Pages

2011-01-07

Evidence of 9/11 being Nuclear

Bruecke Note: The following video was suppressed for 9 years. It is the US Coast Guard's aerial footage of the WTC complex just a few days after 9/11. I believe that one of the reasons that this and many other videos was suppressed until now, is that when you view it, you can't help but think nuclear. The totality of the destruction. The thoroughness of it.

Milli-nukes exist for the same reasons the U.S. arsenal has all sorts of weaponized poisons, gases, bio-terrors, etc. They had the black budget, the scientists, and the itch to find new ways to destroy things. Of course, none of it has anything to do with benefits to mankind or life forms on this planet. Obsessions of overgrown teenagers who did it just because (or to prove that) they could.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hU8L3YuIDus&feature=player_embedded



Agent Hauptstadter wrote:
Me: Even the lowest yield 10 tons TNT eq. nuclear weapon would get noticed. No one noticed.
I agree with the first sentence and disagree with the second. No one noticed? What a crock! Everyone noticed. It is glaring when from the initial seconds of demolition the content is pulverized and ejected horizontally at great force.

Even before the dust had settled, the pysops team was explaining to the public what they did not notice.
Newscaster: “It has some appearance of a controlled demolition.” (Only mentioned on 9/11; never again.)

Govt Spin Meister to Newscaster: “No, I think that the damage from the jet impacts together with the blazing hot jet fuel fires caused the steel to weaken and initiate the collapse that the rest of the structure just could not withstand so it pancaked into itself… Such a tragic loss of life today, and of those true heroes, those patriotic firemen who went into harms way into the burning towering infernos to rescue the innocent trapped victims and didn’t make it out… This has all the earmarks of Osama bin Laden.”

Please go and view some September Clues.




The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

3 comments:

  1. The focus in this video is the crater in building 6 where radioactive water containing six times the normal background readings for Tritium was documented in a Lawrence Livermore report produced for the Official investigation.

    The report concludes that even if all the radioactive elements involved in the attack (gun sights and airplane exit signs) were all thrown into the WTC6 crater it still would not be enough to drive the readings so high.
    Then in true pythonesk fashion it concludes that; in spite of the impossibility of the scenario it's the only explanation that makes sense.

    The knowledge needed to built the micro nukes could have been delivered to a foreign power by spys with names like Pollard and Rosen.

    Just sayin'.

    ReplyDelete
  2. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/141

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous, Your "just sayin" sounds pretty right on to me. Amazing how they can ignore the truth so easily, but then we don't force them to deal with any of it. That, to me, is even more amazing.

    I guess it was the courage of the WW II vets that created the fear in gov of our people such that they would respond when confronted. Today the legislators, most dual israeli citizens honestly believe that we are cattle and thus have no right to complain. Well, they ain't seen nothing yet.

    ReplyDelete

Vatic Clerk Tips: After 7 days, all comments to an article go into the moderation queue for approval which happens at least once a day. Please be patient.

Be respectful in your comments, keeping in mind that these discussions will become the Zeitgeist of our time that future database archeologists will discover. Make your comments worthy and on the founding father's level in their respectfulness, reasoning, and sound argumentation. Prove we weren't all idiots in our day and age. Comments that advocate sedition or violence are not encouraged. Racist, ad hominem, and troll-baiting comments might never see the light of day.