oil spill was adjudicated and likely will have the same
results.

The Exxon Valdez oil spill occurred in Prince William Sound on March 24,
1989. In Baker v. Exxon, an Anchorage jury awarded $287 million for actual
damages and $5 billion for punitive damages, but after nineteen years of
appellate jurisprudence, the Supreme Court on June 25, 2008 issued a ruling
reducing the punitive damages to $507.5 million, roughly a tenth of the
original jury's award. Furthermore, even that amount was reduced further by
nineteen years of inflation. By that time, many of the people who would have
been compensated by these funds had died.

The establishment calls this justice. Do you? Do those of you who reside in
the coastal states that will ultimately be affected by the Deepwater Horizon
disaster really believe that the President can make good on this promise of
holding BP responsible? By the time all the lawsuits filed in response to
this disaster wend their ways through the legal system, Mr. Obama will be
grayed, wizened, and ensconced in a plush chair in an Obama Presidential
Library, completely out of the picture and devoid of all responsibility.

Politicians who engage in this duplicitous posturing know that they can't
fulfill their promises. They know they are lying; yet they do it
pathologically. Aesop writes, "A liar will not be believed, even when he
speaks the truth." Perhaps that's why politicians never do.

Government in America consists of law. Legislators write it, executives
apply it, and courts adjudicate it. But the law is a lie. We are told to
respect the law and that it protects us. But it doesn't. Think about it
people! The law and law enforcement only come into play secundum vitium
(after the crime). The police don't show up before you're assaulted, robbed,
or murdered; they come after. So how does that protect you?

Yes, if a relationship of trust is violated, you can sue if you can afford it, and
even that's not a sure thing. (Remember the victims of the Exxon-Valdez
disaster!) Even if the person who violated the relationship gets sanctioned,
will you be "made whole"? Most likely not! Relying on the law is a fool's
errand. It's enacted, enforced, and adjudicated by liars.

The law is a great crime, far greater than the activities it outlaws, and
there's no way you can protect yourself from it. The establishment protects
itself. The law does not protect people. It is merely an instrument of
retribution. It can only be used, often ineffectively, to get back at the
malefactor. It never un-dos the crime. Executing the murderer doesn't bring
back the dead. Putting Ponzi schemers in jail doesn't get your money back.

And holding BP responsible won't restore the Louisiana marshes, won't bring
back the dead marine and other wildlife, and won't compensate the victims
for their losses. Carefully watch what happens over the next twenty years as
the government uses the law to shield BP, Transocean, and Halliburton while
the claims of those affected by the spill disappear into the quicksand of
the American legal system.

Jim Kouri, citing FBI studies, writes that "some of the character traits
exhibited by serial killers or criminals may be observed in many within the
political arena.;" they share the traits of psychopaths who are not
sensitive to altruistic appeals, such as sympathy for their victims or
remorse or guilt over their crimes. They possess the personality traits of
lying, narcissism, selfishness, and vanity. These are the people to whom we
have entrusted our fate. Is it any wonder that America is failing at home
and world-wide?  (VN:  When a psychopath has unlimited access to wealth and power
it becomes easy for them to engage in this behavior at a high level affecting and serial killing
thousands if not millions as we have seen with no human reactions of any kind. Thus like pedophiles,  they are uncurable and thus must be incarcerated for life, just because of the danger they pose to normal human beings and societies as a whole, can you imagine them running the entire globe like this?)

Some may say that this is an extreme, audacious claim. I, too, was surprised
when I read Kouri's piece. But anecdotal evidence to support it is easily
cited. John McCain said "bomb, bomb, bomb" during the last presidential
campaign in response to a question about Iran. No one in government has
expressed the slightest qualms about the killing of tens of thousands of
people in both Iraq and Afghanistan who had absolutely nothing to do with
what happened on nine/eleven or the deliberate targeting of women and
children by unmanned drones in Pakistan. What if anything distinguishes
serial killers from these governmental officials? Only that they don't do
the killing themselves but have others do it for them. But that's exactly
what most of the godfathers of the cosa nostra did.

So, there are questions that need to be posed: Has the government of the
United States of America become a criminal enterprise? Is the nation ruled
by psychopaths? Well, how can the impoverishment of the people, the
promotion of the military-industrial complex and endless wars and their
genocidal killing, the degradation of the environment, the neglect of the
collapsing infrastructure, and the support of corrupt and authoritarian
governments (often called democracies) abroad be explained? Worse, why are
corporations allowed to profiteer during wars while the people are called
upon to sacrifice? Why hasn't the government ever tried to prohibit such
profiteering? It's not that it can't be done.

In the vernacular, harming people is considered a crime. It is just as much
a crime when done by governments, legal systems, or corporations. The
government uses the law to harm people or shield the establishment from the
consequences of harming people all the time. Watch as no one from the Massey
Energy Co. is ever prosecuted for the disaster at the Upper Big Branch coal
mine. When corporations are accused of wrongdoing, they often reply that
what they did was legal, but legal is not a synonym for right. When
criminals gain control, they legalize criminality.

Unless the government of the United States changes its behavior, this nation
is doomed. No one in government seems to realize that dissimulation breeds
distrust, distrust breeds suspicion, and suspicion eventually arouses
censure. Isn't that failure of recognition by the establishment a sign of
criminal psychopathology?

John Kozy is a retired professor of philosophy and logic who blogs on
social, political, and economic issues. After serving in the U.S. Army
during the Korean War, he spent 20 years as a university professor and
another 20 years working as a writer. He has published a textbook in formal
logic commercially, in academic journals and a small number of commercial
magazines, and has written a number of guest editorials for newspapers. His
on-line pieces can be found on http://www.jkozy.com/ and he can be emailed
from that site's homepage.

John Kozy is a frequent contributor to Global Research.
Global Research Articles by John Kozy
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=19536

---

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.