Its not up to the troops to decide what wars we are to fight, but they are our children and they answer to the call to protect their homeland, their families, neighbors, relatives, etc. And in return we do this below, added to charging our wounded soldiers for their meals while they are in the hospital. Now what kind of support is that? As I said, I won't go into it all, rather I suggest you read the blog we did on this subject.
VA empire strikes back — bureaucrats vs. veterans’ health
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/02/17/va-empire-strikes-back-bureaucrats-vs-veterans-health/
Posted by Veterans Today on February 17, 2015
President Obama and the Veterans Administration bureaucracy are already sabotaging the VA-reform law passed in August.
The ink is barely dry on the 8.6 million “Choice Cards” that supposedly allow vets to see a doctor outside the delay-plagued VA system. But Obama’s budget tries to snatch the $10 billion allocated for choice and let VA top administrators spend it however they want. It’s a sickening betrayal.
Even worse, VA Secretary Robert McDonald is telling federal lawmakers that this underhanded move will better serve “VA system priorities.”
That’s the problem. He’s more interested in protecting “the system” than the vets. It’s all about bureaucratic turf and the interests served by the failed status quo.
With a straight face, McDonald says it has “nothing to do with us trying to gut the Choice Card or anything like that, it was about flexibility.” Flexibility for VA bureaucrats, not for ailing vets who need it.
Removing the funding definitely will gut the program, because the law says the Choice program expires whenever funding runs out.
At a Feb. 2 press briefing, VA administrators claimed without even a smirk that sick vets don’t want to see outside physicians, and that use of the Choice Cards was “much lower” than expected.
That’s a whopper. When asked, they couldn’t provide any specifics.
Pete Hegseth, the CEO of Concerned Veterans for America, can. He reports that vets get the run around when they call the VA for permission to use the Choice Card. “The VA is making a concerted attempt to undermine anything that looks like choice.”
Vets get told they don’t meet the requirement for living 40 miles or more from a VA facility, or they haven’t endured an unacceptably long wait for care or their care isn’t medically necessary.
VA administrators are lying to Congress when they say vets don’t want choice. In a Tarrance Group poll the first week of February, 88 percent of vets said it is “extremely” or “very important” to increase their health-care choices.
Another whopper: The president’s budget parrots the VA’s claim that the money allocated for Choice is urgently needed to “support essential investments in VA system priorities.”
How urgent are those priorities? At their press briefing, the VA brass couldn’t name them.
House Veterans Affairs Committee Chairman Jeff Miller (R-Fla.) dismisses the notion that the Choice money is needed elsewhere, pointing out that the VA has “left hundreds of millions in health-care funding unspent since 2010 while thousands of vets languished on waiting lists.”
Not to mention that the president’s new budget proposes increasing VA funding by another 7.5 percent.
“It’s not about money,” says Hegseth. “The VA wants to perpetuate its dysfunctional system” by keeping vets from choosing to go elsewhere for care.
The shenanigans against Choice are one sign that little progress has been made at the VA since the celebrated enactment of the Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act of 2014. The politicians took their bows, then the VA administrators got busy dismantling the reforms before they could succeed.
Too bad lives are at stake. On Feb. 12, President Obama signed into law a veterans-suicide prevention act named after Clay Hunt, a Marine who’d served in Iraq and later killed himself. It passed Congress unanimously. Too bad no lawmakers asked whether it has any chance of succeeding.
The answer is: probably not.
The law says VA suicide-prevention programs will get outside evaluations. So what? The VA has been inspected ad nauseum by the General Accountability Office, Inspectors General and other auditors.
The reports pile up, unread, and the VA’s dysfunction lives on.
Indeed, the GAO — unimpressed with the reform promises of the new VA secretary — just named the entire Veterans Administration a “high risk” program.
What’s needed is a system that puts vets in the driver’s seat, letting them take their medical-care funding wherever they choose. On Feb. 26, a bipartisan task force assembled by Concerned Veterans for America will unveil such a plan. It’s already attracting support of powerful lawmakers, including House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif), and Miller.
With the VA leadership and unions lined up against them, they have their work cut out for them.
The ink is barely dry on the 8.6 million “Choice Cards” that supposedly allow vets to see a doctor outside the delay-plagued VA system. But Obama’s budget tries to snatch the $10 billion allocated for choice and let VA top administrators spend it however they want. It’s a sickening betrayal.
Even worse, VA Secretary Robert McDonald is telling federal lawmakers that this underhanded move will better serve “VA system priorities.”
That’s the problem. He’s more interested in protecting “the system” than the vets. It’s all about bureaucratic turf and the interests served by the failed status quo.
With a straight face, McDonald says it has “nothing to do with us trying to gut the Choice Card or anything like that, it was about flexibility.” Flexibility for VA bureaucrats, not for ailing vets who need it.
Removing the funding definitely will gut the program, because the law says the Choice program expires whenever funding runs out.
At a Feb. 2 press briefing, VA administrators claimed without even a smirk that sick vets don’t want to see outside physicians, and that use of the Choice Cards was “much lower” than expected.
That’s a whopper. When asked, they couldn’t provide any specifics.
Pete Hegseth, the CEO of Concerned Veterans for America, can. He reports that vets get the run around when they call the VA for permission to use the Choice Card. “The VA is making a concerted attempt to undermine anything that looks like choice.”
Vets get told they don’t meet the requirement for living 40 miles or more from a VA facility, or they haven’t endured an unacceptably long wait for care or their care isn’t medically necessary.
VA administrators are lying to Congress when they say vets don’t want choice. In a Tarrance Group poll the first week of February, 88 percent of vets said it is “extremely” or “very important” to increase their health-care choices.
Another whopper: The president’s budget parrots the VA’s claim that the money allocated for Choice is urgently needed to “support essential investments in VA system priorities.”
How urgent are those priorities? At their press briefing, the VA brass couldn’t name them.
House Veterans Affairs Committee Chairman Jeff Miller (R-Fla.) dismisses the notion that the Choice money is needed elsewhere, pointing out that the VA has “left hundreds of millions in health-care funding unspent since 2010 while thousands of vets languished on waiting lists.”
Not to mention that the president’s new budget proposes increasing VA funding by another 7.5 percent.
“It’s not about money,” says Hegseth. “The VA wants to perpetuate its dysfunctional system” by keeping vets from choosing to go elsewhere for care.
The shenanigans against Choice are one sign that little progress has been made at the VA since the celebrated enactment of the Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act of 2014. The politicians took their bows, then the VA administrators got busy dismantling the reforms before they could succeed.
Too bad lives are at stake. On Feb. 12, President Obama signed into law a veterans-suicide prevention act named after Clay Hunt, a Marine who’d served in Iraq and later killed himself. It passed Congress unanimously. Too bad no lawmakers asked whether it has any chance of succeeding.
The answer is: probably not.
The law says VA suicide-prevention programs will get outside evaluations. So what? The VA has been inspected ad nauseum by the General Accountability Office, Inspectors General and other auditors.
The reports pile up, unread, and the VA’s dysfunction lives on.
Indeed, the GAO — unimpressed with the reform promises of the new VA secretary — just named the entire Veterans Administration a “high risk” program.
What’s needed is a system that puts vets in the driver’s seat, letting them take their medical-care funding wherever they choose. On Feb. 26, a bipartisan task force assembled by Concerned Veterans for America will unveil such a plan. It’s already attracting support of powerful lawmakers, including House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif), and Miller.
With the VA leadership and unions lined up against them, they have their work cut out for them.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Vatic Clerk Tips: After 7 days, all comments to an article go into the moderation queue for approval which happens at least once a day. Please be patient.
Be respectful in your comments, keeping in mind that these discussions will become the Zeitgeist of our time that future database archeologists will discover. Make your comments worthy and on the founding father's level in their respectfulness, reasoning, and sound argumentation. Prove we weren't all idiots in our day and age. Comments that advocate sedition or violence are not encouraged. Racist, ad hominem, and troll-baiting comments might never see the light of day.