Vatic Note: Well another Government Freedom of the Press Restriction upheld by courts with respect to the BLM, round up of Mustang horses in Nev. Gradualism is in full swing in off the wall and out of the way places where most people are not expose to such issues. Its a clever way to begin further erosion of the freedom of the press. That does not bode well for the alternative press either on other issues that could arise.
To retain your freedoms and liberties you must remain vigilant, especially now when its breathing done your neck with tyranny. Stand up when it happens or you won't be able to stand up when they chip you or incarcerate you when you refuse. See how easily this can move into a larger agenda?
Media groups cite 1st Amendment in BLM horse fight http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/world/56883666-68/blm-access-horse-media.html.csp
By SCOTT SONNER, The Associated Press
Reno, Nev. • The Reporters Committee on  Freedom of the Press says the U.S. Bureau of Land Management is using  safety concerns as an excuse to limit media access to wild horse  roundups across the West in violation of the First Amendment.
The National Press Photographers Association  and more than a dozen newspaper companies joined the committee in a  friend-of-the-court brief filed in the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals  late Monday to back an advocacy group waging a series of legal battles  over mustang roundups in Nevada.
Horseback Magazine photographer Laura Leigh and others "have a right to see what happens" during the roundups, the media groups said, urging the court to be "highly skeptical of assertions by the BLM that restrictions placed on media access were done for administrative convenience and/or to satisfy safety concerns."
"People in an open society do not demand  infallibility from their institutions, but it is difficult for them to  accept what they are prohibited from observing," they said.
The 9th Circuit sent the case brought by  Leigh’s advocacy group, Wild Horse Education, back to U.S. Judge Larry  Hicks in Reno last year to determine if the BLM limits are  constitutional.
Hicks ruled in 2011 that a balancing of the  interests of the agency and public access to a roundup in Nevada didn’t  warrant granting an injunction to block the gathers. But a three-judge  panel of the appellate court ruled he failed to determine whether those  restrictions violated First Amendment protections.
"When the government announces it is excluding  the press for reasons such as administrative convenience, preservation  of evidence, or protection of reporters’ safety, its real motive may be  to prevent the gathering of information about government abuses or  incompetence," Appellate Judge Milan Smith Jr. wrote in the 18-page  opinion in February 2012.
BLM spokesman Tom Gorey said Tuesday that the  agency had no comment on the latest filing. Agency officials testified  at a hearing earlier this year that they do their best to provide public  access to the roundups and temporary holding of the animals and denied  Leigh’s claims she was singled out to be kept away from the mustangs.
The National Press Club, Nevada Press  Association, Reno-Gazette Journal, The Seattle Times Company, the Las  Vegas-Review Journal’s owner Stephens Media and others joined in the new  brief arguing that journalists routinely face far more dangerous  assignments, especially at war. They say reporters should have the same  unrestricted access to public rangeland as they do to battlefields.
BLM’s concerns are "speculative at best and at  worst are overly broad and ambiguous, often arbitrarily and capriciously  chilling visual journalists’ ability to cover matters of public  concern," they said.
"If they are willing to assume such risks in a  warzone, it should certainly be considered that such safety concerns by  the government are nothing but mere pretext when it comes to horse  gathers ... BLM land is more akin to an open park than a battlefield,  and a horse gather is less dangerous than open combat or fires, floods,  explosions and other calamities where safety concerns are at stake."
Hicks said during a hearing earlier this year  that he recognizes it’s an issue that "strikes deeply in people’s  emotions and interests."
"I also recognize the government is placed in a  difficult position. It seems no matter what they do, they are going to  be subject to certain controversy and challenges," Hicks said.
The journalists said Hicks effectively "rubber  stamped" the government’s assertion that the observers were allowed  reasonable access even though they were prohibited from witnessing  certain aspects of the gather. They said courts routinely have ruled  that such limits are illegal when it comes to keeping TV cameras out of  courtrooms or prohibiting videotaping of police activities.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
The MediaNews Web sites (the “Sites”) contain material that is protected by copyright, trademark and other intellectual property laws. Unless otherwise specified, the Sites and all content on the Sites are intended for your personal, noncommercial use only. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute in any way any material from the Sites except as provided in this Terms of Use. You may download material from the Sites and may use the Sites for your personal, non-commercial use only, provided you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices. You may not republish any content from the Sites, distribute any content to others, modify, sell or otherwise use the content or decompile, reverse engineer or disassemble any software or other products or processes accessible at the Sites. Your license to use the Sites is contingent upon your compliance with these Terms of Use.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Vatic Clerk Tips: After 7 days, all comments to an article go into the moderation queue for approval which happens at least once a day. Please be patient.
Be respectful in your comments, keeping in mind that these discussions will become the Zeitgeist of our time that future database archeologists will discover. Make your comments worthy and on the founding father's level in their respectfulness, reasoning, and sound argumentation. Prove we weren't all idiots in our day and age. Comments that advocate sedition or violence are not encouraged. Racist, ad hominem, and troll-baiting comments might never see the light of day.