2015-08-27

The Return of the "NINE" - Part 2 of 2

Vatic Note:   This below is a fascinating picture of the "NINE", while the part 1 of this series was done in a much more contemporary way that we could more readily relate to.  This one below takes us on an ancient journey into the world of the Mayans and Hopi Indians and gives us a much different picture of the "NINE".  

This below is speculation about 2012 and has some serious validity.  We did a blog on how in around 2012 the sun began a shift in its Shuman Resonance from 7.82 hertz, which it had been for thousands of years, into a current resonance of over 14 hertz.   That is a huge shift.  What does that mean for the "earth" and Humans, both of which has had 7.82 hertz for that same amount of time.   Well, the earth has advanced to 16 hertz and humans are advancing as well, I just could not find the actual hertz we are now at.


One thing the blog pointed out, was that every time the sun shifted in resonance, mankind, went through a spiritual evolution and we are seeing that today with the new babies being born.  They are far more advanced at birth, then in the past and its evident to those that lived in both today and previous periods over 70 years old.  


I have noticed this change in babies and have commented on it to the parents who agree that their child has definitely advanced brain/spiritual capabilities.  They are less distracted by superficial things and more thoughtful at a much earlier age than in the past.  Does this have anything to do with the predicted return of the 9   I don't know, but it is, at the very least "a coincidence".  Anyway, this is a very interesting read and possibly a tie in to our journey for identifying solutions to our current problems with "low vibrating"  evil.   

So read, and see what you think.    


FUNDRAISING:   We are getting close to the first of the month and still need $110 to meet our deficit by the first of the month. This is critical for us to meet our deficits each mo.  We are not independantly wealthy, so the only way we can surivive doing the blog is if the readers contribute.  We are definitely running out of time.   Its almost the first, D-day, is just around the corner.

Sometimes we have been able to raise what we need without asking for donations, but often, we must come to you to partner with us in providing these researched and offered articles.  If you can afford it, please donate off to the right of the blog at the paypal button.  Thanks and God Bless you for  helping to keep us  up on the net. 

The Return of the "NINE" -  Part 2 of 2   
  By  Philip Coppens, 2010 from PhilipCoppens Website;



What will happen in 2012 - or, in the Mayan calendar, 13.0.0.0.0?
The question has been the subject of many books and one blockbuster movie. 

No-one seems to know, but there is ample speculation: from the return of Zecharia Sitchin’s aliens from the theoretical twelfth planet in our solar system to global annihilation, everyone seems to have an opinion as to what 2012 is about.
 
It might therefore come as a surprise that for the Mayan civilization itself - those who worked the date of December 21, 2012 into their mythology - it was no mystery at all! 
 
The Mayan prophecy to do with 2012 was that it would signal the return of "The Nine”.

“The Nine" are mentioned in an inscription on Monument 6 of the Mayan site of Tortuguero, in the Mexican state of Tabasco. The monument was erected in 669 AD and is one of the very few pre-Conquest sources that mention 2012. Various translations or partial translations of the inscription exist.
This is the most common one:
"At the next creation, the Bolon Yokte Ku, or Nine Support Gods, will return.”
However, the actual word "return”, sometimes translated as "descent”, is not intact on the monument. 
 
Still, it is a safe conclusion to make that the missing word is return. Why? Because other Mayan sources reference the return of these deities at the ending of each baktun. Hence, they are expected to emanate on Earth in 2012 too.

Who are the Bolon Yokte Ku - The Nine?
They have variously been translated as,
  • the God of Nine Strides
  • the Nine-Footed God
  • Jaguar-Foot-Tree
  • Nine-Dog-Tree
They were seen as living in the Underworld and were generally described as god(s) of conflict, warfare, and are hence linked with dangerous transition times, social unrest, eclipses, and natural disasters like earthquakes.

It is said that at the end of a baktun, they would abandon their underworld realm and rise to the Earth’s surface, where they would do battle with the 13 deities of Heaven.

To further identify what the Nine Support Gods are supposed to be, we need to consult other sources, in this case, anthropological ones. Such evidence makes it clear that the Nine Gods appeared during ceremonies that were held at the end of each baktun, the last of which occurred in 1618 AD.

The ceremonial of the baktun is described in chapter 29 of the The Book of Chilam Balam de Chumayel, a Mayan chronicle. It provides a detailed description of the ceremonies that were performed in Merida in 1618 AD, at the end of 12.0.0.0.0.

In total, there are twenty acts, each representing one of the twenty katuns that make up a baktun-cycle.
  • After some initial preparations, in act 2, the bee god tied the masks of the 13 gods of Heaven to those people who were going to perform in the ceremonies.
  • The actual baktun cycle was ended in act 3, whereby the Nine Gods fought, conquered and sacrificed these 13 Gods. Night had conquered day.
  • The subsequent acts involved rituals to do with the election of the new officials for the new period, while in act 12, the Nine Gods sacrifice the Seven Pacers and count the mats, which is an initial line-up of the candidates for investiture for the coming era.
  • In act 13, the 4 year-bearers reappear, in the guise of the four death gods.
  • Most importantly, in act 15, the Nine Gods announce the fate of the new era. This fate was largely the will of the gods, which the community had to achieve during the new era.
In short, the baktun ceremony was therefore a series of rituals, focusing on the Nine Gods and their emanation and rulings. However, these extraordinary rituals have seldom been understood for what they are: part and parcel of the 2012 phenomenon.

The question nevertheless remains as to who these Nine Gods truly are.
Indeed, "Nine Gods" are not just an ingredient of the Mayan culture. There were also Nine Gods in the ancient Egyptian religion, as well as many others (e.g. India). To the Egyptians, they were also known as the Nine Principles and they were directly linked with their Creator Deity, Atum.

Control over these Nine Principles was deemed to be instrumental in the successful rule of a Pharaoh:
proper control over them meant that balance - linked with the deity Ma’at - was maintained and all was well with Egypt, the world and the universe.
We can therefore see that The Nine in an Egyptian or Mayan setting, were closely related; in both instances, they determined the ruling of an era, whereby their consultation was of extreme importance to the success of the nation.

So are we waiting for their return in 2012? If so, what are we meant to expect? 

 
Interestingly, since the 1950s, decades before the 2012 phenomenon rose to prominence, there has been a select number of people that have been speaking about a "Return of the Nine”. For some, this is the return of nine extra-terrestrial beings, for others this is the return of the Egyptian Nine Gods. 
 
Some even link The Nine with the nine founding members of the Knights Templar order - a concept that, alas, resulted in a series of mass suicides in France, Switzerland and Canada in the mid 1990s.
 
However, despite the mass interest in 2012, until now, no-one has drawn attention to the fact that for decades, people claimed to be contacting The Nine and the fact that Mayan inscriptions speak of a return of the Nine Gods in these "end times”!

So what are The Nine?
A group led by paranormal researcher Dr. Andrija Puharich that contacted "The Nine" in the early 1950s. They believed they were an alien intelligence: not necessarily physical, but definitely not terrestrial in the most literal sense. The nine participants each challenged one entity, which communicated through them as a collective. 
 
Puharich was quite clear that these entities had a connection with ancient Egypt. In the 1970s, he chanced upon a young Israeli psychic, Uri Geller. During the many scientific experiments Geller was put through as part as the CIA’s Remote Viewing experiments, Puharich realized that Geller could contact The Nine, and, specifically, that whereas in all previous attempts, he had required a panel of nine people to participate, Geller could channel all nine together.

As Geller’s fame rose, Puharich decided to write a biography of the exploits of this remarkable psychic.

 
In the book, Puharich mentioned the Nine, but for reasons that will forever remain obscure, he largely ridiculed The Nine, even though for several decades before - and after - he would remain obsessed with them. Equally, whereas previously he had spoken of them as an alien intelligence, in the book, they had become an extraterrestrial intelligence. There is a difference…

Geller has always remained silent on what transpired with the Nine, as he was unconscious throughout the channeling. When in contact with the Nine, they summoned him to UFO fly-pasts and more. 
Puharich claimed he made tape recordings of these sessions, but none have ever been made public, so it truly is a case of Puharich against the world.
If true, then Puharich asked,
"Are you behind the UFO sightings that started in the United States when Kenneth Arnold saw nine flying saucers on June 24, 1947?” to which they answered yes.
Swiss psychologist Carl Jung made a detailed study of UFOs (Flying Saucers - A Modem Myth of Things Seen in the Sky - 1959) and was convinced that they were an alien - though not extra-terrestrial - intelligence that was here to help guide us into a new world, which he identified with the cosmic Age of Aquarius.

According to Puharich, The Nine stated they were from a world called Hoova, though on occasion, they called themselves Rhombus 4D. They contacted Puharich and Geller as they had been chosen to prevent war, as well as steering the Earth’s fate into a specific direction, which the Nine argued was indeed to their own needs and benefits, though it was also for the benefit of Mankind. 

 
Here, we therefore see clear parallels with the methodology the Nine employed with the Maya, namely their directing the fate of Mankind.
The Nine also claimed that they were responsible for Geller’s powers and that the way in which Mankind used Geller would determine whether The Nine’s "programme for Planet Earth" would continue, or not.

Others, like Phyllis Schlemmer, have also contacted "Tom”, who is a spokesperson for the Nine, with whom Puharich spoke too.  Her story made it into Stuart Holroyd’s "Briefing for The Landing on Planet Earth" and the later "The Only Planet of Choice”. 

 
Other Nine contactees are Don Elkins and Carla Rueckert, who channeled "Ra”, a member of The Nine, who declared that it was he who had built the Great Pyramid. In sessions with Puharich, "Tom" said the Sphinx was built and named after him. 
Tom adds:
"I am the beginning. I am the end.” - wording that could be lifted from the baktun-ending ceremonies.
I would personally not go as far as to argue that The Nine as per these channellings are who they claim to be.
 
I have done extensive research into them for more than a decade, and they are, quite simply, a complex issue that defies easy categorization. But what can be said about them, is this: it is clear that each culture, whether Mayan, Egyptian or 20th century Western society, was and is in contact with an alien intelligence, which each time, relates messages that are identical in context.

The number nine is prominent in another culture, which is believed to have had direct links with the Maya: the Hopi of Arizona

 
They too believe we are approaching the end of an era, though their doctrine does not stipulate a precise date. Instead, they argue that for a New Era to be born, a series of nine prophecies need to be fulfilled. 
 
Still, according to Twylah Nitsch, her grandfather Moses Shongo, the last of the traditional Seneca medicine men who died in ca. 1925, did predict that there would be a 25 year of purification that would end in ca. 2012. 
 
Generally, the Hopi argue that it is due "soon”, as eight of the nine prophecies linked with it have been fulfilled. The first "sign" occurred as far back as the 16th century, and involved the arrival of the "white men with guns”. The eight, incidentally, were the Hippies! 
 
The only prophecy remaining to be fulfilled, is that of the Blue Star Kachina, which is often interpreted as an alien, and sometimes extra-terrestrial presence that will manifest itself on Earth.

As early as 1948, the Hopi tried to speak at the United Nations General Assembly about their prophecies for our ending era. They feel that they are the caretakers for the American continent and felt they needed to share the message of the necessity for humans to be in balance with nature. Twice, the Hopi elders were turned away, but they eventually were allowed to speak in 1976 at a United Nations-sponsored conference in British Columbia.

Like the Maya, the Hopi adhere to a cyclical world view and believe that we are about to emerge from the Fourth into the Fifth World - out of a total of seven worlds. 

 
Even though the Hopi do not specifically state Nine Gods will return, they do argue that one specific entity needs to return, which will be the final sign that the Fourth World has ended. Kachinas are "spirits”, which are visualized during the Hopi religious dances, very much on par with the masks the participants in the baktun ending ceremonies wore.
 
In 1914, a song was first sung at the Wuwuchim ceremony, which marks the start of the ceremonial calendar year in November. 
 
The 1914 rendition of the song was the first mention of the imminent "Emergence into the Fifth World" and stated that this would occur when the Saquasohuh - the Blue Star Kachina - would dance in the plaza.
 
mentioning the return of "The Nine"
According to the "Book of the Hopi”, by Frank Waters, Saquasohuh,
"represents a blue star, far off and invisible, which will make its appearance soon”.
Others have referenced it as,
"You will hear of a dwelling-place in the heavens, above the Earth, that shall fall with a great crash. It will appear as a blue star. Very soon after this, the ceremonies of my people will cease.”
In recent years, there has been intense speculation as to what the Blue Star could be. 
 
Candidates included the appearance of Hale Bopp in 1997, or the supernova of SN1987A, which occurred on February 23, 1987. The latter was the brightest supernova observed for four centuries.

It seems, however, that the Hopi prophecy has been ill-understood.
Simply put, the prophecy clearly refers to a future tribal ceremony, at which point a kachina - a Hopi spirit - known as Blue Star will reveal himself. As such, Blue Star is nothing more or less than his name, and not necessarily linked to a stellar phenomenon. He is, however, by all accounts a deity - an alien intelligence that will return.

However, in recent years, the Hopi themselves have seriously clouded the debate over what is supposed to happen. Some Hopi argue that our current timeframe is known as the "Great Day of Purification”. 

 
Hopi elder Oh Shinnah Fastwolf states this period will be over by 2011 and that it will be at that moment that the blue star will appear in the sky
Speaking Wind, the son of a Pueblo shaman from New Mexico, has said that the Fifth World will start in 2012. He however argues that the final cleansing of the Earth began in 1998, when in September, the five planets aligned.
He also saw a planetary alignment of nine bodies on May 5, 2000, as very important, as it was the begin date, until 2012, of how the earth would be purged.
"If mankind will not willingly let go of the illusion, and the lie, it will be stripped away.”
And so, despite details and fringe claims, whenever we turn to the core of a phenomenon and the core of the 2012 phenomenon, we are confronted with one key message, one that even archaeologists have uncovered as being at the root of the Mayan prophecy about 2012: it is about the return of the gods.
The Bolon Yokte Ku, who will signal in a new era. 
The Time Returns!
 

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

2015-08-26

THE SATANIC ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION AND THE MANIPULATION OF HUMAN SEXUALITY

Vatic Note:  This is the same group that funded "Eugenics" in Nazi Germany through Dr. Mengeles, and is following the blue print of the protocols written in 1897.  The protocols contain a specific effort to demean sex into a cesspool of lust and perversion in order to attack the viability of family and sacred relationships that ultimately lead to families.

Like Christianity, these satanists hate religion that they do not control and they hate families since they support each other, leaving the state having to compete with families in order to control various individuals as we see with the vaccine issue, and they don't like that.

I just read another article where Obama and congress just made sodomy and beastiality legal in the military and it was once previously illegal. I suspect they intend to use it as a weapon of mass destruction, and do so through the military.

Is that why Obama fired 92 Generals from the pentagon???   The human race is definitely under attack and war is being conducted against us by our foreign occupied government and Rothschild controls the infiltrating foreign country.  Time to fight back.

FUNDRAISING:   We are getting close to the first of the month and still need $110 to meet our deficit by the first of the month. We would like to thank the person that donated and brought our balance down to such a managable level.    If you can afford it, please donate off to the right of the blog at the paypal button.  Thanks and God Bless you for  helping to keep us  up on the net. 


THE SATANIC ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION AND THE MANIPULATION OF HUMAN SEXUALITY 
http://birthofanewearth.blogspot.com/2014/02/the-satanic-rockefeller-foundation-and.html
By Admin,   Birth of  a New Earth



Well, well, well!!! The Rockefeller Foundation strikes again! Having already created the filthy, disgusting, evil monopoly that has now become the American medical system, and having also funded the sordid organization known as Planned Parenthood, should we really be surprised to discover that the Rockefeller Foundation has been the driving force behind the current expression of human sexuality in America -- a sexuality that has become so debase that pornography is now mainstream, pedophilia has been normalized as a "sexual preference", sadomasochism is being promoted by Planned Parenthood, and Planned Parenthood is marketing sex to children in kindergarten. And oh -- let's not forget that bestiality in the U.S. military is on the verge of being legalized by the U.S. government!!!!

If you want to understand the truly perverse sexual activities that now permeate American society, look no further than the Rockefeller family and the few other truly psychopathic bloodlines, such as the Rothschilds and the Windsor family of Britain, whose agenda is to create a "new world order" based on the worship of Satan/Lucifer and the degradation of all of life.

Check out this important excerpt from a great article, the full text of which is below...

"...Kinsey was far more than just an impudent fraud, he was in fact a criminal: a blackmailer (p. 330 ff), a perverted pornographer, and a pedophile who masturbated little children as part of his so-called “research”.

One four-year-old was “specifically manipulated” for twenty-four hours around the clock. This child achieved twenty-six orgasms in this time period. Another eleven-month-old infant had fourteen “orgasms”, according to the Kinseyan definition, in a period of thirty-eight minutes, or one orgasm every 2.7 minutes. (E. Michael Jones, Degenerate Moderns, p. 106)

It cannot be stressed too strongly that all this criminal activity was supported by generous grants from the Rockefeller Foundation to the Kinsey Institute, still flourishing at Indiana University. Waxing eloquent with indignation, Jones’s devastating conclusion is that Americans have to all intents and purposes been led over the cliff like Gadarene swine by Kinsey and his corrupt supporters:

The Rockefeller family was not above supporting illegal activities to attain their ends. … They were willing to use psychological warfare against their fellow Americans. … Sex was part of the arsenal of psychological warfare, and the Rockefellers’ interest in supporting Professor Kinsey of Indiana University gave every indication that they were planning to use that weapon in dealing with new enemies. (p. 313) …

The Kinsey Institute was now in the pornography business and the Rockefeller Foundation was footing the bill . … the Rockefellers were [now] funding the filming of the molestation of children. (p. 336) …

The Rockefellers were interested in social engineering through the manipulation of sexuality, and the Kinsey Report was the vehicle which would make that possible in the near future, with the collaboration of a supine mass media culture. (p. 341)

If Kinsey is still a national hero today, the ultimate authority on all things sexual, we have to thank the Rockefeller Foundation for this remarkable public relations stunt...."

Source Article:
Masters of Porn: The Systematic Promotion of Sexual Deviance
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/06/portraits-of-masters-of-porn-the-systematic-promotion-of-recreational-sex-sexual-callousness-and-sexual-deviancy/

Alfred Kinsey, Time Magazine cover, 1953

“The only unnatural act is that which you cannot perform.”

It comes as a big shock to learn that two of the fathers of the Sexual Revolution were both sexual perverts with an evangelical mission in life: to infect society with their wacky ideas and turn the world into a vast masturbatorium.

I refer to the 2oth century’s premier sex researcher Alfred Kinsey (1894-1956) and his notorious contemporary, cult psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich (1897-1957).

Steeped in the dangerous claptrap of the fraudulent Freud—see here and here—both Kinsey and Reich enthusiastically embraced the laissez-faire Freudian philosophy: “I advocate an incomparably freer sexual life”. Like their Viennese mentor, they would have been only too pleased to add, “If only Americans knew—we are bringing them the plague!”

According to Freud and his followers, anti-Semitism was a universal pathology which had its roots in sexual repression. Its cure lay in “sexual liberation”. The theory, in its crudest and simplest form, amounted to this: instead of picking on the Jews, why not just chill out and have sex?

The underlying assumption here is that sex is the great liberator and that all political and economic frustrations can be alleviated by sexual activity—particularly by obsessive and addictive sex. People who spend all their waking hours in search of sexual stimulation are obviously unfit to organize pogroms, mount bloody revolutions, or become a threat to the rich and powerful.

This, in a nutshell, was the philosophy of Wilhelm Reich, high priest of the “masturbation industry”, to borrow a phrase from E. Michael Jones’s magisterial work Libido Dominandi, where Kinsey and Reich are both discussed in great detail.

Sex, according to the philosophers of the Sexual Revolution inspired by Reich, is to be the panacea for all society’s problems: the new opium of the people. If people cannot have bread, let them eat cake. If they cannot have jobs, security, fulfillment, and a valid purpose in life, let them have sex as a substitute. If nothing else, recreational sex will provide a useful distraction and give people something to do.

The Case Against Reich


Willhelm Reich

A compulsive masturbator himself, Reich believed that masturbation was a useful tool in producing “well-balanced” individuals without religious hang-ups or anti-Semitic attitudes. His major finding (here and here) was that masturbation and the religious life were incompatible, which is why he advocated masturbation as the most effective means of eradicating the religious instinct—which he regarded as the ultimate evil. “What Reich discovered was a fundamental truth of sexual politics, one discovered by the Catholic Church long ago, “Dr E. Michael Jones comments. “Either masturbation destroys your prayer life, or prayer destroys your ability to enjoy masturbation. The two forms of activity are psychically mutually exclusive.” (See here, p. 259) Like many other psychoanalysts, Reich is known to have masturbated his female patients in therapeutic sessions. “The pleasure of living and the pleasure of orgasm are identical,” he pontificated, thereby equating infinite happiness with the provision of an infinite number of orgasms.

Reich was, by his own account, not only a compulsive masturbator from early childhood but a self-confessed pervert with wide-ranging sexual interests. Beginning sexual activity at the early age of four with a maidservant whose pubic hair he was allowed to play with, he went on to seduce the family cook at eleven-and-a-half. While still a small boy, he had begun to take an unhealthy interest in farm animals and could be seen prowling around the stables where he “stimulated mares by inserting whip handles in their vaginas.” At 15 he began visiting brothels where his insatiable appetites made him the talk of the town. Here he is in his Autobiography describing his uncontrollable libido:

Was it the atmosphere, the clothing, the red lights, the provocative nakedness, the smell of whores—I don’t know! I was pure sensual lust. I ceased to be. I was all penis! I bit, scratched, thrust, and the girl had quite a time with me! I thought I would have to crawl inside her…

Nursing an incestuous passion for his mother, he would snoop on her having sex with the family tutor. “I need a woman,” he wrote in his journal, “who is both mother and whore.” Once he was tempted to break into his mother’s room, while she was engaged in sex with his tutor, and demand to be part of a threesome:

I heard them kissing, whispering, and the horrible creaking of the bed in which my mother lay. Ten feet away stood her own child, a witness to her disgrace…. All I remember of that catastrophic night is that I wanted to rush into the room, but was held back by the thought: they might kill you!… I crept back to bed, without hope of consolation, my youthful spirit broken! For the first time, a deep feeling of misfortune and of having been abandoned overcame me…. [I even thought of] breaking in on them and demanding that she have intercourse with me too (shame!), threatening that otherwise I would tell Father.

As it turns out, he did inform his father about his mother’s infidelities, conveniently omitting to mention his own incestuous desires for his mother. His disloyalty to her in becoming an informer, combined with the brutal ill-treatment she was to receive from her tyrannical husband Leon, finally drove his mother to suicide. She swallowed a pint of Lysol, a common domestic cleaning fluid, and died in agony. Another account fills in the bizarre background details to this family saga: “She swallowed one poison after another, while Leon continued to beat her as she died” (emphasis added).

Wilhelm Reich, her son, the famous psychoanalyst-to-be, was only 13 at the time.

This is the man who went on to become, like his equally perverted contemporary Alfred Kinsey, one of the godfathers of the Sexual Revolution of the 1960s.

From the likes of Kinsey and Reich, the easily duped Americans were to receive instructions on how to conduct themselves sexually.

(For corroborative details, see Wilhelm Reich [pdf download])

As part of the neo-Freudian school of psychoanlysts, Reich received the enthusiastic support of a number of psychiatrists and writers, many of them part of the Jewish psychoanalytic sub-culture that was so important to erecting a powerful critique of Western culture, reaching its peak influence in the post-WWII era: Herbert Marcuse, Erich Fromm, Adorno, Horkheimer, Alexander Lowen, Stanley Keleman, Moshe Feldenkreis, Ida Rolf, Paul Goodman, Norman Mailer, Allen Ginsberg, Saul Bellow, Fritz Perls and Arthur Janov (see here and here).

Jewish Porn star Richard Pacheco, who had wanted to become a rabbi at one stage and had even applied for admission to a seminary, was an ardent admirer of Reich whose books he read from cover to cover. Reich apparently influenced his final decision to become a porn star rather than a rabbi. Like his mentor, Pacheco was also an unabashed masturbator. When asked if he still watched pornographic movies now that he had retired from acting and become a senior citizen, he replied with disarming candor, “Occasionally I’ll toss one on for masturbation if my wife ain’t around.”

In 1954, at the height of the McCarthy era, Reich was imprisoned on a charge of medical fraud for trying to promote and sell “orgone boxes”. Slightly smaller than telephone boxes, these were little compartments that patients were told to sit in for short periods to soak up “cosmic rays”. These would reportedly reinvigorate them sexually, cure impotence and cancer, and act as an antidote to radiation poisoning from UFOs which (according to Reich) had secretly invaded the earth. (See here)

While interviewing Einstein, Reich told the great man in confidence that most people considered him (Reich) mad. Einstein replied dryly, “I can believe that.”


The Case against Kinsey

It comes as no surprise to learn that Kinsey, like Reich, was also an avid consumer of pornography, even going so far as to photograph his own penis on several occasions and getting his wife to act in home-made porn movies. His favorite boast was that his Institute’s collection of pornography was the second largest in the world, the largest being housed at the Vatican. A malicious lie, it turned out, since it was easy enough to prove that the Vatican was entirely porn free. (See “The Case Against Kinsey”, here)

It has to be emphasized that Alfred Kinsey, though born and brought up as a Christian, was not only an atheist with a lifelong hatred of Christianity in general and the Catholic church in particular, but was also a Zionist and Shabbat goy who owed his spectacular success entirely to organized Jewry. His fraudulent research, designed to make deviancy appear to be the norm, was generously funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and other Jewish-dominated organizations. (pp. 340–341). “By the time it cut him off in 1954,” E. Michael Jones tells us, “the Rockefeller Foundation had poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into the coffers of the Kinsey Institute.”

The only reason they decided to stop the funding is that by this time the Institute, anxious to retain its squeaky clean image, could no longer take the risk of being associated with Kinsey. His shady criminal activities with a predatory homosexual pedophile, a pervert who had molested and tortured 800 children, suddenly made Kinsey persona non grata (see E. Michael Jones, Libido Dominandi, pp. 327–337).

A sexual pervert of the kinkiest kind, Kinsey once inserted a toothbrush into his urethra and had himself filmed, subsequently adding this gem to his porn collection. Himself a homosexual with an avid interest in little boys, he would make a point of measuring the penis, both recumbent and erect, of every male he interviewed while conducting his “research”. Why? One can only guess.

A year before he died, Kinsey sliced off the foreskin of his penis with a pocket knife—a crude attempt at self-circumcision. No one has been able to figure out why he did this. Kinsey’s death, however, has been ascribed to his sexual proclivities.

Dr. Judith Reisman writes:

An early adherent and advocate of masturbation, Kinsey suffered an untimely death due, at least in part, to ‘orchitis,’ a lethal infection in his testicles that followed years of orgiastic self-abuse.

The New York Times, owned by the Sulzberger family and known to be America’s foremost organ of left/liberal propaganda, did its best (like the Rockefeller Foundation) to promote Kinsey and turn his name into a household word. Indeed, it comes as no surprise to learn that Arthur Hays Sulzberger, publisher of the New York Times, was actually on the board of trustees for the Rockefeller Foundation all during the time it was approving money for Kinsey’s dubious experiments (see here, p. 340).

Kinsey’s most vocal critic and nemesis, Dr. Judith Reisman, has this to say about the Kinsey-Rockefeller connection:

The Rockefeller Foundation was the major funding source for Kinsey, even though it had ample, repeated warning from noted statisticians and social scientists that Kinsey’s pseudo-science was a hoax….

Kinsey is second only to Darwin in the secular pantheon, and a lot of people recognize that exposing Kinsey’s lies is a major assault on the Sexual Revolution and a threat to the sexual license they enjoy….

Kinsey claimed to have proven, based upon the deviant samples used in his research, that 95 percent of American men engaged in deviant sex and thus were sex offenders….

Kinsey believed that all sex was legitimate—pedophilia, bestiality, incest, adultery, prostitution, group sex, transvestitism, sadomasochism—and he worked to overthrow all laws prohibiting any of these perversions. (See here)


Kinsey went out of his way to interview the dregs of society, frequenting slums, gay bars, brothels and prisons. From these interviews he formed sweeping generalizations about the sexual habits of society in general. His methodology, you could say, was outrageous. In Gary, Indiana, for example, he collected 71 case histories, all of them based on interviews with Black female prostitutes. Taking note of what these women told him, Kinsey was apparently happy to conclude that the average White American housewife was a cat in heat—sexually adventurous in the extreme! American psychologist Abraham Maslow put it mildly when he said, “The whole basis for Kinsey’s statistics was proven to be shaky.” (See here, p. 322 and p. 324)

Dr E. Michael Jones is as convinced as Dr Judith Reisman that Kinsey was far more than just an impudent fraud, he was in fact a criminal: a blackmailer (p. 330 ff), a perverted pornographer, and a pedophile who masturbated little children as part of his so-called “research”.

One four-year-old was “specifically manipulated” for twenty-four hours around the clock. This child achieved twenty-six orgasms in this time period. Another eleven-month-old infant had fourteen “orgasms”, according to the Kinseyan definition, in a period of thirty-eight minutes, or one orgasm every 2.7 minutes. (E. Michael Jones, Degenerate Moderns, p. 106)

It cannot be stressed too strongly that all this criminal activity was supported by generous grants from the Rockefeller Foundation to the Kinsey Institute, still flourishing at Indiana University. Waxing eloquent with indignation, Jones’s devastating conclusion is that Americans have to all intents and purposes been led over the cliff like Gadarene swine by Kinsey and his corrupt supporters:

The Rockefeller family was not above supporting illegal activities to attain their ends. … They were willing to use psychological warfare against their fellow Americans. … Sex was part of the arsenal of psychological warfare, and the Rockefellers’ interest in supporting Professor Kinsey of Indiana University gave every indication that they were planning to use that weapon in dealing with new enemies. (p. 313) …

The Kinsey Institute was now in the pornography business and the Rockefeller Foundation was footing the bill . … the Rockefellers were [now] funding the filming of the molestation of children. (p. 336) …

The Rockefellers were interested in social engineering through the manipulation of sexuality, and the Kinsey Report was the vehicle which would make that possible in the near future, with the collaboration of a supine mass media culture. (p. 341)


If Kinsey is still a national hero today, the ultimate authority on all things sexual, we have to thank the Rockefeller Foundation for this remarkable public relations stunt.

The bizarre private lives of sex researchers who dupe millions of people into buying their books—and enthusiastically adopting their mad, bad, and dangerous ideas—simply beggars belief.


Sexual Perversion is good for you: The case of The Independent

Here is another representative of the elite intelligentsia, British prize-winning author Howard Jacobson, who happens coincidentally to be Jewish. He, too, would be proud to wear a T-shirt sporting the slogan: SEXUAL PERVERSION IS GOOD FOR YOU!

Prizewinning author Howard Jacobson puts in a good word for sexual perversion:

It is only when we explore the outer boundaries of our sexual desires that we become most fully human. We are all sick in our way….When he wasn’t looking at pornography or writing The Trial, Kafka visited brothels. I am glad for his sake and for literature’s that he did. I feel about prostitution as I do about pornography—that a man ought to avail himself of whatever is on offer…

We grow a little freer when we read De Sade’s One Thousand Days of Sodom, though we know we cannot live up to its lawlessness….We must find the space to think, and where possible to act, rebelliously, refusing all attempts to confine us to the hell of the normative…

We are strange creatures, part angels of reflection, part beasts that claw the earth. It is too cruel that an accidental species as peculiar as we are should ever have been made to think there is a right way and a wrong way of conducting ourselves sexually, as though there were some divine pattern we were framed to follow. I don’t say that giving ourselves over to the demoniacal, or just the deviant, will necessarily make us happy … but the straight and narrow has never yet made anyone anything but miserable. — Howard Jacobson, In Praise of Perversion. (Emphasis added)


According to this unabashed advocate of sexual perversion, being sexually normal is “hell”. Add spice to your life by making use of prostitutes and pornography. A man, after all, “ought to avail himself of whatever is on offer.”

Howard Jacobson is a Jewish writer who has written novels in which sexual perversion always plays a predominant part. For example, in his novel Peeping Tom he gives us voyeurism; in The Act of Love he dishes up generous dollops of fetishism. All Jacobson’s heroes, like Philip Roth’s Portnoy, are devout masturbators. Jerking off, you could say, is their substitute for religion.

Jacobson’s article advocating perversion was published in a newspaper in which he has appeared as a regular columnist for many years. The same British newspaper, the Independent, has also published for many years the articles of another Jewish writer known as Johann Hari who shows an equal aptitude for sexual perversion. In 2002 Hari wrote an infamous article for the Guardian, Forbidden Love, in which he had put in a good word for incest.

A self-confessed plagiarist, Hari received the Orwell Prize fraudulently in 2008 with the full backing of his newspaper editor who vouched for his veracity. He was forced to return the prize in 2011 when the full extent of his plagiarisms and other duplicities became apparent. For example, he had made up many stories for the Independent, including African atrocities, passing off fiction as fact. Later on, to make matters worse, this gay rights activist and mincing homosexual was to be outed as a writer of gay incest porn.

Now consider this bizarre coincidence: two Jewish writers, both vocal advocates of sexual perversion, receive major literary awards in quick succession (in 2008 and 2010), thereby giving an air of legitimacy and glamor to sexual perversion.

If you’re repelled by the idea of having gay sex with your brother, don’t upset yourself needlessly by reading Hari’s How my little brother learned to be a whore, written under the secret pen name of “David Rose”.

* * * * * * * * *

Now try and connect the dots here: during the many years that these two Jewish writers, Howard Jacobson and Johann Hari, both of them enthusiasts for deviant sexuality, had been regular columnists for the Independent, the editor of that newspaper was also a Jew: one Simon Kelner.

And now for the Big Surprise: the Independent is also Jewish-owned!

Here, then, is the pattern: Jewish columnists pushing sexual perversion, Jewish editor encouraging sexual perversion by publishing their articles, and Jewish newspaper tycoon presiding over the same edifice of sexual perversion by making it all possible by his ownership of the newspaper.

Who owns the Independent?

Step forward Alexander Yevgenievich Lebedev, listed in Forbes magazine in May 2008 as the 358th richest person in the world. Estimated fortune: $3.1 billion. Mr Lebedev, a Russian oligarch, ran away from Russia with billions of rubles under his belt when Vladimir Putin came to power and decided to claw back some of the ill-gotten wealth that a small number of mega rich Jews had filched from the Russian treasury.

On 25 March 2010, Lebedev bought the Independent for a nominal fee of £1, with the derisory token sum of £9.25m to be paid a few months later.

This reminds me of that other Russian oligarch, convicted crook Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who in 1995 rigged an auction in which he managed to steal Russia’s largest oil company, Yukos, reportedly worth $40 billion, for the laughably small sum of $300 million—a mere fraction of its value. (See here)

How do they do it?

The Case of Frank Kameny

Founding father of the gay rights movement in America, Jewish pornographer and perversion promoter Frank Kameny was the main force behind pressuring the American Psychiatric Association (in 1973) into reclassifying homosexual activities as “normal sex”. Hitherto regarded as a socially destructive mental disease that was curable, homosexuality was now given the green light and reclassified as a normal and healthy “alternative lifestyle”.

Here is Kameny saying nice things about sexual perversion:

If something which someone arbitrarily defines as a ‘sexual perversion’ provides happiness for consenting adult participants, then its enjoyment is enshrined in basic Americanism. So let us have more and better enjoyment of more and better sexual perversions, by whatever definition, by more and more consenting adults. We will all be the better off thereby. And that will be Americanism in action…

Having given his imprimatur to sexual perversion in general, Kameny then gives bestiality his blessings. He himself is not particularly keen on having sex with dogs, he tells us, but he sees no reason why other people shouldn’t have sex with the family pet if that’s what turns them on:

Bestiality is not my thing. But it seems to be a harmless foible or idiosyncrasy of some people. As long as the animal doesn’t mind (and the animal rarely does), I don’t mind, and I don’t see why anyone else should. (See here).

How can Kameny be so sure animals “don’t mind”? Has he asked them? No, he casually assumes they will be delighted. Had he studied the Babylonian Talmud, he might have been astonished to learn that bestiality was forbidden to a woman at all times, though it was permissible for men under certain circumstances—a clear case of double standards. “If a woman allows herself to be made the subject thereof, whether naturally or not, she is guilty. But if a man commits bestiality, he is liable only for a connection in a natural manner, but not otherwise.” (Scroll down to picture of Talmud, page 55a, here).

To clarify: For a woman, sex with an animal is wrong at all times, whether the sex is natural or unnatural. For a man, on the other hand, sex with an animal is wrong only when the sex is “natural”. It’s NOT wrong when the sex is unnatural! Figure that out for yourself. I confess I am stumped.

We’ve all heard of Jewish chutzpah, but it comes as a surprise to learn that this famous gay rights icon Kameny has the cheek to condemn God Almighty for his prudish homophobia. Wagging his finger at the God of the Bible, Kameny describes him as “a sinful homophobic bigot who needs to repent.”

Sigh. That’s the trouble with God. If he’d been less bigoted, he would have allowed Adam and Steve to have sex—and make babies.

It comes as even a greater surprise to learn that President Obama recently conferred the supreme honor on this bestiality-supporting Jewish paragon of sexual perversion by rolling out the red carpet for him at the White House, actually shaking his hand and congratulating him on the remarkable benefits he had bestowed on mankind.


“We are proud of you, Frank!”

At a Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender (LGBT) reception held at the Oval Office in June, 2009, President Obama congratulated Frank Kameny, gay rights pioneer and promoter of sexual perversion, for his outstanding contributions to society. “We are proud of you, Frank,” he said, “and we are grateful to you for your leadership.” (See here)


Jews Dominate the American Porn Industry: The Case of Reuben Sturman

Let’s approach this subject from another angle now by asking a simple question: What group dominates the systematic promotion and dissemination of pornography in society? What group can therefore be held responsible for the mass contamination of minds that takes place on a daily basis in Hollywood movies, television shows, magazines, newspapers, and advertising?

We shall now consider this question as objectively as possible, relying only on established facts from the most reputable sources. No source could be more reputable than academic historian Dr Nathan Abrams, world authority on Jewish pornography. I have therefore relied heavily on Dr Abrams. His classic article on Jewish dominance in the porn industry, Triple-exthnics, was published in the winter edition, 2004, of the prestigious Jewish Quarterly.

From 1890 onwards, the main peddlers of inflammatory erotica in America were immigrant Jews of German and East European origin. In the postwar era, America’s most notorious pornographer was a Jew: Reuben Sturman, known as the ‘Walt Disney of Porn’.

By the end of the 1960s, Sturman ranked at the top end of adult magazine distributors and by the mid-70s he owned over 200 adult bookstores, including updated versions of the traditional peepshow booth.

This involved a hole in the partition wall of the booth, through which a pervert would thrust his erect penis, allowing an anonymous individual on the other side of the partition to fellate him discreetly without being seen. The hole in the wall, for some reason, is called a “glory hole”. And its inventor was almost certainly a degenerate Jew associated with Sturman and his sleaze factory.

Convicted of tax evasion and other crimes, Sturman was to die in prison in 1997, surrounded by a stack of his own pornographic magazines. His son David continued the family tradition of constructing “glory holes” across America for the delectation of millions.

If I focus here on the sordid aspects of the peephole, it is not out of prurience but because I wish to draw attention to the fact that Jewish-dominated Hollywood during the next few years has thought it perfectly legitimate to introduce the glory hole into the average American home, which includes children, as a normal and healthy ingredient of family entertainment.

The same people who try so hard to squeeze tears out of the eyes of the public with Holocaust movies such as Schindler’s List, are also, it seems, doing their best to contaminate the minds of the public with movies like Sex Drive, Serial Mom, Jackass Number Two, and other such excursions into the sleazy world of lavatorial lust.

Family entertainment has now been reduced to nasty and scurrilous scenarios such as this: lurkers hanging around urinals hunting for sex, heavy breathers in cubicles with their pants round their ankles, lesbians thrusting their breasts through portholes cut in female washroom walls, female voyeurs invading male washrooms and looking through a peephole only to have their eyes injured by a rampant penis rearing up at the other side, deadly snakes sinking their fangs into tumescent organs thrust though same peephole—and other such abominations too depressing to mention. (See list here.)

It’s worth noting that all this gross indecency continued unchecked without the American government lifting a finger to intervene. There was no attempt to rein in the smut merchants or restrain them from defecating on the cherished values of Christian America. It’s almost as if the ruling classes wanted to see their “huddled masses” turn into salivating perverts.

The reason for this laissez-faire attitude to the systematic demoralization of Christian America is not hard to identify. It clearly lay in the fact that America’s former elite, the WASPs, had already capitulated to the rising Jewish elite. They had been debased and corrupted themselves by the polluted mental atmosphere in which they lived, a psychosphere created by the philosemitic media and Hollywood. One could hardly expect these victims of moral decay to clean out the Augean stables of America, given that they were themselves accustomed to wallow in the same filth and feculence. When the Good Shepherds are up the creek without a paddle, what hope for the good sheeple?


The link between pornography and sex crime

According to Rabbi Samuel Dresner, an orthodox Jew (born 1923 in Chicago), the rootless Jews who ran Hollywood and were behind the lucrative porn industry were all “despoilers of morality and corrupters of culture.” Indeed, Jewish history for Rabbi Dresner was “one long battle against sexual deviancy.” (See here and here)

In an interview with his prison psychologist, James C. Dobson, Bundy confessed to the murder of over a hundred young women. Agonizing over his life-long addiction to pornography, he revealed how it had fueled his compulsive behavior. “I’ve lived in prison for a long time now,” the serial killer confided, “and I’ve met a lot of men who were motivated to commit violence. Without exception, every one of them was deeply involved in pornography—deeply consumed by his addiction.” (See here). Homosexual serial killer Gary Bishop was equally candid in revealing that porn had turned him into a sex killer. “Pornography was a determining factor in my downfall,” he admitted.

Perhaps the most chilling and persuasive porn-made-me-into-a-sex-killer story is that of Thomas Schiro of Evansville, Indiana, whose obsession with pornography from the age of six onward—accompanied by compulsive masturbation 10-12 times a day—led him into a spree of sex crimes in the 1970s and early 80s. “The one thing that remained constant in Schiro’s slide toward the ultimate violation was his constant use of pornography,” Dr E. Michael Jones reports. “It was the gas that fueled his obsession.” (Libido Dominandi, p. 569).

“Exposure to erotica has no impact on moral character….. The increased availability of explicit sexual materials has been accompanied by a decrease in the incidence of sexual crime…. There is no evidence to date that exposure to explicit sexual materials plays a significant role in the causation of delinquent or criminal behavior.” (The Lockhart Commission Report on Pornography. Quoted here, p. 558)

In an ideal world, there would be no need or place for pornography. Porn is a toxic product of dystopia. Any government that permits it is under the dominion of evil.
 

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

The Imperialism of Jewish Capital

FUNDRAISING:   We are getting close to the first of the month and still need $110 to meet our deficit by the first of the month. We would like to thank the person that donated and brought our balance down to such a managable level.    If you can afford it, please donate off to the right of the blog at the paypal button.  Thanks and God Bless you for  helping to keep us  up on the net. 

The Imperialism of Jewish (Khazar) Capital
http://henrymakow.com/the_imperialism_of_jewish_capi.html
By Henry Makow,  August 22m 2915


dragoncover.jpg
By 1864, 150 years ago, 
the wealth of the world 
already was concentrated 
in the hands of the Jewish
central banking cartel. 






"This Money Power of the Money Quarter of London is the only grand pre-eminent Imperialism existing on the earth." 

Updated from Sept. 25, 2007


by Henry Makow Ph.D.

A book published in 1889 "The Red Dragon" by L.B. Woolfolk suggests to me that British (and American) imperialism originated in the need of  Jewish bankers and their Gentile confederates to translate money they could create out of nothing (thanks to their control of credit), into real wealth i.e. world ownership.

The book confirms my assertion that "the Jewish Conspiracy is British Imperialism." (May 2004)
When these bankers finagled a credit monopoly in England in 1694, they turned into a monster that now has highjacked humanity. The London-based banking cartel literally has gobbled up the planet, and will not be content until it owns everything, and enslaves mankind, mentally and spiritually, if not physically. This, in a nutshell, is the New World Order. 
 

The last push came from a secret society  that Cecil Rhodes started in 1891 to "absorb the wealth of the world" and "to take the government of the whole world."  
 
A recent UN study says 2% of the world's population own 50% of the wealth, while half own barely 1% of the wealth. Needless to say, the richest 2% are mainly the London-based bankers and people associated with them. 
 
Today British, American and Zionist imperialism manifest the banker agenda for "world government" through the destruction of religion, nation, race and family. This imperialism does not express the interests or wishes of ordinary English, American or Jewish people who have themselves been colonized.

THE RED DRAGON

Great.Red.Dragon.jpgL.B. Woolfolk was an American Baptist preacher who traced the machinations of the banking cartel in the decades after the Civil War. He confirmed his assertions by contacts with members of this cartel during visits to London . He says "the Great Red Dragon" is the symbol of the "Jew London Money Power." (VN: it should read "Khazar London Money Power)

In his book, which is on line, he describes how this cartel bought up the US economy  through intermediaries, and controlled it long before the passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913.

By 1864, 150 years ago, Woolfolk claims the wealth of the world already was concentrated in their hands.

"The Imperialism of Capital to which I allude is a knot of capitalists--Jews almost to a man--who make their headquarters in the Money Quarter of London, in Threadneedle street, Lombard, and other streets in that vicinity, where bankers have their habitat. 
These Jew capitalists have succeeded in centralizing in their own hands the industry and commerce of the earth. --They own almost all the debts of the world, --the debts of nations, states, counties, municipalities, corporations and individuals, --amounting in the aggregate, it is estimated, to seventy-five billion dollars, on which they are annually receiving about four billion dollars of interest. 

--They own the manufactories, the shipping, and the commerce of Great Britain, and most of the manufactures, shipping and commerce of the whole world. --They have attained control of the industry and trade of the whole earth; and are rapidly centralizing all business in their own hands. 
 
They hold possession of all the great lines of trade and business of all kinds, and they regulate all prices by their own arbitrary methods. This Money Power of the Money Quarter of London is the only grand pre-eminent Imperialism existing on the earth."
east-india-company.jpgWoolfolk traces the spread of imperialism to the British East India Company in the early part of the Eighteenth Century.

"In 1764, the British East India Company was the grandest and richest corporation in the world. It was the only corporation, which ruled a territorial empire. It was enriched by traffic, by the extension of its trade through the conquest of the trading stations of its Continental rivals and by the wholesale plunder of India....it came to pass that the greater part of the stock of the East India Company, and of the other companies afterwards organized out of the dividends of that great company, fell into the hands of the Jews. (VN: khazars.....)


The Jews (Khazars) became the great Money Kings of the world.... History presents no career of conquest, in which fraud, deceit and rapine were so blended as in the conquest of India by the East India Company. It was the first example in the history of the world of a trading corporation becoming an imperial power; and its imperial rule was marked by the rapacity, chicane and fraud that characterize a great corporation in the soulless and conscienceless pursuit of gain."

With the invention of the steam engine in 1775, only the capitalists of the British East India Company had the means to profit from the industrial revolution. They set up hundreds of joint stock companies--manufacturing companies of all kinds, coal and iron mining, railways and ships, real estate-- which concealed their ownership.

"In commercial crises, often originated, and always manipulated by them, they managed systematically to break down rival companies, and buy them out, and to rob and plunder the minority stockholders; until, in the end, these organized capitalists got into their own hands and very cheap, all, or the greater part of the stock of the various companies, manufacturing, mercantile and shipping, that originated in steam manufactures. They thus reduced to a system and a science the art of crushing rival companies, and freezing out minority stockholders." (VN: sounds just like today in all our nations)

Woolfolk speculates that the Rothschilds did not act alone but represented a syndicate of Jewish bankers.

lionel.jpeg(Crowns of Europe beg before Lionel Rothschild)
"The rise of the house of Rothschild is memorable as the first grand combination of the Jews in a syndicate, for the transaction of a vast business in which all their capital might be combined. 

The Rothschilds became the head of the Jew (Khazar) Money Kings, and have ever since been the head of the Jews,(KHAZARS) acting as a syndicate. That house is probably at the head of the Jew Money Power of the world. The wealth of the Money Power is simply beyond calculation. It cannot amount to less than $160,000,000,000. It is probably nearer two hundred billions.... 

The Money Power has so much money, now, that it can not find investment for it. In one more double it will about have all the property of the earth. In the beginning of its career, a double of its capital meant $100,000,000. Now a double of its capital means $400,000,000,000. And all the property of the world is less that $600,000,000,000."

According to Woolfolk, the Rockefellers and most great American industrialist-financiers were merely agents of the London Money Power. Standard Oil is a classic example of how it established a monopoly in every enterprize. Owning the railroads needed to transport oil, the Money Power put competitors out of business by undercutting their prices.

This cartel of cartels kept the business class in line by creating the spectre of Communism:

"It is their policy to keep up a hot agitation for Communism and Socialism in the great cities; so that the businessmen, in their antagonism to those ideas, will keep on the side of the Money Power. It is a significant fact that most of the agitators for Socialism are Jews, who are most probably the agents of the Money Power to keep up this agitation for their own purposes... It is a part of the consummate craft of these Money Kings."

CONCLUSION

"The Red Dragon" is an important reminder that even 150 years ago, wealth and power were concentrated in a relatively few hands. Modern history reflects the hidden machinations of this Money Power to advance their "world government." The whole world is being colonized.
We see evidence today that one hand directs all the great multinationals. For example, they all sing from the same songbook of diversity, homosexuality and feminism.  All US Presidents are front men for this banking cartel. Their Cabinets are chosen from the ranks of the Rockefeller-controlled CFR. Presidents who defy the Money Power are eliminated. (i.e. most recently JFK and Nixon.) All the Presidential candidates support Israel which was created by the banking cartel to be  their world government capital.

This lethal problem arose because the nations of the world were too feckless to do something so simple as create their own currency. They relied on a network of Jewish bankers to create their medium of exchange in the form of  debt to themselves. No nation had the power or wit to break away from this worldwide imperialist system which is tightening its grip and inevitably must enslave mankind. Unfortunately, these bankers are not just interested in power or money. They are Satanists who wish to sabotage civilization and rededicate humanity to Lucifer.

 
We must reject this juggernaut in all its manifestations.  Common sense eventually will prevail not because it is common sense, but because continuous violation of common sense produces collapse.
---
First Comment from Dan-

Yes, it's important that the Rothschilds did not act alone but represented a syndicate of Jewish bankers.   The Red Shield takes attention off of others.  As far as we know the Rothschild clan may be fronting for a silent partner entirely unknown to any but the highest insiders. 
  
The 'money power' isn't the whole story.  Nathan Rothschild served as wardern in the Great Synagogue in Manchester during the early 1800's. The family intermarried first with aristocratic Jewish families. Nathan married Hannah Cohen, daughter of the powerful London merchant from Amsterdam Solomon Cohen.  

Her sister Judith married Sir Moses Haim Montefiore, (Italian Jewish lineage).  He funded the first Jewish settlement beyond old Jerusalem, called New Yishuv in 1860.
 
Wikipedia says: " his correspondence with the British consul in Damascus Charles Henry Churchill in 1841-42 is seen as pivotal to the development of Proto-Zionism." [1]  The Modern Rothschild family never concealed their substantial funding of the establishment of the State of Israel.  
 
Jewish children are taught from the cradle that Theodore Herzl is the primary founder of Zionism.  How can this be, when Herlz was born the year that Sir Moses Montefiore established New Yishuv?   If helps to know the complete history, since public perception today sees Israel as a Rothschild project. [2]
 
What was the interest of these European money power men in establishing their own sovereign state in the Middle East?   
[1] 'Notes on the Diplomatic History of the Jewish Question' with texts of protocols, treaty stipulations and other public acts and official documents, Lucien Wolf, published by the Jewish Historical Society of England, 1919
- See more at: http://henrymakow.com/the_imperialism_of_jewish_capi.html#sthash.PO3EGjld.dpuf

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.