We did numerous blogs proving that fact. So why only the US? Because these globalists need to take us down as the only fully armed nation on the planet since all "commonwealth" countries have basically been disarmed. Also we are the remnant of a race of people that are caucasian Christians and the Israeli's have seen to it that our population has now dropped to only 6% of the worlds population, and now they want us fully gone, so they can fully satanize the planet.
Remember, these khazars killed 63 million Russian Christians after 1917, when they took control of that nation. That is why we are scheduled to be the losers of WW III and they plan on doing it by NAZIFYING THE USA, just like the damn bankers did on Germany. They have infiltrated our gov and those in Europe and thus can manipulate who are the new nazi's on the planet from their infiltrated positions of power from within.
That is their plan to gather the whole world to fight against us and we know the truth now as does every other country and its going to be a lot harder to do than in the past. In fact, if I were them, I would be careful, since the entire world armed by various militaries means they can turn on the bankers in a heart beat.
Media Blacks Out Pentagon Report Exposing U.S. Role In ISIS Creation
http://www.mintpressnews.com/media-blacks-out-pentagon-report-exposing-u-s-role-in-isis-creation/206187/
, Mint Press News, May 30, 2015
The report proved that the growth and expansion of ISIS was a direct result of arms being sent by the U.S. to anti-Assad Islamists, with the strategic U.S. intention of toppling the Assad regime in Syria.
In a story reverberating across the world, last week award winning journalist and scholar Dr. Nafeez Ahmed exposed startling information about U.S. complicity in the creation and rise of ISIS, as contained in a recently declassified Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) report.
Possibly more terrifying than the report itself may be the fact that this information has been virtually blacked out across global mainstream media.
This silence speaks volumes as to the weight of this information. It illustrates the complicity of the English-speaking media, in collusion with government, to keep people ignorant of the harsh realities of U.S. style realpolitik.
The stunning report, dated August 2012, proved that the growth and expansion of ISIS was a direct result of arms being sent by the U.S. to anti-Assad Islamists, with the strategic U.S. intention of toppling the Assad regime in Syria. (VN: think about it, "why would the US want to topple a regime half a world away that has done absolutely nothing to us?" There is only one answer.... its because our government at every level has been infiltrated by the khazar israelis and this is their agenda, toward middle east domination of all the oil resources. They are militarily inferior so they use us and our expensive weapons systems to achieve their global empire building agenda.)
The report stated, “major forces driving the insurgency in Syria” comprise “the Salafist, the Muslim Brotherhood, and AQI [al-Qaeda in Iraq],” showing explicitly what elements were providing the true velocity of the insurgency.
Although the U.S. has held to the official line that only moderate rebels are being armed in Syria, figures such as Presidential candidate Rand Paul stating that “war hawks” in congress were responsible for the rise of ISIS, to Vice President Joe Biden stating (start at 1:30:00), that there were no “moderate rebels,” say otherwise.
“The secret Pentagon document provides extraordinary confirmation that the US-led coalition currently fighting ISIS, had three years ago welcomed the emergence of an extremist ‘Salafist Principality’ in the region as a way to undermine Assad,” Ahmed said.
In an interview with Josh Cook of Truth In Media, Ahmed stated:
“I spoke to a major national newspaper here in the U.K. and what was interesting was they were quite sympathetic to the line of inquiry, but just felt like they couldn’t cover it. And it wasn’t that they were told they couldn’t cover it.
The journalist that I spoke to who is a senior journalist that I have a lot of respect for was very sympathetic to what I was saying. He literally said to me look – I actually could sense that there was this fear that I shouldn’t be talking about this, this is going to far – is the document really strong enough? He didn’t feel confident.
“There is almost like an unspoken recognition I think in the mainstream media that there are certain things we are not allowed to say. The idea that something as despicable as ISIS could actually been foreseen or facilitated deliberately, which is really what is implied by this report quite clearly.
“It’s almost too much,” he said. “It goes against the grain of so much we take for granted. So many assumptions about not just American, but Western kind of supremacy and the benevolence of our government that we would never do anything like this … it’s a big kind of leap.
“On the one hand I think that journalists are scared and worried about pushing boundaries to that extent. It does raise a concern that there is an absolute silence on this issue, especially in the English speaking media. It raises real questions about what is behind that silence?”People have a right to be informed about the undertakings of a government operating in their name and the press has a duty to expose that which is intentionally obscured from the view of the public by those in power.
When the press is afraid or complicit in hiding these facts from the American public, then we, as a nation, are in a much greater danger than anything ISIS presents.
Please share this story to help get this vital information out to as many people as possible, as people deserve to know what actions their governments undertake in their name!
Check out the full interview with Dr. Nafeez Ahmed below:
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Vatic Clerk Tips: After 7 days, all comments to an article go into the moderation queue for approval which happens at least once a day. Please be patient.
Be respectful in your comments, keeping in mind that these discussions will become the Zeitgeist of our time that future database archeologists will discover. Make your comments worthy and on the founding father's level in their respectfulness, reasoning, and sound argumentation. Prove we weren't all idiots in our day and age. Comments that advocate sedition or violence are not encouraged. Racist, ad hominem, and troll-baiting comments might never see the light of day.