2011-09-11

Vatic 9/11 Special [2011]

The Vatic 9/11/2011 Special is intended to serve as a 9/11 Reference.

Things have changed since last year. Dr. Judy Wood came out with her new book, "Where did the Towers Go?", an excellent addition to any serious 9/11 researcher's library. By golly if that book didn't get me into the directed energy weapon camp.

In 2010, the Vatic Project said:

The 9/11 Special does not shirk from saying that 9/11 was a nuclear event, that corporate media fooled the world with computer generated images (CGI), and that US Government/Military Insiders, Mossad/Israel, and zionists within the banks and media are the culprits.

In 2011, the Vatic Project amends that with "9/11 used cold-fusion or nuclear reactors to generate the power for DEW that supplied the accuracy and umpth to pulverize the internals of the towers".

As before, these rabbit holes of 9/11 DEW (powered by nukes or cold-fusion), CGI, and "whodunnit" are very deep and twisted. But if you only have time for limited 9/11 review, put these on your must explore list:

» September Clues 2008 Complete,
» Directed Energy Weapons,
» Nuclear destruction of the WTC (even though we now champion DEW), and
» Israel did 9/11, ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD!!

For your own peace of mind, satisfy for yourself whether or not they have merit. At risk is our entire system of justice.

Why should you care about this ten year old event today? Aside from the lingering effects of radiation in NYC affecting first responders and residents, you should care that the true 9/11 perpetrators are brought to justice, because left unchecked gives them and their successors free reign (again and again) to manipulate us and the world into other wrongful wars and crimes against humanity. Nations fall if justice is not pursued. Only we can save it.

Among the most basic of your take-away action items from this Vatic 9/11 Special, is that you need to be part of the voice to demand an independent investigation of 9/11. After that, you need to be questioning and denouncing all foreign & domestic policy and the right-left political games that are based on the lies of 9/11 ("... because we were attacked on 9/11(?)...") and that seem to scapegoat another [country, ethnicity, religion].

Here are some quick links to help you navigate the 9/11 Special.Do a right-click from your browser and open them in new tabs.

9/11 Who

9/11 What

9/11 Why

9/11 How

Bruecke Note: Updated for 9/11/2012 with Prager links at the top.

Part 1: Jeff Prager eMagazine [86MB]
Part 2: Jeff Prager eMagazine [56MB]

9/11 Anniversary: Astonishing Excerpts From 20 Major Media Articles

http://www.wanttoknow.info/911/911_anniversary_news

By: Want To Know Info
Date: 2011-09-11

On this 10th anniversary of 9/11, our hearts go out to those killed in this tragic event and their families. In their honor, let us open to learning more about what happened on that fateful day. Below are key excerpts from 20 of the most revealing and astonishing major media articles on 9/11 ever published. Links to the full articles on their media websites are provided for easy verification. This vital information is presented as an opportunity for you to educate yourself, and to inspire us to work together to strengthen democracy and build a brighter future for us all. For how you can make a difference with the knowledge you've gained, see the "What you can do" box at the bottom.

Credibility of Toronto 9/11 hearings jeopardized by replacing of Pentagon witness

http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2011/08/28/credibility-of-toronto-911-jeopardized-by-replacing-of-pentagon-witness/

By: Craig McKee
Date: 2011-08-28

It appears that the organizers of the Toronto 9/11 hearings have utterly caved to pressure and thrown fairness and common sense under the bus in the process.

April Gallop, who was injured in the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001 along with her infant son, has been removed from the list of witnesses at the upcoming hearings (Sept. 8-11), to be replaced by an “unconfirmed” witness. If that replacement is assigned to make the case that a 757 did, in fact, hit the Pentagon then truthers everywhere should scream bloody murder.

I really hope that the disappearance of Gallop’s name from the schedule on torontohearings.org has some innocent explanation (no official reason has been given), but I’m not optimistic. Her appearance was to have been in video form.

Quest for consensus: Toronto 9/11 hearings navigate Pentagon minefield

http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2011/09/05/quest-for-consensus-toronto-911-hearings-navigate-pentagon-minefield/

By: Craig McKee
Date: 2011-09-05

For Graeme MacQueen, the word is – or should be – consensus.

MacQueen, a member of the steering committee for the Toronto 9/11 Hearings (Sept. 8-11), says the event was conceived as an opportunity to reach people who are not yet convinced that 9/11 was an inside job, and to show how the evidence does not support the official story. He says the fight over whether a 757 did or did not hit the Pentagon should be put on the back burner so that the hearings can succeed in raising awareness with the public and the media.

“The movement has been tearing itself apart with respect to what hit the Pentagon,” MacQueen said in an interview. “It doesn’t make sense.”

What Really Happened: Category 9/11

Bruecke Note: This is a deep rabbit hole into 9/11. This posting is best studied with your finger exercising the right-mouse click options of your mouse, whereby you'll select "open in new tab" for items of interest from this 9/11 Category listing.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/category/911

Peeling the 9/11 Onion: Layers of Plots within Plots

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08/14/peeling-the-911-onion-layers-of-plots-within-plots/

By: Jim Fetzer (with Preston James)
Date: 2011-08-14

One of the primary means of immobilizing the American people politically today is to hold them in a state of confusion in which anything can be believed and nothing can be known… nothing of significance, that is.– E. Martin Schotz, HISTORY WILL NOT ABSOLVE US (1996)

9/11 appears to have been a classic “false flag” operation in which an attack is planned by one source but blamed upon another. In this case, the evidence suggests neo-cons in the Department of Defense and their allies in the Mossad were actually responsible for the execution of the atrocities of 9/11. That story was buried, however, in a surfeit of alternative explanations for which the evidence was far more tenuous but which were of much greater political utility. And in each case, qualified experts uncovered evidence that induced sincere but false beliefs that they were “the real deal”.

The situation encountered with regard to 9/11 turns out to be far more sophisticated than the efforts that were made to divert attention from the conspirators in the case of the assassination of JFK, where “Track #1”, as we might call it, implicated Lee Harvey Oswald as “the lone assassin”. Track #2 suggested that he working for Fidel Castro and that Cuba had done it. Track #3 was redirected domestically to encompass the mob, while Track #4 targeted the Soviet Union. But these were superficial distractions for which most of the evidence was flimsy and inconclusive. 9/11 presents a greater challenge to unpack, because in this case, planted evidence was more extensive and appeared to be real.

9/11: A Time For Truth

http://www.activistpost.com/2011/09/911-time-for-truth.html

By: Ethan Jacobs, J.D.
Date: 2011-09-06

Now is the time to support the Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth’s 10th Anniversary Campaign by making a donation at Remember Building 7. Remember Building 7 will use the donations for a historic nationwide ad campaign in the month of October showing the American people the unmistakable footage of Building 7's demolition and forcing the mainstream media to finally discuss the issue. The campaign will be a three-pronged blitz of TV, print, and out-of-home advertising. New York City subways will be flooded with poster ads, while TV ads saturate every major cable channel. Print ads will appear in several national publications and in local newspapers in Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Dallas.

1,548 Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth recently released a must-see, 15-minute documentary entitled Solving the Mystery of World Trade Center 7. Why did they focus on the destruction of 47-story modern steel skyscraper WTC Building 7, which imploded despite the fact that it was not hit by a plane? Because it proves beyond any reasonable doubt that the World Trade Center buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.

Demystifying 9/11: Israel and the Tactics of Mistake

http://dissidentvoice.org/2011/06/demystifying-911-israel-and-the-tactics-of-mistake/

By: Dr. Alan Sabrosky
Date: 2011-06-29

Many years ago I read a fascinating discussion of the “tactics of mistake.” This essentially entailed using a target’s prejudices and preconceptions to mislead them as to the origin and intent of the attack, entrapping them in a tactical situation that later worked to the attacker’s strategic advantage.

This is what unfolded in the 9/11 attacks that led us into the matrix of wars and conflicts, present (Afghanistan and Iraq), planned (Iran and Syria) and projected (Jordan and Egypt), that benefit Israel and no other country — although I concede that many private contractors and politicians are doing very well for themselves out of the death and misery of others.

I am also absolutely certain as a strategic analyst that 9/11 itself, from which all else flows, was a classic Mossad-orchestrated operation. But Mossad did not do it alone. They needed local help within America (and perhaps elsewhere) and they had it, principally from some alumni of PNAC (the misnamed Project for a New American Century) and their affiliates within and outside of the US Government (USG), who in the 9/11 attacks got the “catalytic event” they needed and craved to take the US to war on Israel’s behalf, only eight months after coming into office.

Israel, 9/11 and Jonathan Kay

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07/13/israel-911-and-jonathan-kay/

Israel, 9/11 and Jonathan Kay

by Joshua Blakeney

Graduate Student, University of Lethbridge

What’s worse than a Liberal candidate who compares Stephen Harper to Hitler? How about a Liberal candidate who believes 9/11 was an inside job. [sic][i]

Jonathan Kay, The National Post, September 25, 2008.
I have never bothered schooling myself in the minutiae of 911-ology — the microscopic examination of photos and videos, the comparison of melting points and mechanical properties of this or that construction material, the second-by-second timetable of U.S. Air Force activity on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001. I have never done so because it is tedious and time-consuming.[ii]

Jonathan Kay, The National Post, October 27, 2008.
Following the [9/11] attacks, supporters of Israel spoke of a silver lining: The war against militant Islam suddenly was a global one.[iii]

Jonathan Kay, Among The Truthers, 2011.

A Canadian Volunteer: Jonathan Kay Idolizes the Israeli Mossad And Defends the Sacred Myth of 9/11

In these You Tube videos I draw attention to and critique the journalistic and rhetorical contributions of Jonathan Kay.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

PART 2: Waging The Battle for Reality: Joshua Blakeney Confronts Jonathan Kay’s 9/11 Relativism (part 2)
PART 3: Waging the Battle for Reality: Joshua Blakeney Confronts Jonathan Kay’s 9/11 Relativism (part 3)
Kay is the Comments Pages Editor of one of Canada’s most influential national broadsheet newspapers The National Post and is a fellow at the neoconservative think-tank the ‘Foundation For the Defense of Democracies’ which has been characterized by journalist Jeffrey Blankfort as “[o]ne of the most influential and powerful of the Zionist lobbies which changed its name and sprung into action immediately after 9/11.”[iv] The ‘Foundation For the Defense of Democracies’ is an offshoot of the now defunct Project for a New American Century which ominously called for a ‘new Pearl Harbor’ in September 2000.[v]

A Review Essay on a Propagandist’s Journey in Search of the ‘Conspiracist Underground’

Bruecke Note: This is pretty long, but provides the measure of Jonathon Kay. I've moved all of the embedded videos to just past the "read more" break.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/05/27/jonathan-kay-defends-the-sacred-myth-of-911/

A Review Essay on a Propagandist’s Journey in Search of the ‘Conspiracist Underground’

Waging The Battle for Reality

by Anthony J. Hall

Professor of Globalization Studies

University of Lethbridge

Jonathan Kay

Among the Truthers: A Journey into the Growing Conspiracist Underground of 9/11 Truthers, Birthers, Armageddonites, Vaccine Hysterics, Hollywood Know-Nothings and Internet Addicts

Toronto: HarperCollins, 2011

The Sacred Myth of 9/11 as Propaganda for Aggressive War

Jonathan Kay’s Among the Truthers was written to coincide with the tenth anniversary of the contested events of 9/11. Its contents vividly illustrate the strategic geopolitical importance of the public’s changing perception of the hit on the Pentagon and the pulverization of the three World Trade Centers on September 11, 2001.
Most of Kay’s core arguments in the text are undermined by the author’s self-confessed decision not to address directly the empirically-verifiable proof pertaining to what did or did not happen on 9/11. Kay’s zeal to avert any hard reckoning with the complex body of evidence underlying his radical conclusions helps to shed light on the culture of cover-up and propaganda necessary to keep the sacred myth of 9/11 alive in the public’s imagination.
One of the biggest lies of 9/11 involves the all-purpose boogeyman known as al-Qaeda. The claim is often advanced either explicitly or implicitly that this caricatured embodiment of Islamic evil somehow extricated itself from the CIA and the other related agencies that founded the anti-communist proxy army of Islamic jihadists who in the 1980s overturned with US backing the Soviet-backed puppet regime in Afghanistan. Kay simply goes along with the prevalent public mythology constructed to present al-Qaeda as a credible replacement for the now-defunct Soviet enemy in order to justify the further expansion, empowerment and privatization of the world’s most formidable and expensive military-industrial complex.

A very detailed interpretation of al-Qaeda as the primary villain of 9/11 was fed into the echo chambers of the mainstream media from the first hours following the attacks until the present day. This interpretation has had the predictable outcome of driving a wedge between Islam and those adhering to a narrowed construction of the so-called West.

9/11 Disinformation Whores

Bruecke Note: With the 10-year anniversary of 9/11 upon us, the corporate media is continuing its conspiratorial role in keeping the world and us from the truth. A prime example is Jonathon Kay, author of Among the Truthers: A Journey Through America’s Growing Conspiracist Underground.and in my humble opinion a Jewish disinformation whore extraordinaire, who has made his rounds to various programs recently. Does he discuss legitimate points brought up by the 9/11 Truth Movement, like observable and measurable 100 feet of free-fall in WTC-7? No. Instead, he prefers ad hominem of 9/11 truthers in the form of a psychological analysis, liberally paraphrased: "9/11 Conspiracy Truthers are highly educated, rational, and fucking loony."

Mr. Kay first came to my attention as being on some sort of propaganda tour with this "On Point" NPR special program. Mr. Kay and Mr. James Meigs ( editor-in-chief of Popular Mechanics magazine and wrote forward and afterward the Popular Mechanics’ book and 9/11 hit-piece Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can’t Stand Up to the Facts) were given the first 15 minutes to lay the ground work. The substitute moderator, Jane Clayson, showed her bias in the framing of her questions. The one member of the 9/11 Truth Movement she invited, Kevin Ryan, was given all of 5 minutes of air time, where he had to dodge mal-framed questions and keep our focus on salient points. Then the program returned with more Kay/Meigs over-generalizations, guilt-by-association, and smear regarding how crazy those damn 9/11 truthers are.
http://onpoint.wbur.org/2011/08/25/conspiracy-theories-and-the-sept-11-terrorist-attacks

The comments to this are starting to wane at over 3,000. On Point and NPR were taken to task for this dreadful hatchet job.

We should be learning with someone like Mr. Kay, whenever they say something like "it wasn't Israel and that just shows the level of bigoted jew-hating in the 9/11 Truth Movement", by golly, that is a flag to look into Israel and certainly Mossad's potential role.

Canadian Public Broadcasting was in the tour. Canadian Public Broadcasting TV Station TVO Interviewed AE911Truth's Richard Gage, AIA, Barrie Zwicker (Towers of Deception), Author Paul Zarembka on the program "The Agenda" with Steve Paikin.

The first part is all Mr. Jonathon Kay, and he doesn't disappoint in giving wave-off's where he doesn't want the public to look, like into Mossad. He does his best to frame 9/11 Truthers. The first part lays the propaganda on so heavy, it is hard to stomach, but worth viewing to learn all of the areas where he doesn't want the public to look.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Imj7GwcFW1E&feature=player_embedded

Of course, Mr. Kay gets his clock cleaned in part 2.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHbZi80IBNU&feature=player_embedded

Steve Paikin, the moderator, showed where his biases lie in the framing of his questions and trying to corner certain panelists (e.g., Paul Zarembka) into donning labels, that while true are also loaded.

Mr. Gage did the best at steering the discussion to rational areas. However, they program did not purchase enough satellite time, so he was out of the picture for the later discussions.

Barrie Zwicker did the best job of clean Mr. Kay's clock. However, he weakened his argument by taking Mr. Kay's book personally. Although this was justified, Mr. Zwicker's focus on himself prevented him from enlightening us to the lies of Mr. Kay that were larger in nature.

Mr. Kay has been elsewhere on his media tour. The trend line involves how Mr. Kay frames 9/11 truthers as crazy, frames opponents as "jew haters", etc. He is such an overt example of Cass Sunstein influence.

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and 9/11

http://www.wanttoknow.info/050726scandal911

By: Matt Everett

Journal of Psychohistory, Volume 32, No. 3, Winter 2005, pp. 202-238

At the beginning of the invasion of Iraq in March 2003, U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld promised: "What will follow will not be a repeat of any other conflict. It will be of a force and scope and scale that has been beyond what has been seen before." The invasion that ensued was, like all wars, destructive and resulted in the loss of thousands of lives. Yet Baghdad fell in a mere three weeks, and just six weeks after the invasion commenced, President Bush announced: "Major combat operations in Iraq have ended." Despite the death and destruction, it was hardly a war of a 'force,' 'scope' and 'scale' beyond what had been seen before.

However, before it began, there were indications that some people wanted a far more destructive war than that which ensued. For example, ridiculous as it may now sound, it was suggested that Britain and America might use nuclear weapons against Iraq. As The Guardian reported at the time:

"From last year's US defence review and the testimony of the Defence Secretary, Geoffrey Hoon ... it was clear that a major change in the US and UK nuclear policy was taking place. For the first time, Britain and America were contemplating using nuclear weapons against an enemy using only chemical or biological weapons. Referring to 'states of concern', and Saddam Hussein in particular, Mr Hoon []: 'They can be absolutely confident that in the right conditions we would be willing to use our nuclear weapons.'" [1]

A month before the invasion, Hoon repeated his warning: "Saddam can be absolutely confident that in the right conditions we would be willing to use nuclear weapons." [2] As investigative journalist John Pilger points out: "No British minister has ever made such an outright threat." [3]

http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/semicontrolled_demolition.png

War by Deception

http://warbydeception.com/

"War by Deception, the definitive 9/11 documentary

'In all affairs, it's a healthy thing, now and then, to hang a question mark on the things you have long taken for granted'

Anyone looking at the events of 9/11 with an open mind understands full well that the government conspiracy can not be true. This is documented in almost all the 9/11 films, which invariably focus only on the problems with the official story. Until seeing War by Deception, it was obvious I had been missing the forest for the trees. This three hour epic brings matters full circle; capturing in three concise hours what likely took years of research by Mr. Dawson. If a three hour movie is a turn off for you, it is very likely that you don't have the desire to understand the full spectrum of this issue to begin with. Not only does it demolish the official conspiracy, it ties together the fraud of the Iraq war, as well as the key Anthrax link that most miss, linking it to the same group of (mostly) dual citizen criminals whose success in hijacking the American government and using it as an engine for their own ends is unlike anything ever witnessed in history. This film should be mandatory viewing for every American, and frankly, anyone who is deeply troubled by what has transpired in the years since 9/11. Ryan Dawson is a true patriot and hero of the highest order, and War By Deception is the definitive documentary on the 9/11 fraud."

-- Eric M.

The New 9/11 Bait and Switch?

http://www.pakalertpress.com/2011/07/21/the-new-911-bait-and-switch/

By: Zen Gardner
Date: 2011-07-21

This clip below is from Vanity Fair, of all things. It claims that the ties of 9/11 to Saudi Arabia are not just notable, but makes the case that those connections were deliberately skirted by the Bush administration following the infamous false flag attack, throughout the investigation and that there could be something big to it.

Zionist Rulers of Saudi Arabia

Duh. But nice to see someone investigating this, and they do a pretty good job….maybe.

The MSM hardly EVER touches the fact that there are huge doubts about and gaping holes in the 9/11 NWO takeover exercise cover-up story. So what are they up to?

Take a look. The only time the MSM injects some truth is to direct, that is mis-direct, public attention from the real issue or culprit and to attempt to defuse growing discontent. Anyone doing any serious research on the events of 9/11 will come to the conclusion that it was carried out by an Israeli-American cabal–at the least, and that virtually nothing adds up to give any indication whatsoever that the official story has any basis in fact.

Talk about conspiracy theory. The powers that be take the cake. Every time.

What Happened to Flight 77's Passengers?

What Happened to Flight 77's Passengers?
By Jerry Mills, American Action Report, July 7, 2010
Commentary by a Vatic Project Contributor from Taiwan (an American living in Taiwan)

Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. Take, for example, the claim that one or more passengers on Flight 77, with the help of the U.S. Government, faked their deaths on September 11, 2001? Let’s start with what we know. That would require a high degree of evidence because accepting this claim would require some changes within our view of an event that affects us today.

Let’s separate the events of September 11 into causes and results. In the minds of most Americans, the results of 9/11 are beyond question. Around 3,000 people died (more or less), three buildings were destroyed, one other building—the Pentagon—was damaged, and three commercial airliners are no longer in service, at least not under the same call signs.

Causes are another matter. Of the hundreds, if not thousands, of events (apart from what was then the usual routine) causing 9/11, not one of them has been honestly reported by the 9/11 Commission. Not one of them actually happened.

The Vatic Project

Pages

2011-09-11

Vatic 9/11 Special [2011]

9/11 Who

9/11 What

9/11 Why

9/11 How

9/11 Anniversary: Astonishing Excerpts From 20 Major Media Articles

Credibility of Toronto 9/11 hearings jeopardized by replacing of Pentagon witness

Quest for consensus: Toronto 9/11 hearings navigate Pentagon minefield

What Really Happened: Category 9/11

Peeling the 9/11 Onion: Layers of Plots within Plots

9/11: A Time For Truth

Demystifying 9/11: Israel and the Tactics of Mistake

Israel, 9/11 and Jonathan Kay

Israel, 9/11 and Jonathan Kay

by Joshua Blakeney

Graduate Student, University of Lethbridge

A Canadian Volunteer: Jonathan Kay Idolizes the Israeli Mossad And Defends the Sacred Myth of 9/11

A Review Essay on a Propagandist’s Journey in Search of the ‘Conspiracist Underground’

A Review Essay on a Propagandist’s Journey in Search of the ‘Conspiracist Underground’

Waging The Battle for Reality

by Anthony J. Hall

Professor of Globalization Studies

University of Lethbridge

The Sacred Myth of 9/11 as Propaganda for Aggressive War

9/11 Disinformation Whores

Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and 9/11

9/11 Compromise Theory

War by Deception

The New 9/11 Bait and Switch?

Zionist Rulers of Saudi Arabia

What Happened to Flight 77's Passengers?