Vatic Note: Its amazing what we are willing to buy. I had a wikileaks supporter send me an email and her only comment was " No wonder the US wants to shut down Wikileaks....this is information we all need...." As if wikileaks had anything to do with this. That got me first out of the gate. Its the whistle blower who matters and apparently doesn't care that everyone knows he is going to leak it, so wikileaks has nothing to do with it. He would have found someone else to release the info to. It would have been much more effective for him to threaten to leak it to the IRS instead. However, that is
if this performance is for real. This whistle blower is under the gun for his own criminal prosecutions and this could easily be a deal he made to shore up Wikileaks flagging reputation, in order to get a reduced sentence if he pled guilty. Now lets dig further though and see just how
BIG A DEAL THIS LEAK really is.
First lets take a look at what he says his biggest item he will expose, is going to be, which is that many wealthy people are holding capital in trusts. WELL, THAT IS
LEGAL, so what is the big deal? Then the article below and the cult followers of Assange say "The US hates that he is going to give this info to
WIKILEAKS": why
? BECAUSE THE US, controlled by the same bankers, HATES GRABBING ALL THAT WEALTH FROM THE SUPER WEALTHY PEOPLE who were always going to be the last ones robbed by the khazar bankers anyway. Sure they do, THE US run by Rothschilds minions
JUST HATES GRABBING ALL THAT ENORMOUS WEALTH, so they are going to really be mad at wikileaks, that is why they grabbed the wealth of the rich from the stock market about three times already since 2005.
But
WORSE, THESE TYPES OF DISCLOSURES HAVE ALREADY BEEN DONE BEGINNING UNDER BUSH JR IN 2008 AND CONTINUED BACK IN 2009 UNDER OBAMA. WHAT A JOKE AND WHAT SHEEP WE ARE TO BUY THIS STUFF. Here check it out. I told you, no one is going to do or say anything FROM WIKILEAKS, that hasn't already been disclosed, exposed, or already done. This is to shore up wikileaks reputation and all the neocons are on board. Think about it a minute, just use the critical thinking skills God gave you.
WHY WOULD HE PUBLICALLY ANNOUNCE HE IS GIVING THIS TO WIKILEAKS AND NOT QUIETLY TO THE PRESS, OR TO THE IRS DIRECTLY OR TO THE ALTERNATIVE PRESS OR TO ANY NUMBER OF LEGITIMATE OUTLETS???? WHY SAY HE IS GOING THROUGH WIKILEAKS publically, that defies logic of any kind. The
ONLY rational reason he would do this is to act as cover for wikileaks since more and more are turning away from the scam this has become. Remember, even the courts acknowledge and use
"THE REASONABLE MAN THEORY", what would a reasonable man think under these circumstances? Here are some articles to show how this is
NOT a big deal. Its been going on since the time of Bush. Already billions if not trillions have been extracted from those banks and other offshore accounts.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/20/business/global/20ubs.html
http://www.nritoday.net/world-affairs/114-sep-09-swiss-bank-account-holder
Heck they have even been going after the asian banks now, so check it out, THIS IS NOT NEWS NOR IS IT NEW. CHECK dates on these articles
http://blogs.reuters.com/financial-regulatory-forum/tag/tax-havens/
http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Misc/misc.taxes/2010-03/msg00016.html
(this last link above was under Bush for gosh sake, its old news, see excerpt below: ) in case you don't know UBS is the swiss bank for rothshild in switzerland acting as the Global clearing house for all Rothschild banks and is the one where all those big guys deposit their money. Why would the US be mad about the disclosure if they are the ones that pushed this way back before wikileaks ever got outted? Just some common sense goes a long way.
(here is a quote from the above link)
"In connection with the establishment of these offshore company accounts, UBS private bankers and managers accepted and included in UBS's account records IRS Forms W-8BEN (or UBS's substitute forms) provided by the directors of the offshore companies which represented under penalty of perjury that these companies were the beneficial owners, for United States federal income tax purposes, of the assets in the UBS accounts. In certain cases, the IRS Forms W-8BEN (or UBS's substitute forms) were false or misleading in that the United States taxpayer who owned the offshore company actually directed and controlled the management and disposition of the assets in the company accounts and/or otherwise functioned as the beneficial owner of the assets in disregard of the formalities of the purported corporate ownership." (this is already in play as you can see from this link and extract, nothing will change)
Here is more
Obama Forced Swiss Bank To Disclose Secret February 2009 (old news)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090219/ap_on_bi_ge/ubs_secrets
The swiss banks have been cooperating with the US since then and even sooner. I told everyone they would go after confiscation of the big guys money last. That is exactly what happened. I mean big money. Not petty drug dealers money.
LETS SEE WHAT KIND OF SENTENCE HE GETS and that will tell us a lot.
Swiss whistleblower Rudolf Elmer plans to hand over offshore banking secrets of the rich and famous to WikiLeaks
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jan/16/swiss-whistleblower-rudolf-elmer-banks
Ed Vulliamy, The Observer, Sunday 16 January 2011
Rudolf Elmer in Mauritius: “Well-known pillars of society will hold investment portfolios and may include houses, trading companies, artwork, yachts, jewellery, horses, and so on.”
Photograph: Rene Soobaroyen for the Guardian
The offshore bank account details of 2,000 "high net worth individuals" and corporations – detailing massive potential tax evasion – will be handed over to the WikiLeaks organisation in London tomorrow by the most important and boldest whistleblower in Swiss banking history, Rudolf Elmer, two days before he goes on trial in his native Switzerland.
