The military has been speaking out about the dangers of the Israeli influence in our government at every level. Most top level military men, as pointed out below, "know" that Israel was involved deeply in 9-11 as well as many other murderous false flags.... to manipulate a political agenda and that is primarily starting WW III. Its what they did in WW I and WW II, after conducting revolutions that weakened the military of the one country they wanted to economically destroy and it worked. Its what they are doing to us as we speak.
We have done blogs proving it, including a copy of the $20 million dollar draft Shiff of Wall Street gave to Trotsky, also known as "Bronstein", to do the Russian Revolution...They got rid of the Czar because he refused to play the "fiat currency game" with Rothschilds.
Army War College Professor Says Military Brass Knows Mossad Behind 911, Pins Hopes on U.S. Veterans Organizations
http://www.dailypaul.com/131899/army-war-college-professor-says-military-brass-knows-mossad-behind-911-pins-hopes-on-us-veterans-organizations&sss=1
by James Madison Lives, Daily Paul
"I have had long conversations over the past two weeks with contacts at the Army War College and HQ Marines, and I made it absolutely clear that in both cases it [the USS Liberty and 9/11] was a Mossad operation." - Sabrosky
Zionism: A political philosophy envisioning a militarized theocratic state in which Judaism is the official religion, often includes manifest for expansion.
Judaism: One of the world's great religions. All Jews are not Zionists, historically there has been a vigorous debate within Judaism over the legitimacy of a Jewish state, even long before the establishment of Israel. Some strains of Judaism vehemently oppose any Jewish state, for religious or other reasons. See JewsAgainstZionism.org
Anti-Semitism: Bigotry against all Jews, regardless of whether they are Zionist or not. Opposition to Israeli government policies is often incorrectly conflated with anti-semitism.
Below are two audio files of key excerpts from two lengthy recent interviews of Dr. Alan Sabrosky, for the time-challenged who are interested in hearing a compilation of some of the most important (and electrifying) statements made in the course of the interviews. Sabrosky was a Director of Studies and Adjunct Professor at the U.S. Army War College, who has stepped forward to state unequivocally that the Israeli Mossad played a central role in 911, along with co-conspirators in the American government.
Dr. Sabrosky, who is part Jewish and a former U.S. Marine, argues that only the Mossad, representing the Israeli far-right, has the organization, discipline, skills, and above all geopolitical motivation to pull off 9/11, which enabled the American invasion of Iraq. Sabrosky says although money was made by many individuals by the wars, in overarching terms only Israel is the winner.
Rarely remarked upon in discussion of this kind is that the Israeli right's goals in the Middle East have long been public knowledge, promoted by Israeli and dual-citizenship Neocons for some time. In a 1982 article in the Israeli journal Kivunim, the journal of the Department of Information of the World Zionist Organization, Israeli scholar Oded Yinon, formerly attached to the Foreign Ministry, reiterates the old idea that Israel's best course for long-term safety, prosperity, and possible expansion lay in its neighbors being broken up into many weaker, squabbling states.
Yinon envisioned Iraq broken into a Shiite south, a Sunni middle, and a Kurdish north, with other countries thereby destabilized along the same lines. Although the invasion of Iraq has been called an ongoing disaster for America, with troops unable to withdraw due to the threat of full-blown civil war, by another yardstick the invasion has been a resounding success. Sabrosky says that Iraq was never a threat to America, but it was certainly a threat to Israel, to the point of SCUD missiles already having been launched into Tel Aviv by Saddam during the first Gulf War.
In Interview II with Mark ,Sabrosky is accompanied on the air by a survivor of the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty. This deliberate attack on an American ship, in which U.S. 34 servicemen were killed, illustrates, according to Sabrosky, the ruthlessness of an extreme right-wing Israeli military faction, and the lengths to which it will go to achieve a geopolitical agenda.
In Yinon's essay "A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties" he writes:
"Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel's targets.
Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel...Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon.
In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi'ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north."
Yinon's essay influenced a generation of Israeli and Israeli-American Neocon thinkers, and in 1996 an Israeli think tank, The Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, published the widely-reported on “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm”:
"Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions."
Who were the authors of this Israeli-funded publication aimed at advising Prime Minister Netanyahu? A Who's-Who of prominent dual American-Israeli citizens who would later run George Bush's foreign policy, including Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and David Wurmser, the latter of whom would be chief adviser for Middle East policy for vice-president Dick Cheney.
The question may be asked, and Dr. Sabrosky asks it, if these mens' signatures were affixed to a war document which referred to Israel "the" realm, did the use of the word "the" betray the placement of their true allegiances? When Sabrosky says "the" realm, as a Marine he can mean only one realm: America. He questions the notion of dual citizenship with any country, not just Israel, as "political bigamy," as did President Teddy Roosevelt.
In a concluding passage which would foretell language to be used in by George W. Bush in speeches preceding the Iraq invasion, the essay states:
"Israel’s new agenda can signal a clean break by abandoning a policy which assumed exhaustion and allowed strategic retreat by reestablishing the principle of preemption, rather than retaliation alone and by ceasing to absorb blows to the nation without response." (emphasis added)
Wiki summary, "Clean Break..."
As well, the most famous of the Neocon think tanks, the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), made no secret of its desire to overthrow Saddam, which would result in Iraq breaking into manageable pieces, with American soldiers doing the managing. In a letter to George W. Bush, advocating "a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq," PNAC authors wrote:
"...even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Failure to undertake such an effort will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism."
The signers of the letter included Richard Perle, Martin Peretz , Norman Podhoretz, Donald Kagan, and Gary Bauer. And in the darkest passage arising from the PNAC documents, from the paper "Rebuilding America's Defenses," signers including Stephen Cambone, Donald Kagan, Paul Wolfowitz, William Kristol, and Dov Zakheim said:
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor"
There is an excellent video presentation by American activist Dahlia Wasfi M.D., who was born of an American Jewish mother and a Muslim-Iraqi father, raised in Iraq, who spoke at IVAW's "Winter Soldier." Her presentation is on the interests of Israel being formulated and carried out by a "cabal" consisting of dual Israeli-American citizens Douglas Feith, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Dov Zahkiem, Michael Chertoff, Scooter Libby et al, along with their American cabal components George Bush, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, John Ashcroft, General Richard Meyers (NORAD) et al. (Compiled list of possible co-conspirators here.)
Dahlia Wasfi M.D.:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvDHaJiDUek&
The new and better map of Israel for the Israeli right-wing:
http://www.oilempire.us/oil-jpg/newiraq.gif
The upshot of Dr. Sabrosky's thoughts on any possibilities for beginning a new, true investigation of 911, and justice in the event that high treason is uncovered, is the power of the local, versus, the national, U.S. veterans organizations, making their calls for a new investigation through local news media, as opposed to the national outlets, which he considers too controlled.
The military in this country is not "bought-out," Dr. Sabrosky says, but it rarely uses or even knows the power it has to force Congress into action. Sabrosky makes the distinction between local VFW posts and other organizations and the national leadership, and adds a note of urgency, saying the next three or four months represent a real window of opportunity because politicians of both parties are feeling vulnerable.
"The real 800 pound gorilla in the US lobbying systems is the veterans groups...The great fear of AIPAC is that someone will tap into the veterans organizations, because this is the one lobby which can make them history," and push forward the movement for 911 Truth.
Sabrosky urges local veterans groups to call for a new 911 investigation and to announce these through local news media.
As a military officer Sabrosky is joined by many other former military personnel at PatriotsQuestion911.org. By one count, 18 key 911 witnesses are now dead beyond all actuarial probability. The cost of 911 can be reckoned in not only lives and wars whose cost is mounting onto the tens of trillions of dollars, which have for the first time bankrupted the nation beyond any possibility of economic growth out of debt, but in rights held dear by Americans since the Founding, such as right to privacy, and right to trial, and serious abridgments of right to free speech enabled by the new state of permanent war.
Interview I: Dr. Alan Sabrosky interviewed by Daryl Bradford Smith and Ognir - 29 March 2010 of TheInformationUnderground.com
Condensed, excerpts
Full interview I
Interview II: Dr. Alan Sabrosky with Mark Glenn of TheUglyTruth.com, March 15, 2010, joined by Phil Tourney, survivor of the USS Liberty attack
Condensed, excerpts
Full interview II
In Interview II Mark Glenn reads the entirety of Sabrosky's now viral essay, "The Dark Face of Jewish Nationalism," published in the Salem News, Salem, Oregon.
Simple Calculations of Relative Scale in the Collapse of WTC One and Two
Also linked at
Similar Subjects (Sometimes)
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Vatic Clerk Tips: After 7 days, all comments to an article go into the moderation queue for approval which happens at least once a day. Please be patient.
Be respectful in your comments, keeping in mind that these discussions will become the Zeitgeist of our time that future database archeologists will discover. Make your comments worthy and on the founding father's level in their respectfulness, reasoning, and sound argumentation. Prove we weren't all idiots in our day and age. Comments that advocate sedition or violence are not encouraged. Racist, ad hominem, and troll-baiting comments might never see the light of day.