RH negs - 97% of Our DNA has been Disabled - Part 1 of 2

***I had trouble putting this up when I first started and could not figure out why, since then, after scheduling which was for 1:30 am for the benefit of the overseas readers, the time had been changed to 2 am, which then immediate put this behind the originally scheduled 2 am, resulting in many missing this altogether. 

So the harassment continues on those thing they do not want you to know. As I said, they are afraid of us for some reason.Anyway, no matter what they do to this, continue to read it. I am unable to continually monitor these blogs to ensure they stay clean, so help us out by reading them and telling us they are not OK so then we can fix it again.

Vatic Note:  This is the first real evidence that we have been "created" in the past, unless someone can come up with a better explanation of how "God" made us, then this should stand.   We have a part two coming up with even more information along these lines.  This was fascinating.

Work has been done on the "junk DNA" by european and Russian scientists and we did a blog on that, but what we did not have at the time this was done, was the fact that the Human Genome Project was going to map out every single thing in the human Genome, no matter what the reason, since I have my suspicions as to why they are doing it, but at least we get to find out what is in it and for that I am grateful.

This below makes some startling revelations about our genome compared to other species on the planet that are a lot less complex than we are.  What is the reason for that difference?   That is what this covers and involves RH negs even more than RH positives.

There were two creations, with the first being a lot less complex and when these slave workers turned out not to be all they could be in the production dept, they changed the DNA and added more to make them more than they were originally.  That is where the RH neg comes in. 

There is a whole series on this that we will be publishing which will truly expand our knowledge of just exactly what and who we are.  We need to know that because the evil ones are deathly afraid of us.  Why?  Read and you decide.

RH negs - 97% of Our DNA has been Disabled  - Part 1 of 2 - Evidence of DNA manipulation in our distant past?
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vida_alien/slavespecies02.htm
by Michael Tellinger,  Bibliotecapleyades

The Human Genome Project has dished up some real surprises to scientists. The first surprise was the vast percentage of the human DNA that is inactive. It is estimated that at least 97% of our DNA is in actual fact a waste of space, as it does not contain any active genes that actually carry the code for any of our physical makeup.

Then within the genes there are Introns – parts that do not carry any code; and Exons - sections that carry some sort of genetic code. The full length of our DNA is made up of some 20 000 genes that have now been identified.

These genes carry the blueprint for the structure of our entire body. What is very puzzling is the fact that Homo sapiens, as the supposed pinnacle if civilized evolution on this planet, should have such large parts of unused DNA. We seem to have the longest DNA molecule among all other species, but we use the smallest part of it in proportion to the other species. In other words, all the other creatures use much more of their DNA than humans do. Some species use as much as 98% of their DNA. (VN:  after the experiments I have done, I believe we use so much less of our DNA out of ignorance.  We have no idea what we have that we have not  used.  Just in the simple act of healing without anything external, I was able to heal areas of my body that would have required either drugs to do or natural remedies, and I used neither and healed both.  Will discuss the specifics later as I find out more about why and how that happened, this is 5 months later and I am still fine.)

This flies directly in the face of the principles of evolution.
Humans should have the most complex and evolved DNA of all creatures, to have reached levels of civilization seemingly much higher than any other species on Earth over millions of years of evolution. What is even more curious is the predicted number of genes in species. The numbers seem to increase steadily from basic organisms to the most advanced. We would expect that humans should end up having most genes, but strangely this is not the case.

Here are some examples of the predictions for total number of genes in species.

• Fruit Fly   21 000
• Zebrafish  50 000
• Chicken   76 000
• Mouse     81 000
• Chimp   130 000
• Human    68 000

Can you see the problem here?

The Chimp is our closest known genetic relative and yet it has almost twice as many genes as humans.

And then we get to the anomaly of the chromosomes. Our DNA is broken up into 23 pairs of chromosomes. By comparison, all apes have 24 pairs. One would expect that Homo erectus, our immediate evolutionary precursor would then also have had 24 chromosome pairs.

Just one year ago on 6 April 2005, researchers from the National Human Genome Research Institute announced that,

“A detailed analysis of chromosomes 2 and 4 has detected the largest “gene deserts” known in the human genome and uncovered more evidence that human chromosome 2 arose from the fusion of two ancestral ape chromosomes” as reported in Nature.

It is also the second largest chromosome we possess and it seems to make no sense why 2 primordial chromosomes should have merged to make us human, if this new chromosome gives us no apparent advantage for survival.
 

So when we read in the Sumerian tablets that humans were cloned as a sub-species between Homo erectus and a more advanced human-like species that arrived on Earth some 400 000 years ago, it suddenly makes a little bit more sense. The tablets describe how our maker removed certain parts of the “Tree of life” to trim the ability of the new “creature” and how they struggled to make the perfect “primitive worker” so that it could understand commands but not be too smart to question their existence.

Similar suggestions of genetic cloning are made in The Koran and Hindu Laws of Manu.

The Koran:

• Ya Sin: “Is man not aware that We created him from a little germ?”
• The Believers - God says almost verbatim what the Sumerian tablets tell us. “We first created man from an essence of clay; then placed him a living germ in a secure enclosure. The germ we made a clot of blood, and the clot a lump of flesh. This we fashioned into bones, then clothed the bones with flesh…”

Laws of Manu:

• 19. But from minute body (-framing) particles of these seven very powerful Purushas springs this (world), the perishable from the imperishable.
• 20. Among them each succeeding (element) acquires the quality of the preceding one, and whatever place (in the sequence) each of them occupies, even so many qualities it is declared to possess.

Notice the reference to “We” by the creator. The cloning of humans as a more primitive worker or “lulu amelu” suddenly does not seem so far fetched and the strange genetic anomalies seem to support some genetic manipulation in our distant past. The modern-day researchers go further to say that this “fusion” of our chromosome 2 is what makes us human.

Are we getting closer to proving that humans were created by his MAKER as slaves to work in the early gold mines on Earth? It certainly seems like it.

Michael Tellinger
April 2006