9/11 nukes aren't disinformation or limited hangout

Vatic Note:    Answer to an email we received regarding one of our blog entries on 9/11 micro-nukes. The blog entry was summarized in a Vatic Email which was then re-posted elsewhere by someone on the distribution list. The feedback email went to that website before being sent on to us for a response.  

Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 10:49 AM

Subject: "VATIC"...DO YOU EVER HAVE THE COURTESY OF REPLYING TO EMAILS ?

...to ANSWER what I have asked you ? As I have stated to you - YOU are posting LIMITED HANGOUT DISINFORMATION regarding 9/11 that  HIDES the use of DOZENS of MICRO-NUCLEAR DEMOLITION DEVICES - LARGE NUCLEAR DEMOLITION DEVICES(at least 150KT) in the  sub-basements of WTC 1,2,and 7....1,000s of LINEAR SHAPED CHARGES - and the role played by CONTROLLED DEMOLITION Inc(MARK LOIZEAUX & FAMILY) who "just so happens" to be the ONLY COMPANY to have a PATENTED METHOD of BUILDING IMPLOSION using NUCLEAR DEMOLITION DEVICES.......

regards,
[name withheld],Viet Nam Vet(USAF)
Concerned Citizen,Researcher,Investigator,Whistleblower

From: Bruecke  who posted the micro-nukes articles last week, like here 

Dear Mr. [name withheld],

I posted the 9/11 nuke articles on the Vatic Project. I'll be the first to admit that my own position on 9/11 has done a bit of waffling and come full circle a couple of times on certain things over the years.   

(VN: The first point we wish to make up front is this:  we don't have to be right about milli-nukes on 9/11; we'll be happy to be proven wrong. Or more correctly for you to prove the Anonymous Physicist at http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/  wrong.  This can be done immediately without you having to read the entire blog.) 



Before I address your points, let me clarify that 9/11 being an inside job (with lots of Israeli outsourced help) does not live or die with nukes, thermite, real or CGI planes, etc. You convince me I'm wrong on any of these, and I'll be happy to sing another tune. After all, the final NIST report on WTC7 documents what scores of video evidence demonstrates and what the 9/11 truth movement has been saying all along: WTC7 had 2.25 seconds of sudden free-fall through 8 stories or 100+ feet. A solid or even supposedly damaged building does not transition suddenly from measurable support (even if weakened) to zero support unless additional energy is added to move that support out of the way.

If you are a 9/11 truther, we can agree on the above and progress into the finer points of what might have supplied that additional energy. If you are a 9/11 coincidence theorist, well, you'll have to get your head around the fact of free-fall in WTC7 that NIST admits to, doesn't adequately explain, and superficially rules out even investigating any of the various ways that a controlled demolition could also explain the destruction. Rumsfeld was saying on 9/10 that the Pentagon could not account for trillions of dollars, so if the circle of conspirators is widened to consider insiders, that is a pretty deep pocket that can fund all sorts of exotic weapons most of us are 10-20 years from really knowing about.

If OKC was a trial run for the neo-con's 9/11, among the lessons learned includes:

- Don't use domestic patsies; use foreigners as enemies who can advance a far larger global agenda.
- Outsource and off-shore as much as possible of the implementation.
- Don't leave evidence in the form of unexploded bombs and whatnot that can incriminate later.
- Control all aspects of the investigation and official inquiry.

9/11 in the towers demolition is noteworthy in the overkill. I could believe the tops of the towers tipping over and creaming nearby buildings, but I can't believe a progressive collapse through its path of greatest resistance at near free-fall acceleration AND while pulverizing building content into fine powder. The latter is a huge energy sink.

Nano-thermite might explain much of the destruction, particularly where it chemically reacts with steel and chops it into manageable chunks. It might also account for some of the underground fires. Unfortunately, it does not explain the pulverization of the concrete and all building content, or GROUND ZERO FIRES burning for weeks and months, or destruction to vehicles out of the path of falling debris but in the line-of-sight for EMP waves.

Nuclear devices can explain it.

You provide a clever re-framing by writing:

> DOZENS of MICRO-NUCLEAR DEMOLITION DEVICES -
> LARGE NUCLEAR DEMOLITION DEVICES(at least 150KT) in the
> sub-basements of WTC 1,2,and 7....1,000s of LINEAR SHAPED CHARGES

Fusion nuclear bombs, while more reliable, also pack more energy that couldn't easily be hidden within the shell of the towers. This is the implication of your message, but not from the 9/11 nukes message.

On the other hand, fission nuclear bombs have lower and more controllable yields, with the trade-off of a higher probability of fizzling out rather than generating directed explosive yields. Add redundancy from those deep pockets and you'll compensate for any bombs that fizzle, although fission fizzle as we observed reacts at high temperatures for weeks/months even under ruble without air. More details are at:

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/

Dr. Judy Woods didn't go into a lot of detail about DEW, although the US had been investing heavily in this since Pres. Reagan and Rumsfeld admitted to the massive hole in the Pentagon's pockets. She was ridiculed and sidelined even though her main argument was that the energy consumed in the observed destruction & aftermath far exceeded the fairy tale explanation from the gov't about the energy sources: plane impacts, jet fuel, office fire, gravity.

Dr. Steven Jones & others have found nano-thermite in the dust. He lost his job at BYU and has had threats made against him and his family.

Dr. Jones's thermite is a great piece of the energy equation puzzle, a piece like observable free-fall that can't be easily denied or refuted. Because his goal is for a new independent investigation, it was probably easy for him (and others) to compromise "thus far (thermite) and no further (into nukes)" on 9/11 research to avoid the penalties of the threats.

But that doesn't mean it doesn't go into nukes.

Of course, the gov't would be highly motivated to turn nukes into supposedly a limited hang-out in favor of thermite, because public awareness of nukes used on American soil could cause too much civil unrest, gov't overthrow, and possibly an even worse misguided over-reaction & escalation via a nuclear response overseas. When the questions were asked about the source of the nukes -- America, Russia (sold to "terrorists"), or Israel -- it would cut too close to the bone.

The EPA has already been caught lying at the gov't's pressure regarding air quality, whereby residual radiation is just something else they were covering for. FEMA's anal control of ground  zero and the recycling of material before it could be studied are more evidence of top-level insider perpetrators.

How much physics have you had, Mr. [name withheld]? High school physics already proves the gov't in a lie with the observable free-fall that they can't explain in an open and public manner. The pulverization of contents into fine powder would have anybody with college physics proving that the gov't lie goes much deeper. Of course, the subsequent lies about Afghanistan & Iraq and why they were really invaded shows a very deep rabbit hole.

At this point in my understanding of 9/11, milli-nukes aren't disinformation or limited hangout except for those in gov't who wish they were and bemoan such actively in message boards.

Bruecke


Get "The Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath" and "Quarantine: Mankind Held Hostage: The Ultimate Truth of Hiroshima, 9/11 & Man’s History" from the Anonymous Physicist at http://www.anonymousphysicist.com.

---

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.