Pages

2012-06-11

Hillary Clinton coming under Fire In State for Sponsoring Terrorists in Syria

Vatic Note:  This is the 5th time the Mossad, CIA and MI6 have financed and sent their trained agents to act as rebels in order to secure the banks for Rothschild, the oil for the International Zionist bankers and the other natural resources along with future slave labor all for the global elite Satanist/occultists  and their corporations.  Are we about tired of this?  They want martial law and gun collection over here, so the civil war is being touted in the Zionist owned MSM.   Stay united, no matter what.

They want us to start a civil war here while starting a world war, which would then ensure we would lose it just Like Russia did when they did the same thing  in 1917.  This blog pointed it out every time they did it, in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, and now Syria.  Its all planned just like WW I,  WW II, and every single war since. This author is naive to think this is not intentional for profit and gain which is a serious death penalty war crime.

Its all so they can grab land that is not theirs, profits that are criminal and money laundering that would be ignored in the face of a world war.  They need it to globalize and to profit from the weapons and rebuilding like they did in WW II.  Wake up folks, this is the underbelly of total corruption in Government.  Hillary, Feinstein, Pelosi, etc are giving women in Government a truly bad name.

U.S. And Israel Enlist Jihadist Terrorists To Bring Down Syria

http://diSquietreservations.blogspot.com/2012/06/us-and-israel-enlist-jihadist.html

JUNE 10, 2012


U.S. And Israel Enlist Jihadist Terrorists To Bring Down Syria



U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has come under fire for sponsoring terrorists in Syria
(VN: She is looking pretty rough these days,  she is indicating in this picture above, just how much those millions of  deaths are bothering her.)

In Syria, the U.S. and Israel are sponsoring Jihadist terrorists to destroy the unity of Syria and bring down the current Syrian government. As a result, the moral and intellectual arguments for the U.S.-led war on terror are being exposed as propaganda talking points that have no logical connections to the real world.

The U.S. and Israeli governments cannot be taken seriously when they try to sell to the world the lie that Islamic terrorism is a threat to Western civilization while they are secretly funding and arming Sunni terrorists to wage war against governments that they don't like.


We don't have to point to the false flag 9/11 events as an example of state-sponsored terrorism by the U.S. and Israeli governments. There is endless evidence in Syria that points to a coordinated policy of state-sponsored terrorism against the Syrian people by Washington and Tel Aviv.

Washington's alliance with Jihadist terrorists is coming out into the daylight in Syria, Libya, and other nations that have experienced theCIA's "Arab Spring." Rob Prince wrote an excellent article on June 3rd about this unholy alliance called, "Tunisia’s Salafists: Brownshirts of the Arab Spring." Prince said:
"The British and the U.S. prefer the more placid and 'west-oriented’ face of 'moderate Islamic parties' like Tunisia’s Ennahda which claims to respect democratic processes. But when necessary, London and Washington have not hesitated to cooperate with more fanatical elements -- be they Saudi Wahhabists or now Syrian jihadists. Besides the anti-Arab secular nationalist bond that unites U.S. foreign policy with Islamists, there is a bond of another kind: they see eye to eye economically. The Moslem Brotherhoods in Egypt, Ennahda in Tunisia, and Salafists throughout the region are all comfortable with and support the kind of neoliberal economic policies the United States and Europe pursue. They have opposed trade union rights, strong state-directed economic policies. When it comes to neoliberal economics, openness to foreign corporate and financial penetration, the Islamists and U.S. policymakers are in complete harmony."
The U.S.-Israeli-Jihadist war against Syria has produced a humanitarian crisis that the Western media is deliberately and criminally misrepresenting to the world. It is now clear beyond any shadow of a doubt that the guilty party in the Houla massacre was the foreign-armed Syrian opposition.

There is dissent within the loosely assembled, highly unpopular, and murderous opposition, with the more moral members breaking ranksand admitting to a German reporter named Rainer Hermann that their bloodthirsty partners were responsible for the Houla massacre.

The U.S. and its allies have used the Houla massacre as an excuse to apply pressure on the Syrian government at the United Nations. They have wrongly accused Russia of shielding Assad from retribution and going against the international community. French journalist Thierry Meyssan wrote about this angle of the conflict in his article, "Syria: What the Security Council Said."

Also, watch historian Webster Tarpley take Ban Ki-moon and Kofi Annan to task for their despicable and criminal behaviour as it relates to the Syrian conflict. Tarpley calls them, "two of the greatest liars and imperialist tools of the age." 

II. Will The Wise Prevail, Or Will Irrational Aggression Once Again Rule The Day?

If the U.S., Israel, and Saudi Arabia are allowed by the international community to continue their illegal war against Syria then the entire Middle East will explode. Wiser heads in the West and the East must prevail.

Zbigniew Brzezinski is one of the few American geopolitical thinkers to provide a wise, sober, and honest assessment of the conflict in Syria and the hidden forces at work behind the scenes. On MSNBC's Morning Joe program on May 30, 2012, Brzezinski cautioned that America should not react with emotion to what is going on in Syria. He said that there is no sign of a widespread national uprising against the Syrian government, and that isolating Russia because of its stance on the Syrian crisis is impossible.

The Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said in a press conferencein Moscow on Saturday, June 9, that Russia will not support a military intervention in Syria. The delusional and dishonest Western media will spin his remarks as a blanket endorsement of the Assad government.

In an editorial on Friday, June 8, called, "Assad, the Butcher," the New York Times said:
"With every new atrocity, calls for military action grow. We understand the desire to protect innocents. Intervention would be costly and could widen the war. The best hope of avoiding that is for the Security Council to impose comprehensive punishments — and for Russia, China and Iran to stop enabling Mr. Assad’s savagery."
The New York Times knows a thing or two about covering up acts of savagery, having covered up the most savage act of state terrorism in history that was committed by the shadow governments in Washington and Tel Aviv on September 11, 2001.

If the editors of the New York Times are so concerned about stopping human suffering and government savagery, they should start at home, not in Syria.


The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

1 comment:

  1. The writer seems to be keeping his focus narrow, the better to make his point for the half informed. The well informed already know who is pulling the strings. If the author had tried to cover all points in one article, he would have lost his audience. As it is, he made his point in such a way as to wake people up and to get them to follow his line of reasoning to its logical conclusion: that the Israeli regime has a long and prolific history of false flags and controlled opposition to present itself as the victim even as it attacks innocent victims. The Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas come to mind.

    ReplyDelete

Vatic Clerk Tips: After 7 days, all comments to an article go into the moderation queue for approval which happens at least once a day. Please be patient.

Be respectful in your comments, keeping in mind that these discussions will become the Zeitgeist of our time that future database archeologists will discover. Make your comments worthy and on the founding father's level in their respectfulness, reasoning, and sound argumentation. Prove we weren't all idiots in our day and age. Comments that advocate sedition or violence are not encouraged. Racist, ad hominem, and troll-baiting comments might never see the light of day.