South Korea warns North Korea it will ’sternly retaliate’ to any further provocation

If the link does not work,  simply go to  http://www.vaticproject.blogspot.com/  and scroll down on the right for this week and you will see it there under archives.  Thanks and sorry for the harrassment, if you think its bad for you, you should try fighting these truly insane psychos.  Believe me its no picnic. 

Vatic Note:  Something is up,  and it screams it by the lack of any press on Obama or his 3,000 accompanying  bankers and CEO's overseas (underground?). I have been asking that for quite a few days now and no one has answered me.    Where are they and why are they gone so long???  Who is running this country.  I am serious.  I want to know who is the chief executive that intends to declare war without congress??? This is a blatant false flag and we have proof below.  See vatic note below.  But more importantly where is our govenrment?  Or is the charade over  now?  Is Israel now up front and out from behind the curtain and running the show???  Lets ask our senators. 

South Korea warns North Korea it will ’sternly retaliate’ to any further provocation

http://www.blacklistednews.com/index.php?news_id=11607
Blacklisted News, 11-23-2010
Source: Telegraph

South Korea has warned North Korea it would “sternly retaliate” to any further provocations after dozens of shells were fired at a South Korean island.

Two South Korean marines were killed and 17 others injured, as well as three civilians, after North Korea fired dozens of artillery shells onto a Yeonpyeong Island in the Yellow sea, 50 miles off the South’s northwest coast in an area close to a disputed sea border.

The attack, which comes days after it emerged that North Korea was pressing ahead with its illegal nuclear programme, marks a serious further escalation of tensions on the Korean Peninsula.
A presidential statement said the shelling “constitutes a clear armed provocation.”
“Furthermore, its reckless shelling of civilian targets is unpardonable.

“North Korean authorities must take responsibility.” (VN:  REMEMBER, HOW MANY TIMES WE HAVE BEEN DRAGGED INTO WAR WITH BOGUS FALSE FLAGS???,  BAY OF TONKIN,  IRAQ'S WMD, THE LUCITANIA, THE MAIN,  ETC.... remember the satanic handsign of the previous article?  Remember the same handsign by the Great William of Great Britian both of which we have shown on here, remember So. Korea is the Allie of Britian and the US,  remember, those two countries have been trying for a long time over the past year or so, using No. Korea as the bad guy to try and start WW III?  Remember how it was all a false flag???  Well, guess what, so is this one, only this time they used SO Korea where before it was Israel etc that was used, so now they get caught,  (PASS THIS AND THE FIRST ARTICLE WE POSTED, AROUND EVERYWHERE AND STOP THEM BEFORE THEY HAVE A CHANCE TO PULL THIS ONE OFF, otherwise if this goes that far,  THE ENTIRE GLOBES POPULATION HAS TO TAKE OUT THOSE WHO ARE THE REAL ENEMY AND ITS NOT ONE ANOTHER, ITS THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS. THAT IS WHO WE MUST GO AFTER.)  

Full article here (It was so ridiculous I didn't even give it the courtesy of a full publication on this blog,  it was literally insulting. LOL)   http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/southkorea/8153291/South-Korea-warns-North-Korea-it-will-sternly-retaliate-to-any-further-provocation.html

Vatic Note: You can click on the link above and watch the video where the early responses by So Korea are provided. Then come back and watch this video below and see the difference, and NOTICE THE BRITISH ARE TAKING THE LEAD ON THIS in the LONDON TELEGRAPH. I told you they are key and pivitol to the conspiracy to begin world war III. THEY WANT THEIR EMPIRE BACK AGAIN, and the only question then, is who will prevail between the British royalty and the Rothschild as cesaer which will be our benevolent Benjamin Rothschild of france. If nothing else and if we lose, we get to watch them sell each other out for top billing. LOL That would be worth the effort.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?

---

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.