Was JFK's comment on "secret societies" a statement against the "NWO"? I searched this famous quote and finally found the full unedited written transcript and audio of this speech.
JFK was actually talking about current events of the cold war and how nontraditional enemies were gaining information on how the US was battling this war.
In this speech JFK actually points out "the need for far greater "official" secrecy"...as well as "the need for a far greater public information". (VN: I believe he was talking about more than that, I believe he saw what we see today, non traditional enemies and wars....but you listen and decide for yourselves.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=zdMbmdFOvTs
JFK admits "I have no easy answer to the dilemma that I have posed," but also states, "and would not seek to impose it if I had one." This is a major difference from where todays elected officials stand. (VN: that is because JFK stood for honor, integrity, and his sworn oath to defend and protect the Constitution of the United States..... he meant it when he took it, reps today do not. They just want to know how much will be going into their pockets.)
Address, "The President and the Press," Before The American Newspaper Publishers Association, 27 April 1961
http://www.jfklibrary.org/Asset-Viewe...
Illuminati: Origins of Secret Government
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KA5KB0...
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
JFK, the first (and hopefully last) Roman Catholic President of the most Protestant and most prosperous nation in history, and who was the flagbearer of its final destruction, was noble because he advocated more government secrecy?
ReplyDeleteWell, the good news is, I was alive when he was in office and aware enough to know what he did do that was saving our bacon. If he had lived, Viet Nam would never hve happened, we would be under the gold standard now, silver certificates would still be in circulation backed by silver, The fed reserve would be gone and treasury would be dealng with our currency based on real assets backing the currency, and the steel industry would be as healthy as a horse and we would not be driving guranteed fibreglass death traps, rather steel automobiles that can be easily fixed, higher off the ground, and definitely not death traps. All of that in such a short time. Truly amazing. Viet Nam would never have happened and Russian glostnose would have been achieved decades earlier than it finally was.
ReplyDeleteHis religion, like anyone elses, had nothing to do with all the good he had done when he had been in office only 2.5 years.
Some people will claim that JFK is talking about Communism in this speech. My question is; how is Communism a secret society?
ReplyDeleteTo Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteWhat does bashing a beloved, assassinated president's religion have to do with the opinion expressed by the author? And how exactly was he the flag bearer of it's final destruction. Your comments are not constructive or helpful.
He was talking about the vatican and the jesuits - u dont speak against the pope - and he was made a public example.
ReplyDeleteFirst and last anonymous... its nice that other commenters did such a good job answering your two comments about our President and his religion. In fact, he was the first Catholic president that put that sorry bogus threat to bed and now no one talks about religion with as much angst as they did back then.
ReplyDeleteWhy? Becuase he proved it was a bogus concern. Nothing he did helped the pope, and in fact, if you believe the pope was and is part of the conspiracy to bring down America, then what he did was hurt the pope so bad, that the international bankers had to assassinate JFK.
War is a racket, I agree that claim about him talking about Communism is definitely bogus. Why? Communism was first introduced to us by who? KARL MARX, a Khazar, and Engels, another khazar. What they wrote about communism was adopted by the khazar leaders to justify the Russian revolution, and Socialism, the baby brother of communism was used by the same khazar bankers to justify overthrow of the German gov at the time in 1933.
ReplyDeleteWell, the reason they did not use communism the 2nd time was the horrors known about Communism used in Russia before WW I. No one in Germany would buy it. So they created the baby brother and used that to work up the masses.
Here in America we are much more educated now and that is why these international Zionist bankers are moving directly into a fascist police state, since that is where the previous two revolutions led the people back then.
It was all a game to garner control of the world, using those two systems as boogymen, but today we know the game. We found and read the protcols and they can't smooze us anymore, so they are moving into the real agenda they have always had. Global domination of a fascist world work force with slavery as the goal.