http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=30862
By: Finian Cunningham
Date: 2012-05-16
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
By: Finian Cunningham
Date: 2012-05-16
You know when Western powers are getting trigger
happy towards Iran again because the mainstream media propaganda machine
starts cranking out lurid scare stories.
The latest wheeze is based on “computer-generated
drawings” allegedly depicting a nuclear explosion blast chamber that
Iran has allegedly been using to test mini nukes. The drawings were
provided “exclusively” to the Associated Press news agency by an unnamed
official from “a country tracking Iran's nuclear program, who said it
proves [sic] the structure exists”.
Don’t you just love the way “unnamed sources” are quoted, who go on to “prove” their own unverifiable claims?
The AP story has since been picked up, predictably, by all and sundry Western media [1].
Not only are the stories illustrated with
computerised images of the alleged blast chamber, there are also
mathematical details of chamber dimensions, design and structure.
A good rule-of-thumb is that when western media and
unnamed “diplomats” assiduously provide “details” on suspect
installations, then it is a sure sign of desperation to convince the
wider public about otherwise dubious claims.
The template for this kind of disinformation stunt
was the presentation by former US Secretary of State Colin Powell in
February 2003 before the United Nations Security Council. Then, in a
contrived performance that smacked of sheer theatre, Powell presented
audio recordings and satellite images to testify that Saddam Hussein’s
Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. This was a piece with then
British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s hysterical assertion that Iraq had
the capability of launching such weapons “within 45 seconds”.
In sonorous tones, Powell declared to the world: “My
colleagues, every statement I make today is backed up by sources, solid
sources. These are not assertions. What we’re giving you are facts and
conclusions based on solid intelligence.”
All of the supposed “solid sources” claimed by Powell
(and Blair and George W Bush) were later shown to be fabrications or
spurious. Powell for one lied through his teeth. But based on his
performance, the US and Britain launched a nine-year war of aggression
on Iraq that claimed over one million lives and bequeathed that country
with a heinous legacy of ongoing internecine violence, poverty,
destruction and widespread cancer-causing depleted-uranium
contamination.
Incredibly, far from being shamed over committing war
crimes and being complicit in war crimes, Western governments and media
continue to repeat the same cynical charade of weapons of mass
destruction on Iran.
Less than three years after Colin Powell’s
disgraceful moment of mendacity before the eyes of the world, the New
York Times ran a story alleging that Iran had nuclear warheads. The
claim was based on images obtained by unnamed American intelligence
officials allegedly from a stolen Iranian laptop. That story was later
exposed by investigative journalist Gareth Porter to be a ludicrous
fabrication because the images were actually of redundant North Korean
missiles.
It is with this kind of track record of war crimes
and blatant fabrication that the latest “exclusive” story of a secret
Iranian nuclear blast chamber must be assessed – a story based on
computer drawings supplied yet again by ubiquitous unnamed sources.
Debunking such disinformation is not enough. Given the seriousness of
consequences from publishing this disinformation, Iran or some
international citizen body should be filing a legal case against Western
mainstream media for inciting illegal wars.
It should be noted that the latest nuclear allegation
against Iran comes only days ahead of the second round of the P5 + 1
negotiations set to take place on 23 May in Baghdad. Ominously, it is
being mooted in the Western media that if Iran does not make a major
concession, that is stop its legally entitled civilian nuclear energy
programme (a highly unlikely concession), then the Western powers or
their Israeli subcontractor of terror will move to a military option. In
this context, of concern is the recent build-up of military forces by
the US and its proxy autocratic monarchy states in the Persian Gulf.
The move this week by Saudi Arabia and the other Gulf
states to form a closer military union – citing Iran as a regional
threat – can be seen as an American closing of ranks in advance of a
possible attack.
The dissemination by Western media of “evidence” of
Iranian nuclear weaponisation takes on an even more sinister purpose,
with shadows of the “Colin Powell moment”.
Finian Cunningham is Global Research’s Middle East and East Africa Correspondent
Notes
[1] http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/05/13/drawing-may-provide-insight-into-iran-nuclear-intentions/
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
Former CIA analyst Ray McGovern quoted a long list of generals and intelligence heads (including three former Mossad heads), all of whom said that Iran poses "no existential threat" to the United States. Experts including McGovern have also stressed that taking out Iran's nuclear power plants is militarily impossible (consider the countries over which pilots would have to fly) and politically counterproductive.
ReplyDeleteThose who are "in the know" are almost unanimous in this assessment. Only the politicians and pundits are in favor of war with Iran. Check out the following video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DxyA4LT7MA