Movement to Declassify 9/11 Information Gathers Momentum ... 9/11 Commission Chairs and Congressmen Call for Declassification

Vatic Note:  This, below, is about as much of a white wash as the 9-11 commission report and declassifying non classifiable information is a ruse. There is a video of Sec of Transportations testimony before the commission and watch how fast Lee Hamilton and others, tried to stop his testimony.  I was impressed with the speed in which he tried to shut Manetti down.  His testimony was eliminated from the final report and no testimony was taken by those witnesses that could back him up.

Oh, just a reminder..... Chertoff, head of homeland security, who is a dual israeli citizen, gave immunity to Israel, in the Patriot Act,  for what she might have done on 9-11.  That is important. Its probably why the members of congress were not allowed to read the patriot act before voting on it.

I have subsequently learned that the video has been messed with, so find the full version if you can since I was lucky enough to see his testimony and its my understanding they cut and pasted parts out of the testimony that were damaging.  I would not have known about it had I not seen it for myself, live raw feed, when it happened.   Obviously, there is a reason he was relieved of his position as SOT.

Maneti was in the war games room with Cheney and saw everything the VP did to stop any attempt to prevent the attacks from happening.  The video of his testimony is the most damaging and indicting of all the witnesses.  That may explain why they shortened it and used it in place of the full uncut version.

What made it especially damaging is the fact that military personnel were there and could act as witnesses to support Maneti's testimony, since these military men, tried to get the VP to do something and warned him of the approach to the Pentagon of the other plane (which was not used to hit the pentagon, witnesses saw the missle that hit the pentagon and said so on raw live feed).  They asked Cheney if he wanted to change his order to "stand down".  Remember, he was conducting war games at the time.  What a coincidence. 

He yelled at them saying "have you heard anything different?"  or something to that effect.  Go watch the video. So, the stand down order stood.  Hamilton attempt to manipulate Maneti's  testimony convinced me that the co-chairmen were possibly in on it.  Lets not forget that Bush tried to get Kissinger to chair the committee and the hue and cry was so great that they put in back up players like Hamilton and Kean, instead.

There is more, I could go on for hours, but this is just one example of the RICO-ness of the Conspiracy by insiders to bring down the nation and did so by murdering American citizens that they were elected to protect and defend.  The list of those witnesses who should have been interviewed, but were not, is long.  Many of them died shortly afterwards with only their raw live feed testimony on TV.  I saw the raw live feed and the witnesses who said it was a missle that went by their heads that hit the pentagon.  Where are they in this commission report?

What about the various security cameras and the confiscation by the FBI of same from the Hotel across from the pentagon?  Where are the raw live feed videos that filmed all this during the entire day of 9-11?   It took several years for someone to sneak out the clips that were done to the video feed and a video was made with those clips, called "9-11, In Plane Site", and I cried.  It showed what I saw on Raw Live feed that day.  If you get a chance watch that video. Never mind, I decided to put it up for you in this vatic note. 



https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=oPRILY10Ms4

It was when I watched those people in the towers realizing they were going to die and chose to do so by jumping rather than by burning to death, that I lost it, and vowed I would never give up until I had the truth and justice for those people, and thus began my research journey down this rabbit hole.  Righteous anger has a way of diminishing fear and freeing one up to seek pure truth at any cost. Anyway watch all this and read it, and see for yourselves.  You decide.

Why are they making noises now about all of this?   Because this issue is never going to go away and they were on the wrong side of the issue and are now shifting to cover their collective butts.  Its obvious.   I am disappointed that neither Washington's Blog or Blacklisted News bothered to point out the weaknesses and pathetic attempts to back pedal their role in the cover up.  Why bring up declassifying info when the non classified info is enough to convict those involved and imprison them for life. 


Movement to Declassify 9/11 Information Gathers Momentum ... 9/11 Commission Chairs and Congressmen Call for Declassification
http://www.blacklistednews.com/Movement_to_Declassify_911_Information_Gathers_Momentum_..._911_Commission_Chairs_and_Congressmen_Call_for_Declassification/37623/0/38/38/Y/M.html
by Admin Black listed News,  orig source Washington's blog, August 31, 2014

The 9/11 Commission Co-Chairs - Lee Hamilton and Thomas Kean - have called for the 28-page section of the 9/11 Commission Report which is classified to be declassified. Kean said that 60-70% of what was classified shouldn't have been classified in the first place:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=H00l9AlYnEs

Congressman Thomas Massie read the 28 classified pages of the Joint Intelligence Committee Inquiry into 9/11 (the joint Senate and House investigation into 9/11) and immediately called for them to be released to the public:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ItE28oeMnas

A bipartisan bill - introduced by congressmen Walter B. Jones (Republican from North Carolina) and Stephen Lynch (Democrat from Massachusetts) - would declassify the 28 pages of the Joint Inquiry which implicate the Saudi government.

Former Congressman Ron Paul is also demanding the 28 pages be declassified:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=sGC5hfEL4o4

The Co-Chair of the congressional investigation into 9/11 - Bob Graham - and 9/11 Commissioner and former Senator Bob Kerrey are calling for either a “permanent 9/11 commission” or a new 9/11 investigation to get to the bottom of it.



Senator Graham has lobbied Obama for years to release the 28 pages and to reopen the investigation, but Obama has refused. The former Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee and 9/11 investigator has even resorted to filing Freedom of Information requests to obtain information, but the Obama administration is still stonewalling:

Graham said that like the 28 pages in the 9/11 inquiry, the Sarasota case is being “covered up” by U.S. intelligence. Graham has been fighting to get the FBI to release the details of this investigation with Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and litigation. But so far the bureau has stalled and stonewalled, he said.

And high-level former NSA official Thomas Drake provided testimony to the 9/11 investigations documenting that the "official story" of 9/11 makes little sense, as the intelligence agencies had all of the information they needed to stop it. Drake's testimony has - for no real reason - been classified. Drake is seeking to declassify his testimony to the 9/11 Commission:

I would argue for declassification and release because the 9/11 Commission asked for it in the public interest, my testimony was given to Congress via testimony (oral and written) to investigators as a material witness and whistleblower, because of NSA’s coverup of its accountability for 9/11, and the coverup committed by NSA to obstruct official Congressional investigations, plus declassification is timely in terms of ongoing efforts to reform NSA by Congress and the President.

I do know that my testimony and evidence was fully suppressed and censored as a deep state secret - so secret that it was not included in the classified report of the 9/11 Joint Inquiry.

Indeed, the 9/11 Commission admits that it never got all of the facts ... and many officials are eager to spill the beans about what they know.

Still Urgent Today

Ancient history, you say? Graham notes:

Although it's been more than a decade ago when this horrific event occurred, I think [the questions of who supported the attacks] have real consequences to U.S. actions today.

As Graham told PBS:

We need to have this information now because it’s relevant to the threat that the people of the United States are facing today.

Postscript: People may not remember now, but – at the time – the supposed Iraqi state sponsorship of 9/11 was at least as important a justification for the Iraq war as the alleged weapons of mass destruction. This claim that Iraq is linked to 9/11 has since been debunked by the 9/11 Commission, top government officials, and even – long after they alleged such a link – Bush and Cheney themselves.


But 70% of the American public believed it at the time, and 85% of U.S. troops believed the U.S. mission in Iraq was "to retaliate for Saddam's role in the 9-11 attacks."

Only last year, John Glaser noted:

Significant portions of Americans still believe that Saddam and al-Qaeda were in cahoots and cooperated in the 9/11 attacks. The reason is simple: the administration told them this lie.

An investigation by a committee in the House of Representatives in 2004 identified “237 misleading statements about the threat posed by Iraq that were made by President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Secretary Rumsfeld, Secretary Powell, and National Security Advisor Rice. These statements were made in 125 separate appearances, consisting of 40 speeches, 26 press conferences and briefings, 53 interviews, 4 written statements, and 2 congressional testimonies.”

According to the committee, at least 61 separate statements “misrepresented Iraq’s ties to al-Qaeda.” A Senate investigation in 2006 also covered these lies.

Keeping this lie afloat took some work. The Bush administration, primarily Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld, “applied relentless pressure on interrogators to use harsh methods on detainees in part to find evidence of cooperation between al Qaida and the late Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein’s regime,” McClatchy reported in 2009.

According to Lawrence Wilkerson, chief of staff to Bush’s Secretary of State Powell, “the administration authorized harsh interrogation” in 2002, and “its principal priority for intelligence was not aimed at pre-empting another terrorist attack on the U.S. but discovering a smoking gun linking Iraq and al-Qa’ida.”

Wilkerson is right.
In other words, the failure to conduct a real 9/11 investigation contributed to the Iraq war, torture, and the failure to fix fundamental weaknesses in - and threats to - America's national security.  (VN: Wrong..... both Bush and Cheney were in on it and that was proven by Secretary of Transportations testimony before the committee that Cheney intentionally used the war games to impede a timely response to the attack when it was happening.  Soon after his testimony Sec of Transportation, Minetti was relieved of duty as the SOTransportation.  That meant Cheney knew in advance about the attack.  History is not a series of coincidences.

His testimony was the most damaging of all those who testified.  It proved the VP prevented the stoppage of the attacks in his role as conducting all war games based on the exact same attack that was under way, and that is evidence of treason.  One last point.... never before had a civilian ever taken over conducting military war games.  The obvious is what was missing in that report.  It was Minetti's testimony that proved the commission was a farce. They down played his eye witness evidence.)

Bonus:Top NSA Whistleblower: We Need a New 9/11 Investigation Into the Destruction of the World Trade Center.

---

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.