***Fundraising status: We still have a balance on our deficit of $20 which is still needed to meet our obligations, We are so close now, that I feel we will make, but we have only 2 more days before
our deadline. We want to thank those who got us down to this level.
We are eternally grateful that the hits are definitely there, and the
donations are almost there as well. So please, if you can afford it,
donate off to the
right of this blog. Thank you to those who came through so far.
I am looking into other ways to raise these funds, but
for now it has to be a partnership between us until I can find other
ways. So any help you can give will be greatly appreciated. The
pay pal donation button is off to the right of the blog. Thank you
again from the bottom of our hearts.
Vatic Note: Hmmmm, that is interesting, since the cherokee tribe has a high percentage of RH neg within their tribe. I wonder if there is a connection? Further, this confirms the teachings of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Now, how ironic is that?
Their Book of Mormon contains writings of prophits from among the American Indians that were transplants from the middle east to here. Specifically, from Israel, Iraq and Iran. Archeological digs have also reported the same thing based on finds here. They also knew about Christ long before the Spaniards arrived. How was that possible?
Ironically, the Book of Mormon gives a complete and detailed history of how these middle eastern people arrived here in the United States, beginning with their first adventure and how it came about and who were the players. A fascinating read if I do say so myself. They were translated from gold plates that were discovered by the early founder of the church and translated by him. I find the information about the cherokees, scientifically, to be fascinating. Its amazing what we did not know about history.
Is that why the Christians in early America went after these Indians so viciously? And eventually went after the Mormons just after the Bill of Rights were passed, that gave everyone the freedom to practice their particular religion?? Is that how they chased them out of America and into other countries, before they became states in America??? Utah was not a state when they migrated there. Anyway, this is a fascinating read.
Anomalous Native American DNA: New Tests Show Middle East Origins
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=2917
Posted by "Rumormill", October 28, 2014
Participants
in Dr. Donald Yates’s Cherokee Native American DNA testing. Top Left:
Karen Worstell’s grandmother Odessa Shields Cox is shown with her
husband William M. Cox and Worstell’s mother, Ethel, as a baby, ca.
1922. Bottom Left: Karen Worstell. Right: Jan Franz. (Courtesy of Dr.
Donald Yates)
The universe is full of mysteries that challenge our current
knowledge. In "Beyond Science" Epoch Times collects stories about these
strange phenomena to stimulate the imagination and open up previously
undreamed of possibilities. Are they true? You decide.
Geneticist
Dr. Donald Yates has been studying Cherokee DNA, particularly genetic
markers passed on only from a mother to her children, not passed on
along paternal lines. Anomalies in Native American DNA are often
dismissed as signs of racial admixture after colonization, the anomalies
are not attributed to the origins of Native peoples.
Yates chose to focus on the maternal line to make it easier to filter
out any colonial-era admixture. It was far more common for male
colonists to mate with Native American women than it was for female
colonists to mate with Native American men when the Old World first met
the New.
To further rule out admixture in his test results, Yates combined genetic testing with genealogical records where possible.
He found what he sees as strong evidence that Cherokee Native
Americans have Middle Eastern ancestry—ancestry that cannot be accounted
for by modern admixture, but which is rooted in the ancient origins of
the people.
Native Americans are conventionally held to fit into a handful of
haplogroups. The term haplogroup refers to a genetic population group
stemming from a common ancestor. Haplogroup T is not among the
haplogroups most geneticists recognize as Native American. Yates,
however, said that it is prevalent among the Cherokee and has been for a
very long time.
He wrote
in his report,
released earlier this month: “T is the leading haplogroup (23.1
percent), with a frequency on a par with modern-day Egyptians (23.4
percent) and Arabs (24.4 percent). T is thus a defining mark of Cherokee
ancestry. … We can safely rule out recent European admixture.
As we
have discussed again and again, there was no available source for a
huge, sudden influx of female-mediated Middle Eastern DNA on the
American frontier. Even Sephardic Jews (11 to 14 percent), many of whom
were also Indian traders, could hardly have accounted for such
admixture.
“Moreover, had it occurred in the colonial period or more recently,
the diversity, age, and unique characteristics of the T haplotypes would
not have yielded the patterns noticed in this paper.
Most T’s would
have matched people in the Old World and we would simply be looking at
an effect of migration. Instead, we have a North American branch of T
with peculiar SNPs [Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, a DNA sequence
variation] which is evidently a cross-section of a very old population
originating in the Old World.”
In a different part of the report, he explained one way to tell if
the genetic characteristics are ancient in origin, or if they could be
attributed to recent admixture:
“Generally, the more mutations, the more
ancient the type.”
While the level of the T-haplotype found across Yates’s 67 Cherokee
test subjects is comparable to those found in
Iraqi and Iranian Jews
(about 24 percent), it is far higher than that found in nearby regions
where one would expect admixture.
In neighboring countries in the Middle
East, as well as among Jews from other regions, the frequency of T is
only 4–14 percent.
An example of how Dr. Yates combined genetic testing with genealogical research is the case of Kathleen Rogalla.
Mother of Kathleen Rogalla, Ethel Estell Caywood Christian, ca. 1930. (Courtesy of Dr. Donald Yates)
Kathleen Rogalla of Panama City, Fla. is descended from Deborah
Cook(e), wife of William Chisholm (born 1720 in Amelia County, Va.).
Cook is her ancestor in an unbroken female line. A woman named Amy or
Annie (no last name) was Cook’s mother. Yates wrote,
“It is unlikely Amy
or Annie was the daughter of an Englishwoman … around the time of first
intermarriages.”
Rogalla underwent genetic testing from another company, which she had
sought out after taking an interest in her Native ancestry. This
company told her she was of 100 percent European ancestry with no chance
of being Native American. When Yates tested Rogalla, he found haplotype
T in her results.
He wrote:
“These historical accounts are given here in detail to
document the early Cherokee affiliation of the line. More could be
added. Suffice it to say that the Chisholms and all their marriage
partners were well known to Cherokee leaders from the 1760s on … All the
names are well documented in Cherokee and Melungeon genealogies, as
well as U.S. Indian treaties, chiefs-lists and agency records. … There
is every reason on genealogical grounds to regard her T* haplotype as
Cherokee, not Eurasian.”
Yates is of Cherokee descent, he has a Ph.D. in classical studies,
and he founded the
genetics research institution DNA Consultants. These
three credentials have given him a unique perspective on Native American
history as it relates to these ancient cultures, and how DNA testing
can support the theoretical link.
He hypothesizes that an expedition of
Ptolemaic Egyptians and others in the 3rd century B.C. sailed to North
America and were the settlers from whom descended today’s Cherokee
Native Americans.
Follow @TaraMacIsaac on Twitter, visit the Epoch Times Beyond Science page on Facebook, and subscribe to the Beyond Science newsletter to continue exploring the new frontiers of science!
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
