Pages

2013-05-11

Mossad, Wolfowitz & The Strangely Defenseless Pentagon On 911

Vatic Note:  This was an analysis I did not see when it first came out, so I assumed at that point in time, many had not seen this nor thought about it.  Its a great dissecting of the mantra by the neocons and neolibs that Mossad had warned the CIA.  This is a good analysis, but the only thing missing is the Cheney factor that has to be included in any such analysis. 

Why did Cheney do what no other VP in the history of this nation had ever done?  He took control of "War games" that day, away from the military, and controlled them himself.  No questioning about that part of it.  Was Cheney working for Israel and Mossad as such?  It appears so, and after Mineta's testimony before the 9-11 commission, I am thoroughly convinced it is so.  

He testified that Cheney ignored all the continued warnings by the working military men, in the war room, that the planes, flight 93, and the flight to hit the pentagon, were getting closer and closer and asked Cheney if he wanted to rescind his "Stand down" order.  

Cheney finally yelled at the poor soldier and said "If I wanted to change my order, I would have said so"!   What kind of a response is that from a VP that knows full well what is happening and he is purposely chosing to do nothing about it.  There is only one conclusion anyone can make from such behavior.  Even the courts say "Given the circumstances described, WHAT WOULD A REASONABLE MAN DEDUCE?", and that is accepted as a valid consideration in a court of law during a jury trial and is part of the judges instructions to the jury.

That is basically, the only problem I had with this entire analysis since I believe it highlights just how serious it was to ignore Cheneys role in all of it.  It takes it out of the realm of a foreign power harming the US and puts it into a conspiracy of a treasonous nature on the part of the administration at the time.  You read and decide.  If this is as we analyzed, then all that is happening now is no less deceptive including what is going on in Syria and we must believe NOTHING of what these Israeli's say or their dual citizens within this administration.

Mossad, Wolfowitz & The Strangely Defenseless Pentagon On 911
http://www.nogw.com/download/2006_defenseless_pentagon.pdf
By Leland Lehrman, At Rense.com 

The Case Against The Mossad And Israeli Partisans    


Although the Mossad's warnings regarding 9/11 appear to exonerate it, that is not the case. Former Mossad case officer Victor Ostrovsky in his two excellent books By Way of Deception and The Other Side of Deception demonstrates that the Mossad often uses useless warnings as a way of making themselves look innocent when in fact the opposite is true:


"Admony, then the head of Mossad, decided they would simply give the Americans the usual general warning, a vague notice that they had reason to believe someone might be planning an operation against them. But this was so general and so commonplace, it was like sending a weather report;  unlikely to raise any particular alarm or prompt increased security precautions. 

In the six months following receipt of this information, for
example, there were more than 100 general warnings of car-bomb attacks.  One more would not heighten US concerns or surveillance."

"Admony, in refusing to give the Americans specific information on the truck, said, "No, we're not going to protect the Americans. They're a big country. Send only the regular information."

Once one understands the methodology of the Mossad and its management of false flag attacks - as well as the massive involvement of the US - Israeli axis in manufacturing the "War on Terror" - to accept the idea that the Mossad is innocent because it gave weak and useless warnings to its well-infiltrated sister the CIA becomes absurd.

Read Michael Collins Piper's work on James Angleton and the Mossad in his book Final Judgment for an understanding of just how deep the connection between the two agencies really is.
Here's the article from the Jerusalem Post about the Mossad warnings:

Note that they gave no targets, fingered bin Laden and *implicated Iraq,* and we all know how involved Iraq was in 9/11...
--
"Mossad warned CIA of attacks" - report By Douglas Davis
LONDON (September 17) - Mossad officials traveled to Washington last month to warn the CIA and the FBI that a cell of up to 200 terrorists was planning a major operation, according to a report in the Sunday Telegraph here yesterday.
The paper said the Israeli officials specifically warned their counterparts in Washington that "large-scale terrorist attacks on highly visible targets on the American mainland were imminent." 

They offered no specific information about targets, but they did link the plot to Afghanistan-based terrorist Osama bin Laden, and they told the Americans there were "strong grounds" for suspecting Iraqi involvement.

A US administration official told the paper that it was "quite credible" that
the CIA did not heed the Mossad warning: "It has a history of being
over-cautious about Israeli information." But the official noted that "if this
is true, then the refusal to take it seriously will mean heads will roll.""
--
Furthermore, according to Der Speigel, Mossad handed over a list of 19
terrorist suspects. We know that the "19 terrorists" are not on the passenger
manifests and that the FBI has acknowledged that several of them are still
alive while refusing to change the official list of suspects.

Did the Mossad know the official story was going to include 19 hjacker
patsies? It's a pretty eerie coincidence I'd say.
"While the Israelis were closely observing Atta and his friends, they did
not inform the U.S. government what they were up to until August 2001:
Der Spiegel reported (October 1, 2002) that they handed over a list of 19
terrorist suspects, with at least four of the hijackers on it, "a few weeks
before" September 11, but the federal government says that the warning
was for attacks "outside the United States."
--
Paul Wolfowitz and Doug Feith, both well-known Israeli partisans who
have even been investigated for espionage on behalf of Israel, were both
effectively *in command* of the Defense department on 9/11. If Mossad
had wanted to warn America, it would have warned them. And yet, no
action on 9/11 from DoD. Nothing. A giant 757 or whatever hit the
Pentagon nearly an hour and a half after the first hijacking was known to
be underway and neither fighter aircraft nor anti-aircraft missile batteries
performed.

Just look at the way Wolfowitz, Feith, Perle and Niger Uranium hoaxer
Michael Ledeen have been caught working for Israel throughout history:

"In 1978, [Wolfowitz] was investigated for providing a classified
document on the proposed sale of U.S. weapons to an Arab government, to
an Israel Government official, through an AIPAC intermediary. An inquiry
was launched and dropped, however, and Wolfowitz continued to work at
ACDA until 1980...

...But Feith was fired because he'd been the object of an inquiry into
whether he'd provided classified material to an official of the Israeli
Embassy in Washington. The FBI had opened the inquiry...

... Perle's second brush with the law occurred a year later in 1970. An FBI
wiretap authorized for the Israeli Embassy picked up Perle discussing with
an Embassy official classified information which he said had been supplied
to him by a staff member on the National Security Council. An NSC/FBI
investigation was launched to identify the staff member...

...In 1983, on the recommendation of Richard Perle, Ledeen was hired at
the Department of Defense as a consultant on terrorism. His immediate
supervisor was the Principle Assistant Secretary for International Security
Affairs, Noel Koch. Early in their work together, Koch noticed with
concern Ledeen's habit of stopping by in his (Koch's) outer office to read classified materials. When the two of them took a trip to Italy, Koch
learned from the CIA station there that when Ledeen had lived in Rome
previously, as correspondent for The New Republic, he'd been carried in
Agency files as an agent of influence of a foreign government: Israel..."
A photo of Wolfowitz, Feith, Dov Zakheim and Israeli Chief of Defense
Shaul Mofaz four months after 9/11 is here:

More information on Iran Contra criminal and Israeli agent Michael
Ledeen can be found here:
--
My friends, if the Mossad had truly warned America, and the Mossad's friends in America had intended to protect us, we would never have been attacked.
It's that simple.

CIA/Mossad/AEI asset and right wing Israeli war hawk Benjamin
Netanyahu talks weekly with Larry Silverstein: http://tinyurl.com/qsvjj
And, although Mossad met with the CIA on August 23rd, 2001 to give
warnings, they didn't tell the CIA what the targets were. And here's the
clincher:
*They clearly knew what the targets were because less than three weeks
later, Israeli agents were set up at the WTC ahead of time filming and
celebrating.*

More information on the involvement of Silverstein and Netanyahu, along
with the Republican Jewish Coalition can be found here:
Instead of crying at the sight of the WTC in flames, the Mossad agents
were laughing and celebrating.

If you were a loyal, religious Mossad agent who had been unable to
prevent an attack on an ally, would you be laughing and celebrating, taking
photos of yourself with a lighter positioned underneath the image of the
WTC towers and box cutters in your van?

I wouldn't. But if your motto is By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War,
perhaps you would consider it:


Leland

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Vatic Clerk Tips: After 7 days, all comments to an article go into the moderation queue for approval which happens at least once a day. Please be patient.

Be respectful in your comments, keeping in mind that these discussions will become the Zeitgeist of our time that future database archeologists will discover. Make your comments worthy and on the founding father's level in their respectfulness, reasoning, and sound argumentation. Prove we weren't all idiots in our day and age. Comments that advocate sedition or violence are not encouraged. Racist, ad hominem, and troll-baiting comments might never see the light of day.