2013-02-21

Murder of Whistle Blowers now Domestic Policy: 9/11 author was killed in black ops hit

*** FUNDRAISING UPDATE:  They gutted my fund raising.  That is new... I wondered what they would use next and this is were it hurts the most, so this was late in getting to you since I just discovered they were gone.  We still have a deficit of $230.  So please thwart their efforts to stop this blog by contributing at the pay pal button off to the right.  Bless you for your efforts and than you to those who have contributed so far.  I am sorry I have not been able to get back to you to thank you, but their harrassment has kept me very busy.  We thank everyone for their support in reading, distributing and contributing to this blog that we invest so much of our time too.  Thanks again.  We have 7 days left to make our goal, so please do what you can afford to do

Vatic Note: Oh, this is a must read all the way through. They cover so much more than just this assassination by our foreign occupied government, that is truly news. As I have mentioned before, this is not for FAST FOOD INFO junkies, its for the serious seeker of truth and information and exposure of our reality so far that we must address in some fashion to rid us of this evil.  
 
I have said often that if we let these edomites continue with the take over of this nation, it would begin to look a lot like Palestine and sure enough, here is another one murdered, just like the blog before this one.  Then we wonder why our ENTIRE CONGRESS is missing in action?  Now we know why.  They are petrified.  That does not include the traitors who have sold out their nation and received money in exchange and we know who they are, don't we?

I understand now why they killed Kyle, the marine super sniper.  Pay back is hell.  This is amazing, as it not only talks about the murders and assassinations, but who probably did it and how they tied into the Martin Luther King and JFK assassinations.  I had not heard this before, so this is a must read.  Then we find out that most of the judges in New Orleans and in parts of Califnoria are all "mobbed up".  

That explains a lot about the courts.  This reminds me of the Doren Police officer killed by fellow officers and done so through hiding testimony and evidence by purposely eliminating the evidence from the official report.  Press is owned by the same killers foreign country through their neocons/libs in America, so it prints what its told to print.  Bye bye press. 
 
Don't forget the judge murdered using Gifford as the front who was miraculously healed after being shot in the brain, yeah right.  Another edomite working for the foreign occupier of our government. That judge was killed because he refused to release the drug money funds from a cartels account, that the banks were money laundering, so they killed him and sent a message to all the judges nationwide,  "Do as we say or you die".  We seriously need to clean house, pronto.  This is truly beginning to look like Palestine for sure.  No rule of law of any kind for these animals. 

Look at those kids, We have said continually if we allow these neocon/lib edomite satanists gain control over this nation and the globe, that all our children will be at risk.  I truly believe this was also a sacrifice, since children are the offerings to satan for power and success.  They feel they need it since they are way behind in their agenda and running out of time. 


Philip Marshall, Alex Marshall, and Macaila Marshall , RIP. We’ll do what we can to bust the scumbags who did this to you.

After a week-long on-site investigation, former National Security Agency officer Wayne Madsen is “100% certain” that 9/11 investigator and author Philip Marshall and his two children were killed in a black ops hit. Madsen’s conclusion is that the cover story – an alleged murder-suicide – is transparently absurd.

Madsen stated his conclusions on yesterday’s Kevin Barrett show. Among the evidence cited by Madsen:

*Neighbors’ houses are “practically on top of” Marshall’s house, so dozens of neighbors would have heard any gunshots that weren’t muffled by a silencer…and Marshall’s “patsy gun” did not have a silencer.

*The crime scene was illegally and surreptitiously cleaned up by professionals, including “a SUV, license undetermined, with an array of communication antennas bristling from the roof.”

*Philip Marshall, who had expressed his fear of being harassed or silenced for his 9/11 revelations, never kept his doors open – but when the bodies were found, a side door Marshall never used was wide open.

According to Madsen, all of Marshall’s neighbors believe it was a professional murder, not the murder-suicide claimed by corrupt local police, who have presumably been told what to do and say by higher authorities working on behalf of “national security.”

Marshall, Madsen points out, was not just any 9/11 conspiracy author. A former airline pilot, Marshall was a close associate of notorious CIA drug smuggler Barry Seal, and a peripheral player in the New Orleans CIA/crime nexus that killed JFK, Martin Luther King, and many others. Madsen suggests that Marshall, a long-time participant in covert operations, developed a penchant for truth during the last years of his life.

According to Madsen, Marshall had stated that he was holding explosive information that would be revealed in his next book. The repeated professional-clean-ups of Marshall’s house after the murder suggest that the killers, and the agency or agencies employing them, were looking for a specific piece of evidence or information. (Marshall’s computer mysteriously disappeared after the killings, and its whereabouts remain unknown.)
Below is a transcript of my interview with Wayne Madsen. A big thank-you to whoever took the time to transcribe it!
-KB

The Kevin Barrett Show
February 19, 2013.
#####

BARRETT: Welcome to the Kevin Barrett Show. I’m Kevin Barrett, back from a long vacation. I just spent two weeks in Iran over at the film festival, The Hollywoodism Conference,  as part of the Fajr Film Festival in Tehran. And wow, that was pretty exciting, and one of the pieces of news that arrived from the US  while I was in Tehran was the killing of Phillip Marshall and his two children in California.

Phillip Marshall is a retired United Airlines pilot, he’s written a couple of books about 9/11, most recently “The Big Bamboozle”, he was a former associate of the CIA/DEA informant Barry Seal, the notorious CIA cocaine smuggler, and if you think Phillip Marshall killed himself and his two children as the police are trying to claim; well, I don’t know…you need to go back to school.

Today I’m going to be talking about this tragic case of an apparent 9/11 whistleblower being silenced with one of my favorite sources of leaks from inside the US Intel community, the thinking man’s Seymour Hersh, and that is Wayne Madsen. Wayne Madsen is formerly with the National Security Agency, he has since become an independent patriot journalist doing consistently excellent work, and well, It’s an honor to welcome Wayne Madsen back to the show. How are you Wayne?

MADSEN: Fine, good to be with you.
BARRETT: Yeah, well I do follow your work, and you’ve made a number of very interesting breakthroughs, and your piece on Phillip Marshall is very important. I mean, those of us in the 9/11 Truth community should not just take it lying down when somebody is murdered along with their children to keep this covered up. I think that’s more or less what happened to Paul Wellstone as well. These people have no shame; I mean killing the children all with their targets, it’s absolutely disgusting. Why don’t you give the listeners sort of a rundown on Phillip Marshall?

RH neg - The Curious Missing Blood Factor

Kate and anonymous in comments, please scroll down on the article/blog and go to the end.  I put up something for you we discussed in the comments section. 

 ***Fundraising:  Well, its that time again.  Fund raising and our deficit is $145, keeping in mind this is a short month til the first.  If we have been of  any help in providing you with information and truth telling, then please support our efforts by donating to the cause.  We are going to prevail since information is the WMD in this war that is going on.  If you can afford it and want to donate to our cause, then please use the pay pal button off to the right of this blog.

We wish to thank all of you who have supported this humble effort to move into our 1000 years of prosperity and overcoming all obstacles that get in the way of achieving that goal.  Also, please remember, the deficit does not include what we still owe the computer guy although that has gone down some from last months efforts.  We thank you deeply for that, so he will be happy to help should we be brought down again.  Bless you all who visit, donate, comment, and contribute information to our efforts.

Vatic Note: This was good and from a slightly different angle than I have read before and I am sure you can imagine, that to find these, I have put up, required an enormous amount of reading.  Those things that could not be verified I did not put up, but continue to look for evidence of what was presented. I still had to read it to know if it was viable for publication.  

I love to read, but sometimes it gets to ya.  I end up believing "I know too much".  That can be lonely and frustrating. What has really struck me is how RH positives will abandon you in a heart  beat when something happens that can easily be resolved by discussion and yet, that never happens with RH negs.  I am still trying to find out why the difference. LOL Its almost how I can tell if someone is RH neg or positive.

In this instance, this series of observations and analysis, below, was spot on with much of what I have found and read in the past, but with a different twist on it.  He spent a lot more time on Spirituality than any other write up I had seen.  In his description of that, it fit well with what I know, but I did have to make a few counter points to his on a couple of things.  Otherwise, this was an excellent read and I encourage you, if you are RH neg, to take the time to read it.  Its worth it. 


The Curious, Missing Blood Factor
http://timenolonger.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/295/
by admin, Time No Longer


If you have ever researched the Rhesus blood grouping system, you probably already know that there is something mighty peculiar about the rhesus negative status. The Rhesus blood grouping system is differentiated from the ABO system, dealing with separate groups of antigens.

First, to give some foundation information on blood grouping: the ABO blood grouping system reflects whether a person has the antigen “A”, or the antigen “B”, or has both, or neither. “O” simply stands for zero, or “null”, having no A or B antigens.

The Rhesus blood group system contains some 50 different antigens, but the one of great importance is the “D” antigen. It is the D which determines the rh status of an individual.

This, the most immunogenic of the Rhesus factors, is key in knowing what individuals can donate blood or tissue to another without complications. The presence of a D antigen will not be tolerated by a body which does not have it, just as an A or B will not be tolerated by a type O.

Most people do have the D antigen, the function of which is said to not be fully understood in the medical field, though there is sufficient evidence to suggest that it plays a role in cellular respiration facilitation, or the transference of oxygen from the red blood cell to tissue and co2 from tissue to red blood cell.

If you live in the U.S., you have about a 15% chance of not having the D antigen present on the surface of your red blood cells.

This next statistic is highly speculative, (as i have no way of measuring this) but i will venture a guess that if you live in the U.S. and are reading this article, the chances that you are rh negative are better than 70%. I’ll explain that speculation a bit more further on.

The supposition that the scientific community has expected you to believe about the origins of this strange deletion of a blood antigen in some people is that it derives from a completely random mutation of unknown origin.

The blood being as highly resistant to random mutation as it is, it would not seem likely that this accounts for it.

Dr. Karla Turner MURDERED for Exposing Alien Greys

***Fundraising:  Well, its that time again.  Fund raising and our deficit is $240, keeping in mind this is a short month til the first.  If we have been of  any help in providing you with information and truth telling, then please support our efforts by donating to the cause.  We are going to prevail since information is the WMD in this war that is going on.  If you can afford it and wish to donate to our cause, then please use the pay pal button off to the right of this blog.

We wish to thank all of you who have supported this humble effort to move into our 1000 years of prosperity and overcoming all obstacles that get in the way of achieving that goal.  Also, please remember, the deficit does not include what we still owe the computer guy although that has gone done some from last months efforts.  We thank you deeply for that, so he will be happy to help should we be brought down again.  Bless you all who visit, donate, comment, and contribute information to our efforts.

Vatic Note: What I am beginning to understand, after all  these years of research, that this subject of aliens is finally becoming clearly the base or root of the confusion and understanding of how such  a large group of people can be so ruthlessly psychopatic at such a deep level, and now its becoming clear that their in humanity comes from being partially inhuman, if not completely inhuman.

Having said that, let me make it clear.  I do not know for a fact that aliens were ever here, are here now, or will be coming.  All I know is that there is sufficient evidence from a huge variety of sources that supports that contention.  Its also very possible we are fed these various bits by the deceptors to lead us to that conclusion.  I give a personal example below that something happened that made me believe they exist in human form as shape shifters because of what I personally saw, but that doesn't mean it was not a production for just such a pupose. 

We have had experiences lately with "movie productions" that are used to move us into supporting some political agenda or another.  That could be the case here.  Unfortunately, we don't know, so you read, keep an open mind both ways and you decide.  ALWAYS KEEP AN OPEN MIND, as the truth will tell you when it arrives.
 
It is also confirmed by what I saw G. Bush Sr do back in 1990 when he ran for his second term for president and he did a "live" speech in front of a camera with an audience that contained some POW AND MIA families of Viet Nam war era.  I have mentioned this before, but I will do it again only more briefly than I have in the past, but I saw him, and it was raw live feed, not video copied, but happening as it was recording,  when he got angry at the MIA/POW families for chanting "Bring our people home", and lost his cool, he screamed "Sit down and Shut up, I am sick of you people".

He was sooo angry, that he began losing his shape, and his face elongated, eyes slit vertically,  and his tongue lashed out. It only lasted a few seconds, but it  knocked me on my butt. I remember he was on Halcion that was banned everywhere in the world, but approved for here in the US just so he could take it.  I thought I was crazy in seeing that and never mentioned it except to my husband at the time, when I screamed, "Mark, did you see that?".  I just called my ex and he remembers this happening, so I am not crazy.  LOL



Dr. Karla Turner MURDERED for Exposing Alien Greys
Uploaded by prophesised · on Jan 17, 2012
 
Dr. Karla Turner was murdered by the CIA for exposing the Alien Greys. A Ufological researcher whose focus was alien, military, and para-military abductions, or MAAR (Malevolent Alien Abduction Research), in this lecture she discusses her findings after years of personal experience and having worked closely with many abductees.

Dr. Karla Turner was widely respected in the field of Ufology for her research on alien abduction. A brilliant scholar and professional educator, she earned a Ph.D. in Old English studies and taught at the university level in Texas for more than ten years. But in 1988, she and her husband and son endured a disturbing series of experiences and recollections that forced them to recognize that they were all abductees.  (VN:  Watch this video and listen to her and decide for yourself if she is credible.  She was to me.  Very professional and very scientific and specific, so I believe her and the cancer was too quick to be normal cancer, but you decide. This is something no one can prove except through personal testimony of their own experiences)



http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=jKbOpTMmnNg

Many of the abductees Dr. Turner studied had at one time or another had alien implants removed by a surgeon. Her research found that the extraterrestrials known as the Alien Greys or Grey Aliens, beings from Zeta Reticuli (a binary star system in the southern constellation of Reticulum), who identify themselves as the "Reticulans" (Lam was purportedly a Zeta Reticulian), abduct humans and take them to alien ships and alien bases that were located underground and on the ocean floor. Some abductees even reported that they were, from time to time, kidnapped by human U.S. military personnel who worked with the aliens.

Dr. Turner, who was in perfect health and had no genetic history of cancers of any kind, died of an unidentifiable cancer on January 10, 1996, after being repeatedly threatened and harassed in an attempt to force her to discontinue her research. She was just 48. Since then, several other people involved in UFO abduction investigations have also experienced threats followed by highly unusual, fast-acting cancer. (VN: Coincidence that the same thing happened to Phil Schneider after he began his seminar tours, only worse.)

Dr. Turner's alien abduction research was published in 3 paperbacks: Into the Fringe, Taken, and Masquerade of Angels ( http://www.scribd.com/doc/100295685/9... ). Shortly after her suspicious and untimely death (murder), her publishing company was intimidated into halting the printing of Karla Turner's haunting conclusions about the agenda of the evil Greys, their alliance with the Illuminati, and it how it factors into the New World Order.

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

2013-02-20

Sun & NASA disinfo exposed! Another force twisting Earth's magnetic field & sending particle influx!

***Fundraising:  Well, its that time again.  Fund raising and our deficit is $300.(It dropped to $280)  If we have been of  any help in providing you with information and truth telling, then please support our efforts by donating to the cause.  We are going to prevail since information is the WMD in this war that is going on. Hopefully, spring is going to provide us with the Jewelry sales we need to see us through summer and if so, we won't be out here begging.  

We wish to thank all of you who have supported this humble effort to move into our 1000 years of prosperity and overcoming all obstacles that get in the way of achieving that goal.  Also, please remember, the deficit does not include what we still owe the computer guy although that has gone done some from last months efforts.  We thank you deeply for that, so he will be happy to help should we be brought down again. Please use the Pay Pal donation button off to the right of this blog.   Bless you all who visit, donate, comment, and contribute information to our efforts.

*** Oh, my Gawd, they switched videos on me.  They do not like this feel good information so they put up the nasty one.  That should tell us alot about how close we are coming to the truth about Nibiru, the dwarf star and the shift that is coming close to happening.  Will try to refind the video and replace it.  Thanks for your patience.  This is becoming a full time job.  Damn.   Stock up on water, for sure and food if you can. 

Vatic Note: This was a very interesting rabbit hole, that started when we did the series on the Antarctica, Hitler, and the anomolies occuring there and was further fueled by the fact that the Chinese sent up a satellite and discovered Nibiru or the dwarf star, and I questioned as well, the many meteors that have recently hit Russia and other countries which was predicted to be the debri from the twin star as it pulled them from the Ort Cloud when it passed through there on its way here

If you revisit some of my vatic notes about the anomolies of weather this winter, especially the snow that did not act, look or have properties of real snow, but created a freezing atmosphere of cold, yet when it began to "melt", and the sun came out during the day, it would get up to 60 degrees in Denver in January no less.  When I started down this rabbithole, you will see I had questions as well.  I even postulated that its the twin star that has arrived and was causing all these problems since the sun itself looked much bigger, for this time of year, when it is so far away from us normally in Winter, so what is causing it to appear so huge?

Normally its the size of a golf ball and now its the size of a basketball which normally would be closer to its size in summer when we are closest to the sun. This below adds much facts to this issue of observation that I had done using two pairs of sun glasses to look at the sun.  Could it be the dwarf star is in front of the sun and surrounded by the suns light, making the center look so big?  I don't know, but asking and questioning is important right now.  

Would that explain why every doggone employee of our government and members of congress and the White House are playing deception games with us?  NASA as well which has been put under the military?  No more space shuttle flights under NASA.  Only under the military and only certain types of vehicles which are nothing like the space shuttle.  So what the heck is going on?


I don't know, however, there is more and I am calling this part 1 of 3 and the Book of Enoch and other such predictions are going to be in part 2 & 3.  I maybe off base here, but you read, study and decide for yourselves. What I had not covered that this person below, does cover, was the behavior of our magnetic shield around the planet at the same time we are seeing these other anamolies.   I just keep thinking of the trillions of dollars put into underground bases and living quarters all over the planet, in every country.  

I also keep remembering the 30 countries that have research facilities in the South Pole.  Why?  What is coming from the south that these countries are interested in?  Why does the US have a military force down there?  WHAT IS GOING ON? Why aren't they telling us?  Well, read all this and parts 2 & 3 and we will see if we can deduce an explanation and preparation for what it might be and why they aren't telling us


Sun & NASA disinfo exposed! Another force twisting Earth's magnetic field & sending particle influx!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJvQ_zcJDv4
Published by Theunitedknowledge, on Dec 28, 2012
 
I want answers and so should you!

The information shared here proves we're being played for fools, the same specific activity keeps happening on the same dates over and over again! That is not normal!

The simple fact I was able to accurately predict activity before anywhere else and before Solar Activity really proves a point!

It's easy to predict activity accurately when you know what specific activity to look for on specific dates.

I'm sure somebody would have noticed this data sooner or later anyway and certainly some will figure out even more than me now being I'm sharing all this.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=ZJvQ_zcJDv4


The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

The Black Hole In The Book of Enoch 1/5 (Cern, Large Hadron Collider, Black Holes and Revelations)

***Fundraising:  Well, its that time again.  Fund raising and our deficit is $300, (Just dropped to $280, which is great) keeping in mind this is a short month til the first.  If we have been of  any help in providing you with information and truth telling, then please support our efforts by donating to the cause.  We are going to prevail since information is the WMD in this war that is going on.  Hopefully, spring is going to provide us with the Jewelry sales we need to see us through summer and if so, we won't be out here begging. Please use the pay pal button off to the right of this blog to contribute to the cause.

We wish to thank all of you who have supported this humble effort to move into our 1000 years of prosperity and overcoming all obstacles that get in the way of achieving that goal.  Also, please remember, the deficit does not include what we still owe the computer guy although that has gone done some from last months efforts.  We thank you deeply for that, so he will be happy to help should we be brought down again.  Bless you all who visit, donate, comment, and contribute information to our efforts.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=UukVS-tcqa8&feature=endscreen

Uploaded by Apocryphile1970
on Sep 25, 2008

One of six treatises I wrote the winter of 1997-1998. This one shows how a mysterious object described in the Book of Enoch is, in fact, a black hole. (VN: The other 4 videos are on the site link above.... I only included one to save on space, but please avail yourselves of this.  He does a very credible job.  You watch and decide.)

Vatic Note:  What is fascinating about this particular series of videos and the subject matter, is that he wrote all these and posted the videos before Cern tried to create a black hole in Switzerland and it shut down the accelerator and they had to basically rebuild the accelerator.  Hows that for spooky.  

Some scientists even speculated that the black hole had intelligence and did not want to be created.  That is just speculation.  Watch these series of videos and you decide, this goes with the first part we put up on the suns actions and impact on the earth and also ties in Enoch.  How did he know way the heck back then about black holes?  Only if God showed him, (whoever that is for you).   Most of this is leading into the return of the dwarf star and the ancestors and wisemen.

I did this one because it proves just how deeply Enoch knew so much, and yet, even though early Christians used his books, today they are called Apostasy and are no longer included in the Bible, yet, Enoch walked with God and was so favored that he was taken up alive.  So how could his writings not be that of  God?  Just asking.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=UukVS-tcqa8

GET YOUR COPY OF THE SUPER GOSPEL: https://www.createspace.com/3377578

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

ENOCH, FALLEN ANGELS, ALIENS, DEMONS, EVERYTHING!!!

Vatic Note:  This was a very interesting presentation of Enoch, which  fits with the previous two blogs we put up digging deep into the psyche and the explanation for the insanity and hate deeply embedded into these evil ones and why they exhibit absolutely no humanity.   I took a second look at Senator Feinstein after reading this and watching the videos.  I swear, you can see it in her eyes and face.

A warning and caution.  Remember the powers that be intend to use a false flag alien invasion for globalizing and 2 different sources, say they want us to "fight" the good aliens coming to rid the planet of the edomites, and they also say that it could be a full on bogus event depending on when they decide to do this deed.

The PTB have perfected flying saucers now through star wars budgets and that is why so many star wars scientists have died. Then there is also cloning; and genetic engineering had advanced to the point where aliens could also be manufactured for this scam.  (Keep in mind the body that washed ashore near Plum Island that was 9 feet tall and had 10 inch fingers.) 

Finally, keep in mind that there is a reason 30 countries have research facilities in the south pole.  It was also offered that Nibiru or the twin star was coming from the south and now we are having huge meteors entering into our atmosphere creating large explosions.  One just happened, "again", in Russia. That is the arrival of the debri that follows the twin from the Ort Cloud.



Published by Trey Smith on Aug 18, 2012
ENOCH, FALLEN ANGELS, ALIENS, DEMONS, EVERYTHING!!!
http://youtu.be/mtBz1roiQR8

Enoch (Book of Enoch): The Enoch video (released 2012) is a journey 5000 years in the past through the eyes of Enoch, 7th from the Biblical Adam, and great grandfather of Noah.

Enoch covers the Fall of the Angels (Watchers), producing Nephilim, Annunaki, and / or the Discovery Channel's Ancient Aliens (Ancient Aliens). Enoch also covers Serpent / Reptilian creature/s. Popular TV shows such as Ancient Aliens say we are encountering "Ancient Aliens", Entities, alien beings, alien agendas, UFO's, UFO sightings from ages past, UFO sightings in modern day; but more than this, if Enoch is correct -- not only does it mean we are "not alone" -- but greater still --- he paints a picture that is somewhat darker, grander in scope, and encompasses all mankind, history, the whole universe, and dimensions from heaven to hell, and all the things that lurk between.

An epic journey from man's origins, to the "fallen angels", to Noah's Flood, to the "End of the World"... to eternity itself.  (VN:  that explains why they took the Book of Enoch out of the Bible.  Even though they did, many in the Old Testament referance Enoch, so all is not lost.  Read it, its amazing.)



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZGN6EKjvAo&feature=player_detailpage

BOOK of ENOCH (Experts in video and links to their materials on Enoch, Nephilim, Annunanki & Walt Brown on Naoh's Ark, Noah's Flood)

✔Enoch: 2012 Enoch video by Trey Smith http://www.godinanutshell.com/ -or- http://readthieves.com/
✔Enoch: Book of Enoch read by Robert Ferrell http://scriptural-truth.com/ (Robert Ferrell's website covers in-depth videos on many, many ancient texts)
✔Enoch: 2012 Nephilim, 2012 Illuminati, 2012 Luciferian, 2012 Ancient Aliens, Fallen Angels, Ancient Egyptian, Babylonian Practices covered by David and Donna Carrico http://ritualabuse.org/
✔Noah's Flood: Dr. Walt Brown author of "In the Beginning" covers Noah's Flood and Hydro-plate Theory http://www.creationscience.com

God in a Nutshell: ENOCH. Video file 5 (SUMMARY OF VIDEO)

2013-02-19

AUDIO FROM DORAN SEIGE: “Burn This Motherfucker” - Part 2 of 2

Vatic Note:  What is the cover these cops have for murdering a suspect without a trial?  Remember in part 1, we showed a witness testified, WHO WAS NOT A PART OF THE BLUE line of protection protecting other cops from their wrong doing. He testified that his son, when delivered home, had told his father that the cop had kicked him in the face.  There are three videos below, with links incase they gut them. 

He testified to that under oath, but it was never reported in the official report and the documents we showed in Part 1, had a heading "Not to be included in the official report", now why do you think that was? .  All the cops disagreed with the story,  the father of the mentally ill kid who had been kicked in the face, and Dorans immediate supervisor who had since retired, and Doran who reported the violent act by his trainer,against a mentally ill man, but then when all the testimonies were recorded and transcribed, it was different than what the press and police had put out.  Whats new, huh?  That is why the father and Dorans supervisor were not included in the official report, but Doran decided to fight back and that is why all this is coming out now.  Read his manifesto.

So we don't know what really happened and that is what a trial is for.  So how are they going to get the truth if your allowed to execute him without a trial?  OBAMA'S EO ALLOWING ASSASSINATION OF AMERICANS WITHOUT A TRIAL. Now finally we see how they intend to use that deep violation of the Bill of Rights.  There were ways to get him out without burning him alive.  If you know history at all, before Hitler turned on the bankers, this is exactly what the bankers had him do in pre world war two to his dissidents in Germany.  Mental wards, prisons and finally assassinations. Disarming veterans is right up there as well.  

This man was an ex soldier and believed in what he was doing, wrongly, of course but then most Americans don't know the truth either about what is going on.  That is intentional, and worked in two other revolutions and world wars that the bankers orchestrated. 

Listen to this audio and tell me if this sounds like the America we had before the foreign occupiers took over our government.  It looks more  like Israel, than America, like Goldstone said, they do crimes against humanity that are horrific, even in their own country.  Know this ....  THEY HATE US, AND ALWAYS HAVE and we are next.  They are also racists.  Remember, they were the ones that introduced and imported slavery of blacks from Africa to the western world, and profited handsomely for it.  

Police Audio From Dorner Siege: “Burn This Motherfucker” 
http://www.infowars.com/lapd-audio-from-dorner-siege-burn-this-motherfucker/
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
February 13, 2013

“Alright, we’re gonna go ahead with the plan with the burners”
   
UPDATE: The L.A. Times reports that “incendiary tear gas” was used by police to start the fire that killed Christopher Dorner, confirming our report. Police audio from the Christopher Dorner siege reveals a deliberate plan to burn down the cabin in which Dorner was trapped, with one officer heard to say, “fucking burn this motherfucker,” before police discussed their intention to, “go ahead with the plan with the burners.”  (VN:  SOUNDS LIKE WACO, HUH? Precedence has been set without us being outraged that they killed 97 Americans most of whom were children, and we said nothing, so now they use it as a tool.  Satanism rewards horror deaths as a sacrifice.  How do you like your new satanic world, courtesy of the edomites?)



http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=0X-WoiJhVY8

The audio was captured on police scanners as well as being picked up by a local news broadcast. More than seven agencies, federal, state and local were involved in the final hours of the siege. The LAPD SWAT Team was airlifted in to carry out the final raid, with reports later confirming, “the SWAT team had the cabin surrounded.” 

San Bernardino County sheriff’s deputies were also involved in the standoff. The video above is from captured police scanner transmissions which were broadcast online shortly before authorities ordered them to be disabled.
“Alright, we’re gonna go ahead with the plan with the burners,” one officer says.
“Copy,” replies another.
“Like we talked about,” the first officer responds.
“The burners are deployed, and we have a fire,” says another officer moments later, before the police dispatcher repeats the statement.
Within minutes of the fire starting, police note that the cabin is “starting to collapse.”
Police are also heard discussing if they are ready to “bring fire”.
“Burners” is police slang for tear gas canisters, which are known to cause fires.
In a separate clip carried by a local news channel, police are heard to say, “Fucking burn this motherfucker,”  and “burn that fucking house down.” This audio appears to be from earlier in the siege following the initial shootout between Dorner and cops.

In another audio clip broadcast by CBS Los Angeles, police are heard saying, “get the gas, burn it down,” clearly indicating cops knew use of tear gas would set the cabin on fire.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=sisVskohj1k

As the Guardian reports, tweets made by journalist Max Blumenthal, who was listening live to police scanner feeds, correlate with the audio from the YouTube clips.
Shortly after smoke was seen rising from the cabin, police ordered online scanner feeds to be cut having earlier barred networks like CNN from carrying live footage of the scene and telling journalists not to put out tweets.
The fact that police would burn down the cabin in which Dorner was trapped, in a similar fashion to how the infamous Waco siege ended in 1993, was predicted ahead of time in a video Alex Jones made hours beforehand. I made the same prediction in a Facebook post before reports even emerged that the cabin was on fire.
Given the ammunition inside the cabin, LAPD officers knew that the tear gas would lead to a fire and instead of waiting it out, chose instead to carry out a summary execution. That’s not to excuse the actions of Dorner, but the fact that police now view burning people to death as a reasonable way to apprehend a suspect is shocking.
As Mike Adams writes today, “If the LAPD is going to abandon its mission of public safety and function as an armed vigilante justice squad, dishing out death sentences to those it believes are guilty — without a trial or anything resembling due process — then they might as well throw away all their badges as just call themselves the LA Gang Squad. Because that’s how they’re acting.”
A spokeswoman for the San Bernardino county sheriff’s office said that Dorner’s charred remains were found inside the cabin.
The quotes by cops screaming to burn the cabin down from earlier in the siege can be heard in the news report below.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=po9EaU7ZjxI

*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.
This article was posted: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 at 10:32 am

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Christopher Dorner v. LAPD Case File - Part 1 of 2

Vatic Note:  Not all is as it seems in this case, not at all.  I was surprised at the difference between what really happened and what was fed to the press.  Its like night and day.   Notice below in the beginning of the transcripts the heading "NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS". Now why is that?  Well, if you are not a "fast food" reader, then read this and you will see, evidence contained in here that no one is talking about including some of the Alternative press, and that is why they GUTTED THIS BLOG TWICE NOW AND I COULD NOT FIND IT AGAIN, except at this site I am providing that I found only through Dog pile search. They did not want me to publish this and now we can understand why after you read it.  It means they murdered him for not going along, even with corruption, violence or anything that is outside their procedures, even if they are violated by a supervisor.

Try finding this anywhere on the search engines, and then check the case number in LA appeals court by its number and verify this exists.  THEY REALLY WANTED THIS BURIED, SINCE IT PROVES the man should have had a trial to determine guilt or innocence of what he was accused of, and there is testimony, NOT FROM THE COPS, buried down in this mess that supported his version of events by someone who had no connection to Doran in anyway and had no reason to lie. HIS NAME IS GETTLER AND I BOLDED HIS TESTIMONY BELOW, SO YOU COULD SKIP ALL THE COP TESTIMONY AND GET TO THE FATHER OF THE VICTIM.  ITS NOT INCLUDED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORT. I also bolded the testimony of Dorans supervisor at the time, since both contradict the official story and I believe that is why they did not want it in the official report. I also recommend you read the section on the burden of proof arguments.  That was a real eye opener.

After reading this, then READ HIS MANIFESTO ALL THE WAY THROUGH.  And then you decide.  I see this as  our future if we let this one go without a huge wave of protest and demand to stop the EO ALLOWING THE GOV TO ASSASSINATE AMERICANS WITHOUT A TRIAL.  THAT IS REALLY WHAT HAPPENED HERE and that EO provides cover for corrupt cops to protect their turf and legalize murder as a way to cover their crimes.  

Los Angeles Police are notorious for their corruption as we have seen regularly since the 70's with their involvement with the Contra drug scandel, where many went to jail in the federal gov. my podunk town hired just such an ex LA cop for their sheriffs office and he got fired for lying under oath in a court case..  Ok, I admit it, it was my case and I had a witness who proved the cop was lying and he should have gone to jail, but he didn't, he just got fired.  He was an EX LA COP. 

Christopher Dorner v. LAPD Case File

https://leaksource.wordpress.com/2013/02/07/christopher-dorner-v-lapd-case-file/
by Leak source,  February 7, 2013

In LAPD Manhunt, News on February 7, 2013 at 3:50 PM

DORNER v. LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
CHRISTOPHER DORNER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT et al., Defendants and Respondents.
No. B225674.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.
Filed October 3, 2011.
Law Office of David J. Duchrow, Jill A. Piano and David J. Duchrow for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Carmen A. Trutanich, City Attorney, Claudia McGee Henry, Assistant City Attorney, and Gregory P. Orland, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

WILLHITE, Acting P. J.

Appellant Christopher Dorner, an officer with the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD), made a complaint against his field training officer, Sergeant Teresa Evans, accusing her of kicking a suspect, Christopher Gettler (Gettler). The Los Angeles Police Department Board of Rights (Board) found that appellant’s complaint was false and therefore terminated his employment for making false statements. Appellant filed a petition for a writ of administrative mandamus in the superior court pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5, seeking to overturn the decision of the Board. The superior court denied his petition, and he now appeals. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND. Appellant was charged in a formal written complaint with three counts: count 1, on August 10, 2007, making false statements to Sergeant D. Deming, who was conducting an official investigation; count 2, on October 9, 2007, making false statements to Detectives S. Gallegos and T. Lai, who were conducting an official investigation; count 3, on August 10, 2007, making a personnel complaint that he knew or should have known was false. The Board held a series of hearings at which the following witnesses testified: appellant, Captain Donald Deming, Sergeant Evans, Sergeant Leonard Perez, Sergeant Eddie Hernandez of the Los Angeles Port Police, Sergeant Phil Jackson, Sergeant Julie McInnis, Detective Shelly Villanueva (formerly Gallegos), Christopher Adrid, Ashlye Perez, Christopher Gettler, and Richard Gettler.
Testimony of Captain Deming1

In August 2007, Captain Deming was a sergeant assigned as an assistant watch commander at the Harbor Division of the LAPD. On August 10, 2007, appellant spoke with Captain Deming about an incident on July 28, 2007, involving the use of force during Gettler’s arrest at a DoubleTree Hotel in San Pedro.

Appellant told Captain Deming he had something bad to report, and he “expressed remorse that he failed to report what he believed to be misconduct (unnecessary kicks applied to an arrestee) that he witnessed approximately two weeks prior.” Appellant said that he had handcuffed the suspect and was struggling with him when Sergeant Evans (Officer Evans, at the time) kicked the suspect twice in the left shoulder area and once in the face. Appellant had not told Sergeant Jackson about the kicks when Sergeant Jackson conducted a use of force investigation, and Sergeant Evans later discouraged appellant from disclosing she had kicked the suspect. 

Appellant was unsure what to write about the incident on the arrest report, so Sergeant Evans completed the report, “omitting any reference to the kicks.” Appellant was visibly upset when he spoke with Captain Deming, and Captain Deming believed this was caused by fear of repercussions for reporting misconduct by a training officer. Because of his fear of repercussions, appellant told Captain Deming, “Promise me you won’t do anything.” 

Appellant testified that the reason he asked Captain Deming not to do anything was that he knew Sergeant Evans had a child to support and he did not want her to lose her job.

After Captain Deming retired from the LAPD, appellant called to tell him he was being investigated for false statements. Captain Deming expressed surprise, and appellant told him, “No matter what happens, I just want you to know I never lied to you.” 

Captain Deming testified that appellant’s performance was satisfactory while he was under his supervision.

Following appellant’s complaint about Sergeant Evans, appellant believed someone urinated on his equipment bag at the police station. Appellant thought this was in retaliation for his complaint against Sergeant Evans and filed a complaint about this incident. However, an analysis of the unknown substance on appellant’s jacket revealed that the substance was not urine.

Testimony of Sergeant Evans
Sergeant Evans was the field training officer assigned to train appellant, who was a probationary employee. She testified that appellant had expressed to her the need for reintegration training because he had been away for a long time during his military deployment.2

Sergeant Evans and appellant responded to a call around 8:46 a.m. on July 28, 2007. When they arrived, they saw the subject sitting on a bench outside the main door of the hotel. Based on the subject’s demeanor and gaze, the officers thought he was either suffering from mental illness or under the influence, so they discussed a plan to isolate him from the numerous pedestrians in the area.

Appellant told the subject to stand up, but he did not comply, so appellant placed his hand on the subject’s arm and helped him stand. When appellant and the subject were walking near a planter box on the sidewalk, the subject suddenly swung at appellant and said, “fuck you.” Sergeant Evans took a taser from appellant’s duty belt and called for backup.

While appellant was trying to gain control of the suspect, Sergeant Evans told the subject to stop or she would use the taser. Appellant and the suspect fell into the bushes in the planter box, and the suspect’s arm was wedged against a wall. After Sergeant Evans shot Gettler twice with the taser, appellant was able to control Gettler’s left wrist and place handcuffs on him. Sergeant Evans went behind the bushes and crouched down to help appellant control Gettler’s right arm. After about 30 seconds of struggling, Gettler let the officers handcuff him and said, “Is that what you wanted? Here you go.” Sergeant Evans denied kicking Gettler in the face or the shoulder area.

Appellant then helped Gettler stand and placed him in a police car. Sergeant Evans noticed that Gettler had a laceration on his cheek, but no other injuries. There were no boot marks on Gettler’s face or shirt and no bruising on his face. When Gettler was taken to the police station, he did not tell the watch commander or a physician, who treated his facial injuries, that he was kicked in the face.

After Gettler was in custody, other officers arrived, including Sergeant Phil Jackson. Sergeant Jackson interviewed Sergeant Evans about the use of force and interviewed other witnesses at the scene.

Sergeant Evans and appellant discussed the incident so appellant could write the arrest report, but she stated that appellant took too long to write the report. Appellant asked Sergeant Evans several questions about how to complete the use of force section, which underwent about three revisions by Sergeant Evans and Sergeant Jackson. Sergeant Evans testified that the revisions were mainly to articulate what specific actions the officers took during the incident because appellant was unfamiliar with the “specific verbiage” used to describe their actions. 

Appellant reviewed the report before it was turned in to Sergeant Jackson for approval. The use of force report stated that Gettler’s injury was consistent with the use of force involved in arresting him and did not state that Sergeant Evans kicked Gettler.

Sergeant Evans previously had told appellant that he needed to take less time in writing arrest reports. She also had indicated in an evaluation that appellant needed to improve in the areas of officer safety and common sense and good judgment. Appellant received the evaluation on August 9, 2007.

Testimony of Christopher Adrid

Adrid was working as a bellman at the DoubleTree Hotel on the date of the incident. He saw Gettler on a bench in the lobby, talking to himself, so he asked Gettler if he was a hotel guest. When Gettler said he was not staying at the hotel, Adrid asked him to sit on a bench outside the hotel.

When appellant and Sergeant Evans arrived, Adrid saw them ask Gettler to take his hands out of his pockets and approach them. Gettler stood up and walked toward the officers, but when he tried to run away, appellant tackled him. Adrid testified that he saw Gettler and appellant fall into the bushes, which were about four feet high, although in an earlier interview, he had said he did not see appellant tackle Gettler. 

Adrid testified that Sergeant Evans was telling Gettler to put his hands behind his back or else she would use the taser. Gettler did not comply, so Sergeant Evans shot him with the taser, and then he complied and was handcuffed. Sergeant Evans stepped into the planter and helped appellant and Gettler get up. Adrid did not see Sergeant Evans crouch in the bushes or kick Gettler. He said that Sergeant Evans had one foot in the planter and one on the sidewalk and never had both feet in the planter. Adrid saw the cut on Gettler’s nose but did not see any other injuries.

Testimony of Sergeant Perez
Sergeant Perez met appellant in 2004 or 2005, when they were both in the United States Navy Reserves. While appellant was in the police academy, he told Sergeant Perez that a classmate had used a racial epithet against him (appellant is black) and continued doing so after appellant asked him to stop. Appellant reported the incident to a supervisor.

In August 2007, Sergeant Perez was camping at a lake when he noticed he had received several phone calls from appellant; he tried calling him back, but service was intermittent. Over a series of five or six calls, appellant told Sergeant Perez that he was not getting along with Sergeant Evans and that Sergeant Evans had kicked a suspect who was either handcuffed or had one handcuff on. 

Appellant asked Sergeant Perez if he needed to report the incident, and Sergeant Perez said appellant needed to tell a supervisor immediately or else Sergeant Perez would do it himself. Sergeant Perez asked appellant about the arrest report, and appellant alluded to Sergeant Evans having changed the report or told appellant to change it. When appellant started telling Sergeant Perez about the incident, Sergeant Perez stopped appellant because Sergeant Perez knew he might become a witness in any investigation. A few days later, appellant told Sergeant Perez he had reported the incident to Captain Deming.

Testimony of Sergeant Hernandez
Sergeant Hernandez was an officer with the Port Police at the time of the incident. He responded to the DoubleTree Hotel when he heard a call that an officer needed help. When Sergeant Hernandez arrived, he saw “two officers crouched over, half in the bush and half not,” struggling with a suspect and trying to handcuff him. As he ran up to them, he saw them get the second handcuff on the suspect and saw appellant pick the suspect up. Sergeant Hernandez testified that appellant was wearing a dress uniform with a tie that was messed up, so he told appellant to fix his tie while he held the suspect for him. It was subsequently established that appellant was not wearing a dress uniform or a tie, based on testimony and a photo.

Sergeant Hernandez thought that Sergeant Evans had one foot in the planter and one on the sidewalk, and he never saw her in or behind the bushes. Sergeant Hernandez did not see Sergeant Evans taser Gettler or kick him.

Testimony of Ashlye Perez
Ashlye Perez was working at the DoubleTree as a bellhop on July 28, 2007. She was in the lobby of the hotel when she saw appellant and Sergeant Evans arrive at the hotel. The hotel doors were open, so she heard the officers ask Gettler to stand and ask if he was a guest at the hotel. After Perez went outside to try to usher hotel guests inside, she heard Gettler start yelling and saw the officers grab him to stop him from running away. She did not remember exactly what happened, but she saw Sergeant Evans use the taser, and she saw Gettler fall headfirst into the bushes. She noticed that some branches were broken when Gettler hit the bushes. Perez did not see Sergeant Evans go into the bushes or kick Gettler. Perez went back into the hotel, so she did not see the officers handcuff Gettler, but she saw Gettler struggling while the officers tried to get him out of the bushes. She noticed that Gettler had a cut on his face, which she thought was from hitting his face on the bushes.

Testimony of Sergeant Jackson
When Sergeant Jackson arrived, he saw appellant, Sergeant Evans, Sergeant Hernandez, a few other officers, and Gettler in custody inside the police car. After learning from Sergeant Evans that use of force was involved, Sergeant Jackson began to interview people regarding the use of force. He interviewed the officers and the other witnesses individually and did not recall any of the witnesses reporting that kicks were used. When he inspected Gettler’s injury, he saw blood on Gettler’s face that he thought was from the bushes, but he did not see any bruising or other indication that Gettler had been kicked. Sergeant Jackson read several revisions of the arrest report prepared by appellant and Sergeant Evans, and he noticed Sergeant Evans becoming frustrated with the amount of time it was taking to prepare the report.

Testimony of Appellant
Appellant testified that he graduated from the police academy in February 2006, but he left for a 13-month military deployment in November 2006. When he returned to the LAPD in July 2007, he was still on probation and was assigned to the San Pedro area with Sergeant Evans.

On July 28, 2007, appellant and Sergeant Evans received a call about a man refusing to leave the DoubleTree Hotel. When they arrived, they saw Gettler sitting on a bench, and appellant noticed a lot of people standing in front of the hotel. Appellant wanted to move Gettler away from the other people, so he asked Gettler to come speak with him, but he got no response. After asking Gettler several times, appellant placed his hand onto Gettler’s wrist and pulled Gettler up from the bench.

Appellant and Gettler walked about 15 feet away, with Sergeant Evans a little behind them and on Gettler’s left side. Gettler suddenly stopped, turned to Sergeant Evans and yelled at her, at which point Sergeant Evans took appellant’s taser. Appellant thought Gettler was about to hit Sergeant Evans, so he tried to drag Gettler to the ground and ended up pushing Gettler toward the bushes. Gettler turned around and started pushing appellant in an attempt to get away, so appellant pushed back, and they both fell in the planter box. Appellant was trying to straddle Gettler to gain control of his hands, and after he got Gettler’s left hand he heard two taser bursts.

Appellant was trying to grab Gettler’s right arm, which was pressed against the wall, but Gettler did not comply. Sergeant Evans went into the bushes, between the bushes and the wall, lifted Gettler by his hair, and told him to give appellant his arm. Appellant testified that Gettler did not have blood on his face at that point. Sergeant Evans then stood up and kicked Gettler twice in the left clavicle. Gettler yelled, and then Sergeant Evans kicked him on the left cheek, causing him to start bleeding. Gettler said, “Is this all you want?” and gave appellant his right arm to be handcuffed. Sergeant Hernandez then drove up, got out of his car, asked if they needed help, and helped pick Gettler up.

Sergeant Jackson arrived and began his investigation. He asked what appellant did during the use of force, so appellant told him that force was used to try to gain control of the suspect’s hands and that he thought he heard Sergeant Evans use a taser. Appellant did not report the kicks by Sergeant Evans because Sergeant Jackson asked him only what his own involvement was.

Appellant testified that Sergeant Jackson spoke with Sergeant Evans first and that after Sergeant Jackson spoke with appellant, appellant heard him say that appellant’s story was consistent with Sergeant Evans’s. When appellant heard Sergeant Jackson say that his story was consistent with Sergeant Evans’s, he knew that Sergeant Evans had not reported the kicks, so he thought about saying something then, but he did not. He did not feel comfortable speaking with Sergeant Jackson because Sergeant Jackson and Sergeant Evans got along well.

Appellant also testified that he was hesitant to report the kicks because when he was in the police academy, he had reported an incident in which two recruits were using a racial epithet against another recruit. He had been shunned by other recruits after that, so he did not want to speak up again.

Appellant stated that he did not think the kicks were necessary and that he would not have kicked the suspect, but he thought they might have fallen within the use of force policy. Appellant was not sure if the kicks were wrong because he had been away for over a year during his military deployment and had not received reintegration training, despite his request for the training.

After Gettler was arrested, Sergeant Evans and appellant presented him to the watch commander, Lieutenant Andrea Grossman. Appellant did not report the kicks to Lieutenant Grossman because he was not asked and he knew that probationary officers did not speak to Lieutenant Grossman unless spoken to. He also was hesitant because he knew that Sergeant Evans and Lieutenant Grossman were friends. Gettler did not report being kicked. The medical form filled out by appellant asked if the arrestee had any injuries or medical problems, and appellant had written that Gettler had a minor scratch on his face.

When appellant and Sergeant Evans were in the car later, Sergeant Evans asked appellant if he was comfortable with the use of force, and appellant replied that he was. Sergeant Evans then stated that they would not mention the kicks in the report. Appellant did not reply because he was trying to avoid conflict with her. He said that Sergeant Evans previously had told him she was trying to limit the number of use of force incidents she had because she was on a list to become a sergeant.

When they began writing the use of force report, appellant felt that he was struggling with an ethical dilemma about the use of force, but he had forgotten some of the use of force policies because of his long military deployment. He acknowledged writing the first part of the arrest report but testified that he and Sergeant Evans disagreed about the report and that she deleted what he had written and wrote it herself. Appellant also acknowledged that he reviewed the report but reiterated that he was hesitant to report misconduct because he was afraid of retaliation. When he realized the kicks were not in the report, he decided to report them to Sergeant Perez.

Appellant testified that he called Sergeant Perez because he wanted to speak with someone who worked in Internal Affairs before reporting the incident. Sergeant Perez stopped him from telling him about the incident and instead urged him to report it to his supervisor, telling appellant that he would report it if appellant did not. Sergeant Perez followed up by calling appellant to be sure he had reported it.

Appellant had asked Sergeant Evans several times for reintegration training after his deployment and had spoken with other officers about it, but he was told that probationary officers did not receive reintegration training. On July 28, 2007, appellant gave Lieutenant Grossman a request for the training, and she said that he could attend. Appellant asked to go to reintegration training at the academy because he did not want to work with Sergeant Evans any more.

Appellant testified that Sergeant Evans had not given him unsatisfactory evaluations, but he thought that personal issues she had told him about were affecting her work and causing her to be angry and difficult to approach. For example, he said that Sergeant Evans had slapped his hand on two occasions. Sergeant Evans had told appellant that she was having difficulties at home regarding a domestic violence incident and was having financial difficulties. Appellant did not report the difficulties in his relationship with Sergeant Evans because he was still on probation and did not want to cause problems.

Appellant received a weekly evaluation report dated July 29 to August 4, 2007, in which Sergeant Evans indicated that appellant needed to improve in the areas of report writing, officer safety, suspects, prisoners, and use of common sense and good judgment. He testified that the evaluation did not bother him because he had received similar reports from other officers but had never received an unsatisfactory evaluation, which he described as “a silver bullet.”

Testimony of Richard Gettler

Richard Gettler testified that his son was schizophrenic with severe dementia. He explained that his son sometimes was verbal and able to respond, but other days he was not responsive. Gettler sometimes wandered from home, but his father usually did not report him as missing because he knew the police always brought him home.

Gettler’s father stated that when the officers brought his son home on July 28, 2007, he asked Gettler if he had been in a fight because his face was puffy. Gettler told him that he was kicked at the hotel, so they drove around until Gettler directed his father to the DoubleTree, where Gettler pointed to the wall and indicated the incident happened near there. Gettler told his father he was kicked in the chest twice by a police officer, but his father decided not to report it because he assumed it was an accident and Gettler was not hurt.

Testimony of Detective Villanueva
Detective Villanueva worked in the Internal Affairs Criminal Section of the LAPD and investigated the excessive force complaint against Sergeant Evans. During her investigation, she tried to interview Gettler, but she was told by Gettler’s grandmother and father that Gettler probably would be unable to answer simple questions because of his severe mental illness. She did not ask Gettler’s father about the incident at the DoubleTree Hotel.

Based on Detective Villanueva’s interviews of three DoubleTree employees and Sergeant Evans, she concluded that appellant falsely accused Sergeant Evans of kicking Gettler. Her investigation did not reveal any evidence to support appellant’s allegation that Sergeant 
 Evans intentionally kicked Gettler.

Testimony of Christopher Gettler
The Board brought Gettler in to question him during the administrative hearing, but his responses generally were incoherent and nonresponsive. A videotaped interview of Gettler, taken on December 8, 2008, was shown at the administrative hearing.

Decision of the Board
The Board stated that the primary issue in the case was whether Sergeant Evans actually kicked Gettler or not. After reviewing all the evidence, the Board stated that it could not find that the kicks occurred. The Board pointed out that, although Gettler’s clothes were soiled, consistent with testimony that he and appellant fell in the bushes, there was no “visible dirt transfer” on Gettler’s white shirt to support the allegation that Sergeant Evans kicked him in the shoulder or chest area.

The Board reasoned that, although there were inconsistencies in the testimony, the testimony of Adrid, Sergeant Perez, and Sergeant Hernandez was consistent with the original report by appellant and Sergeant Evans. Although Richard Gettler’s testimony supported appellant’s assertion that Sergeant Evans kicked Gettler, the Board found his testimony not credible because it was inconsistent with his son’s testimony. 

The Board also noted that Gettler’s mental illness affected his ability to give an accurate account of the incident and found that Gettler’s videotaped statement, alleging one kick, was not credible.

The Board found that appellant had failed to report the alleged kicks, despite numerous opportunities to do so, and that his testimony regarding his reasons for not reporting the kicks was not credible. The Board also found that the injury to Gettler’s face was caused when he fell into the bushes.

The Board found there was evidence that appellant had a motive to make a false complaint, citing Sergeant Evans’s testimony that appellant was going to receive an unsatisfactory probationary rating if he did not improve his performance and that the kicks were reported the day after appellant received an evaluation. The Board concluded that appellant was not credible and found him guilty of the charges against him.

Decision of the Trial Court
Appellant filed a petition for writ of administrative mandamus, which the trial court denied. The court stated that, after an independent review of the administrative record, the court was “uncertain whether the training officer kicked the suspect or not.” Because the court was not convinced that the administrative findings were wrong, the court found that appellant failed to carry his burden of establishing that the administrative findings were contrary to the weight of the evidence. The court also rejected appellant’s contention that the Board shifted the burden of proof by requiring him to prove the training officer kicked the suspect."

 Finally, the court rejected appellant’s contention that the Board members were biased. The court reasoned that no other witness testified that Sergeant Evans kicked Gettler and that the issue came down to a determination of the relative credibility of appellant and Sergeant Evans. The court thus denied appellant’s petition for writ of mandate and entered judgment in favor of respondents. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal. (VN: notice how they discarded the testimony of the father and what the son told him when he got home.  Also remember, how the kid got in trouble, because he would not respond at all, and the acted out when forced to respond.  It is part of his mental illness)

DISCUSSION “Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5, when the trial court reviews an administrative decision that substantially affects a fundamental vested right, the trial court `not only examines the administrative record for errors of law but also exercises its independent judgment upon the evidence . . . .’ [Citations.]” (Sarka v. Regents of University of California (2006) 146 Cal.App.4th 261, 270 (Sarka).) The right to practice one’s trade or profession is a fundamental vested right. (Bixby v. Pierno (1971) 4 Cal.3d 130, 143; see also Barber v. Long Beach Civil Service Com. (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 652, 658 [stating that the trial court is required to exercise its independent judgment where a case involves a police officer's vested property interest in his employment].)

“Under the independent-judgment standard, `the party challenging the administrative decision bears the burden of convincing the court that the administrative findings are contrary to the weight of the evidence.’ [Citation.] `[The] trial court must accord a “`strong presumption of . . . correctness’” to administrative findings . . . .’ [Citation.] The trial court begins its review with the presumption that the administrative findings are correct, and then, after according the respect due these findings, the court exercises independent judgment in making its own findings. [Citation.] . . . [¶] On appeal, we review a trial court’s exercise of independent review of an agency determination for substantial evidence. [Citation.]” (Sarka, supra, 146 Cal.App.4th at pp. 270-271.) “`[O]ur review of the record is limited to a determination whether substantial evidence supports the trial court’s conclusions and, in making that determination, we must resolve all conflicts and indulge all reasonable inferences in favor of the party who prevailed in the trial court. [Citations.]‘” (Wences v. City of Los Angeles (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 305, 318.) We review independently any legal interpretations made by the administrative agency and the trial court. (Breslin v. City and County of San Francisco (2007) 146 Cal.App.4th 1064, 1077 (Breslin).)

I. Burden of Proof
Appellant’s first contention is that the trial court erred in rejecting his argument that the Board improperly shifted the burden of proof from the employer to him. Whether the Board shifted the burden of proof is a legal question reviewed de novo. (Breslin, supra, 146 Cal.App.4th at p. 1077.) We conclude that the Board did not improperly shift the burden of proof.

The parties agree that respondents had the burden of proving the charges against appellant. (See California Correctional Peace Officers Assn. v. State Personnel Bd. (1995) 10 Cal.4th 1133, 1167 [explaining that a public employee's interest in his employment is protected by due process, which requires an administrative hearing at which "`the burden of proving the charges rests upon the party making the charges'"].) Thus, here, the LAPD was required to prove that appellant made a complaint he knew or should have known was false and that he made false statements during the investigation.

In arguing that the Board improperly shifted the burden of proof, appellant focuses on the Board’s statement that, after reviewing all the evidence, it could not “make a factual finding that the kicks occurred.” Neither this statement nor anything else in the Board’s decision indicates that the Board shifted the burden to appellant.

In order to prove that appellant made false statements and a false complaint, the LAPD needed to prove that Sergeant Evans did not kick Gettler. The LAPD accordingly presented witnesses and other evidence tending to show that the kicks did not occur, and the Board found its evidence persuasive. The Board’s statement that it could not find evidence to support appellant’s claim that Sergeant Evans kicked Gettler does not mean that appellant had the burden of proving his statements were not false. Rather, it indicates that the LAPD bore its burden of convincing the Board that the kicks did not occur. The trial court did not err in rejecting appellant’s argument.

II. Substantial Evidence
Appellant’s second contention is that the trial court erred in upholding the Board’s factual findings because they were not supported by substantial evidence.3 As stated above, on appeal, “we may not reweigh the evidence, but consider that evidence in the light most favorable to the trial court, indulging in every reasonable inference in favor of the trial court’s findings and resolving all conflicts in its favor.” (Breslin, supra, 146 Cal.App.4th at p. 1078.)

Appellant argues that the trial court did not understand that it was required to exercise its independent judgment, pursuant to Fukuda v. City of Angels (1999) 20 Cal.4th 805 (Fukuda), and that the court instead merely “rubber-stamped” the Board’s decision. Contrary to appellant’s claim, the trial court specifically stated that it had independently reviewed the administrative record and, based on that review, it was uncertain whether Evans had kicked Gettler. Appellant therefore had failed to carry his burden of convincing the court that the administrative findings were contrary to the weight of the evidence. (Fukuda, supra, 20 Cal.4th at p. 817; Breslin, supra, 146 Cal.App.4th at p. 1077.) The trial court did not fail to exercise its independent judgment.

Appellant further contends that the findings made by the Board were so lacking in evidentiary support as to be inherently improbable and unreasonable. We disagree.
The Board’s findings relied on physical evidence and the testimony of several eyewitnesses who testified that they did not see Sergeant Evans kick Gettler. Sergeant Hernandez and the two DoubleTree employees who witnessed the incident, Adrid and Perez, did not see any kicks. The Board also noted that the photo of Gettler did not show any dirt on his white shirt that would have indicated he was kicked in the clavicle area. 

The Board also relied on appellant’s failure to report the kicks despite several opportunities to do so, citing Sergeant Jackson’s testimony that appellant did not report the kicks when he was first interviewed about the use of force, as well as appellant’s failure to report the kicks to Lieutenant Grossman. In addition, the Board found that appellant had a motive to make false allegations against Sergeant Evans, based on her testimony that appellant would receive an unsatisfactory rating if he did not improve his performance.

Even if the Board had not found the evidence listed above persuasive, Sergeant Evans herself testified that she did not kick Gettler. Her testimony alone would have been sufficient to support the Board’s findings. (See People v. Fierro (2010) 180 Cal.App.4th 1342, 1347 (Fierro) [stating that "`unless the testimony is physically impossible or inherently improbable, testimony of a single witness is sufficient to support a conviction'"].)

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s finding. The Board simply found appellant not credible and thus implicitly found Sergeant Evans credible. Credibility determinations are within the province of the trier of fact. (Fierro, supra, 180 Cal.App.4th at p. 1347.)
DISPOSITIONThe judgment of the trial court, denying appellant’s petition for a writ of administrative mandamus, is affirmed. Respondents shall recover their costs on appeal.
MANELLA, J. and SUZUKAWA, J., concurs.

Footnotes

1. At the time of the hearing, he was a captain with the Lompoc Police Department.
Back to Reference
2. Appellant left for a 13-month military deployment shortly after his graduation from the police academy.
Back to Reference
3. Because we find the findings supported by substantial evidence, we need not consider respondents’ assertion that appellant waived the substantial evidence issue.
Back to Reference
Related Links:
Christopher Dorner Investigation | DOCUMENTS: Deposition, Legal Papers Challenging LAPD
LAPD Reopening Case That Ended In Christopher Dorner’s Termination
Manhunt Underway for Ex-LAPD Officer Suspected of Shooting 3 Cops
(UNCENSORED) Ex-LAPD Officer Christopher Dorner’s Online Manifesto

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.