Pages

2011-08-23

New social network will force Google+ users to identify themselves.. or leave the site

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2025677/Google-users-forced-identify--leave-site.html

By: Hannah Roberts
Date: 2011-08-15

Web users who go by bogus names will be booted off the new Google+ social network.

The company has recently launched the network as a rival to Facebook.

But If Google learns the name you're using on the network is not your real name, you have just four days to clean up your act. If you don't your profile will be removed.

Saurabh Sharma, product manager on the Google+ team, announced the new rule in a video shared on YouTube and on Google+.

The company said it tried to make connecting with people on the web more like connecting with people in the real world, so those signing up for the service are required to use the name they commonly go by in the real world.





Social buzz: Google+ is billed as the next generation social network

The new regulations were billed as an 'update to how we handle potential violations of our common name policy.'

In the past, when the company suspended the profile of those it judged were not using their real identity, and then let the user appeal.

But from now on there will be no appeals permitted, msn news reported.

Sharma said: 'If we find that your profile name does not adhere to our policy, we’ll give you a 4-day grace period to fix your profile name before we take further action.'

'Taking action means your account is closed although you will be allowed to 'take all your content with you, even after your profile is suspended. Visit Google Takeout for more details.'

GOOGLE+ GETS SOCIAL

Google has begun integrating Google+ into search results with public Google+ posts now appearing in Social Search.

Links shared on Google+ will show up under that link when it appears in a friend’s search results.

Google+ now joins Flickr, Twitter, Quora and Google Buzz as input for Google’s Social Search.

Social Search debuted in 2009 at the Web 2.0 Summit, partly as a response to Bing’s integration with Facebook and Twitter.

Social Search highlights links a user's friends are sharing on the web and returns 'relevant' results based on your friends’ interests.

The news immediately angered users.

'Gwyddonaid' on YouTube said: 'I will be removing Google+ from my online activities. There are many reasons for the use of pseudonyms, including personal safety. For years, we have instructed children and others to not use their 'real names' online for privacy and safety concerns. Now Google, in its INFINITE UNwisdom decrees that only 'real names' will be used," said 'Goodbye, Google. So much for 'do no evil.'

Emilio Osorio wrote: 'What about the necessity of those involved in risky political environments and the use of Google+ as a reach out medium? How's google+ going to handle those real needs of the rest of us that are living in unsecure places (like Mexico)? Or google+ just needs to be considered as a "linkedin/facebook" thing with only rosy politically correct content?'

And said another: 'No. I'll gladly give you my real name, you can keep it, give it to advertisers, I really don't care, that's OK with me, its part of the service and I understand that, but, I will not have my display name as my 'real' legal name, I just simply don't use that name with people, I don't use it on the web, its not me, I don't like it, I won't do it.'


The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

2 comments:

  1. For almost a thousand years, it has been a feature of common law that people can go by any name they wish as long as it's not for fraudulent purposes.
    Google is going against centuries of law. Worse, their totally ignoring the practical reasons for going by a name other than your birth name.
    The only reason I can imagine is, they want a weapon that the NWO can use to cow us into silence.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Remember, we did a blog on google and the khazars who own and run it. I must make the point that they fought tooth and nail to stop the government from using google to spy on Americans through google. They lost in court and thus were forced into doing the governments bidding. For that I give them much credit. However, they are now on the wrong side and we must act accordingly.

    ReplyDelete

Vatic Clerk Tips: After 7 days, all comments to an article go into the moderation queue for approval which happens at least once a day. Please be patient.

Be respectful in your comments, keeping in mind that these discussions will become the Zeitgeist of our time that future database archeologists will discover. Make your comments worthy and on the founding father's level in their respectfulness, reasoning, and sound argumentation. Prove we weren't all idiots in our day and age. Comments that advocate sedition or violence are not encouraged. Racist, ad hominem, and troll-baiting comments might never see the light of day.