Pages

2011-03-26

Prince Andrew's big mistake: Humiliated Duke of York vows to end friendship with billionaire paedophile

Vatic Note:  Keep in mind two things that seguays into this subject:    1.  TSA has been foundling children at airports and this prepares the child to be touched inappropriately for those sicko's who are satanists.   2.  Remember the article above about introducing gay sex into the curriculum of the school all the way down to 4 year olds.   That simply blew me away.  This is what happens when you have too much money and time on your hands.  Good thing we are not part of the commonwealth or there would be no more royalty.  They would be fired and made to work for their money and that would keep them out of trouble. I still believe that the Queens real family name is Khazarian.  Her real family name is Gothe Saxe and its Khazar German, similar to the Khazarian Rothschild being "Bauer" before he became King Rothschild to the Israeli's.  There must be a fight going on between Rothschild/Israel and the Queen/Illums.... The Daily Mail is owned by Murdock who is a lock step zionist, and there is no way this would have come out were they all pals together as they were in the past.  Lets watch and see if there might not be something to that given this big front page story.  (forgot to mention, in the US the billionaire here got off without any jail time, so at least Britain still treats it as a crime, even though minor.) Perversion has always been the problem with royalty. They don't work. Need to keep them busy so they don't have time to ruin childrens lives with their perversions. This is what we have to look forward to if we ever get back under the thumb of British Royalty. LOL

Prince Andrew's big mistake: Humiliated Duke of York vows to end friendship with billionaire paedophile

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1363163/Prince-Andrew-vows-end-friendship-billionaire-paedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein.html
By Fay Schlesinger, Stephen Wright and Tom Leonard, the Daily Mail

Last updated at 9:33 AM on 5th March 2011

Duke now said to recognise friendship was 'unwise'.  

Former Scotland Yard royalty protection chief: 'Prince Andrew is bringing the royal family into disrepute’.  Mistake: The duke has cut ties with the disgraced billionaire.  Prince Andrew has promised to sever his controversial links with child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The Duke of York has finally admitted that meeting the disgraced billionaire recently was ‘unwise’ and has ruled out further visits to the Florida mansion where Epstein sexually exploited underage girls.

In a warning that may have come from the Queen, the duke’s aides have advised him that his continued association with the paedophile risked damaging the reputation of the monarchy.

Now the humiliated duke, the fourth in line to the throne, has backed down and cut ties with Epstein, 58, in the hope that he can draw a line under the sordid association.

An impeccably-placed source said yesterday: ‘The duke recognises now that the meeting in December 2010, after Epstein’s conviction, was unwise.’

It was not clear last night if Andrew, a UK trade envoy, has acted before fresh revelations about the friendship are made public.

Earlier this week, in a rare move, his conduct was raised on the floor of the House of Commons.

But, whatever the motivation, his decision to sever ties with an old friend is a tacit admission that he has got it wrong with his choice of friends.  He has been criticised for selling his former home to an oil tycoon for £15million, £3million above the market price.

Eyebrows have also been raised over his links to the Libyan regime and trips to Tripoli.  In December, the Wikileaks website revealed he was described as ‘cocky and rude’ by a senior U.S. diplomat because of his behaviour in Kyrgyzstan.   Andrew was defended at the time for being a stalwart supporter of British trade.

But even his most loyal supporters were left floundering when a photograph emerged last weekend of the smiling duke with his arm around 17-year-old Virginia Roberts, an ‘erotic masseuse’ who was sexually abused by Epstein at the time.

Alarm bells were already ringing at Buckingham Palace over pictures taken in December of Andrew strolling through New York’s Central Park with Epstein, two years after he was jailed for soliciting prostitution from minors. He served 13 months.   The pre-Christmas trip was said to be the first time the duke had seen Epstein in four years.

But they were still close friends and would speak on the phone regularly after being introduced by media mogul Robert Maxwell’s daughter Ghislaine more than a decade ago.


The duke has taken holidays with the sex offender in Florida, New York, Thailand, New Mexico and on Epstein’s private island in the Caribbean.

The Mail told this week how Andrew was present in Epstein’s Florida mansion where masseuses offered private massages for guests and young women regularly frolicked at naked swimming pool parties.

Last night former Scotland Yard royalty protection chief Dai Davies criticised the duke’s security team for failing to alert the monarch sooner.



He said: ‘I would have thought that action should already have been taken because Prince Andrew, through his behaviour and his associates, is bringing the royal family into disrepute.’

On Thursday night, a former Foreign Office minister and UN diplomat defended the duke amid growing clamour for him to quit his role as the UK’s ambassador for trade.   Lord Malloch-Brown argued that Andrew should keep his job, saying Britain is ‘lucky’ to have him.



The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Vatic Clerk Tips: After 7 days, all comments to an article go into the moderation queue for approval which happens at least once a day. Please be patient.

Be respectful in your comments, keeping in mind that these discussions will become the Zeitgeist of our time that future database archeologists will discover. Make your comments worthy and on the founding father's level in their respectfulness, reasoning, and sound argumentation. Prove we weren't all idiots in our day and age. Comments that advocate sedition or violence are not encouraged. Racist, ad hominem, and troll-baiting comments might never see the light of day.