Bilderberg Wants Americans Disarmed And Dependent On Government

Vatic Note:  We should be questioning why all this is going on right in the middle of a supposed extinction event chemically induced by Goldman Sachs company and ordered to be done by Goldman Sachs other company BP?  Was this the reason it was done?  To grab the guns using a cover that would be hard to detect?  Chemical warfare to harm citizens to make them comply is an act of TERROR.  Someone call Homeland security please.  Now it makes sense why the powers that be are not at all concerned with the Gulf and fixing hte problem, rather they have militarized the gulf, the platforms with swat teams and the beaches and the forbidden zones.   Are those videos live streaming real?  With all the lying, scamming and repressive activities going on at this point, it really makes one wonder.   So far we have seen serious assaults against freedom of speech, press, and our 2nd amendment now.  So, other than poisoning us, our water and food supply, what else do they have planned???  It should prove interesting to say the least. Maybe someone should reintroduce the guillotine to these royals and see if they have a long or short memory. 

Bilderberg Wants Americans Disarmed And Dependent On Government

http://www.infowars.com/bilderberg-wants-americans-disarmed-and-dependent-on-government/print/


Posted By admin On June 7, 2010 @ 7:42 am In Featured Stories
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, June 7, 2010

As part of Bilderberg’s agenda to “Europeanize” America and turn it into a socialist welfare state wherein its citizens are completely dependent on the government, the elite are celebrating Foreign Governor President Obama’s support for a UN small arms treaty, which many fear could be used to impinge on the right to keep and bear arms.

According to Bilderberg sleuth Jim Tucker, elitists were celebrating one of their scant victories at the annual meeting this year, namely the fact that Foreign Israeli Governor President Obama has promised to support a United Nations small arms treaty that could represent an end run around the second amendment.

By encapsulating the gun grab within a treaty, the Obama administration could claim that no Senate approval is needed to authorize any such move against the right to bear arms – although whether a treaty trumps the Constitution is a very murky area of debate.

Congressman Paul Broun warns that,  “With willing one-world accomplices in Washington, D.C., gun-grabbers around the globe believe they have it made.” Broun characterizes the U.N.’s Small Arms Treaty as “nothing more than a massive, GLOBAL gun control scheme.”

The treaty would force national governments to acquiesce to a global gun registry, while strengthening licensing procedures so as to make it almost impossible for a citizen to legally purchase a gun. It would also ban the private sale of semi-automatic weapons and ultimately lead to the confiscation and destruction of all “unauthorized” firearms owned by citizens.

American Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton echoes Broun’s warning, explaining that the treaty appears to be aimed at the international arms trade yet in reality, “the real agenda is domestic firearms control”.

“I think it was clear from the outset that the Obama administration would move in this direction. The only thing that’s surprising is that it’s taken this long,” said Bolton.

If the elite are to implement their stuttering “post-industrial revolution” with crippling austerity measures, consumption taxes, and mass unemployment with any success, then 100 million armed Americans are going to provide somewhat of a stumbling block. Bilderberg’s desire to see the middle class eviscerated and replaced with a servile, destitute and dependent population mandates that private gun ownership in the U.S. be outlawed just as it is in most European countries.

Cynics have claimed that the treaty will only apply to terrorists or those who force children to enlist as soldiers. (VN:  Yes, and we trust the intent of our leadership in Bilderberg, don't we? Hahaha) However, since the federal government has repeatedly made clear that it considers gun owners, libertarians, tea party activists and basically anyone who is politically active as a likely domestic terrorist under the MIAC report  and others, Americans would be remiss not to be concerned about the activities of an organization that symbolizes its agenda in the form of a huge anti-gun statue which it proudly displays in the middle of New York City.

Indeed, if the UN’s anti-gun statue was supposed to represent a symbol of peace as the organization claims, why does it depict not a weapon of war but a mere handgun? This is clearly the UN giving the middle finger to the Constitution and the second amendment, and any attempt by the globalists to act on this attitude should be a massive cause for alarm.

---

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.