Vatic Note: Amazing, these people live every day with the gulf and have for generations and someone sitting in Washington is going to tell them what to do with protecting their wetlands??? This is a good example of how much worse it will be when orders come from Switzerland if Rothschild is running the global government or from Britian if the Queen is doing so, or someone from Tel Aviv if Israel is running the globe. Given that almost all of them are satanists you can understand why they want innocent and lovely seabirds and baby turtles dead. They make life enjoyable for those living around them. Can't have that now can we. lol Well, it will be interesting to see who wins this battle between state and fed. We are keeping an eye on AZ for the same reason.
EPA slams Jindal's sand berm plan
http://www.wwltv.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/EPA-slams-Jindals-sand-berm-plan-102590289.html
by Cain Burdeau / Associated Press, wwltv.com
Posted on September 9, 2010 at 8:33 PM
Federal environmental regulators are blasting Gov. Bobby Jindal's $360 million plan to block oil from the BP spill with sand berms, saying barriers built so far are ineffective and threaten wildlife. In a Sept. 7 letter made public Thursday, the Environmental Protection Agency urged the Army Corps of Engineers to turn down the state's recent request to build 101 miles of sand berms to stop oil from contaiminating shores and marshlands. The state needs permission from the Army Corps to complete the project.
The sand berms -- paid for with $360 million from BP -- have drawn criticism from coastal scientists and federal regulators. Critics say the work was ill-conceived and would damage the environment. Still, Jindal has made the sand berms a cornerstone to his strategy to fight the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. The state said it has spent $86 million on the project so far.
EPA said there were serious problems with the project.
On May 27, the Army Corps of Engineers allowed the state to build 40 miles of berm, but only four miles have been constructed so far, EPA said.
The four miles of berm have "received only light oiling" and done little to stop oil from reaching wetlands and barrier islands behind them, the EPA said.
Garret Graves, a Jindal aide who handles coastal affairs, said "some the heaviest oiling on Louisiaina's coast" occurred on the berms. He said the Louisiana National Guard has picked up at least 1,000 pounds of oily debris from them.
"Now is not the time to stop protective measures that have proven their effectiveness," he said.
Also, EPA said the berms pose problems for sea turtles, birds, seagrass beds, navigation, water quality and the natural flow of sediment along the coast. The agency called on the Army Corps to do in-depth environmental studies before allowing the state to build more berms.
Graves said birds have been attracted to the berms and that they "appear to actually increase bird habitat."
EPA approval is an important part of the federal government's permitting process, but Army Corps spokesman Ricky Boyett said it was too early to determine how EPA's opposition would affect its decision.
Graves said he did not see EPA's opposition as outright rejection. Instead, he said the state would work with the state to ensure new berms help restore Louisiana's coast. In its letter, EPA said it might approve more berms if they could be proven to help restore barrier islands.
Some Louisiana officials blasted the EPA on Thursday.
"To be honest, most of these people sit behind a computer; they all have degrees, but none of them have a lick of commonsense," said Grand Isle Mayor David Camardelle.
Federal agencies have shot down spill-fighting projects championed by some Louisiana officials, including a plan by Camardelle to block some passes with rocks.
Louisiana officials argue that their proposed projects not only keep oil out of sensitive marshes but also would help build back the badly eroded coastline. "They're worried about these islands. In the 1930s and 1940s, all these islands were connected," Camardelle said. "What is wrong with us dredging and building these islands back up and trying to connect these islands?"
Gregory Stone, the director of Coastal Studies Institute at Louisiana State University's School of the Coast & Environment, said building back Louisiana's coast is a good idea, but that the work has to be done correctly.
"Anything that would be undertaken to allow for the introduction of sediment onto the beaches and barrier islands is a plus," Stone said. "I'm not opposed from that perspective to the berms."
But he said the state rushed into the sand berm work without considering where the sediment for the berms would come from, what effects the work would have on currents and tides and how they would stand up to storms.
"The next tropical storm or tropical cyclone or winter storm that comes through this area, they are not going to stand a chance," Stone said. "They have begun to disintegrate and they are not doing the job that was anticipated."
(Copyright 2010 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
"It is the greatest of all mistakes to do nothing because you can only do a little." ~ Sydney Smith
Pages
▼
2010-09-17
1 comment:
Vatic Clerk Tips: After 7 days, all comments to an article go into the moderation queue for approval which happens at least once a day. Please be patient.
Be respectful in your comments, keeping in mind that these discussions will become the Zeitgeist of our time that future database archeologists will discover. Make your comments worthy and on the founding father's level in their respectfulness, reasoning, and sound argumentation. Prove we weren't all idiots in our day and age. Comments that advocate sedition or violence are not encouraged. Racist, ad hominem, and troll-baiting comments might never see the light of day.
From a document called "Blue Labour....Same Old Danger"
ReplyDelete"The Rothschild family had their eyes upon the offshore deepwater drilling opportunities in both Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico. It was these objectives which also influenced their choice of running mates for McCain. As usual they had groomed two poor, obscure and opportunistic candidates for this purpose. So obscure were the candidates, that many in the Republican Party and the world in general had difficulty in understanding the logic behind McCain’s “Maverick” choices. McCain tried to pretend that he was being his own man and playing “Maverick”, but the selection had been made for him by the Rothschilds.
Louisiana Governor, Bobby Jindal was one “Maverick” choice. Jindal had the required obscure, poor, opportunistic credentials. Most importantly, he was a Rhodes Scholar56. The reader may remember a famous Rhodes Scholar, of similar great expectations, who came from a “poor white”, Arkansas background and went on to become President57. The mandate of the Rhodes Scholarships is to return all former Commonwealth territories, including America, to control of the British Crown; or rather the hand that controls the British Crown. The opportunist, Cecil Rhodes58, was plucked from penniless obscurity by the Rothschild family, to carve out an empire for them in Africa. His Rhodes Scholarship56 for young empire builders was administered after his death by the Old Harrovian Edmund Leopold de Rothschild59. The empire that Jindal was to administer for the Rothschild family was in Louisiana, the gateway to the offshore deepwater Gulf of Mexico oil fields. From there, he could also perhaps one day go on to administer a global empire for them from the Oval Office like the other Othello currently administering on the world’s stage."