Vatic Note: Be sure to rewatch the video that leads up to this three part series.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMdw24f0XmA
Source: Who Owns the World - Vatic commentary
Title: The Queen of England is the largest LANDOWNER IN THE WORLD - part 2
Date: 3/15/2010
Queen Elizabeth II, head of state of the United Kingdom and of 31 other states and territories, is the legal owner of about 6,600 million acres of land, one sixth of the earth’s non ocean surface.
She is the only person on earth who owns whole countries, and who owns countries that are not her own domestic territory. This land ownership is separate from her role as head of state and is different from other monarchies where no such claim is made – Norway, Belgium, Denmark etc.
The value of her land holding. £17,600,000,000,000 (approx).
http://www.whoownstheworld.com/about-the-book/largest-landowner/
This makes her the richest individual on earth. However, there is no way easily to value her real estate. There is no current market in the land of entire countries. At a rough estimate of $5,000 an acre, and based on the sale of Alaska to the USA by the Tsar, and of Louisiana to the USA by France, the Queen’s land holding is worth a notional $33,000,000,000,000 (Thirty three trillion dollars or about £17,600,000,000,000). Her holding is based on the laws of the countries she owns and her land title is valid in all the countries she owns. Her main holdings are Canada, the 2nd largest country on earth, with 2,467 million acres, Australia, the 7th largest country on earth with 1,900 million acres, the Papua New Guinea with114 million acres, New Zealand with 66 million acres and the UK with 60 million acres.
She is the world’s largest landowner by a significant margin. "Elizabeth also controls URAINIUM just as De Beers controls the diamond trade, but she does it through direct ownership. Think it through. Check out where it is mined and she owns the land or controls the companies one way or another. The more you know about the Royal holdings the more you shake your head in amazement. She does control Canada and not long ago shut down government.
The next largest landowner is the Russian state, with an overall ownership of 4,219 million acres, and a direct ownership comparable with the Queen’s land holding of 2,447 million acres. The 3rd largest landowner is the Chinese state, which claims all of Chinese land, about 2,365 million acres. The 4th largest landowner on earth is the Federal Government of the United States, which owns about one third of the land of the USA, (so between the queen and the Fed Gov, most of our land is lost to the people) 760 million acres. The fifth largest landowner on earth is the King of Saudi Arabia with 553 million acres
Largest five personal landowners on Earh Queen Elizabeth II 6,600 million acres
King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia 553 million acres
King Bhumibol of Thailand 126 million acres
King Mohammed IV of Morocco 113 million acres
Sultan Quaboos of Oman 76 million acres
The more you know about the Royal holdings the more you shake your head in amazement.
She does control Canada and not long ago shut down government. Read this article mentioning the Queens rep involved in a decision to shut down the canadian parliament.
BBC NEWS
Americas
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7765206.stm
The Queen has an inordinate amount of influence as a private land holder in Canada. She then halts parliament amid a row Dec 4, 2008 ... "Ms Jean - the representative of head of state Queen Elizabeth II ... The Conservatives immediately shut down parliament, ending all debate". ...
What is the impact on the US?
"AND BY DECEPTION WE SHALL CONDUCT WAR". So are we a reoccupied country without ever firing a shot? Is this why the British were doing as much if not more repression in their own country than we were in ours??? They are as involved in all the wars? More land accumulation??? Now maybe owning land in Iraq and Afghanistan? BUYING UP THE ENTIRE PLANET?
Obama is also her relative since he is related as is Cheney to Bush who is related to the Queen, so maybe there is something to the question, is A SECOND REVOLUTION ON ITS WAY?
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-2844300086.html
Now this link is an excellent read about this long term relationship between the banking family, Rothschild and the Windsor dynasty which is so tied into the Rothschilds, formerly bauers (ashkenazi/khazars and german). Rothschilds shielded red crest is exactly the same as that of Khazaria from which he came. Was it Rothschild that bailed out the royalty when they were so broke they had to make their mansions into tourist attractions??? And now they are wealthy beyond belief. That will be covered more in Part III.
If the Queen truly is worth 33 Trillion dollars based on land holdings, then in fact, there is a problem. Remember her visit here with the drunken Bush hosting a "restricted visitors" list of very select few for a dinner for the Queen who visited ONLY JAMES TOWN when she came. (Once the Queen saw the list she cut the names from the list she didn't want on it, now that is never done by dignitaries from other countries, its only done by our Head of State. I knew then this visit was different, not the normal foreign dignitary dinner).
It was as if she was reclaiming British territory not visiting as a head of state of a foreign country, rather as the holder of this land viewing her holdings. It was mentioned then that Bush is her relative and thus its royalty welcoming royalty. Makes one wonder if there will be any connection between the bankers and our high level of foreclosures? Who will be the owners of this property/land in the end? There are hundreds of thousands of acres involved here. It also makes us relook at the Utah issue where the feds just confiscated another 94 million acres from Utah that has been geologically surveyed and has massive mineral and URANIUM deposits on it, as well as potential for gas and oil. Does British petroleum ring a bell? Remember privatization of societies resources began in England well before we began it here.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
"It is the greatest of all mistakes to do nothing because you can only do a little." ~ Sydney Smith
Pages
▼
2010-03-15
7 comments:
Vatic Clerk Tips: After 7 days, all comments to an article go into the moderation queue for approval which happens at least once a day. Please be patient.
Be respectful in your comments, keeping in mind that these discussions will become the Zeitgeist of our time that future database archeologists will discover. Make your comments worthy and on the founding father's level in their respectfulness, reasoning, and sound argumentation. Prove we weren't all idiots in our day and age. Comments that advocate sedition or violence are not encouraged. Racist, ad hominem, and troll-baiting comments might never see the light of day.
I thought the Catholic Church was the biggest land owner - any comments?
ReplyDeleteFor some reason the moderation system isn't working, but you said
ReplyDelete"I thought the Catholic Church was the biggest land owner - any comments?"
Here is a link to a site about the book written based on extensive research into the subject. Explore the site, the author, the book and decide for yourself. Many other countries have far more land holdings than the Catholic Church and while it holds a goodly amount of land, it does not compare to those listed in the book.
Remember also, the Church has had a massive decline in membership and thus financial support, and probably had to sell a good chuck of what they did own at the time. So who knows why they don't rank up their with the Queen, Russia, the arab emerites, etc... but that is the research to date. email the author and ask him.
Whoops, forgot to give you the link to the book,
ReplyDeletehttp://www.whoownstheworld.com/about-the-book/largest-landowner/
Any ifo on her Canadian holdings cause i, dlove to spread the word and trash her royally
ReplyDeleteI believe everything I have read says she is the largest land owner in Canada. In fact, the link in the comment above says she literally owns the Country where else where she owns a good chunk of other countries. So you might want to read that link in the comment above yours.
ReplyDeleteI remember watching her and prince sleeze on TV on the balcony and he apprently let a bad one go and everyone on the balcony including he queen looked at him with disgust and he laughed. Nice ole sludge. What do you expect from an ancestor (Queen) of a Rothschild. lol
The Queen has title only over the land and by definition of 'private land ownership' she would not be the owner as she is unable to 'do' anything with the land.
ReplyDeleteCanada's land is partitioned into different strands of crown land which by legal definition are owned by the government of Canada.
Quebec also does not recognize the Queen as sovereign hence any of that land is negated.
Ted Turner is still the largest private land owner in the world.
Great, can you supply a link to that fact??? I would really appreciate it since the evidence I had was that she out and out owned the land as a private citizen. In fact they even made the point that she has someone who represents her at parliament and when she is unhappy they have to overturn whatever it is she is against and if here is some other source countering that fact, I would love to see it.
ReplyDeleteThanks and looking forward to proof of the correction.