They have no excuse since all the photos, videos and evidence has been distributed all over the globe, so that means the daily mail is in on it and gone as well, just like our MSM. I am beginning to wonder why they even stay open and report anything, since no one believes them anymore as we showed on a blog recently.
60% do not trust the MSM any longer and do not even watch the news. In fact, many are giving up TV altogether. In fact, I just read how the Daily Mail is having financial troubles and now we know why. Their readers no longer believe them either.
This was a good analysis below on how this was so badly handled by the police as far as evidence goes. But then, why waste all that time and risk the scientists finding out that the perp did not do the shooting. Thats the only explanation for why they treated evidence as poorly as they did. Even the remaining ammo would or could have had fingerprints on it.
How To Destroy Sandy Hook School Shooting Evidence
http://beforeitsnews.com/politics/2012/12/how-to-destroy-sandy-hook-school-shooting-evidence-2479724.html
by TheSONSOFLIBERTYMC, Before Its News
Published on Dec 15, 2012
NEWTON SCHOOL SHOOTING ..is that how you handle evidence? Evidently the safetyNUTZI’s ..don’t understand the importance of FINGERPRINTS/etc ..even with the DEAD GUY you still need to preserve evidence:
Needless to say, it makes ZERO SENSE that the best weapon for the killing was left in the trunk of the vehicle. and could NOT possibly have been used at the school because the dead shooter couldn’t have put it back into the trunk. (VN: it was also confirmed as we showed on here by the news, that the guy shot the kids with that kind of assault weapon, yet, it was not found near the body, so how did it get back into the trunk of the car? There were only two hand guns found by his body. Hmm, two?)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=RDw0DUpKssA
Which raises the all important question: “Say, this kid shot mommy in the face 6 times with this thing that day, how many rounds did the stupid moron [officer at the trunk] eject from the still inserted magazine onto the pavement behind the weapon?”
I’m presuming that the magazine was ‘full’ though no gun owner would ever allow any weapon to be so stored as this puts a preset into the magazine feed spring, which is a bad idea all the way around.
IF the magazine was ‘full’ at the house, and the kid didn’t calmly sit down and reload it again after killing mommy, that magazine would have a total capacity minus ’6′ or however many the guy fired into mommy’s face.
Another good reason for the trunk of the vehicle to have been ‘sealed’ immediately for the vehicle to be processed properly at the State’s crime laboratory for fingerprints and other clues. Once the trunk was opened on the car and it was ascertained that the trunk did not contain any obvious booby traps of any kind, the trunk should have been shut again very carefully, the trunk lid sealed by special evidence anti tamper tape across the trunk lid seal to the body, and indeed over the key opening, and the vehicle put on a flatbed and towed to the crime lab for extensive analysis.
My guess is that that was not done. But that’s exactly what should have been done when the police determined the car contained weapons not used in the shooting, obviously, least not at the SCHOOL. That car would have gone to the central crime lab there in Hartford for processing, not mucked with on location by morons.
Dennis Cimino fromveteranstoday.com/2012/12/27/sandy-hook-huge-hoax-and-anti-gun-psy-op/
Sandy Hook: Huge Hoax and Anti-Gun “Psy Op”
By Jim Fetzer and Dennis Cimino
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Vatic Clerk Tips: After 7 days, all comments to an article go into the moderation queue for approval which happens at least once a day. Please be patient.
Be respectful in your comments, keeping in mind that these discussions will become the Zeitgeist of our time that future database archeologists will discover. Make your comments worthy and on the founding father's level in their respectfulness, reasoning, and sound argumentation. Prove we weren't all idiots in our day and age. Comments that advocate sedition or violence are not encouraged. Racist, ad hominem, and troll-baiting comments might never see the light of day.