tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5848012286026687939.post8373392205400496617..comments2024-02-27T08:10:51.019-07:00Comments on The Vatic Project: Bob McIlvaine on how his son’s death points to controlled demolitionM. C. Brueckehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11749873350461333806noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5848012286026687939.post-77732930363612462842016-09-12T10:51:11.732-06:002016-09-12T10:51:11.732-06:00Dear Mr. Goldstein,
How about authoring something...Dear Mr. Goldstein,<br /><br />How about authoring something original? I plop various sentences from you into Google and find they go back to 2012 and even 2009.<br /><br />Secondly, -- ho hum -- I've read Dr. Wood's <i>"Where did the the towers go?"</i> thoroughly and know exactly where she skews things. First and foremost, she doesn't take her analysis far enough and purposely parks in dead-end alleys. Secondly, she introduces lots of distractions, skew, and innuendo, such as Hutchison, Tesla energy from space, and energy from hurricanes. Third and most important, she doesn't power her DEW devices with anything real-world operational. Promoting or allow it to be promoted about "beams from space" is proof of her deceit. Optics and energy sources confound the ability to enable the destruction observed happening on the ground.<br /><br />Had she promoted "DEW within the structures" and specifically "fourth generation nuclear devices" which are all within the DEW classification, she would have hit the nail on the head. But she stops short. Purposely. And isn't open to new information or analysis that would keep her on the road and not in the weeds.<br /><br />Have Dr. Wood look into Dr. Andre Gsponer.<br /><br />// vcVatic Clerkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06172659938805595553noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5848012286026687939.post-41795895540793408582016-09-12T06:05:46.577-06:002016-09-12T06:05:46.577-06:00Popular theories about what destroyed the World Tr...<br />Popular theories about what destroyed the World Trade Center towers on September 11, 2001 are:<br /><br />1 Fires from jet fuel and office materials weakened steel in the upper floors and the buildings collapsed<br /><br />2 Conventional controlled demolition blew out supports at the base and the buildings collapsed<br /><br />3 Thermite cut steel columns on virtually every floor and the buildings collapsed<br /><br />4 Conventional explosives blew the buildings up<br /><br />5 Mini-nukes blew the buildings up<br /><br />Theories 1, 2 and 3 rely on gravity to bring the buildings down while the last two blow them up. Popular theories, yes, and dead wrong.<br /><br />Five facts scientifically documented in Ph.D. engineer Judy Wood’s comprehensive textbook (Where Did The Towers Go?) prove the popular theories false beyond any doubt whatsoever. Yes, I know it’s amazing. Who’d a thunk it’d be this easy? I'm a thinker and not a believer. It is in the interest of the government to have a population of believers and not thinkers. The media assists this goal explicitly and in concert as agents-of-influence. <br /><br />THE FACTS:<br /><br />1. DEBRIS: What debris? There was so little debris from each 110-story building that there was no “pile” or “stack.” Rubble totaled less than a story. It was a football field as a survivor who emerged from Stairwell B, North Tower, exclaimed. No computers, toilets, and only one small piece from one Steel-case file cabinet were found. Some steel and mostly dust remained. Lack of debris on the ground from quarter-mile-high twin towers whispers “no collapse.” See Chapter 9.<br /><br />2. BATHTUB: A bathtub or slurry wall surrounded 70 feet of WTC subbasements to prevent the Hudson River from flooding the WTC and downtown. If each 500,000-ton tower had slammed into the bathtub in 10 seconds or less, the protective wall would collapse. Did not happen. Upshot? Collapses did not happen. See Chapter 5.<br /><br />3. SEISMIC IMPACT: “Had the towers collapsed, foundation bedrock would have experienced tremendous force hammering on it throughout the ‘collapse,’” writes Dr. Wood. Seismic instruments registered disturbances far too short in duration and far too small to record tower collapses. This was true of both the twin towers and 47-story WTC7. Again, no evidence of collapses. See Chapter 6.<br /><br />4. SOUND: There were no loud explosions, as established by videos, witnesses, and the official report of NIST. Nor were there loud screeches and screams from massive metal falling, colliding, scraping and collapsing on metal. See Chapter 6.<br /><br />5. DUST: Photos, videos and witness testimony show the towers turned to powder in mid-air. Tim McGinn, NYPD, said, “I was standing there for a couple of seconds thinking where the f**k is the tower? I simply couldn’t comprehend it.” The dust roll-out was so enormous and thick it blocked out sunlight and left an inch or more of dust covering downtown. Much of it wafted into the upper atmosphere. The volume was incredible. Particles from dust samples were smaller than red blood cells and about the size of DNA. As for toxicity, researchers said the dust “recorded the highest levels we have ever seen in over 7,000 measurements we have made of very fine air pollution throughout the world, including Kuwait and China.” See Chapters 8, 9, 14-16.<br />Emmanuel Goldsteinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12818352984159292378noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5848012286026687939.post-51750397804878730002016-09-12T06:04:56.428-06:002016-09-12T06:04:56.428-06:00The 9/11 official story is:
Nineteen fanatical Ar...The 9/11 official story is:<br /><br />Nineteen fanatical Arab hijackers, masterminded by an evil genius named Osama bin Laden, crash airplanes into steel skyscrapers because they “hate our freedom to consume”. (And what did Bush tell us to do right after the event? Go shopping!”) Inexplicably the jet fuel, which is basically kerosene that burns at about 400c, took on the qualities of an explosive demolition agent, vaporizing 70 tons of aircraft into a puff of smoke and causing 110-story buildings to collapse into a pile of rubble.<br /><br /><br />The 9/11 Truth Movement has the dual purpose of vectoring genuine truth seekers to dead ends, where anger, hype, and paranoia endlessly stress the seeker and those around him or her, and to facilitate the mainstream media’s task of branding those who ask questions of authority and the true nature of reality as insane. What if the 9/11 Truth Movement is nothing more than a pseudo-movement promoting a government “alternative official” story?<br /><br />When the truth about 9/11 is finally exposed, not only will the wars be ended, but the world will finally be liberated from the grip of the oil companies. If you are interested in evidence and not opinion, read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? as I did over 5½ years ago.Emmanuel Goldsteinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12818352984159292378noreply@blogger.com