Our Satanic General Aquino made a big deal out of that mind control program he is head of, by saying the objective is to use propoganda and disinfo to convince us, the American people, that we would never win in a fight against them. I suspect that was also the objective of the JDL's letter to a dissident who spoke truth about what they are doing and got threatened for doing so.
Fear is the objective and I say "RIGHTEOUS ANGER" is the cure. What are the implications of that decision listed below? If you take into account that Homeland Security, under the watchful eye of the dual Israeli citizens that head up the agency in the persons of Nepolitano as head, and the Mossad sponsored ADL and the SPLC on the citizens advisory board, then you also have to take into account the recent purchase of 2,400 drones for use in America.
The foreign country occupying our government, is using our taxes to pay for our own repression and future assassinations. Now this is more blatant than anything they have done previously. We don't even have to dig for info on this one. Its right out there and not even being denied.
What are the implications of those drones in American skies and this decision? It means they could already be killing American citizens and this court they apparently own, has ruled that it can be kept a secret. So our courts in NY at least are gone.
Now we have no legislative protection, White House obviously gone or the Homeland Gestapo would never have been able to buy those drones, and would not have asked for the power to assassinate Americans without a trial or due process. This below proves that we also have no protection from the courts. WE ARE DEFINITELY ON OUR OWN. Do not give up your guns no matter what, unless you are willing to live in a fascist police state with no life of your own. Your choice.
White House wins fight to keep drone killings of Americans secret
http://philosophers-stone.co.uk/wordpress/
Reuters / Pascal Lauener
United States District Court Judge Colleen McMahon wrote in her finding this week that the Obama administration was largely in the right by rejecting Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and The New York Times for materials pertaining to the use of unmanned aerial vehicles to execute three US citizens abroad in late 2011 [pdf].
Anwar al-Awlaki (VN: As we stated above, he is still alive and kicking and his real name is Greenberg, visit ) and Samir Khan, both US nationals with alleged ties to al-Qaeda, were killed on September 30 of that year using drone aircraft; days later, al-Awlaki’s teenage son, Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, was executed in the same manner.
Although the Obama administration has remained largely quiet about the killings in the year since, a handful of statements made from senior White House officials, including Pres. Barack Obama himself, have provided some but little insight into the Executive Branch’s insistence that the killings were all justified and constitutionally-sound. (VN: They just did this to see how we would react when they get very serious about murdering Americans here on our soil, THAT IS WHY YOU HAVE TO KEEP THE GUNS AND HONE YOUR HACKING SKILLS TO BRING THOSE DRONES DOWN.)
Attempts from the ACLU and the Times via FOIA requests to find out more have been unfruitful, though, which spawned a federal lawsuit that has only now been decided in court.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Vatic Clerk Tips: After 7 days, all comments to an article go into the moderation queue for approval which happens at least once a day. Please be patient.
Be respectful in your comments, keeping in mind that these discussions will become the Zeitgeist of our time that future database archeologists will discover. Make your comments worthy and on the founding father's level in their respectfulness, reasoning, and sound argumentation. Prove we weren't all idiots in our day and age. Comments that advocate sedition or violence are not encouraged. Racist, ad hominem, and troll-baiting comments might never see the light of day.