Vatic Note: Lets go ahead and add this onto what I just sent and check out where the info comes from. Veterans today has staff that are ex intel people who have contacts still inside.... but check it out. I am doing this for me so I can finally when its over, I will be able to say that I did all I could to get peoples minds to open up on this subject and get us back to the real historically serious crimes that are being committed as we sit here talking about this that no one is paying any attention to.
Its literally the stealing of our country, in land, water and wealth right out from under us while we listen to this soap opera that most of us know all about since its all on this blog, so if you read here, you know all that he released that we already knew, lets get going with the things HE DID NOT TELL US ABOUT THE LAND GRAB, THE MASSIVE WATER GRAB GOING ON, AND THE MASSIVE WEALTH GRAB IN THE TRILLIONS OF OUR MONEY BEING PAID TO ROTHSCHILDS INTERNATIONAL BANKS for their derivatives bets. We are now not only bailing out our own, BUT AMERICANS ARE BAILING OUT THREE BRITISH BANKS, 2 FRENCH BANKS, A GERMAN BANK, ETC ETC ETC. JAPAN ETC... Now this is doggone serious stuff. This is with our tax money. That is called communism on a global level or worse, Fascism.
Does everybody know about the war games going on where the military is with JP Morgan to learn how to crash the economy and then they are practicing how to control us militarily once they do. THE FINAL COUP BY OUR FOREIGN OCCUPYING COUNTRY WILL BE OVER. Interview With Gordon Duff: Wikileaks Debunked
http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=13378
Summary: BUSTED!! WIKILEAKS STRUCK A DEAL WITH ISRAEL OVER CABLE LEAKS
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/12/08/wikileaks-struck-a-deal-with-israel-over-cable-leaks/
Gordon Duff is a Marine Vietnam veteran, and Senior Editor at Veterans Today. His career has included extensive experience in international banking along with such diverse areas as consulting on counter insurgency, defense technologies or acting as diplomatic officer of UN humanitarian groups. Gordon Duff's articles are published around the world and translated into a number of languages.
The US Military KNOWS israel did 911
Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former director of studies at the US Army War College says that the military brass now know that israel and those traitors within our nation committed the 911 attack
VN: Now for the article they were discussing written by Gordon Duff. Its a scathing and highly credible article based on leaks from within the intel agencies about what has really happened. Once again Gordon is on the forefront and everytime he has been right on over all these many years I have been following him.
BUSTED!! WIKILEAKS STRUCK A DEAL WITH ISRAEL OVER CABLE LEAKS
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/12/08/wikileaks-struck-a-deal-with-israel-over-cable-leaks/
Dec 8, 2010, Gordon Duff, Veterans Today
“Assange met with Israeli officials in Geneva earlier this year and struck the secret deal. The Israel government, it seems, had somehow found out or expected that the documents to be leaked contained a large number of documents about the Israeli attacks on Lebanon and Gaza in 2006 and 2008-9 respectively. These documents, which are said to have originated mainly from the Israeli embassies in Tel Aviv and Beirut, where removed and possibly destroyed by Assange, who is the only person who knows the password that can open these documents, the sources added.”
We should obviously all support WikiLeaks and its founder and spokesperson, Julian Assange, who has just been arrested in Britain, in this dirty war by states around the globe against transparency and openness. But in the world of politics, sadly, things are never as innocent as they appear. According to new revelations, Assange had allegedly struck a deal with Israel before the recent ‘cable gate’, which may explain why the leaks “were good for Israel,” as the Israeli prime minister put it.
A number of commentators, particularly in Turkey and Russia, have been wondering why the hundreds of thousands of American classified documents leaked by the website last month did not contain anything that may embarrass the Israeli government, like just about every other state referred to in the documents. The answer appears to be a secret deal struck between the WikiLeaks “heart and soul”, as Assange humbly described himself once [1], with Israeli officials, which ensured that all such documents were ‘removed’ before the rest were made public.
According to an Arabic investigative journalism website [2], Assange had received money from semi-official Israeli sources and promised them, in a “secret, video-recorded agreement,” not to publish any document that may harm Israeli security or diplomatic interests.
The sources of the Al-Haqiqa report are said to be former WikiLeaks volunteers who have left the organisation in the last few months over Assange’s “autocratic leadership” and “lack of transparency.”
In a recent interview with the German daily Die Tageszeitung, former WikiLeaks spokesperson Daniel Domscheit-Berg said he and other WikiLeaks dissidents are planning to launch their own whistleblowers’ platform to fulfil WikiLeaks’s original aim of “limitless file sharing.” [3]
Mr Domscheit-Berg, who is about to publish a book about his days ‘Inside WikiLeaks’, accuses Assange of acting as a “king” against the will of others in the organisation by “making deals” with media organisations that are meant to create an explosive effect, which others in WikiLeaks either know little or nothing about. [4]
Furthermore, Assange’s eagerness for headline-grabbing scoops meant that WikiLeaks had not been able to ‘restructure’ itself to cope with this surge of interest, insiders add. This has meant that smaller leaks, which might be of interest to people at a local level, are now being overlooked for the sake of big stories. [5]
According to the Al-Haqiqa sources, Assange met with Israeli officials in Geneva earlier this year and struck the secret deal. The Israel government, it seems, had somehow found out or expected that the documents to be leaked contained a large number of documents about the Israeli attacks on Lebanon and Gaza in 2006 and 2008-9 respectively. These documents, which are said to have originated mainly from the Israeli embassies in Tel Aviv and Beirut, where removed and possibly destroyed by Assange, who is the only person who knows the password that can open these documents, the sources added.
Indeed, the published documents seem to have a ‘gap’ stretching over the period of July – September 2006, during which the 33-day Lebanon war took place. Is it possible that US diplomats and officials did not have any comments or information to exchange about this crucial event but spent their time ‘gossiping’ about every other ‘trivial’ Middle-Eastern matter?
Following the leak (and even before), Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a press conference that Israel had “worked in advance” to limit any damage from leaks, adding that “no classified Israeli material was exposed by WikiLeaks.” [6] In an interview with the Time magazine around the same time, Assange praised Netanyahu as a hero of transparency and openness! [7]
According to another report [8], a left-leaning Lebanese newspaper had met with Assange twice and tried to negotiate a deal with him, offering “a big amount of money”, in order to get hold of documents concerning the 2006 war, particularly the minutes of a meeting held at the American embassy in Beirut on 24th July 2006, which is widely considered as a ‘war council’ meeting between American, Israeli and Lebanese parties that played a role in the war against Hizbullah and its allies.
The documents the Al-Akhbar editors received, however, all date to 2008 onwards and do not contain “anything of value,” the sources confirm. This only goes to support the Israel deal allegations.
Finally, it might be worth pointing out that Assange might have done what he is alleged to have done in order protect himself and ensure that the leaked documents are published so as to expose the American hypocrisy, which he is said to be obsessed with “at the expense of more fundamental aims.”
Haaretz – WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Wednesday defended his disclosure of classified U.S. documents by singling out Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as an example of a world leader who believes the publications will aid global diplomacy.
“We can see the Israeli Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu coming out with a very interesting statement that leaders should speak in public like they do in private whenever they can,” Assange told Time Magazine in an interview on Wednesday, days after his online whistleblower published thousands of secret diplomatic cables.
“He (Netanyahu) believes that the result of this publication, which makes the sentiments of many privately held beliefs public, are promising a pretty good [indecipherable] will lead to some kind of increase in the peace process in the Middle East and particularly in relation to Iran,” Assange said.
“I just noticed today Iran has agreed to nuclear talks. Maybe that’s coincidence or maybe it’s coming out of this process, but it’s certainly not being canceled by this process,” he added.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
"It is the greatest of all mistakes to do nothing because you can only do a little." ~ Sydney Smith
Pages
▼
2010-12-13
4 comments:
Vatic Clerk Tips: After 7 days, all comments to an article go into the moderation queue for approval which happens at least once a day. Please be patient.
Be respectful in your comments, keeping in mind that these discussions will become the Zeitgeist of our time that future database archeologists will discover. Make your comments worthy and on the founding father's level in their respectfulness, reasoning, and sound argumentation. Prove we weren't all idiots in our day and age. Comments that advocate sedition or violence are not encouraged. Racist, ad hominem, and troll-baiting comments might never see the light of day.
Americans should be bailing out the worlds banks as it was you who caused this crisis by lending too many people who were not able to make their payments!
ReplyDeleteI take exception with only one thing you've stated above, and that is your suggestion that Fascism id worse than Communism. Personally I am neither, but an obejective analysis of both ideologies shows communism to be way worse, not only in their total death count, but the fact that at least with Fascism, the economy might work, but with communism there is only misery on all levels, plus no private ownership. Peter
ReplyDeletethank you for your comments and lets have a discussion on that. Both definitions have been perverted from their original meanings, so that is why I lumped them together. Actually "true" communism has worked very well with small groups such as the American Indians and the Kabutz's of Israel. But it only works in small groups, once it starts getting a larger population they had to break off and form a new kabutz or Tribes had to split up.
ReplyDeleteAs for fascism, under normal conditions you would be right, but what has happened is the fascists have created disasters that allowed them to begin the process globally of buying up all the land at pennies on the dollar and by virtual of them owning all the land, no one else can own the land.
Right now, its impossible for an average American to buy farm land and start a farm, a grove, a pecan farm etc. All such lands are now in the hands of bankers and agricorps that are poisoning our food in their food factories. Long story that has been written about on here, but you would have to search archives to find it. So you see, BOTH HAVE BEEN PERVERTED AND THEY ARE NOW BEGINNING TO MESH INTO A THIRD TYPE OF WEIRD CONFIGURATION WE HAVE NO NAME FOR.... MAYBE WE COULD CALL IT "COMOFASCISM", YEAH, I like it. LOL
Anonymous, who said we americans should be bailing out the worlds banks. Nope, sorry, how this works is, YOU MAKE A DECISION TO BUY MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES THAT TELLS YOU EXACTLY WHAT IS IN THE PACKAGE THEN YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR IT, however, that is NOT why we bailed them out.
ReplyDeleteWe bailed them out because they bet on the level of INTEREST RATES as a derivative bet, and that had nothing to do with the quality of loans or the foreclosures, since those are still only at about 600 billion dollars, but the derivatives world wide on the banks GAMBLING DEBT ON MOVEMENT OF RATES, is in the 400 TRILLION DOLLARS, AND THAT IS WHY WE ARE BAILING THEM OUT.
Watch Jesse Ventura's Wall STreet videos on here from a couple of days ago. And you will see what is really going on, he did an excellent job of it. Then you will have EDUCATED yourself and will know when someone feeds you that propoganda and disinformation, that they are full of you know what. Wake up and research for yourself. Do anything but take their word on anything they are doing.