Vatic Note: WATCH OUT AND BE CAREFUL.... THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED IN "PRE-WW I AND PRE-WW II. This appears to be a serious attempt to get us to overthrow or revolt against our govenment so they can take over from the top. That is exactly what these khazars did in both previous World wars before they started, which weakened the nation and those then lost the war.
The powers that be who orchestrate all this has tried to accomplish their agenda through the two previous World Wars, and how they managed it all, was to create a revolution within the economic powerhouse of the day both times. In 1917 it was Russia, and in 1933, it was the Nazi's that overthrew the Weimar republic and installed Hitler as dictator.
In both cases the economic powerhouses of the day lost their World Wars and that is exactly how its being set up right now, for America as the loser of WW III. In 1871, the PTB set up all three world wars in writing, to take over control of the globe.
Once done they intend to run it like a feudal system as used to be the case with royalty and the peons, as slaves to serve the royalty with all their needs and wants met with the peons having no say whatsoever in anything. Freedom is a thing of the past if they succeed and so is justice. We are seeing that already. Laws are enforced based on "who you are".
These foreign nation infiltrators are performing their duties within our government to first of all make us look like the New Nazi's to justify a war against us by the rest of the world. Second, to weaken our military by deminishing the Veterans admin and their care of our wounded. Regular soldiers see this and realize they are on their own and become demoralized.
In such a condition, who wants to fight for a nation who does not give a damn about their soldiers??? Not the soldiers, thats for sure. Then a revoluton divides the nation and pits one group against another. They tried all that with traditional tactics and it didn't work, but this is different. The nation is divided on who they believe the true villians are. Many are calling Obama a Muslim and that the Muslims are the enemy.
Ironically OBAMA IS A DUAL ISRAELI CITIZEN ON HIS MOTHERS SIDE OF THE FAMILY AND THAT CHICAGO IS FILLED WITH DUAL ISRAELI CITIZENS AND THEY LAUNCHED OBAMBA RAPIDLY INTO THE WHITE HOUSE AND THAT WAS COMMENTED ON BY JUST ABOUT EVERYONE.
We have done several blogs on his Israeli connection including how he has 32 dual Israeli citizens serving in the White house and in Homeland SEcurity were the SPLC and the ADL control the citizens advisory board and only 6 muslims, HUH???? Does that make any sense if you truly believe he is a muslim? No, I think he doing the Khazars bidding in the White House and those 32 dual citizens are there to make sure he performs.
Check all these out. So many of Obama's apptments were not Muslims, rather dual Israeli citizens, like Chertoff, and others.
Stanley Fischer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Born in Northern Rhodesia (now Zambia), he holds dual citizenship in Israel and .... American President Barack Obama nominated Fischer as vice chair of the ...
en.wikipedia.org
Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories - Wikipedia, the free ...
As an attempt to prove that Obama was no longer a U.S. citizen (or held dual ... to Israel, then to the United States, and holds dual U.S. and Israeli citizenship, ...
en.wikipedia.org
Michael Chertoff - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
His mother is Livia Chertoff (née Eisen), an Israeli citizen and the first flight ... Chertoff was asked by the Obama administration to stay in his post until 9 a.m. on ... Summit in 2009, Chertoff described globalization as a double-edged sword.
en.wikipedia.org
Rahm Emanuel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
@Nonpartisan
Rahm Israel Emanuel (/ˈrɑːm/; born November 29, 1959) is an American politician (VN: and a dual Israel citizen) ... After the 2008 presidential election, President Barack Obama appointed ...
en.wikipedia.org
WE CAN FIGHT THE BAD GUYS BY EXPOSING WHO THEY REALLY ARE AND THUS REMAIN A FULL UNITED NATION THAT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO DEFEAT IF WE STAY UNITED. UNITED WE STAND AND DIVIDED WE FALL. OUR CHOICE. We don't even know who controls the POLLS, so we trust just about nothing anymore and we are ALL IN THIS TOGETHER. REMEMBER THAT ALWAYS. The fascists are on the move.
“U.S. Government… a Clear and Present Threat to Liberty” say 49% of Americans… Polls
http://beforeitsnews.com/war-and-conflict/2015/09/u-s-government-a-clear-and-present-threat-to-liberty-say-49-of-americans-polls-2458436.html
by Tom Dennon, the Paranoid Historian
Government poses a threat to liberty, that much is clear.
And yet, things continue to get worse and worse with each political cycle, and each new president… [wants more and more Americans in the Middle East conflict, now extended to a NATO-based alliance with the Ukraine against Russia.]
Gallup reported that:
The complaints about government’s abuse of powers reaches across the isle, and straddles both parties in the White House, yet people tend to direct their anger only at the current president – thus falling for the ruse of blaming the puppet, and not the system.
As Americans shift blame about the state of affairs back-and-forth with every election, most miss the point about why these things are happening – someone is writing reports and creating policies that allow these things to happen. All the Congress and President do is approve them, and deflect attention towards who is running the show.
What are Americans upset about, according to polls?:
Other general complaints enunciated by smaller numbers of those who think the government poses an immediate threat include perceptions that the government is "socialist," that the government spends too much, that it picks winners and losers such as the wealthy or racial and ethnic minorities, that it is too involved in things it shouldn't be and that it violates the separation of powers.
More specific complaints -- again voiced by small numbers of those who agree with the threat statement -- focus on freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the overuse of police and law enforcement, government surveillance of private citizens including emails and phone records, government involvement in gay marriage issues, overregulation of business, overtaxing, the healthcare law and immigration.
The majority of those who today believe government is an immediate threat, and who answer the open-ended question, are either Republicans or independents who lean Republican. Thus, these open-ended responses tend to reflect the views of Republican-oriented citizens. A look at the smaller number of Democrats who feel the government poses an immediate threat shows that their responses are generally similar to Republicans, with some exceptions. Democrats are somewhat less likely to mention gun control, and also less likely to mention very specific issues such as marriage, taxes, immigration, spending or the healthcare law.
Implications
The fact that almost half of Americans see the federal government as an immediate threat to their lives and freedoms may appear alarming at first, perhaps conjuring an image of Americans worrying that the government will be breaking down their doors and engaging in random arrests of private citizens.
But two findings mitigate against this type of more dramatic interpretation. First, the fact that Democrats and Republicans have flipped in their probability of holding these views when the administration changed in 2009 shows that these attitudes reflect more of a response to the president and disagreement with his policies than a fundamental feeling about the federal government in general.
Second, the explanations offered by those who hold this view reveal more traditional or political types of complaints about things the government is doing, rather than more radical beliefs about the government using power or force against its citizens.
Gallup does not have survey data extending back to the late 1780s when the Constitution was ratified and the federal government began to exercise control over the lives of its citizens. Clearly, there has been tension between the government and the people at many times in history since that point, and it may be that such tensions are a natural part of the system by which the people willingly give up power to government institutions that in turn intrude on their daily lives.
Still, the persistent finding in recent years that half of the population views the government as an immediate threat underscores the degree to which the role and power of government remains a key issue of our time. As a case in point, a question in this same survey asked Americans to name the most important problem facing the nation, and found that issues related to government were the most frequently mentioned. Plus, numerous other measures show that the people give their government some of the lowest approval and trust ratings in the measures' history.
From the people's perspective, then, a focus on the appropriate role for government should be at the forefront of the nation's continuing political discourse and should be a key point of debate in the current presidential election campaigns.
Survey Methods
Results for this Gallup poll are based on telephone interviews conducted Sept. 9-13, 2015, with a random sample of 1,025 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. For results based on the total sample of national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. All reported margins of sampling error include computed design effects for weighting.
Each sample of national adults includes a minimum quota of 60% cellphone respondents and 40% landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas by time zone within region. Landline and cellular telephone numbers are selected using random-digit-dial methods.
View survey methodology, complete question responses and trends.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
The powers that be who orchestrate all this has tried to accomplish their agenda through the two previous World Wars, and how they managed it all, was to create a revolution within the economic powerhouse of the day both times. In 1917 it was Russia, and in 1933, it was the Nazi's that overthrew the Weimar republic and installed Hitler as dictator.
In both cases the economic powerhouses of the day lost their World Wars and that is exactly how its being set up right now, for America as the loser of WW III. In 1871, the PTB set up all three world wars in writing, to take over control of the globe.
Once done they intend to run it like a feudal system as used to be the case with royalty and the peons, as slaves to serve the royalty with all their needs and wants met with the peons having no say whatsoever in anything. Freedom is a thing of the past if they succeed and so is justice. We are seeing that already. Laws are enforced based on "who you are".
These foreign nation infiltrators are performing their duties within our government to first of all make us look like the New Nazi's to justify a war against us by the rest of the world. Second, to weaken our military by deminishing the Veterans admin and their care of our wounded. Regular soldiers see this and realize they are on their own and become demoralized.
In such a condition, who wants to fight for a nation who does not give a damn about their soldiers??? Not the soldiers, thats for sure. Then a revoluton divides the nation and pits one group against another. They tried all that with traditional tactics and it didn't work, but this is different. The nation is divided on who they believe the true villians are. Many are calling Obama a Muslim and that the Muslims are the enemy.
Ironically OBAMA IS A DUAL ISRAELI CITIZEN ON HIS MOTHERS SIDE OF THE FAMILY AND THAT CHICAGO IS FILLED WITH DUAL ISRAELI CITIZENS AND THEY LAUNCHED OBAMBA RAPIDLY INTO THE WHITE HOUSE AND THAT WAS COMMENTED ON BY JUST ABOUT EVERYONE.
We have done several blogs on his Israeli connection including how he has 32 dual Israeli citizens serving in the White house and in Homeland SEcurity were the SPLC and the ADL control the citizens advisory board and only 6 muslims, HUH???? Does that make any sense if you truly believe he is a muslim? No, I think he doing the Khazars bidding in the White House and those 32 dual citizens are there to make sure he performs.
Check all these out. So many of Obama's apptments were not Muslims, rather dual Israeli citizens, like Chertoff, and others.
Stanley Fischer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Born in Northern Rhodesia (now Zambia), he holds dual citizenship in Israel and .... American President Barack Obama nominated Fischer as vice chair of the ...
en.wikipedia.org
Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories - Wikipedia, the free ...
As an attempt to prove that Obama was no longer a U.S. citizen (or held dual ... to Israel, then to the United States, and holds dual U.S. and Israeli citizenship, ...
en.wikipedia.org
Michael Chertoff - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
His mother is Livia Chertoff (née Eisen), an Israeli citizen and the first flight ... Chertoff was asked by the Obama administration to stay in his post until 9 a.m. on ... Summit in 2009, Chertoff described globalization as a double-edged sword.
en.wikipedia.org
Rahm Emanuel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
@Nonpartisan
Rahm Israel Emanuel (/ˈrɑːm/; born November 29, 1959) is an American politician (VN: and a dual Israel citizen) ... After the 2008 presidential election, President Barack Obama appointed ...
en.wikipedia.org
WE CAN FIGHT THE BAD GUYS BY EXPOSING WHO THEY REALLY ARE AND THUS REMAIN A FULL UNITED NATION THAT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO DEFEAT IF WE STAY UNITED. UNITED WE STAND AND DIVIDED WE FALL. OUR CHOICE. We don't even know who controls the POLLS, so we trust just about nothing anymore and we are ALL IN THIS TOGETHER. REMEMBER THAT ALWAYS. The fascists are on the move.
“U.S. Government… a Clear and Present Threat to Liberty” say 49% of Americans… Polls
http://beforeitsnews.com/war-and-conflict/2015/09/u-s-government-a-clear-and-present-threat-to-liberty-say-49-of-americans-polls-2458436.html
by Tom Dennon, the Paranoid Historian
Government poses a threat to liberty, that much is clear.
But what may be surprising is that almost half of Americans clearly identified government as a clear and “immediate” threat, and are obviously outraged about what is going on.
Oddly, the number of angry Americans has remained consistent in poll number ever since about 2006 during George W. Bush’s second term, maintaining around 46-49% throughout Barack Obama’s entire presidency.And yet, things continue to get worse and worse with each political cycle, and each new president… [wants more and more Americans in the Middle East conflict, now extended to a NATO-based alliance with the Ukraine against Russia.]
Almost half of Americans, 49%, say the federal government poses “an immediate threat to the rights and freedoms of ordinary citizens,” similar to what was found in previous surveys conducted over the last five years.
The remarkable finding about these attitudes is how much they reflect apparent antipathy toward the party controlling the White House, rather than being a purely fundamental or fixed philosophical attitude about government.
[…] during the Republican administration of George W. Bush, Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents were consistently more likely than Republicans and Republican-leaning independents to say the federal government posed an immediate threat.
[…] during the Democratic Obama administration, the partisan gap flipped, with Republicans significantly more likely to agree.
[…]So why does the situation between the people and government continue to deteriorate?
Still, the persistent finding in recent years that half of the population views the government as an immediate threat underscores the degree to which the role and power of government remains a key issue of our time… numerous other measures show that the people give their government some of the lowest approval and trust ratings in the measures’ history.
The complaints about government’s abuse of powers reaches across the isle, and straddles both parties in the White House, yet people tend to direct their anger only at the current president – thus falling for the ruse of blaming the puppet, and not the system.
As Americans shift blame about the state of affairs back-and-forth with every election, most miss the point about why these things are happening – someone is writing reports and creating policies that allow these things to happen. All the Congress and President do is approve them, and deflect attention towards who is running the show.
What are Americans upset about, according to polls?:
Other general complaints enunciated by smaller numbers of those who think the government poses an immediate threat include perceptions that the government is "socialist," that the government spends too much, that it picks winners and losers such as the wealthy or racial and ethnic minorities, that it is too involved in things it shouldn't be and that it violates the separation of powers.
More specific complaints -- again voiced by small numbers of those who agree with the threat statement -- focus on freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the overuse of police and law enforcement, government surveillance of private citizens including emails and phone records, government involvement in gay marriage issues, overregulation of business, overtaxing, the healthcare law and immigration.
The majority of those who today believe government is an immediate threat, and who answer the open-ended question, are either Republicans or independents who lean Republican. Thus, these open-ended responses tend to reflect the views of Republican-oriented citizens. A look at the smaller number of Democrats who feel the government poses an immediate threat shows that their responses are generally similar to Republicans, with some exceptions. Democrats are somewhat less likely to mention gun control, and also less likely to mention very specific issues such as marriage, taxes, immigration, spending or the healthcare law.
Implications
The fact that almost half of Americans see the federal government as an immediate threat to their lives and freedoms may appear alarming at first, perhaps conjuring an image of Americans worrying that the government will be breaking down their doors and engaging in random arrests of private citizens.
But two findings mitigate against this type of more dramatic interpretation. First, the fact that Democrats and Republicans have flipped in their probability of holding these views when the administration changed in 2009 shows that these attitudes reflect more of a response to the president and disagreement with his policies than a fundamental feeling about the federal government in general.
Second, the explanations offered by those who hold this view reveal more traditional or political types of complaints about things the government is doing, rather than more radical beliefs about the government using power or force against its citizens.
Gallup does not have survey data extending back to the late 1780s when the Constitution was ratified and the federal government began to exercise control over the lives of its citizens. Clearly, there has been tension between the government and the people at many times in history since that point, and it may be that such tensions are a natural part of the system by which the people willingly give up power to government institutions that in turn intrude on their daily lives.
Still, the persistent finding in recent years that half of the population views the government as an immediate threat underscores the degree to which the role and power of government remains a key issue of our time. As a case in point, a question in this same survey asked Americans to name the most important problem facing the nation, and found that issues related to government were the most frequently mentioned. Plus, numerous other measures show that the people give their government some of the lowest approval and trust ratings in the measures' history.
From the people's perspective, then, a focus on the appropriate role for government should be at the forefront of the nation's continuing political discourse and should be a key point of debate in the current presidential election campaigns.
Survey Methods
Results for this Gallup poll are based on telephone interviews conducted Sept. 9-13, 2015, with a random sample of 1,025 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. For results based on the total sample of national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. All reported margins of sampling error include computed design effects for weighting.
Each sample of national adults includes a minimum quota of 60% cellphone respondents and 40% landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas by time zone within region. Landline and cellular telephone numbers are selected using random-digit-dial methods.
View survey methodology, complete question responses and trends.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Vatic Clerk Tips: After 7 days, all comments to an article go into the moderation queue for approval which happens at least once a day. Please be patient.
Be respectful in your comments, keeping in mind that these discussions will become the Zeitgeist of our time that future database archeologists will discover. Make your comments worthy and on the founding father's level in their respectfulness, reasoning, and sound argumentation. Prove we weren't all idiots in our day and age. Comments that advocate sedition or violence are not encouraged. Racist, ad hominem, and troll-baiting comments might never see the light of day.