Pages

2011-05-13

Health Care Nullification on Governor’s Desk in North Dakota

Vatic Note:  This was scheduled out and no daily summary was done, so I have no way to replace the vatic note they dumped, but I am sure you can guess what I would have said about it.   I have to fix the others and some they left the vatic note and others as suspected they took the notes off, like the Sirius one and the Obama as a POW one both had vatic notes removed along with this one.  I can't remember what I said at the time, so will have to do something about it later.  What I am realizing is they do not like my vatic notes.   That is the surprise.   If they had left all of them off, I would have thought differently, but they left them off the ones that they gave me a hard time over when I put them up.... so its clear to me, its my notes.   You decide if you still want them up or are the articles important enough to leave the vatic notes off the blog???  Let us know.   Thanks.

Health Care Nullification on Governor’s Desk in North Dakota
http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/04/22/health-care-nullification-on-governors-desk-in-north-dakota/
by Michael Boldin, 10th Amendment Center,

Nullification in North Dakota? That’s just what could be coming if Governor Jack Dalrymple signs Senate Bill 2309 (SB2309). This week, the bill passed the senate by a vote of 32-15 and the house by a vote of 69-24.

The bill, just one page of legislative language, states:

1. The legislative assembly declares that the federal laws known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111 - 148] and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 [Pub. L. 111 - 152] likely are not authorized by the United States Constitution and may violate its true meaning and intent as given by the founders and ratifiers.

2. The legislative assembly shall consider enacting any measure necessary to prevent the enforcement of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 within this state.

3. No provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 may interfere with an individual’s choice of a medical or insurance provider except as otherwise provided by the laws of this state.

This is a modification of the Tenth Amendment Center’s Federal Health Care Nullification Act – introduced in more than ten states this legislative session. Click here to track progress.

NULLIFIED!

Nullification – any act or series of acts which results in a particular federal law being rendered null and void, or unenforceable, within a state, is what Thomas Jefferson referred to as “the rightful remedy” to unconstitutional acts by the federal government.

Implied in any nullification legislation is enforcement of the state law. In the Virginia Resolution of 1798, James Madison wrote of the principle of interposition:

That this Assembly doth explicitly and peremptorily declare, that it views the powers of the federal government, as resulting from the compact, to which the states are parties; as limited by the plain sense and intention of the instrument constituting the compact; as no further valid that they are authorized by the grants enumerated in that compact; and that in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by the said compact, the states who are parties thereto, have the right, and are in duty bound, to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights and liberties appertaining to them.

Interposition is explicitly stated in SB2309 through its requirement that the legislature to consider measures preventing the Affordable Care Act from being enforced within the state.

SUPREMACY

Opponents, however, claim that the law is “meaningless because state law can’t override federal law.” But, constitutionally-speaking, such a statement is dubious, at best.

All the founders agreed that the federal government would only be able to exercise those powers delegated to it in the constitution. It was clearly represented to the Constitution’s ratifiers that laws made outside those powers were not really laws at all – they were usurpations.

And, more importantly, such a statement is a direct reference to Article VI, the “supremacy clause” of the constitution. But, claiming that state laws cannot override federal law as a blanket statement is flat out wrong. Here’s the full text of the clause:

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding. [emphasis added]

The key points:

1. For a federal law to be supreme, it must be made in pursuance of a power delegated to the federal government in the constitution. If not, it’s no law at all, and state law is supreme.

2. There is no number two, it’s that straightforward.

THE MOVEMENT

All across the country, activists and state-legislators are pressing for similar legislation, to nullify specific federal laws within their states.

Seven states have passed Health Care Freedom Acts to block health care mandates from being enforced. Eight states have passed Firearms Freedom Acts. Fifteen states – most recently Arizona – are using the principles of the 10th Amendment to actively defy federal laws (and a supreme court ruling, too!) on marijuana. Massive state resistance to the 2005 Real ID Act has rendered the law virtually null and void. And, five states, led by Texas HB1938, are now considering measures to nullify TSA violations of the Constitution through bans on groping or bans on body scanners altogether.

While some advocates concede that a federal court battle has a slim chance of success, they point to the successful nullification of the Real ID Act as a blueprint to resist various federal laws that they see as outside the scope of the Constitution. No court battle has been waged, no federal law has been repealed. Yet, the 2005 Act sits virtually null and void due to state-level resistance.

Some say that each successful rejection of federal acts will only embolden others to try the same – resulting in an eventual shift of power from the federal government to the States and the People themselves.

Michael Boldin [send him email] is the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center. He was raised in Milwaukee, WI, and currently resides in Los Angeles, CA. Follow him on twitter - @michaelboldin  - and visit his personal blog - http://www.michaelboldin.com/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Al Qaeda group is being paid by our own government. They are real terrorist paid for by American tax payer via the CIA and working through NSA/HLS causing trouble in our own country. We need to call the White House and tell them to stop involving U.S. citizens in this war games/psyop program.

They are nothing more than "False Flag operations"
http://www.infowars.com/al-qaeda-100-pentagon-run/
http://www.oilempire.us/reichstag-fire.html
http://www.infowars.com/red-alert-help-stop-false-flag-terror/?utm_...



The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

5 comments:

  1. Your opinions, the Vatic notes are extremely important. You are expressing your wealth of knowledge in conjunction with the present article. The total sum conveys an idea of what the heck is going on as well as what we need to do or look out for... If there are no notes, then what would be the point of the blog :")

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you, Anonymous, these notes started out as a personal need to vent my frustrations at the lies, deceptions and outright fraud these people were engaging in and I felt I had no where else to legitimately do that. But you are right, others have responded similarly saying the notes are why they read them. The articles can be found anywhere, but not the notes, so I appreciate it and did not realize they had become that important to the blog.

    Now that I know, I will keep them. I should have guessed since the notes seem to be what sets them off on me, so it means they are a problem for the PTB and if that is the case, all the more reason to keep them up there. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  3. Also, maybe blog, vent, write your notes, the whole entry in another program, and then paste into your blog, so if they "disappear it" all you have to do is pull out your original, which has been dated, filed for archive purposes. I've had my whole website disappear, and so backup was always a must. It is just a matter of uploading the file again :")

    ReplyDelete
  4. All the things which are in the bill and the legislative have passed are fair enough and they would surely be great for the health care of the people. All the key points which are mention over here are important.

    ReplyDelete

Vatic Clerk Tips: After 7 days, all comments to an article go into the moderation queue for approval which happens at least once a day. Please be patient.

Be respectful in your comments, keeping in mind that these discussions will become the Zeitgeist of our time that future database archeologists will discover. Make your comments worthy and on the founding father's level in their respectfulness, reasoning, and sound argumentation. Prove we weren't all idiots in our day and age. Comments that advocate sedition or violence are not encouraged. Racist, ad hominem, and troll-baiting comments might never see the light of day.