I regret that I do not have the time to pin-point which of the Protocols of Zion this piece of radio trash best demonstrates. I view it as hate mongering against the Jews that, without this disclaimer, will be picked up and used against the Vatic Project as an example of anti-Semitic intents. But it is also so badly done as Jew bashing by the Rabbi himself, one can't respect the Christian side of it either.
My view on the interview? Theater - Staged - Actors - Christian Radio Shock Jock Pastor throwing up missing Christian children red meat to his listening congregation of sheeple.
The fact that the rabbi was able to talk on end without interruption in a self-incriminating way and would agree to the negative names and characterization by the pastor kind of indicates who wrote the outline for this ad lib radio screen play.
http://www.youtube.com:80/
They say that even with the most biting humor, there is a kernel of truth. This wasn't funny, and one may have to dig deep to find the kernels of truth in it. Rather than censure it (by not posting it), as was my first reaction, I'll let you, the Vatic reader, decide.
It is interesting in a morbid sort of a way and might have some truth in some of the points. But come on? (Missing Goyin) children's blood in matza balls and ground into meat for McDonald sausage and hamburgers?!
Be sure to post your comments. Rake it over the coals.
Bruecke
Vatic Note: First, thank you for posting it for me. I left your note fully in tact. As you know we are committed to well intentioned disagreements and air all out that needs to be aired for well thinking people to make their own conclusions without censorship. All sides need to be heard without name calling.
Regarding Bruecke's point:
I view (the interview) as hate mongering against the Jews that, without this disclaimer, will be picked up and used against the Vatic Project as an example of anti-Semitic intents.
Like millions of others world wide, that slur no longer works when criticism of their plans are laid out. Where before we were afraid to be called that, no more; it doesn't work anymore. We don't hear that said about Muslims who are far more peaceful than the Khazars who are NOT Jews. Real Jews are now only 5% and they are in as much danger from the Khazars as we are.
Regarding Bruecke's point:
My view on the interview? Theater - Staged - Actors - Christian Radio Shock Jock Pastor throwing up missing Christian children red meat to his listening congregation of sheeple.
By their own admission they are far superior to us in their deception skills, so how do you know it wasn't the Rabbi who set this up to make the Christian Pastor look bad?
The only thing I will moderate is manipulation, as outlined in Protocol #12. (You can search the site by typing in Protocols of Zion and click on the title to do with world domination and the entire list of protocols are there.)
All I am going to post is one protocol and only two subsections, and then agree that you were partially right, Bruecke. Is it possible the Rabbi did it for just the reason you said: to make it look like the Christian anti-semite pastor did it to then make many like yourself more confirmed in your support of Israel and its poorly troddened on leaders by those big bad ugly anti-semites?
Well lets see what their 1903 protocol says about the Goyim vs the Zionist and then we can revisit that interview at that video. This is just for you and your masonic lodge.
Remember these protocols were investigated by US military Intel and the results and report were then classified for over 50 years to prevent others from knowing the results. I just wonder how much we could have stopped had we not classified that document.
Protocol #15, subsection 6 & 7 (this does not include the protocol where they talk about encouraging anti-semitism since it serves their purpose to have it and if not there, they will create it.)
"6. The GOYIM enter the lodges out of curiosity or in the hope by their means to get a nibble at the public pie, and some of them in order to obtain a hearing before the public for their impracticable and groundless fantasies: they thirst for the emotion of success and applause, of which we are remarkably generous. And the reason why we give them this success is to make use of the high conceit of themselves to which it gives birth, for that insensibly disposes them to assimulate our suggestions without being on their guard against them in the fullness of their confidence that it is their own infallibility which is giving utterance to their own thoughts and that it is impossible for them to borrow those of others .... You cannot imagine to what extent the wisest of the GOYIM can be brought to a state of unconscious naivete in the presence of this condition of high conceit of themselves, and at the same time how easy it is to take the heart out of them by the slightest ill-success, though it be nothing more than the stoppage of the applause they had, and to reduce them to a slavish submission for the sake of winning a renewal of success .... BY SO MUCH AS OUR DISREGARD SUCCESS IF ONLY THEY CAN CARRY THROUGH THEIR PLANS, BY SO MUCH THE "GOYIM" ARE WILLING TO SACRIFICE ANY PLANS ONLY TO HAVE SUCCESS. This psychology of theirs materially facilitates for us the task of setting them in the required direction. These tigers in appearance have the souls of sheep and the wind blows freely through their heads.
We have set them on the hobby-horse of an idea about the absorption of individuality by the symbolic unit of COLLECTIVISM .... They have never yet and they never will have the sense to reflect that this hobby-horse is a manifest violation of the most important law of nature, which has established from the very creation of the world one unit unlike another and precisely for the purpose of instituting individuality ....
7. If we have been able to bring them to such a pitch of stupid blindness is it not a proof, and an amazingly clear proof, of the degree to which the mind of the GOYIM is undeveloped in comparison with our mind? This it is, mainly, which guarantees our success."
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
This surely makes great sense!!!
ReplyDelete