The military has been speaking out about the dangers of the Israeli influence in our government at every level. Most top level military men, as pointed out below, "know" that Israel was involved deeply in 9-11 as well as many other murderous false flags.... to manipulate a political agenda and that is primarily starting WW III. Its what they did in WW I and WW II, after conducting revolutions that weakened the military of the one country they wanted to economically destroy and it worked. Its what they are doing to us as we speak.
We have done blogs proving it, including a copy of the $20 million dollar draft Shiff of Wall Street gave to Trotsky, also known as "Bronstein", to do the Russian Revolution...They got rid of the Czar because he refused to play the "fiat currency game" with Rothschilds.
Army War College Professor Says Military Brass Knows Mossad Behind 911, Pins Hopes on U.S. Veterans Organizations
http://www.dailypaul.com/131899/army-war-college-professor-says-military-brass-knows-mossad-behind-911-pins-hopes-on-us-veterans-organizations&sss=1
by James Madison Lives, Daily Paul
"I have had long conversations over the past two weeks with contacts at the Army War College and HQ Marines, and I made it absolutely clear that in both cases it [the USS Liberty and 9/11] was a Mossad operation." - Sabrosky
Zionism: A political philosophy envisioning a militarized theocratic state in which Judaism is the official religion, often includes manifest for expansion.
Judaism: One of the world's great religions. All Jews are not Zionists, historically there has been a vigorous debate within Judaism over the legitimacy of a Jewish state, even long before the establishment of Israel. Some strains of Judaism vehemently oppose any Jewish state, for religious or other reasons. See JewsAgainstZionism.org
Anti-Semitism: Bigotry against all Jews, regardless of whether they are Zionist or not. Opposition to Israeli government policies is often incorrectly conflated with anti-semitism.
Below are two audio files of key excerpts from two lengthy recent interviews of Dr. Alan Sabrosky, for the time-challenged who are interested in hearing a compilation of some of the most important (and electrifying) statements made in the course of the interviews. Sabrosky was a Director of Studies and Adjunct Professor at the U.S. Army War College, who has stepped forward to state unequivocally that the Israeli Mossad played a central role in 911, along with co-conspirators in the American government.
Dr. Sabrosky, who is part Jewish and a former U.S. Marine, argues that only the Mossad, representing the Israeli far-right, has the organization, discipline, skills, and above all geopolitical motivation to pull off 9/11, which enabled the American invasion of Iraq. Sabrosky says although money was made by many individuals by the wars, in overarching terms only Israel is the winner.
Rarely remarked upon in discussion of this kind is that the Israeli right's goals in the Middle East have long been public knowledge, promoted by Israeli and dual-citizenship Neocons for some time. In a 1982 article in the Israeli journal Kivunim, the journal of the Department of Information of the World Zionist Organization, Israeli scholar Oded Yinon, formerly attached to the Foreign Ministry, reiterates the old idea that Israel's best course for long-term safety, prosperity, and possible expansion lay in its neighbors being broken up into many weaker, squabbling states.
Yinon envisioned Iraq broken into a Shiite south, a Sunni middle, and a Kurdish north, with other countries thereby destabilized along the same lines. Although the invasion of Iraq has been called an ongoing disaster for America, with troops unable to withdraw due to the threat of full-blown civil war, by another yardstick the invasion has been a resounding success. Sabrosky says that Iraq was never a threat to America, but it was certainly a threat to Israel, to the point of SCUD missiles already having been launched into Tel Aviv by Saddam during the first Gulf War.
In Interview II with Mark ,Sabrosky is accompanied on the air by a survivor of the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty. This deliberate attack on an American ship, in which U.S. 34 servicemen were killed, illustrates, according to Sabrosky, the ruthlessness of an extreme right-wing Israeli military faction, and the lengths to which it will go to achieve a geopolitical agenda.
In Yinon's essay "A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties" he writes:
"Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel's targets.
Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel...Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon.
In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi'ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north."
Yinon's essay influenced a generation of Israeli and Israeli-American Neocon thinkers, and in 1996 an Israeli think tank, The Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, published the widely-reported on “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm”:
"Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions."
Who were the authors of this Israeli-funded publication aimed at advising Prime Minister Netanyahu? A Who's-Who of prominent dual American-Israeli citizens who would later run George Bush's foreign policy, including Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and David Wurmser, the latter of whom would be chief adviser for Middle East policy for vice-president Dick Cheney.
The question may be asked, and Dr. Sabrosky asks it, if these mens' signatures were affixed to a war document which referred to Israel "the" realm, did the use of the word "the" betray the placement of their true allegiances? When Sabrosky says "the" realm, as a Marine he can mean only one realm: America. He questions the notion of dual citizenship with any country, not just Israel, as "political bigamy," as did President Teddy Roosevelt.
, she mentions how to use the color green if you are sad or depressed. A non-spiritual 
description of this color is often associated with envy (as in green with envy) but Choquette advises to go outside in nature and observe all of the 'green' around you because through nature and the predominance of the color green, it will lift your spirits.
for ages and have succeed far beyond our imagination. (VN: yeah? Well, we have been doing some research of our own and we have a few surprises for them as well. )
