2015-12-16

Non-Violent Non-Compliance

Vatic Note:  The points this author makes are very valid.   The most successful revolutions that had sustaining power were those that were non violent and non compliance.  The author gives examples of both violent and non violent and the end results to each.   There is no doubt that the non violent one was much more successful.

However, when being fired on, one has an inherit need to defend and that is why we must never give up our guns.   We have already learned that these elite khazar bankers are cowards and operate on fear.   Everything they do is riddled with protections for them and their cohorts to keep them from suffering at our hands in resistance.

They are afraid of being harmed themselves and that is why they want and need to take our guns. Its also why they use "fear" on us, because it works on them.  Its why they can't and don't want to deal with people who are not afraid. 

Does that mean, TODAY, that such a strategy will work as in the past???  Its hard to say.  In the protocols, it makes it clear that they intend to use violence to keep us in fear and that will be our biggest battle..... staying out of immobilizing fear.   It truly is a case of "UNITED WE STAND AND DIVIDED WE FALL".  Keep that in mind when considering your options.  

Non-Violent Non-Compliance
http://beforeitsnews.com/power-elite/2012/09/non-violent-non-compliance-2440072.html
By Luke Eastwood,  Before It's News, Sept 2012
                                                           

Many ordinary people discuss the world’s problems, their nation’s problems, even local problems, perhaps even figure out how to solve them and then shrug and end the conversation with ‘what can I do I’m only one person?’
 
Unfortunately that lack of self-belief and lack of confidence in our ability to change things is exactly why so little changes in the world. It is that very attitude that enables an amazingly tiny number of powerful people to control most of what happens in human society. However, we do in fact have the power as individuals to decide to act collectively to effect change and thereby nullify the power that these world leaders, shadow leaders or whoever it is that is pulling the strings possesses.
 
Successive violent revolutions through history have proven that one corrupt and oppressive regime is most often replaced by another equally bad or even worse – fairly recent perfect examples of this are the French and Russian revolutions; both of which led to an enormous amount of blood-letting years after the ‘revolution’ had taken place and leaving the bulk of society no better off or worse off than before.
 
So what other options do we have? Taking a look at two other relatively recent examples – the civil rights movement in USA and the struggle for independence in India/Pakistan, it becomes immediately obvious that not only is there another road to change, but this is actually a road that leads to success.

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi’s one-man rebellion against imperial oppression began in South Africa in the years before Word War One. From the very start he advocated non-violence and non-compliance, choosing to rely on the rule of law and moral high ground as a means to achieving his aims. In what is now India and Pakistan, Gandhi (as a Hindu) was very much guided by the concept of ashima (respect for life) in his objectives and also in the way he sought to achieve those objectives.
 
On several occasions Gandhi fasted until violence, rioting and looting amongst the population came to an end – in the run-up to independence and during the Muslim-Hindu conflict afterwards. What was originally a one man movement gained worldwide attention and such was the respect and reverence for this man that the whole country did eventually listen, however peaceful negotiation between the partitioned parts of the former Indian colony disintegrated after Gandhi’s assassination in 1948.
 
Despite the ultimate failure of his dreams of a peaceful co-existence, Gandhi’s legacy has inspired generations across the globe and created an unstoppable wave of anti-imperialism that ended the old European empires and ushered in a new era of independence for many nations across the world. In some cases this freedom was short lived, but what one man inspired proved that freedom, peace and true democracy are achievable goals and not just the pipe-dreams of the oppressed.
 
Martin Luther King Jr. is a another fine example of a non-violent, non-complier who’s efforts and belief in justice for all resonated around the world. Emerging from a small Alabama town in the 1950s he not only changed the course of American history, but gave hope of equality and freedom to all those around the world who are oppressed for their race or skin colour. Whilst other civil-rights leaders (such as Malcom X) advocated violent insurrection if necessary,

King preached non-violent direct action, grounded in his religious beliefs. Despite being shot on several occasions he continued to campaign very publicly for emancipation of minorities and the end of segregation. His efforts succeeded, however like Gandhi he was eventually assassinated in 1968 by a sniper and so did not live to fully see the fruits of his labour. His unshakeable faith and belief in humanity’s potential to rise above its squalor gave him the strength to lead even though he was well aware that someone would eventually succeed in killing him.
 
His life and work no doubt inspired the struggle against Apartheid in South Africa (where Gandhi’s efforts began) and like Gandhi, even now he is held up as a shining example of right over might for all the oppressed.
 
Once again, the human world finds itself struggling to escape from oppression although the problems of economic/political hegemony are now exacerbated by climate change, overpopulation and near depletion of un-renewable resources. The hand of oppression seems to reach across the entire globe and equally the desire for freedom, equality and basic human rights seems to be fore-most in peoples minds the world over.
 
Power seems to be increasingly concentrated among the super-rich (a minute but hugely influential group of people) with their power exercised through gradual corporate takeover of all sections of human society and financial control of almost all areas of human activity. This situation has existed for centuries in many parts of the world, but now it appears that financial and social control of the entire world is almost complete.
 
As share-holders get richer, people are murdered by remote-control machines and foreign troops for oil, others starve to pay the debts of their governments while food is exported elsewhere and the financial incompetence of banks and commercial interests is borne on the backs of the ordinary working people. Maybe such inequality and unfairness has always been so prevalent, but never before has there been such widespread knowledge of this great divide between the ‘haves and have nots’ or such widespread understanding of why things are as they are.
 
Those in control, although they fear active rebellion and violence, realize that it gives them the perfect excuse for violent suppression and more removal of freedoms in the name of law and order. What they cannot deal with though, as both Gandhi and King understood, is being made irrelevant. If societies en-masse refused to comply with governments, financial institutions and all other instruments of control then the powerful would become the powerless. Without our complicity there is no government, there is no power structure, there is no financial system and also no means to wage war.
 
Perhaps ordinary people around the world are waiting for an extraordinary individual to lead us through these dark times and inspire the strength of will to bring about a major shift in the direction of human development? However, we cannot rely on such an individual to emerge – it is now time for each of us to become our own Gandhi or King and stand up against the tidal wave of oppression that looks soon to overwhelm us. Non-violent non-compliance is the only effective weapon we have, violence begets only more violence in an endless cycle.
 
Now more than ever, we need to find the strength to stand up for justice, fairness and human rights, the stakes are now too high to remain quietly idle. The road ahead will not be easy, whatever happens, but with faith and standing together, united by a refusal to accept the unacceptable, we have the power to change or collective futures and take back control of our own lives from those that seek to control all of us.
 
Luke Eastwood is the author of ‘The Journey’, you can also read more of his writing at lukeeastwood.com


The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

2015-12-15

Vaccine Whistleblower book exposes 32 years of CDC's science fraud

Vatic Note:  Add this to other acts of fraud that the CDC has been exposed to performing and we have a perfect storm of criminality that must be addressed.  Just imagine what our lives would be like if they ever succeed in globalizing.  These acts done, even with oversight and enforcement of the laws, would then be unfettered by a government that works for the people.   Instead it would be complete and total fascism.

We would have absolutely no protection from these various special interests groups, such as these drug companies.... and its our children who would suffer the most, as we have seen recently.   That is why India has a warrant out for the arrest of Bill Gates for the damage he has done to the people in India,  with his vaccines.

If these fascist, satanic globalists are willing to do this when they still have some accountability, can you imagine what they would be willing to do without any accountability? I simply can't imagine the kind of dangerous would we would live in as a result.  Depopulation would be the order of the day and no one to hold them accountable for murder, since they would control such a system and have already proven they have no moral core from which to operate.... That makes them extremely dangerous to every one else on the planet.

No thanks.... with that as an option, its now even more important that we follow Putin’s advice and never give up our guns. Better to die fighting than to ever live the life they have planned for us.  Its truly beyond comprehensible.

You read and decide.  Sometimes doing this research and publishing the results, gets to  me.  Then I have to create something pretty or comforting, and that then reminds me of why we must not give up our choices, by giving up our freedom to be who we are, both physically and spiritually.  Without that break dealing with something creative, who knows what our lives would be like.

FUND RAISER FOR THE FIRST OF THE MONTH. 
 
We are now asking you once again, to contribute toward our deficit of $350 that we need by the 1st of the month. That is 15 days away, so we are beginning now, so we make it by that time.   We are so grateful for your support in so many ways.  

If you can afford it please donate off to the right of the blog.  God Bless you and your family in all things.   So stay with us til the first and hopefully, you will be able to contribute so we can continue our work in educating, researching and informing.  
 

Vaccine Whistleblower book exposes 32 years of CDC's science fraud  
http://www.naturalnews.com/052238_vaccine_whistleblower_vaccine-autism_link_CDC_scientists.html

                                                         

(NaturalNews) In August 2014, it was revealed that senior Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) scientist William Thompson had been having numerous conversations with vaccine critic Brian Hooker in which Thompson noted that the data from one of his studies had been massaged prior to publication in order to conceal a link between the MMR vaccine and autism in black boys.

In a new book, Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing the Autism Research Fraud at the CDC, attorney Kevin Barry examines the content of ten months worth of conversations between Thompson and Hooker, which were recorded prior to September 2014.

Hooker is a bioengineer and a professor of biology and chemistry at Simpson University. He has spent 12 years using Freedom of Information Act requests to obtain data on studies the CDC has conducted on a possible link between vaccines and autism, and he has submitted many of his findings to Congress.

Omitted data shows autism link

According to Thompson, he was unaware that his conversations with Hooker were being recorded. After his name was outed as a CDC informant without his permission, he hired a law firm specializing in whistleblower protection and released a public statement through them.

"I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics," the press statement reads. "The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed."

Thompson notes that while he considers himself pro-vaccination, he believes that the CDC's decision making and data analysis needs to be transparent.

"My concern has been the decision to omit relevant findings in a particular study for a particular sub- group for a particular vaccine," his statement reads. "There have always been recognized risks for vaccination and I believe it is the responsibility of the CDC to properly convey the risks associated with receipt of those vaccines."

"Crooked" agency

Among the revelations in the book is the repeated admission by Thompson to Hooker that the mercury-containing thimerosal, which has long been used as a preservative in vaccines and is still used in flu shots and adult-only vaccines, causes "tics."

"I can say tics are four times more prevalent in kids with autism," Thompson elaborates at one point. "There is biologic plausibility right now to say that thimerosal causes autism-like features.'"

The book also reveals more details about the data coverup that Thompson referenced in his August 2014 public statement. It reveals that because the data from that study was modified to show no link with autism, the controversy was rapidly declared settled. "Because the CDC researchers omitted significant data, the flow of research was diverted away from vaccination," Barry writes.

Thompson claims that his studies were "watered down" and his data was "omitted."

"The whole system is paralyzed right now," he says of the CDC's research into a vaccine-autism connection.

Barry's book uses Thompson's testimony to suggest that at best, the CDC is incompetent and misguided on this issue. At worst, to use Thompson's word from the tapes, the agency is actually "crooked."

Rates of autism have ballooned from about 1 in 10,000 in 1960 to an astonishing 1 in 68 today. Over the same time period, the number of vaccines on the childhood schedule has also dramatically expanded. Page 107 of Vaccine Whistleblower contains the 1983 and 2015 recommended vaccine schedules; the former has ten shots for three vaccines by age four, while the current schedule has 27 shots for more than 12 vaccines by age six.

Sources for this article include:
AgeOfAutism.com
HealthImpactNews.com
MorganVerkamp.com


The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

The Missing Piece of the Financial Puzzle

Vatic Note:  We got this link from a commenter on our blog that led us to this information and thus we are posting it as an important analysis about what is REALLY going on.  Please read it carefully and realize WE NEED TO DO AN ICELAND AND ARREST THESE BANKERS AND THEIR COHORTS IN CONGRESS THAT HAVE ENABLED THEM TO COMMIT THESE CRIMES AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

We are the only ones that can make that happen and it will require calling and demanding their arrest and for us to default on any loans from those criminal bankers, since its fraud which is a crime, thus the debt is invalid.  We can do this.   This article proves it would have been cheaper to let the banks go down and simply bail out the depositors.  A lot cheaper.

FUND RAISER FOR THE FIRST OF THE MONTH. 
 
We are now asking you once again, to contribute toward our deficit of $350 that we need by the 1st of the month. That is 15 days away, so we are beginning now, so we make it by that time.   We are so grateful for your support in so many ways.  

If you can afford it please donate off to the right of the blog.   So stay with us til the first and hopefully, you will be able to contribute so we can continue our work in educating, researching and informingGod Bless you and your family in all things, for your support in our mission to expose the underbelly of the satanic beast trying to take over our world. 
 

The Missing Piece of the Financial Puzzle
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/11/18/the-missing-piece-of-the-financial-puzzle/
By Preston James, PHD, Mike Harris,   Veterans today, November 18, 2015

Is there a faction in the Pentagon and the CIA which views the support of ISIS/ISIL necessary to keep the largest Wall Street Banks afloat?

by  Preston James and Mike Harris

End of the hegemony of the Petrodollar system?
Why are the largest Wall Street Banks still afloat?
Many financial experts expected their financial collapse months ago, despite the continuing Quantitative Easements of the Federal Reserve System.
 
Why has the collapse of these largest Wall Street banks been expected and seemed imminent to many financial experts?
The hard reality is that some of these largest Wall Street Banks have over-leveraged themselves to stay afloat using inflated Oil Derivatives which require a fairly high World crude oil price to stay solvent. And the price they need is far higher than what the current crude oil price per barrel has fallen to right now.
 
Unless these largest Wall Street Banks somehow compensate for these losses, these Oil Derivative contracts will crash due to these crude oil prices having falling too far. The result will be that the largest Wall Street Banks holding these contracts will implode financially.
 
This of course could take the whole American financial system down with them.
 
And as many now realize these large Wall Street Banks over-speculated during the boom years up until 2007 and took huge profits for their principals, leaving bankrupt-ready empty financial shells once the numerous investment bubbles they created burst.
 
The major worldwide investment gambling losses that these major Wall Street Banks accumulated brought them to the point of imminent collapse in 2008 and 2009.
 
banksterslaughing2

Hank Paulson, Secretary of the Treasury and Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the private Federal Reserve System great Wurlitzer elastic money creating machine. 

These men were having a good laugh about a bought and owned Congress and the stupid American Taxpayers who were going to bail out the largest Wall Street Banks.

The monumentally large bank losses that Congress and the Administration forced American taxpayers to cover totaled over two trillion US Dollars. These mega losses were the result of careless international investments by these largest Wall Street Banks.

This actually constituted high tech international speculating, best described as high stakes gambling. If the original Glass Steagall Act had not been repealed, these bad investments could never have been made in the first place.
However, these large Wall Street banks immediately used their well established influence to manipulate the US Congress and Two different Administrations (Bush2 2 and Obama) using fear and the threat of Martial Law in the Streets of America to manipulate Congress and the Administration into giving them two huge near Trillion Dollar bailouts all fully financed by the American taxpayer.
Despite some efforts by the US Congress to track where these expenditures went, Congress was only able to find out that most of the Taxpayer provided money was transferred to foreign banks to prop up the foreign investments of these large Wall Street banks and the US Petro Dollar and never learned the specific trails or amounts.
Many Americans did however find out that very large bonuses, often a million dollars or much more, were paid to the top Officers and earners in these large Wall Street Banks during this severe financial crisis, much of it linked to the taxpayer bailouts.
These two bailouts were so large that if applied on behalf of the American People, all homesteaded home mortgages and all college loans could have been paid off.
When a similar crises of impending bankruptcy of the large banks in Iceland occurred, Icelanders reacted and forged a whole different direction of actions and corrections. They arrested the bankers responsible, cancelled any liability of Iceland and its citizens to restore these bankers losses, and declared most home mortgages paid in full. They also tried, convicted and jailed several of the top bankers responsible for this fiasco and financial mal-management.
BANKERSxxA significant portion of the American public want the same thing done that Iceland did to the Bankers responsible for our Wall Street banking crisis and the two bailouts.
We now have a new US Attorney General. The prior totally corrupt one that refused to enforce the laws the Bankers broke has resigned.
Many Americans want the US Department of Justice to now begin a process in earnest and deliver indictments against these Bankers of the largest Wall Street banks involved in the Wall Street meltdown of 2008.
Some legal experts believe that there is no standing statute of limitations because fraud was involved and this negates such normal statutes of limitations.
When the Saudis lowered their price of crude at the apparent direction of the Pentagon power structure in an attempt to create maximum financial stress to Putin and the Russian Federation, Putin, the master chess player that he is, reacted quite unexpectedly. He lowered his crude price even further. This turns out to have been a very crafty move.
What is truly surprising is that not only has it turned out that the Russian Federation is stable financially enough to handle this drop in the World price of crude, but it now seems evident that Putin has used this opportunity to once again outsmart the Wall Street Banksters and the Khazarian Mafia.
This drastically lowered crude price has seriously stressed some of the largest Wall Street Banks to the max because of their inflated Oil Derivative contracts they have used to stay afloat.
These Banks have apparently countered this drastic drop in the price of crude by accessing revenues derived from British Petroleum and Exxon buying stolen crude from ISIS at a greatly reduced, deeply discounted prices and re-selling it at the much higher going World crude price. This appears to have provided a means for these large Wall Street Banks to keep their Crude Oil Derivative Contracts afloat.
Under American Law as well as International Law, this makes BP and Exxon Directors and officers quite vulnerable to legal action as well as major trans-national anti-terror measures that can be legally exercised directly against them personally if these reports are cross validated and pursued legally in US and International venues.
Kaiser_695Now with the downing of the Russian airliner in Egypt and the mass-murder of 224 innocent on-board passengers, President Putin appears to have intensified his attacks on ISIS/ISIL.
We have reports that Russian Federation Forces are now directly attacking ISIS/ISIL Oil shipment tanker caravans of their stolen Syrian oil and directly attacking ISIL controlled oil facilities.
Putin has publicly stated that if a dog bites you, don’t worry about the dog but go after its master. And that is what he is now doing by attacking these ISIS/ISIL tanker caravans of Syrian of oil stolen by ISIS/ISIL.
The Liveleak Video Clip below shows Russian aircraft destroying 500 ISIS/ISIL Oil tanker trucks filed with stolen Syrian Oil.

Conclusion:
Kaiser_710If this decimation of ISIS/ISIL crude oil shipments by the Russian Federation continues it is likely that such will be the straw that soon breaks the back of the Wall Street Oil Derivative contracts.
And once that occurs it is expected that we will then see the fall of the US Petro Dollar soon to follow. The US Petro Dollar will then cease to be used any further as the World’s Reserve Currency.
And you can imagine how quickly and deeply that will erode the power and political influence of the Khazarian Mafia and its large Wall Street banks in America and around the World.


The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Hillary Clinton is on wrong side of everything: Stop telling me I have to vote for her because of the Supreme Court

Vatic Note:  I have been both a registered democrat and a registered republican and what I finally discovered is that I am neither.   I am unaffiliated since, parties are simply back door ways to subvert our system and have the affluent, foreign leaders and special interests set the agenda for our nation.

That is why we are living in "perpetual war" since the 60's and why our nation is in debt in the trillions with no possible chance of ever getting out of it.  Fiat currency and bogus debt with interest payments for accounting entries, is our present and future if we, the people, do nothing to stop it.  Get rid of our leaders and vote in honest productive people.  Our neighbours would have more in common with us than these professional politicians.

FUND RAISER FOR THE FIRST OF THE MONTH. 
 
We are now asking you once again, to contribute toward our deficit of $350 that we need by the 1st of the month. That is 15 days away, so we are beginning now, so we make it by that time.   We are so grateful for your support in so many ways.  

If you can afford it please donate off to the right of the blog.   So stay with us til the first and hopefully, you will be able to contribute so we can continue our work in educating, researching and informingGod Bless you and your family in all things, for your support in our mission to expose the underbelly of the satanic beast trying to take over our world. 


Hillary Clinton is on wrong side of everything: Stop telling me I have to vote for her because of the Supreme Court 
http://www.salon.com/2015/11/11/hillary_clinton_is_on_wrong_side_of_everything_stop_telling_me_i_have_to_vote_for_her_because_of_the_supreme_court/?source=newsletter
By H.A. Goodman,  Salon publication,   

Hillary Clinton is on wrong side of everything: Stop telling me I have to vote for her because of the Supreme Court

First and foremost, the latest unscientific poll out of Western Illinois University has Bernie Sanders winning the presidency. Therefore, if polls are gospel, we’ll have a Democrat in the White House who plans on fixing the structural issues plaguing Wall Street and the U.S. economy.

With Sanders, we’ll have an honest attempt at breaking up “Too Big to Fail” banks, reinstating Glass-Steagall, and tackling wealth inequality. Perhaps one reason WIU predicts Sanders winning the presidency is that Vermont’s senator has more than 1 million online donors who’ve funded his campaign. No need for prison lobbyists, like his challenger Hillary Clinton, and no need for a super PAC.
 
Also, one great thing about a Sanders presidency is that Americans will be able to trust a person who never had to evolve toward progressive stances on war, foreign policy, Wall Street and environmental issues like Keystone XL. While critics haven’t let me evolve from one article on Rand Paul (written from a purely progressive outlook on ending perpetual war, please read the actual article), supporters of the former secretary of state are very comfortable with her evolution on a number of topics. Naturally, Clinton supporters aren’t concerned with perpetual wars.
 
ADVERTISING
According to one conservative historian in the New York Times, Clinton’s foreign policy can easily be deemed “neocon”:
“I feel comfortable with her on foreign policy,” Mr. Kagan said, adding that the next step after Mr. Obama’s more realist approach “could theoretically be whatever Hillary brings to the table” if elected president. “If she pursues a policy which we think she will pursue,” he added, “it’s something that might have been called neocon, but clearly her supporters are not going to call it that; they are going to call it something else.”
When a conservative historian known for neoconservative views says Clinton’s foreign policy is “something that might have been called neocon,” it’s safe to say her foreign policy will be hawkish. In addition, another New York Times article states that neocons are “aligning themselves with Hillary Rodham Clinton and her nascent presidential campaign, in a bid to return to the driver’s seat of American foreign policy.”
 
Yes, Clinton will have something close to a neoconservative foreign policy, and if you don’t believe me, trust the neocons who approve of her views on war and international relations. Or, you can just read Hillary Clinton’s book review of Henry Kissinger’s “World Order.”
 
In addition to being a Republican pertaining to war and foreign policy, conservative stances have plagued Clinton throughout the years. With Clinton, poor judgment is referred to as a regrettable mistake. Owning a personal server was a “mistake,” voting for the Iraq War was a “mistake,” she “wasn’t raised” to envision gay marriage, and now opposes the TPP based upon “What I know about it, as of today.”
 
Generally, poor decision-making is addressed as an honest error, then acknowledged wholeheartedly, while supporters find every way to justify the flip-flop. Accountability is a foreign concept to the Clinton campaign and any reasoned critique is met with“You sound like a Republican!” Even accepting $100,000 from Donald Trump is simply part of Washington politics.
 
Hillary Clinton has evolved on war, gay marriage, Keystone XL, the TPP, in addition to marijuana legislation, and her supporters believe this is a good thing. All human beings evolve, therefore politicians who do the same must be doing so for altruistic reasons. For the rest of America, 57 percent of voters nationwide find Clinton to be “not honest and trustworthy.”
 
Luckily, Clinton has made up for this deficit in trustworthiness by stating she’ll no longer accept money from prison lobbyists.
 
This is a relief since four of her top five donors since 1999 are investment banks and there are questions about foreign donors to her foundation. Nonetheless, in the eyes of supporters, a Democrat is always better than a Republican, even if Politico labels Clinton to be Wall St. Republicans’ dark secret.
 
We dare not vote based upon principle, since only the political power Hillary Clinton is said to possess protects us from Trump, if Sanders doesn’t get the nomination. Granted, Bernie Sanders defeats Trump by a wider margin than Clinton, but we can’t rock the boat for fear of a Trump presidency if Clinton is the nominee.

Republicans are the enemy, says the thought process bolstering the Clinton campaign, therefore accepting money from prison lobbyists and Wall Street is part of the game.
 
There’s a reason Hillary Clinton waited almost three weeks to address the death of Michael Brown and the Ferguson protests. Sadly, part of this reason could be prison lobbyists.
 
The Huffington Post explains the conundrum faced by the Clinton campaign in an article titled “Hillary Clinton Says She’ll End Private Prisons, Stop Accepting Their Money”:
Lobbying firms that work for two major private prison giants, GEO Group and Corrections Corporation of America, gave $133,246 to the Ready for Hillary PAC, according to Vice…
Immigrant and civil rights groups have urged Clinton to stop accepting contributions from donors with ties to GEO and CCA. Earlier Thursday, in announcing its co-founder Cesar Vargas was moving to the campaign of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), the advocacy group Dream Action Coalition singled out Clinton for accepting those contributions.
Sanders recently introduced a bill to ban government contracts for private prisons, including immigrant detention centers.
Even as Bill Clinton apologizes for making the issue of mass incarceration worse and 2008’s 3:00 a.m. ad (an attack ad against Obama labeled by Harvard’s Orlando Patterson as containing a “racist sub-message”) is relegated to the ash heap of liberal consciousness, some people refuse to acknowledge issues pertaining to race within the Clinton campaign.
 
One must vote for any Democrat, regardless of how they treat a core constituency.

Right?
Wrong.

But think about Supreme Court nominees! Selfish! Infantile!

Ruth Bader Ginsburg is fine and the New York Times writes that she has “no interest in retiring.” Justice Scalia isn’t stepping down from the U.S. Supreme Court soon and will only contemplate retirement when he “can’t do the job well.” Anthony Kennedy is in “no rush” to leave the Supreme Court. Justice Breyer has no plans to step down but will “eventually” retire one day.
 
The paranoid legions, frightful of voting their conscience and actually upholding our democracy, can rest assured that all four Supreme Court justices mentioned are still capable of lasting four more years.

Furthermore, it’s doubtful Clinton could win a general election with an ongoing FBI investigation and negative favorability ratings. The Benghazi hearing was a sign of noble defiance to many, regardless of the fact Republicans are already planning impeachment if Clinton wins the election. Nevertheless, the reality is that Sanders is poised to shock the political establishment.
 
I’ve already explained in June that Bernie Sanders will defeat Clinton and any GOP challenger to win the presidency. However, if Clinton is the nominee, the Democratic Party will be forced to “evolve” toward progressive politics in the following election. I’m only voting for Bernie Sanders in 2016 and I explain why in this YouTube video and recent article in the Huffington Post and Salon.
 
If electing a person who voted for Iraq and accepts money from prison lobbyists is the next evolution of the Democratic Party, then it’s best to make a statement now before Marco Rubio is eventually considered a Democrat.
 
If by chance Sanders loses the nomination, I’ll write him in, and if Democrats lose, then the Democratic Party will evolve to cater to progressives tired of moderate Republicans posing as Democrats. The Democratic Party will learn to uphold its ideals and evolve toward progressive views on war, foreign policy and other topics integral to the presidency.
 
Most important, Democrats like Hillary Clinton will never again accept money from prison lobbyists or expect to win the presidency after voting for devastating wars like Iraq. If the Democratic Party learns the hard way, it won’t be my fault. It will be the fault of pragmatists who’ve coddled the DNC for fear of Supreme Court nominees, or the allure of political power.

I’m only voting for Bernie Sanders, primarily because we still live in a democracy, and I’ll vote based upon my conscience. Bernie Sanders is a once in a lifetime political figure, and I won’t settle for his antithesis, simply to appease the same people who’ve allowed the Democratic Party to become what it is today.


The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

2015-12-14

NWO Following Deranged Jewish (VN: Khazar.....) Blueprint?

Vatic Note:    I believe that this cabal he is discussing below, are religiously "Luciferians" and thus satanists.  But this explains exactly what that looks like and I remember reading the same thing from a Barry Chamish book several years ago, so there is precedence for this view of the khazar Zionist bankers behavior, their success so far, but also for their failures from past tries at this. 

He also says, as I have done, that the protocols were approved by the ashkenazi khazar Jews of Europe and in 1897 written up afterwards by Rothschild and I believe that to be the case and why they are followed today like a serious blueprint.  All you have to do is read them and its all right there for us to see.

Finally, I have included the comments section for this since many of them were very enlightening as well.  Its interesting to see the variety of perspectives on this issue.   You read and decide.
 

NWO Following Deranged Jewish Blueprint? 
http://henrymakow.com/002089.html
By  Chris Jon Bjerknes,  Henry Makow,  December 11, 2015

Bjerknes.jpg


Chris Jon Bjerknes has been off my radar for eight years
but his dire warnings about the Illuminati following a 
apocalyptic agenda in the Bible seem to be coming true. 

He says redemption requires that the Rothschilds
("the King of the Jews") rule the world after a global calamity. 
(What Every Jew and Non-Jew Should Know updated from July 22, 2007

By Henry Makow Ph.D.

A Chicago-area scholar, Christopher Jon Bjerknes, 50, thinks he knows what plagues mankind and believes his knowledge is necessary to stop Armageddon.

He says a heretical cult, the "Sabbatean Frankists," controls organized Jewry, including Zionism and Freemasonry. They began as followers of Sabbatai Zvi (1626-1676) and later Jacob Frank (1726-1791.) They believe Sabbatai was the Messiah (God) and his soul has transmigrated down to the Rothschild dynasty, who are now the "King of the Jews." (VN: remember, these Jews he is discussing are not the ones of the Bible, rather they are the non DNA Jews of the Khazars with not one ounce of DNA blood in them. They are a mix of turks and mongols.)

According to their messianic system, Redemption requires that the Rothschilds become God, i.e. King of the World. This will see the sacrifice of 2/3 of all Jews and the destruction and enslavement of the rest of mankind. Bjerknes believes this demented creed actually is the motive force behind history, including all wars, and "world government."

Bjerknes (B-YERK-NES)  is proud of his Norwegian part-Jewish heritage, ( maternal grandfather, a famous musician, was Jewish.) He has written two massive books-- one about Albert Einstein as a plagiarist, and another about the Sabbatean inspired Armenian Genocide -- that include hundreds of pages of suppressed Jewish history. They can be found as PDFs at his web site http://www.jewishracism.com/

His message is compelling and consistent with the Protocols of Zion where the author (whom I suspect is Lionel Rothschild) talks about coming into his "kingdom."

The Sabbateans believe their king is duty bound to restore the Jews to Israel and exterminate the Gentiles. They believe the Messiah won't appear until the world succumbs to evil and are determined to make this prophecy self-fulfilling. Thus evil is good. In Bjerknes' view, this constitutes a "Jewish war against humanity." 


The Sabbateans are often sexual degenerates who engage in wife swapping, orgies and incest. They often pretend to be Christians or Moslems to worm their way into Gentile society in order to destroy it. (Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians, pp.64-65.)

Bjerknes cites Deuteronomy as an example of this Jewish supremacism: "the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth. " (7-16) "And all people of the earth shall see that thou art called by the name of the LORD; and they shall be afraid of you." (28:10)

He points to Zachariah [13;8-9] as evidence that Jews will be slaughtered: "And it shall come to pass, that in all the land, saith the LORD, two parts therein shall be cut off and die; but the third shall be left therein."


[9] "And I will bring the third part through the fire, and will refine them as silver is refined, and will try them as gold is tried: they shall call on my name, and I will hear them: I will say, It is my people: and they shall say, The LORD is my God." (He also cites Ezekiel 5:12-13 to this effect.)

On pp. 43-46 of Jewish Genocide, Bjerknes cites references from the Talmud and the Old Testament to the plan to exterminate and enslave Gentiles.

For example ,Genesis 25;23, and 27;38-41 promises the Gentiles to the Jews as their slaves and slave soldiers, and gives an incentive to exterminate the Gentiles simply because they dare resent their fate.


ROTHSCHILDS FOLLOW BIBLICAL BLUEPRINT

At the beginning of the 19th century, the Rothschilds started campaigning to return the Jews to Israel, purchasing land there and scheming to breakup the Ottoman Empire. They later bought the Suez Canal to project their power into the Middle East. Bjerknes writes:

"The ruin of the Turkish Empire and the mass murder of the Armenian Christians were one step on the long and tumultuous Jewish march toward the death of mankind. The ruin of the Russian empire was another, followed by the repeated destruction of Europe, particularly Germany in the World Wars this Jewish cult created in an attempt to artificially fulfill Messianic prophecy and force the Jews of Europe against their will to flee to Palestine." (66)

According to Bjerknes, Jewish support was the only thing lacking in the Rothschilds' plan to establish a world government in Jerusalem, with them as king:

"They could bankrupt Egypt and Turkey. They could bring Russia to ruins. They could buy Jewish ne'er-do-wells. They could even buy the Pope but the only way to force Jews in large numbers to Palestine was to put Hitler and Stalin in power and persecute Jews on a massive and unprecedented scale." (291)  (VN:  we proved this point several times with this link. Read it and see if you agree)

CHRISTIANS ARE BEING DUPED

Bjerknes has a poignant warning to Christians:

"In the Jewish dominated media of today, we find many Jews preaching to the public that the end times are coming and that Christians ought to view their own destruction in a positive light as if it were the divine fulfillment of Christian and Jewish prophecy. Many Christians have been duped by these charlatan...the destruction of the world and its nations is occurring as the result of the deliberate intervention of immensely wealthy Jews and not as the result of God's will. These Jewish leaders view the Hebrew Bible as a plan, which they are deliberately fulfilling.... (327)

In an email, Bjerknes writes that intermarriage is part of the "Jewish" strategy:

"I believe that powerful Jewish interests have been deliberately attempting to fulfill Jewish messianic prophecy for 2,500 years and have duped many Gentiles into helping them obtain their objectives. They have also recruited many Gentiles through intermarriage, friendship and selfish interests, who are not dupes, but commit inhuman acts out of greed, vanity, or for other immoral reasons. Do they believe that what they are doing is evil? I suspect some do."


CONCLUSION 

Lately Bjerknes seems focused on Donald Trump.
"It is truly shameful that we Americans tolerate this Jewish media which not only tries to train and brainwash Trump to stop speaking out for Americans' best interests, but in doing so, and in countless other ways, is training and brainwashing Americans to abandon our own best interests in favor of those who would destroy us."
He also thinks Putin, far from being a defender of Christianity, is controlled by the "Jews."
Today, the Russian Soviets are controlling ISIS to bring about communist revolution in Islam and war. They will pretend to fight ISIS so as to enter these nations with military presence and to gain all the intelligence of the opposition. The Soviet Jews will then have complete control over the process of bolshevising Islam and surrounding Israel with jew State control over all human activity.
The Jews are also destroying the White Race in this endeavor to bolshevize Islam. They are flooding our countries with hostile anti-Whites, wrecking our economies with the thievery of communist China and providing the Chinese with our industrial and military secrets. They have begun to flood our nations with Asians and KGB propaganda and are threatening us with nuclear war from their communist States."

Let's hope Chris Jon Bjerknes is wrong about this.

---- 

Related: Bjerknes Interview with Makow 

Chris Jon Bjerknes Tears Apart the Old Testament 
Bjerknes Blog 

Makow Comment:  Ten years ago I wrote: "Does the New World Order serve a "Jewish" agenda or a banker elite agenda? I would venture that it serves the latter, and the Jewish people are an instrument of this agenda like so many other people. By giving private individuals the ability to create money out of nothing, we have created a monster which threatens to devour the planet and with it the human race." 

What I wrote is still true. But after reading this quote from The Jewish World of Feb 9, 1883, I am beginning to think Bjerknes was also right; the banker and "Jewish" agenda are one :
"The dispersion of the Jews has rendered them a cosmopolitan people. They are the only cosmopolitan people and in this capacity must act and are acting, as a solvent of national and racial differences. The great Ideal of Judaism is ...that the whole world shall be imbued with Jewish teachings, and that in a universal Brotherhood of Nations - a greater Judaism, in fact -- all the separate races [and nations] and religions shall disappear." 
----

First Comment from JG:
This article answers a lot of questions for both the Jew and Gentile and hypothesizes the root cause of all this mayhem that has plagued this planet especially over the last 100 years so very well.
I don't believe money or Jewish philosophy to be the motivating factor in the House of Rothschild's plan here. Both are just tools. It would have to be something more powerful than that to keep this plan so active and effective with the success that it has had to date.
There would have to be some perverse existing religious belief amongst them that would justify it all and ease their conscience. The twisted believe that you are fulfilling God's will by creating every hellbent scheme against humanity along with all the genocides as well is a heresy at best.
- See more at: http://henrymakow.com/002089.html#sthash.rIoE2ip4.dpuf


The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Psychiatric hospital places patients in the middle of busy roadways to have them killed by vehicular manslaughter, says politician

Vatic Note:  The intense cruelty of this act tells us who is doing it.  Khazars, who have no soul, no spirit and no compassion or humanity.  Remember, their depopulation is very specific.  They want to depopulate the "USELESS FEEDERS", except themselves who are the most "USELESS" of all.  And they have to do it, so they are not identified as the perps and arrested.

Rahm Emmanual's brother, the son of an ex Urgan terrorist from Israel, wrote up an entire document on "eugenics" and how we must change our valuing of each individual in a society to value based on contribution to society.  In other words, ability to work as slave labor for the good of the corporations, in other words,  FASCISM.   That would then justify eliminating seniors, permanently handicapped, and mentally ill.  Was this a trial run to see if it worked and then would be used in Europe and America? 

This is a good example of why we must NEVER let these people take control of our planet since their cruelty knows no bounds.  Notice, how they war game these crimes in third world, slave labor countries.  Why is that?  Because the population has been kept so poor, that their only concern is survival.  We must fight this NWO to the bitter end and NEVER give up our freedoms or our guns. Read this and see what you think.


Psychiatric hospital places patients in the middle of busy roadways to have them killed by vehicular manslaughter, says politician  
http://www.naturalnews.com/052184_Psychiatric_hospitals_inhumane_treatments_lethal_injection.html

                                                             
(NaturalNews) If you ever happen to find yourself stranded in Mexico, begging passersby for a little extra cash to get home, watch out!

A Mexican politician is calling on folks like you to be put down with a lethal injection – a practice that she claims is already taking place in a similar, but different, way against mental patients deemed unworthy to live.  (VN: aaaah, a NWO politician in Mexico.  Gee, why am I not suprised?  A country where corruption is a legitimate source of income.)

Olga Gutierrez Machorro made headlines after she told a local newspaper in the Mexico City state of Tecamachalco that homeless beggars throughout the city would be better off dead because they're a nuisance. A politician in the local government, Machorro admits that most of the homeless in her area are "harmless," but insists that something needs to be done to get rid of them.

"Yes, they're a little crazy, but they're harmless," she stated, adding that this is why she thinks it would be "kinder to just give them a lethal injection."

An audio clip of Machorro making these statements is available at the following Soundcloud link (in Spanish): http://metro.co.uk

Machorro's statements are exceptionally shocking, considering she's also the councilor responsible for heading the area's Vulnerable Groups Commission, whose stated purpose is to help the homeless and disadvantaged emerge from the depths of their despair and get back on track in civil society.

The problem, Machorro says, is that there simply aren't enough resources in the government coffers to care for the large and ever-growing number of homeless people who now roam the area begging for money and food. Though typically non-aggressive, these beggars are unsustainable and need to be dealt with, she insists.

Human Rights Commission of Puebla opens case against Councillor Machorro for suggesting that homeless people be killed with lethal injections

In all fairness, Machorro has actually opened up her own home in the past to homeless folks looking for a place to rest their heads and avoid possible death on the streets. But their overall numbers are now far too high to deal with and something needs to be done, she told reporters during a recent interview.

And her plan isn't necessarily all that controversial considering a local psychiatric hospital in El Batan already disposes of unwanted mental patients by sending them to their deaths late at night, according to Machorro.

As reported by Yahoo News, Machorro told the local media that beggars are unofficially "deposited" onto busy streets late at night, where their chances of being hit by trucks and other vehicles is high. This is how the mental hospital gets rid of "un-aggressive" patients when it runs out of space to care for them.

"Places like Batan [a psychiatric hospital in the city of Puebla] release the homeless who aren't aggressive," Machorro is quoted as saying by Fox News, in defense of her plan. "But where do they let them go? All along the side of the road. Nobody condemns them for that, for letting [the homeless] get struck and killed by cars."

After saying these things, Machorro received considerable backlash that resulted in her issuing an official apology. She now says that she plans to come up with a new course of action to deal with the homeless problem that is a little less heartless, and perhaps more embracing of compassion and human decency.

Following Machorro's interview, the Human Rights Commission of the State of Puebla also intervened, filing a case against her for proposing heinous acts against the homeless that represent serious human rights violations.

"...the CHR Puebla (has) asked the municipal authority [for] a detailed order to hear the case and why the statements [were made]," reports the Mexican paper The Excelsior (in a Spanish-to-English translation of the article, courtesy of Google Translate).

Sources for this article include:

News.Yahoo.com

DailymMail.co.uk

Excelsior.com.mx

Latino.FoxNews.com


The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Fluoride in drinking water may trigger depression and weight gain, warn scientists

Vatic Note:  We got fluoride out of our water back in March 2005, and it was not the natural fluoride  that we find in nature.   It was toxic waste from Pesticide production and it cost the manufacturer $40 a truck load to get rid of it.  Instead they passed putting it in our water and we had toxic waste in our water until 2005 and ever since then I have lost 78 pounds, and my thyroid is much better.

Our Water company is who made the decision to buy toxic waste and put it in our water.  Those making that decision to use toxic waste fluoride should be prosecuted and sentenced to jail if found guilty.

This article also shows that the government of Englands health agency says fluoride in the water is good for you and disputes the results of this study below.  However, its important to remember, that Britain in one of the major leaders in the move toward globalizing, population reduction and DNA manipulation to reduce the intel level of the remaining population to keep resistance at bay.

Also, we just proved in a blog that all major international newspapers are owned by the khazars,  no different than Rothschild owning the British and Canadian governments and thus controlling public policy.  If there is a rebellion, let it be world wide against the international Khazar bankers and their Illuminati bosses.

Rothschild is one of the Illuminati families, as is Dupont, the chemical giant whose products poison our daily lives with chemicals, not only in our water, but in our food and pesticides as well.  So, any counter argument by the Telegraph reporter has to be viewed with a Jaundiced eye.  For Goodness sake, make it a priority to get that fluoride out of your water and soon.   You read and decide. Its also in your toothpaste. 

Fluoride in drinking water may trigger depression and weight gain, warn scientists 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/11430087/Fluoride-in-drinking-water-may-trigger-depression-and-weight-gain-warn-scientists.html
11:30PM GMT 23 Feb 2015


Depressed and gaining weight? You may live in an area with fluoride in the water
Depressed and gaining weight? You may live in an area with fluoride in the water Photo: Dave and Les Jacobs/Getty/Blend Images
Fluoride could be causing depression and weight gain and councils should stop adding it to drinking water to prevent tooth decay, scientists have warned.
A study of 98 per cent of GP practices in England found that high rates of underactive thyroid were 30 per cent more likely in areas of the greatest fluoridation.
 
It could mean that up to 15,000 people are suffering needlessly from thyroid problems which can cause depression, weight gain, fatigue and aching muscles.
Last year Public Health England released a report saying fluoride was a ‘safe and effective’ way of improving dental health.
 
But new research from the University of Kent suggests that there is a spike in the number of cases of underactive thyroid in high fluoride areas such as the West Midlands and the North East of England.
Lead author Professor Stephen Peckham, Centre for Health Service Studies, said: “I think it is concerning for people living in those areas.
“The difference between the West Midlands, which fluoridates, and Manchester, which doesn’t was particularly striking. There were nearly double the number of cases in the West Midlands.
 
“Underactive thyroid is a particularly nasty thing to have and it can lead to other long term health problems. I do think councils need to think again about putting fluoride in the water. There are far safer ways to improve dental health.”
In England, around 10 per cent of the population (6 million) live in areas with a naturally or artificially fluoridated water supply of 1 mg fluoride per litre of drinking water.
 
The researchers compared areas to records from 7935 general practices covering around 95 per cent of the English population in 2012-2013.
 
Rates of high underactive thyroid were at least 30 per cent more likely in practices located in areas with fluoride levels in excess of 0.3 mg/l.
 
Fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral found in water in varying amounts, depending on the region and it is also found in certain foods and drinks, including tea and fish. It helps combat tooth decay by making enamel more resistant to bacteria.
 
But previous studies have found that it inhibits the production of iodine, which is essential for a healthy thyroid.
 
The thyroid gland, which is found in the neck, regulates the metabolism as well as many other systems in the body.
 
An underactive thyroid can lead to depression, weight gain, fatigue and aching muscles and affects 15 times more women than men, around 15 in 1,000 women.  The researchers say councils must rethink public health policy to fluoridate the water supply in a bid to protect the nation’s tooth health.
 
However Public Health England said that previous evidence overwhelmingly showed that fluoride in water was safe.
 
Dr Sandra White, Director of Dental Public Health at Public Health England, said: “Public Health England regularly reviews the evidence base for water fluoridation. 
 
“The totality of evidence, accumulated over decades of research, tells us that water fluoridation is a safe and effective public health measure, and shows no association with reduced thyroid function.” 
 
Other experts also warned that the study may have been skewed by population bias, a claim denied by the authors.
 
Prof David Coggon, Professor of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Southampton, said: “It is quite possible that the observed association is a consequence of other ways in which the areas with higher fluoride differ from the rest of the country. 
 
“There are substantially more rigorous epidemiological methods by which the research team could have tested their idea” 
 
The research was published in the BMJs Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.


The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

2015-12-13

NOW THE GOVERNMENT CAN LEGALLY KILL CHRISTIANS

Vatic Note:   You cannot kill anyone legally, for a crime that harms no one, nor deprives them of their property.  A death penalty requires a trial.  After you read the blog today that came up at 1 am, you will understand this below.

It is the Rothschild Khazars globally trying to destroy Muslim and Christian faiths, and to bring them all under the "Talmudic 'self worship' beliefs that these khazars have sold to their people.  The 1% torah worshipping Jews still believe and rely on their Torah,  but they are a small minority.

Our true enemy are the Rothschild/Israeli khazars who are psychopaths and that fits with their distortion of their religion.  Remember they have a law in the Talmud that says you cannot rape children under 3.5  years old....WHAT???

What about the child who is only 4 and a half years old?  This is why Israel has legalized prostitution, makes billions off of the porno industry etc and Is also a major player in the "child international sex slave trade". What does one expect with that kind of background and history of Judaism.


NOW THE GOVERNMENT CAN LEGALLY KILL CHRISTIANS
http://www.takebackourrights.org/docs/Christians-full%20page.html
By Bill Dannemeyer,  U.S. Congressman, 1979-1992


          Your U.S. government can now legally kill Christians for the “crime” of worshipping Jesus Christ!  A diabolic deception has been perpetrated on the American people by their OWN leaders, Senators and Congressmen, who have sold their soul to the devil.  

On March 5, 1991, in the House of Representatives, and March 7, 1991, in the U.S. Senate, without any knowledge of, or input by, the people of the United States, U.S. Senators and Congressmen passed a law that is so outrageous – and frankly unconstitutional – that it forces the American people to be bound by a set of monstrous rules, called the Noahide Laws, rules that make the belief in Jesus Christ a crime punishable by decapitation by guillotine!  On March 20, 1991, President George H.W. Bush, a supposed Christian, signed the bill into law.
 
          Before you respond, “NO, that cannot be – not in our free country!” let me explain.

          The passage of this law, HJ Res. 104, is especially troublesome to me because I was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives at the time it was passed.  Even worse, I was in the House Chamber the very day that is was passed, voting on other legislation.  Yet I, as a U.S. Congressman, had NO KNOWLEDGE that it had been passed or even that it was to be brought up for a vote.

          How could this be?  How could the deception be so pervasive that those of us who had sworn to uphold our country’s Constitution, particularly those of us (few, indeed) who really took our position seriously as the protectors of the people, could be totally in the dark regarding the content of this bill and its passage by the leaders of this country – by treachery and deceit?
          
Here’s how it happened!

          On January 31, 1991, an innocuous-sounding Resolution was introduced, designating March 26, 1991 as “Education Day, USA.”  It was purposely given this name to deceive the American people.  It was, in fact, a Double Deception because not only did the Resolution have nothing to do with “Education,” it was also deceptively billed as a vehicle for recognizing the eighty-ninth birthday of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson.  But in truth, the Resolution was nothing less than a secret, under-handed plot to control the American people by the Noahide Laws – a subterfuge for the elimination of Christianity, the elimination of all Christians, and the enslavement of all remaining “Gentiles.”
 
          The Resolution, first introduced by Minority Leader, Rep. Robert H. Michel of Illinois, was then referred to the House Post Office and Civil Service Committee.
          Early in March 1991, 225 members of the House had signed on as co-sponsors of this Resolution, but it is highly doubtful they were given the full text of the document.  They were probably told only that it was a Resolution in honor of Rabbi Schneerson’s birthday.  Most likely they had no knowledge that the treacherous Noahide Laws were a silent attachment.  I was not one of the co-sponsors.
          The committee referred this Resolution to the House for a vote on March 5, 1991.  But here is where the real treachery begins!  The record states that the House of Representatives passed this Resolution by “Unanimous Consent.”  But what the average American does not know is that “Unanimous Consent” is a euphemism for getting a bill passed “under the radar” with almost NO ONE present to vote AND with NO RECORD of who voted or HOW they voted.
          A Congressman’s ears prick up when he hears the words “Unanimous Consent” because he is aware that this may be a signal for skullduggery.  And in this case, it most certainly was!
          On the day this Resolution was “passed,” the entire membership of the House of Representatives had already been dismissed after having been told that the day’s work, including all the voting, was over.  We could all go home.
          It was THEN, after virtually ALL members had left, that the traitorous authors of this Resolution brought it up for a vote on the House floor – with only four hand-picked members present.  It was then deceitfully “passed” by “Unanimous Consent” on March 5, 1991, by voice vote with almost NO ONE there and NO RECORD made of their names or how they voted.
          Two days later, on March 7 1991, the U.S. Senate passed the Resolution by voice vote, also with no recorded vote.  On March 20, 1991, it was signed by President George H. W. Bush and became Public Law 102-14.
          As you read on, you will discover the identity of the evil forces that have so much control over the U.S. Government that they can accomplish these dastardly deeds under cover of darkness.

            This is the language of HJ Res. 104:
102nd CONGRESS
1st Session
H. J. RES. 104
JOINT RESOLUTION
To designate March 26, 1991, as `Education Day, U.S.A.'.
HJ 104 EH
102nd CONGRESS
1st Session
H. J. RES. 104

JOINT RESOLUTION
To designate March 26, 1991, as `Education Day, U.S.A.'.
Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;
Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;
Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos;
Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society;
Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these historical ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future;
Whereas the Lubavitch movement has fostered and promoted these ethical values and principles throughout the world;
Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and revered and his eighty-ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991;
Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, `the rebbe,' this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of `education and giving,' the year in which we turn to education and charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and
Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is designated as `Education Day, U.S.A.'. The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 1991.
Attest:
Clerk.
END

The Lubavitch movement mentioned in HJ Res. 104, began in the late 18th century and is the largest branch of orthodox Hasidic Judaism.  One of its prime goals is the enforcement of the Noahide Laws on all humanity.
          The words “Seven Noahide Laws” are mentioned twice in this Resolution.  But completely missing from this Resolution are the following:
1. WHAT IS THE SPECIFIC LANGUAGE OF THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS?
2. WHO DRAFTED THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS AND WHERE DID THEY COME FROM?
3. WHEN WERE THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS DRAFTED?
4. WHO DEFINES WHAT THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS MEAN? WHAT IS THE PENALTY FOR VIOLATING THEM? WHO WILL ADMINISTER THEM?
5. “MAN’S” SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS VS. GOD’S TEN COMMANDMENTS.
6. TO WHOM DO THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS APPLY AND WHO MAKES THAT DECISION?
7. IS HJ RES. 104, CONTAINING THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS CONSTITUTIONAL?
  
(1) WHAT IS THE SPECIFIC LANGUAGE OF THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS?
           The Encyclopedia of Judaism describes The Noachide Laws (the words Noahide and Noachide are used interchangeably) as follows:
          The Noachide Laws – The Encyclopedia of Judaism
    1. Civil justice [the duty to establish a legal system];
    2. Prohibition of blasphemy [which includes the bearing of false witness];
    3. The abandonment of idolatry;
    4. The prohibition of incest [including adultery and other sexual offenses];
    5. The prohibition of murder;
    6. Also that of theft;
    7. The law against eating flesh [a limb] cut from a living animal [ie., cruelty in any shape or form] (Babylonian Talmud. Sanh. 56A)
         Before providing answers to the other six questions, I would like to describe my analysis of the process by which this Resolution was adopted by Congress.
          When you initially read HJ Res. 104, it seems to be a vehicle for recognizing the eighty-ninth birthday and the beginning of the 90th year of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson which fell on March 26, 1991.  I have no recollection of anyone asking me to co-sponsor this Resolution so I am not familiar with what reasons were given to House of Representative members to sign on as co-sponsors.
          The language of the Resolution speaks for itself.  But the consequences of their adoption is that the Seven Noahide Laws have been recognized by the Congress of the United States and the President of America as “the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization” and the claim will be made that they are now the law of our land, the United States.  Most Americans would be shocked to learn that the Babylonian Talmud, NOT the Old Testament, is the “Holiest” book of Judaism, and is the source of these Seven Noahide Laws, which provide a specific penalty for violating any of these Seven Noahide Laws, namely death by decapitation [Sanhedrin 57A]
          Make no mistake about it, what appeared to be nothing more than a recognition of the eighty-ninth birthday of Rabbi Schneerson and the establishment of Education Day in the United States will be claimed by the proponents of this Resolution as the establishment of a law by which a Christian who worships Jesus Christ will be charged with idolatry and decapitated.
          Based on my fourteen years of service in the House of Representatives, the process by which HJ Res. 104 was adopted was a complete disregard and purposeful circumvention of a very important basis on which representative government is founded.  Namely, accountability to the people of America of how we conduct the people’s business.  Specifically, roll call votes are the means whereby members of Congress identify what laws have been passed and by whom.  When laws and resolutions pass by unanimous consent, watch out!  In this case someone or some group wanted to hide the real purpose behind a seemingly innocuous birthday recognition of Rabbi Schneerson.
          I was not part of the discussion that led to the drafting and presentation of HJ Res. 104, to members of Congress.  But based on my knowledge of how Congress works, this describes what most probably took place.
          Jews, who by their financial contributions to members of Congress, claim they control what Congress will or will not do.  A look at the recent history of U.S. politics confirms this.  “He who has the gold – rules!”
          Stephen Sizer, author of the book, Christian Zionism, first published in 2004, states:
          “The Unity Coalition for Israel (UCFI) is probably the most recent network of Christian Zionists to be formed in the US yet it is already the largest and most powerful.  The UCFI was founded by Esther Levens, a Jew, in Kansas in 1994 and now comprises a broad coalition of 200 different and autonomous Jewish and Christian organizations representing 40 million members who are ‘dedicated to a secure Israel’.  Their principal strategy is to lobby the US media and political establishment, to challenge what they term ‘disinformation and propaganda’ and to express ‘the truth about Israel’. The UCFI includes three of the largest Christian Zionist organizations: Bridges for Peace, the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem, and Christians for Israel.
          This coalition has a major influence on both the Republican and Democratic parties by providing the bulk of campaign funding to both sides.  Aluf Ben, a spokesman for Shimon Peres, was quoted in Ha’aretz, a leading newspaper in Israel, as claiming that sixty percent of all financial help to Democrats came from Jewish sources.’  According to the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, ‘most pro-Israel fund-raisers estimate that at least 60 to 90 percent of Democratic campaign funding comes from Jewish sources, which also supply perhaps 40 percent of Republican funding’.  Christian Zionists have also been influential in forging a closer relationship with Israel by facilitating solidarity pilgrimages and educational tours to the Holy Land.” (page 215)
          Jewish lobbyists were successful in enlisting Minority Leader, Congressman Bob Michael, to be the chief sponsor of this resolution purportedly to honor and recognize Rabbi Schneerson, the leader of the Lubaviteh movement, on his eighty-ninth birthday.
          These lobbyists wanted to eliminate, for obvious reasons, any chance for discussion of the seven questions written above in this report.  Specifically, the Bible, with particular reference in this instance to the Ten Commandments written by God, is the source of the ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society, not the Seven Noahide Laws, written by man.
          To avoid this debate and the recorded vote that would have followed, a strategy was devised to get Resolution 104 adopted by “unanimous consent” with no documentation that 99% of all House members were absent, and none of the four members that were present would be held accountable by a recorded vote.
          The Journal of the House of Representatives (JHR) for March 5, 1991, on page 151, describes item 30.12 H Res. 95- Unfinished Business.  This Resolution commended the President and United States and allied military forces in the success of Operation Desert Storm.  A recorded vote was taken and Item 30.13 describes the count: Yeas 410, Nays 8.  My yes vote was among the 410.  This page contains the name of each member present and how he or she voted.
          Item 30.14, on the next page (page 152) of the JHR, recorded the announcement that when the House adjourns, it will meet on Wednesday, March 6, at 12 noon.  This told all the members that there would be no more roll call votes on Tuesday, March 5, that the day’s business was over, and within minutes after this announcement, virtually all the members were off the House floor, on their way home, and totally unaware of anything thereafter that was brought up.
          Here is the subsequent record of what took place AFTER the members were gone.  Item 30.15 of the JHR was a routine announcement concerning recesses and a joint session with the President of the United States:
          But then after almost everyone was gone for the day, Item 30.16 on the agenda, HJ Res. 104, the Resolution in question, was surreptiously brought up on the House floor with only four members present, who spoke on behalf of the Resolution.  This is how it occurred:
          Congressman Thomas Sawyer (D-OH), the Chairman of the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service asked for “unanimous consent” to take up HJ Res. 104.  Congressman Thomas Ridge (R-PA) reserved the right to object, but did not object.  If he had objected, it would have stopped the process of unanimous consent.  Instead, he acknowledged the work of Minority Leader Michel who was the chief sponsor of this legislation and he then yielded to (Jewish) Congressman Benjamin Gilman (R-NY).  Congressman Gilman spoke briefly as did Minority Leader Michel.  It appears likely that these four Congressmen were the only ones present.
After assisting with the underhanded passage of HJ Res. 104, Congressman Thomas Ridge also subsequently assisted in the cover up of the truth of 9/11, claiming that flight #93 crashed in Pennsylvania, even though NO parts of an airplane or passengers or baggage were ever found.  From then on Thomas Ridge’s career blossomed!  At the time of 9/11, Ridge was Governor of Pennsylvania (1995-2001).  But in 2003, Ridge was named the First Secretary of the new Department of Homeland Security (2003-2005).  After the tragic multiple shootings at Virginia Tech on April 16, 2007, Ridge became part of the committee to cover up what actually happened in that event.
Continuing with the debacle of the “Noahide Laws” passage, the Speaker pro tempore asked if there was any objection to the request from Congressman Sawyer.  There was no objection.
30.16 EDUCATION DAY, U.S.A.
     On motion of Mr. Sawyer, by unanimous consent, the Committee on Post Office and Civil service was discharged from further consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 104) to designate March 26, 1991, as “Education Day, U.S. A.”
     When said joint resolution was considered, read twice, ordered to be engrossed and read a third time, was read a third time by title, and passed.
     A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said joint resolution was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
     Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said joint resolution.
          Their total remarks consumed no more than four or five minutes and there was not even a mention of the Seven Noahide Laws.  For the balance of the early evening these routine non-controversial items were considered by the “House” with only these four members present.
          Item 30.17 National Employ the Older Worker Week
          Item 30.18 Baltic Foreeda day
          Item 30.19 Leave of Absence
          Item 30.20 Adjournment
          The Jews claim that with their financial contributions they have bought control of the U.S. Congress, and so they have.  As proof of this statement no one needs to search further than the blunt words of Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, uttered on October 3, 2001 to his colleague, Shimon Peres:
“Every time we do something, you tell me America will do this and will do that…I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel.  We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”
Indeed, the Jews had “bought” control of the House and Senate which resulted in ignoring the whole concept of accountability that the presence of debate and a roll call vote accomplishes.  Bringing up HJ Res. 104 for passage at a time when the process selected assured that no more than four members of the House of Representatives were present, each of whom was committed to the passage of HJ Res. 104, guaranteed that when the request for unanimous consent was expressed on the floor of the House, no one was around to object.  And because no one objected, passage was obtained with no member having his or her vote recorded in favor of or against the Resolution.  By design there was no roll call vote and thus no member was held accountable for what Congress did.  This is a prime example of the fraud perpetrated on the American people by their so-called “Representatives.”  The oft quoted cliché is operating here, “With friends like these, who needs enemies?”

(2) WHO DRAFTED THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS AND WHERE DID THEY COME FROM?
          Dr. Eliezer Segal, a Jewish Associate Professor of Theology at the University of Calgary, admits that history proves that the Talmud, Mishnah (a part of the Talmud) and the seven Noahide Laws are derived from Babylonian traditions, that Jesus vehemently denounced because they nullified the teaching of Scripture.
          The Encyclopedia of Judaism identifies the Babylonian Talmud (T.B.) as the source of the Noahide Laws.
          According to “Secret Societies and Subversive Movements,” by Nesta Webster,  the Talmud, and the Kabbalah, were derived from Jewish oral Traditions which the Jews claim to have the same authority as the Laws of Moses found in Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy.
          The “Holiest” books of Judaism are the Talmud, a compendium of over 100 “books” written by Pharisees and Jewish Rabbis, that is the utter perversion of God’s Word. The Kabbalah, another Jewish “holy book,” is a book of witchcraft and licentious debauchery.
          Provisions of the Talmud, Genesis Rabbah 16: 6. Sanhedrin 56 states that the seven Noahide Laws were commanded to Adam.  Yet there is nothing in the Bible to support this claim.
The book, Judaism’s Strange Gods, by Michael A. Hoffman (2000), describes how the Talmud specifically defines all non-Jews as non-human animals.  It also distinguishes between actions by Jews against non-Jews, from actions of non-Jews against Jews.  Jews are clearly spoken of as Superior to non-Jews.
Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God
          Sanhedrin 58b.  If a gentile hits a Jew, the gentile must be killed.

Acceptable to Cheat Non-Jews
          Sanhedrin 57a.  A Jew need not pay a gentile the wages owed him.

Jews Have Superior Legal Status
          Baba Kamma 37b.  “If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite (Gentile) there is no liability, but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite…the payment is to be in full.”

Jews May Steal from Non-Jews
          Baba Mezia 24a.  If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile it does not have to be returned.  (Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b.)  Sanhedrin 76a.  God will not spare a Jew who marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a gentile…”

Jews May Rob and Kill Non-Jews
          Sanhedrin 57a.  When a Jew murders a gentile there will be no death penalty.  What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.
          Baba Kamma 37b.  The gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has “exposed their money to Israel.”
          “Relying upon the Code of Maimonides and the Halacha, the Gush Emunim leader Rabbi Israel Ariel stated:  “A Jew who killed a non-Jew is exempt from human judgment and has not violated the religious prohibition of murder.”

Jews May Lie to Non-Jews
          Baba Kamma 113a.  Jews may use lies (“subterfuges”) to circumvent a Gentile.

Non-Jewish Children are Sub-Human
          Yebamoth 98a.  All gentile children are animals.  Abodah Zarah 36b.  Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.

Insults Against Mary
          Sanhedrin 106a.  says Jesus’ mother was a whore:  “She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters.”  Also in footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b of the Soncino edition, it is stated that in the “uncensored” text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus’ mother, “Miriam the hairdresser,” had sex with many men.

Jesus is also described in the Talmud
          By 1999, certain Orthodox Jewish organizations described Jesus as a sorcerer and a demented sex freak.
          On the website of the Orthodox Jewish, Chabad-Lubavitch group, chabad.org, — one of the largest and most powerful Jewish organizations in the world and whose spiritual leader, Rabbi Menachen Mendel Schneerson, whose birthday honoring was the false flag cover-up for signing into law the authority to murder Christians for worshiping Jesus Christ — we find the following statement, accompanied by citations from the Talmud:
          “The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of ‘Jesus the Nazarene.’ 1. ‘He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a).’”
          2. “He was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned), was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent (Sanhedrin 107b; Sotah 47a).”
          3. “He learned witchcraft in Egypt…(Shabbos 104b).” (End quote from Chabad-Lubavitch).

More quotes from the Talmud about Jesus
          Gitten 57a says Jesus is in hell, being boiled in “hot excrement.”
          Sanhedrin 43 says Jesus was executed because he practiced sorcery: “It is taught that on the eve of Passover Jesus was hung, and forty days before this the proclamation was made: Jesus is to be stoned to death because he has practiced sorcery and has lured the people to idolatry…He was an enticer and of such thou shalt not pity or condone.”

Genocide Advocated by the Talmud
          Soferim 15, Rule 10.  This is the saying of Rabbi Simon ben Yohai” Tob shebe goyyim harog (“Even the best of the gentiles should all be killed”).
          This Talmudic passage has been concealed in some translations.
          The Jewish Encyclopedia states, "…in the various versions the reading has been altered, 'The best among the Egyptians' being generally substituted."  In the Soncino version: “the best of the heathens” (Monor Tractates, Soferim 41a-b).  But “heathen” is translated as “Gentile” (non-Jews) by the Jews.

Talmudic Doctrine: Non-Jews are not Human
          The Talmud specifically defines all who are not Jews as non-human animals, and specifically dehumanizes Gentiles as not being descendants of Adam. 

Moses Maimonides:
Advocate of Extermination
          The rabbinic teacher Moses Maimonides called the “Rambam” by the Jews, is revered in Judaism as a supreme “sage” of the highest stature.
          “Moses Maimonides is considered the greatest codifier and philosopher in Jewish history.  He is often affectionately referred to as the Rambam, after the initials of his name and title, Rabenu Moshe Ben Maimon, “our Rabbi, Moses son of Maimon.”
          According to the introduction to the book, Maimonides’ Principles, p. 5, Maimonides “spent twelve years extracting every decision and law from the Talmud, and arranging them all into 14 systematic volumes.  The work was finally completed in 1180, and was called Mishnah Torah, or “Code of the Torah.”
Here is what Maimonides taught concerning the saving of the life of a Gentile or Christian, and even Jews who dared to deny the “divine inspiration” of the Talmud:
          “Accordingly, if we see an idolater (gentile) being swept away or drowning in the river, we should not help him.”
          Maimonides ruled that it is a Jewish court – or a court appointed by Jewish authority—that enforces obedience and passes judgment on Gentiles, as well as promulgating legislation by court order for that purpose.  Maimonides further decreed that any non-Jewish nation “not subject to our jurisdiction” (tahaht yadeinu) will be the target of Jewish holy war.
          These courts are to be convened allegedly under the “Noahide Laws” (proscriptions against idolatry supposedly based on the covenant with Noah).  But there is nothing in the Bible to support this claim.  This claim is a preposterous FRAUD – and a sign of the anti-Christ!
          Prof. Easterly of the Southern University Law Center, a Jewish legal expert, has diabolically compared HJ Res. 104 to the “first rays of dawn” which “evidence the rising of a still unseen sun.”
          The Jewish Encyclopedia envisages a Noahide regime as a possible world order (One World Government) immediately preceding the “universal reign of the Talmud.”  A terrifying prospect, indeed!
          These provisions of the Talmud, the same Talmud that is the source of the Noahide laws, make very clear why the proponents of HJ Res. 104 used the subterfuge of obtaining the passage of this legislation without any debate or a recorded vote.  HJ Res. 104 was fraudulently and deceitfully passed by “unanimous consent” when no one was around to consider and discuss the provisions of the Talmud. If these had been brought to the attention of the members of Congress, HJ Res. 104 would never have been passed.
          The Chabad Lubavitch falsely claims that God gave the Seven Noahide Laws at Mt. Sinai with the intention that the Children of Israel should keep them and teach them to the Gentiles.  This is a deliberate lie!
          There is absolutely no support in the Bible for this fraudulent claim.
The Source of these Seven Noahide Laws was NOT, as the Jews have claimed, directions from God to Adam – or Noah – or Moses.  Their source is the Oral Traditions of the Pharisees that began in Babylon after the Israelites were captured in 586 BC.
Over 600 years later, after the Pharisees had killed Christ and the Temple in Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD, these Oral Traditions were written down and became the Babylonian Talmud.

(3) WHEN WERE THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS DRAFTED?
          The Exodus of the Israelites from Egypt took place in about 1445 BC.  Moses died in 1405 BC.  Shortly after beginning the forty year wandering in the desert, God wrote the Ten Commandments on two tablets with his own finger and they are recorded in Exodus 20: 1-17.
          The ancient nation of Israel reached its height of power and prestige during the reign of Solomon from 960-930 BC.
          After Solomon, most of the Israelite kings were corrupt or inept and the Northern ten tribes of Israel were taken captive by Assyria in 721 BC.  The Southern tribes, Judah and Benjamin, were expelled to Babylon in about 586 BC, after which the Talmud oral traditions, specifically including the Seven Noahide Laws, were produced in Babylon during this period.

(4) WHO DEFINES WHAT THE NOAHIDE LAWS MEAN?  WHAT IS THE PENALTY FOR VIOLATING THEM?  WHO WILL ADMINISTER THEM?
A Jewish website, www.NoahideNations.com, states that the worship of any deity other than God, which includes Jesus Christ, is idolatry.  The penalty for idolatry is decapitation.
          Moses Maimonides (Rabbi Moshe Ben Maimon 1138-1204) is recognized for his preeminence as a Jewish philosopher.  Maimonides’ Mishnah Torah, Chapter 10 of the English translation, states concerning Jesus Christ:
          “It is a mitzvah (religious command or duty), however, to eradicate Jewish traitors, minim (Gentiles = non-Jews), and apikorsim (secular Jews), and to cause them to descend to the pit of destruction, since they cause difficulty to the Jews and sway the people away from God, as did Jesus of Nazareth and his students, and Tzadok, Baithos, and their students.  May the name of the wicked rot.”  Sanh.57A of the Talmud states the penalty for disobedience, with these words:
          “One additional element of greater severity is that violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noahide to capital punishment by decapitation.”
          The Noahide Laws will be administered by a restored Sanhedrin, the ruling body of Jews that found Jesus Christ guilty of blasphemy on the accusations of two false witnesses according to Matthew 26:60.  Under the “Courts of Law” section of the Noahide Laws this is stated:
          “A person may be convicted in a Noahide court on the testimony of single witness, but only if the witness is known to be righteous.”
(5) “MAN’S” SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS VS. GOD’S TEN COMMANDMENTS.
          It is God’s Law, the Ten Commandments, that is the basis of civilization, NOT the Noahide Laws written by the killers of Christ – the Pharisees.
          The Ten Commandments are found in Exodus 20: 1-17 and were written by God in his own finger on two tablets of stone, to show their permanence.  God wrote these Commandments shortly after the Exodus that began in 1445 BC.
          Although false claims have been made by the Jews that the origin of the Noahide Laws began with Adam, and included Noah and Moses, Jewish Professor Segal stated that the evidence of history proves that the origin of the Seven Noahide Laws is the Babylonian Traditions!
          The captivity and removal to Babylon of the Northern tribes Judah and Benjamin occurred in 586 BC.
          In other words, at least 859 years after God gave the Ten Commandments to mankind on Mt. Sinai, the Pharisees, the cultural progeny of the killers of Christ, in exile in Babylon, drafted the Seven Noahide Laws which were written by “man,” NOT by GOD!
          In examining the history of the Seven Noahide Laws, no claim is made that God wrote them and/or that He wrote them with His own finger, as He did the Ten Commandments.
TEN COMMANDMENTS IN THE ARK OF COVENANT
          The two tablets of stone containing the Ten Commandments written by God, were housed inside the Ark of the Covenant.  (2 Chronicles 5:10, 1 Kings 8:9)  The ordinances, written by Moses, were housed in a side pocket on the outside of the Ark of the Covenant.  (Deuteronomy 31:26)
          When Jesus died on the cross He abolished the ordinances written by Moses (housed on the outside of the Ark of the Covenant) including the sanctuary-related ordinances that looked forward to the sacrificial lamb, Jesus Christ, and thus were abolished when these were fulfilled with the crucifixion of Christ.  But the ordinances did NOT include the Ten Commandments.  The ordinances were totally separate from the Ten Commandments.
          No trace of a claim by anyone has been found which asserts that the Seven Noahide Laws were inside or on the outside of the Ark of the Covenant or anywhere during the Israelites sojourn in the wilderness.  This fact is not surprising since the Seven Noahide Laws were first developed as a part of the Babylonian Talmud long after the exile of the Israelites to Babylon in 586 BC.
Exodus 20:3-17, contains the Ten Commandments:
3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
6 And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.
7 Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.
9 Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work:
10 But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:
11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
12 Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.
13 Thou shalt not kill.
14 Thou shalt not commit adultery.
15 Thou shalt not steal.
16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
17 Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.
          What God gave in these texts to the Children of Israel was clearly conditional.  In the 23rd Chapter of Matthew, Jesus properly brought to account the Scribes and Pharisees for not keeping the covenant, the Ten Commandments.  No better proof of the total rejection of the covenant was the actions of the Jews to call for the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.
          The only reason the Pharisaical leaders of the Jews did not directly order Jesus’ death, was that they did not have the legal authority to do so.  They were under Roman rule and only a Roman ruler could order the death penalty for any person.  So they pressured Pilate (who said “I find NO FAULT in this “man” (Jesus)) to order the Jews’ murderous demand.
          Many Christian leaders claim that the Ten Commandments were done away with at the Cross and only those commandments that Christ specifically mentioned in the New Testament are to be kept by “New Testament Christians.”
          This is their justification for ignoring the Fourth Commandment which is God’s command that we keep holy the Sabbath day (Saturday) as the Sabbath.  But in the following analysis, you will see that ALL Ten Commandments including the (Saturday) Sabbath Commandment are given in the New Testament.
          In addition, Jesus Himself, kept the Seventh Day Sabbath, and Jesus was NOT a Jew.  Jesus is God and God is not Jewish.
          The Christian Patriot Association of Boring, Oregon, published this document, “The Law of God” which contains a side by side scriptural reference of the Old and New Testament concerning the Ten Commandments.
 
THE LAW OF GOD
OLD TESTAMENT
1. Thou shalt have no other gods before Me.

2. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them; for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate Me; and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love Me, and keep my commandments.

3. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord they God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh His name in vain.

4. Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work; but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God, in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates; for in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day; wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day, and hallowed it.

5. Honor thy father and thy mother; that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.

6. Thou shalt not kill.

7. Thou shalt not commit adulterv.

8 Thou shalt not steal

9. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy
neighbor.

10. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife, nor his manservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor anything that is thy neighbor's.
See Exodus 20:1-18
I will not alter nor break the thing that is gone out of my
lips.
(See Psalms 89:34)
NEW TESTAMENT
1. "Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve." Matthew 4:10

2. "Little children keep yourselves from idols." "Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device." 1 John 5:21; Acts 17:29

3. "That the name of God and His doctrine be not blasphemed." 1 Timothy 6:1

4. "Pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the Sabbath day." "The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath, therefore the Son of man is Lord also of the Sabbath." "For He spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise. And God did rest the seventh day from all His works." "There remaineth therefore a keeping of a Sabbath to the people of God. For he that is entered into His rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from His." "For by Him were all things created that are in heaven, and that are in earth." Matthew 24:20, Mark 2:27;28; Hebrews 4:4, 9, 10, margin; Colossians 1:16.

5. "Honor thy father and thy mother." Matthew 19:19.

6. "Thou shalt not kill." Romans 13:9.

7. "Thou shalt not commit adultery." Matthew 19:18.

8. "Thou shalt not steal." Romans 13:9.

9. "Thou shalt not bear false witness." Romans 13:9.

10. "Thou shalt not covet." Romans 7:7.

AFTER HIS DEATH
"Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: Yea, we establish the law." Romans 3.31.
"They... rested the Sabbath day according to the commandment." Luke 23:54-56

SABBATH IN THE NEW EARTH
"For as the new heavens and the new earth, which I will make, shall remain before Me, saith the Lord, so shall your seed and your name remain, and it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one Sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before Me, saith the Lord." lsaiah 66:22,23. See Mark 2:27-28.
FOR ADDITIONAL COPIES, COMPLETE CATALOG, OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, CONTACT
CHRISTIAN PATRIOT ASSOCIATION
P.O. Box 596 Boring, OR 97009 (503)668-4941





          The words of Jesus in Matthew 5:17-19 completely disprove the idea that His death on the cross repealed the Ten Commandments:
          “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.  I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.  Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven” (NIV)
          When Jesus used the word “fulfill” He meant to convey the idea that His life was a living example of the Ten Commandments.  To reach the conclusion that His death on the cross repealed the Ten Commandments would necessitate changing the verb “fulfill” to “abolish” in total conflict with the negative expressly stated by Jesus in the use of this verb.  Jesus said, “I have not come to abolish them (the Ten Commandments).”
          In Matthew 19:18-19 Jesus mentions Commandments 5-10.  These six Commandments reveal how man is to relate to his fellow man.
          In Mark 2:27-28, Jesus uses these words to make clear that He not only recognizes and affirms the Fourth Commandment, but He has complete authority over it:
27 The Sabbath was made for man (all mankind, anthropos in Greek – the root word for anthropology - the study of humanity), and not man for the Sabbath.  28Therefore, the Son of Man is also Lord of the Sabbath. (This is the Seventh day (Saturday) Sabbath.)
          In Matthew 4:10 Jesus affirms the First Commandment with these words:
          Thou shall worship the Lord thy God and Him only shalt thou serve.
          The Apostles John, Mark and Paul made specific references to the Second and Third Commandments in 1 John 5:21; Acts 17:29 and 1 Timothy 6:1.
          Archeologists have searched for many centuries in the Christian era to find the Ark of the Covenant.  Yet no one has claimed to have found it.  In Revelation 11:19, John’s vision revealed that the ark of His covenant was still in the heavenly temple of God.  Here are John’s words:
Then the temple of God was opened in heaven, and the Ark of His covenant was seen in His temple.  And there was lightings, noises, thunderings, and earthquakes and great hail.
          The Ark of the Covenant had/has only one item in it – the Ten Commandments.  God is telling us through John, the Revelator, that the Ten Commandments are still operative now and will never be abolished.  The reason heaven will be heaven is that the Ten Commandments will be in the heart of everyone there.

(6) TO WHOM DO THE NOAHIDE LAWS APPLY AND WHO MAKES THAT DECISION?
           Proponents of the Noahide Laws claim that the Ten Commandments were given exclusively to the Nation of Israel who they incorrectly refer to as “Jews”---and the Noahide Laws were given to govern all other persons, - “non-Jews” – or goyim –Gentiles.
          Scriptural texts that are quoted to support this false view are Exodus 19:3-6 and 20:1-2 and 3:17.  But even a cursory examination of these texts will prove this claim to be utter nonsense.
Exodus 19:3-6

3And Moses went up unto God, and the LORD called unto him out of the mountain, saying, Thus shalt thou say to the house of Jacob, and tell the children of Israel; 4Ye have seen what I did unto the Egyptians, and how I bare you on eagles' wings, and brought you unto myself.  5Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth is mine: 6And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel.
The children of Israel were then – and are now – of no particular ethnicity.
The term “children of Israel” refers to the TRUE followers of Jesus Christ.

Exodus 20:1-2
1And God spake all these words, saying,  2I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
Egypt, in the Bible, is symbolic for sin.  See Rev. 11:8.

Exodus 3:17
17And I have said, I will bring you up out of the affliction of Egypt unto the land of the Canaanites, and the Hittites, and the Amorites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, unto a land flowing with milk and honey.
          There is no language in any of these texts of Scripture, or for that matter any other text of Scripture in the entire Bible, to support the claim that the Noahide Laws were given to govern all non-Jews and the Ten Commandments were given only to the Jews.
 
          The assertion that the Ten Commandments were given only to the Israelites of old (and supposedly the Jews of today) is CONTRARY to the Word of God and completely ignores the TRUTH of the New Testament.  Jesus made this clear in Matthew 5:17:

17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.
Jesus “fulfilled” the law by showing us how we must keep the law.
          Paul in Galatians 3:16, 29 made the same point:
16. Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.
29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
          The true followers of Jesus Christ, wherever they may be found, are the “seed of Abraham and heirs according to the promise.”
 
(7) IS HJ RES. 104, CONTAINING THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS CONSTITUTIONAL?
           The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides among other things, that:
 
          “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”
 
          HJ Res. 104 fraudulently claims that the Seven Noahide Laws are the “bedrock of society” from the dawn of civilization.  This is a deliberate lie and seeks to re-write history.  The Seven Noahide Laws were written by Jewish Pharisees and Rabbis about 586 BC, when the tribes of Judah and Benjamin were in exile in Babylon.
 
          The Ten Commandments were written by God in His own finger in stone approximately 1445 BC at Mt. Sinai.
 
          The Ten Commandments were written by God over 850 years BEFORE the Seven Noahide Laws were written by man.  The Ten Commandments, NOT the fraudulent Noahide Laws, are the generally acknowledged bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, but have not been designated as law by an act of Congress.

          Because the Seven Noahide Laws are obviously religious in their purpose, any act of Congress that attempts to establish them as the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization is clearly religious and in a complete and total violation of the First Amendment.

CONCLUSION
           The Noahide Laws have nothing to do with Noah, or Adam or God.  In about 1600 B.C. God directed Noah to build an ark and save his family and the animal population of the world from the flood which destroyed life on the surface of the earth.
 
          Over one thousand years later, in 586 BC, during the Babylonian captivity, diabolical laws were developed by the Pharisees and Jewish Rabbis who sought to title these laws with a name that would give them legitimacy.
          The purpose of the Jews in developing the Noahide Laws is to rule over all of the non-Jews in the world without having to suffer a mass conversion of these people to Judaism which they fear would dilute the cultural cohesion of the Jewish population.
 
          The Rabbis who produced the Talmud and the Noahide Laws claim that the Noahide Laws are the universal way of reaching God even though they privately state the Noahide Laws are only for the “Gentiles.”  Behind this false claim is the true belief of the Rabbis that it is the means whereby the Rabbis are seen as God and are to be worshiped as God by the “Gentiles.”
 
          The Noahide Laws are to become the national, though undeclared, religion of America.  The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits Congress from passing a law which establishes a religion for the United States of America.  If another 9-11 type “terrorist” incident takes place, and Martial Law is declared, it is likely that the claim would be made that since the Noahide Laws have been recognized by Congress as the “basis of our civilization” and that according to the third Noahide Law, anyone who worships Jesus Christ violates this law, he or she may be characterized as a terrorist.  Then the Talmudic penalty for violating any of the Noahide Laws, namely decapitation, would be enforced.
 
          No American should underestimate the ferocity of the commitment of the Zionist Jews to control the entire political system of the world through the One World Government now being created, and in so doing administer “Justice” as they define it.
 
          The main goal of the Zionist Jews and their New World Order is exactly the same as it was when Jesus was on earth – to exterminate Christ – and His followers!  Nothing has changed.


The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.