Pages

2010-12-02

WIKILEAKS - MORE ISRAELI GAME THEORY WARFARE?

Vatic Note:  What more is there to say.   This is about the 4th article that makes it clear, at least to me,  what is really going on with Wikileaks and when you consider Mossads, favorite saying hanging on their wall,  "By Deception, we will conduct war"..... then this all makes sense.  

WIKILEAKS – MORE ISRAELI GAME THEORY WARFARE?

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/12/01/wikileaks-%e2%80%93-more-israeli-game-theory-warfare/
December 1, 2010 posted by Jeff Gates

When waging intelligence wars, timing is often the critical factor for game-theory war planners. The outcome of the WikiLeaks release suggests a psy-ops directed at the U.S.

By Jeff Gates
Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini


“The United States is the real victim of WikiLeaks. It’s an action aimed at discrediting them.” Franco Frattini, Foreign Minister of Italy

The impact of the WikiLeaks release of diplomatic cables fits the behavior profile of those well versed in game theory warfare.

When Israeli mathematician Robert J. Aumann received the 2005 Nobel Prize in economic science for his work on game theory, he conceded, “the entire school of thought that we have developed here in Israel” has turned “Israel into the leading authority in this field.”

The candor of this Israeli-American offered a rare insight into an enclave long known for waging war from the shadows. Israel’s most notable success to date was “fixing” the intelligence that induced the U.S. to invade Iraq in pursuit of a geopolitical agenda long sought by Tel Aviv

When waging intelligence wars, timing is often the critical factor for game-theory war planners. The outcome of the WikiLeaks release suggests a psy-ops directed at the U.S.

Why now? Tel Aviv was feeling pressure to end its six-decade occupation of Palestine. With this release, its foot-dragging on the peace process was displaced with talk of an attack on Iran.

While the U.S. bore the brunt of the damage, the target was global public opinion. To maintain the plausibility of The Clash of Civilizations, a focus must be maintained on Iran as a credible Evil Doer.

With fast-emerging transparency, Israel and pro-Israelis have been identified as the source of the intelligence that took coalition forces to war in Iraq. Thus the need to shift attention off Tel Aviv.

WikiLeaks may yet succeed in that mission.

Foreseeable Futures probabilities. That’s why Israeli war planners focus on gaining traction for a plausible narrative and then advancing that storyline step by gradual step.

For the Zionist state to succeed with its expansionist agenda, Iran must remain at center stage as an essential villain in a geopolitical morality play pitting the West against Islamo Fascists.

To displace facts with false beliefs—as with belief in the intelligence that induced the invasion of Iraq—momentum must be maintained for the storyline. Lose the plot (The Clash) and peace might break out. And those deceived may identify the deceiver.

Thus the timing of this latest WikiLeaks release. Its goal: to have us believe that it is not Tel Aviv but Washington that is the forefront of geopolitical duplicity and a source of Evil Doing.

Intelligence wars rely on mathematical models to anticipate the response of those targeted. With game theory algorithms, reactions become foreseeable—within an acceptable range of probabilities.

Control enough of the variables and outcomes become a mathematical inevitability.

The WikiLeaks Motive

Was the reaction to this latest WikiLeaks foreseeable? With exquisite timing, the U.S. was discredited with an array of revelations that called into question U.S. motives and put in jeopardy U.S. relations worldwide.

As the Italian Foreign Minister summarized: “The news released by WikiLeaks will change diplomatic relations between countries.”

The hard-earned trust of the Pakistanis disappeared overnight. Attempts to engage Iran were set back. The overall effect advanced The Clash storyline. If Washington could so badly misread North Korean intentions, then why is the U.S. to be trusted when it comes to a nuclear Iran?

This Wiki-catalyzed storyline pushed Israel off the front page in favor of Iran.

Even U.S. detainees at Guantanamo are again at issue, reigniting that shameful spectacle as a provocation for extremism and terror. U.S. diplomats will now be suspected of spying and lying. What nation can now trust Americans to maintain confidences?

In short, the risks increased for everyone.

Except Israel.

Should Israel launch an attack on Iran, Tel Aviv can cite WikiLeaks as its rationale. Though an attack would be calamitous from a human, economic and financial perspective, even that foreseeable outcome would be dwarfed by the enduring hatred that would ensue.

That too is foreseeable—from a game theory perspective of those marketing The Clash.

The effect of the U.S. invasion of Iraq was predictable. King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia foresaw it, noting simply that the U.S. invasion would “give Iraq to Iran as a gift on a golden platter.”

With the elimination of Sunni leader Saddam Hussein, the numerically dominant Shiites of Iraq were drawn into the political orbit of the Shiite-dominant Iran.

Game theorists focus their manipulation of affairs on their control of key variables. Then events take on a life all their own. The impact of this discrediting release was wide-ranging and fully foreseeable.

A Mossad case officer explained Israel’s success at waging war by way of deception: “Once the orchestra starts to play, we just hum along.”

These, after all, are the leading authorities in the field.
2010 Copyright – Jeff Gates



The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

3 comments:

  1. It is more likely that Wikileaks is a joint US-Israeli intelligence operation using the "leaks" of information that is either already in the public domain, (US military brutality, US duplicity in its relations with everyone) to plant documents which can be used to justify war against the "axis of evil" (Iran, North Korea, Syria) as well as China, Pakistan etc. No one knows who Wikileaks are, who finances them, who supplies them with the material, why they post it without reading it (no one can tell me that a couple of people could read 250,000 documents in less than a few years) why they "leak" them to newspapers connected to US and British Intelligence (NY TImes, Washington Post, Guardian), how the US government is aware before hand of these "leaks", why there is never any leakage of what is happening in the inner circles of the US government or military, and why, if they are such a danger they have not been shut down. Everything points to Wikileaks being a complex US propaganda exercise preparing for war. People should start asking questio9ns about wikileaks, their sources, their obejctives. Remember wikileaks itslef proclaimed its first mission to expose things about China and Burma to US enemies. That indicates they act in the US govt interests. Now they have expanded their target list. People should stop being so gullible and acceptin what a Nato gangster like Fratinni says. He works for Nato. Nato works for the US.As for Isreal, it does not control the US, the US controls it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent and insightful commentary. However, its not a US vs Nato situation. Its definitely a class control situation who controls both NATO and US and Israel intel. They operate out of the Tavistock group in Britian and MI6 and someone gave me a lead on this organization that is the composite of all intel agencies globally including India and Pakistan.

    I have not had time to go down that rabbit hole, but we have put up blogs proving the intel agencies do not work for the US Gov. Now Israel is part of the global elite but they are unique. They do continue to work for Israel because Rothschild is Israel and is also the head of the illuminati, class group outside all national boundaries.

    Truman found that out after he had created them. He said at the end of his term he wished he had never created them since he has no idea what they do. Same with JFK who fired the elites controlled in the intel dept and thus along with other reasons was assassinated.

    Search for the Tavistock group and read about them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I wrote this "Truman found that out after he had created them. He said at the end of his term he wished he had never created them since he has no idea what they do. Same with JFK who fired the ELITE'S CONTROLLER/HANDLER IN THE WHITE HOUSE FOR THE INTEL DEPTS and thus along with other reasons was assassinated."

    But it got changed BETWEEN THE TIME I WROTE IT AND IT GOT POSTED, THE CYBERPIGS HAVE A MIRROR OF MY SITE AND CHANGE THINGS TO MAKE US EITHER LOOK BAD OR TO DISTORT THE INTENT OF THE MESSAGE. THEY DO BACK OFF ONCE THEY SEE I WILL EXPOSE IT WITH NO HESITATION, SO LETS HOPE THIS GETS UP HERE AS IT WAS TYPED. Please see what I did write in caps

    ReplyDelete

Vatic Clerk Tips: After 7 days, all comments to an article go into the moderation queue for approval which happens at least once a day. Please be patient.

Be respectful in your comments, keeping in mind that these discussions will become the Zeitgeist of our time that future database archeologists will discover. Make your comments worthy and on the founding father's level in their respectfulness, reasoning, and sound argumentation. Prove we weren't all idiots in our day and age. Comments that advocate sedition or violence are not encouraged. Racist, ad hominem, and troll-baiting comments might never see the light of day.