Vatic Note: Well, are we surprised? She is a Khazar, ruled by Israel through the mossad controlled and funded SPLC and the ADL and of course Chertoff, the "dual Israeli citizen" made money off this by his part ownership in the "ISRAELI COMPANY" that manufactured these killing machines and made the radiation lethal, which is a criminal act of "Intentional" conflict of interest. Lets remember these are hard core believers in Satanism, and the harvesting of souls can only happen upon death. So not only is it a control issue for the elite who are doing all this, but its also a power and wealth pay off for those who are avowed satanists. Chertoff also intended to commit the crime and now we have them both knowing and lying about the safety which is attempted murder for profit. I think its for depopulation, but going to jail for "profitting" from the crime is even worse in our pathetic court system.
Exposed documents reveal Napolitano, TSA lied about safety of cancer-causing naked body scanners
http://www.naturalnews.com/032839_body_scanners_TSA.html#ixzz1QajlrW5B
by Ethan A. Huff, Staff Writer, Natural News
(NaturalNews) Remember when Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano claimed back in 2010 that the US Transportation Security Administration's (TSA) naked body scanners had been proven safe by research conducted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (http://epic.org/privacy/backscatter...)?
A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request recently brought to light internal emails that were sent by NIST to DHS that basically decry Napolitano's false assertion that NIST had verified the safety of the naked body scanners.
Amid the string of emails discussing the matter, an undisclosed sender explains that NIST was "a little concerned" over Napolitano's public reassurances that TSA's naked body scanners are safe. After all, NIST does not test products, and it never tested the naked body scanners in the first place.
Napolitano apparently took the individual machine dose measurements that NIST had gathered and twisted them to say what she wanted them to say, which was that the machines are safe.
You can view a partially-censored copy of that email exchange here:
http://epic.org/privacy/backscatter...
Worse, NIST had actually warned DHS and TSA that the machines were not necessarily safe, and that airport screening agents should avoid standing next to them because of the harmful radiation they emit. It is unclear whether or not this warning was ever taken seriously by TSA officials.
Napolitano also falsely claimed that research conducted by the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory confirms the safety of naked body scanners, even though the research actually suggests the opposite.
Dr. Michael Love from the school publicly stated that the machines are going to give people skin cancer, and the specific findings of the report indicate that "radiation zones" around the machines emit enough radiation to exceed the "General Public Dose Limit."
One thing is for sure, though. Many current and former TSA agents who have developed cancers are now speaking out against the machines, as they believe repeated and continual exposure to them is responsible for their conditions.
Many TSA agents have repeatedly requested that they be given dosimeters to wear that will warn them of dangerous radiation exposure -- but TSA higher-ups have never followed through in addressing their concerns, despite empty promises that they would.
Sources for this story include:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/new-doc...
http://epic.org/2011/06/epic-v-dhs-...
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/032839_body_scanners_TSA.html#ixzz1QapzAdM0
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Vatic Clerk Tips: After 7 days, all comments to an article go into the moderation queue for approval which happens at least once a day. Please be patient.
Be respectful in your comments, keeping in mind that these discussions will become the Zeitgeist of our time that future database archeologists will discover. Make your comments worthy and on the founding father's level in their respectfulness, reasoning, and sound argumentation. Prove we weren't all idiots in our day and age. Comments that advocate sedition or violence are not encouraged. Racist, ad hominem, and troll-baiting comments might never see the light of day.