It sure sounds like a valid explanation for our heart brain power from a scientific point of view. You watch and decide. I do not know if this is valid, but there would be no reason to do to the scientist what the powers that be did when he created his orgone machine and then threw him in jail for it. After he "died" in jail, they destroyed all his notes and books etc on the subject of Orgone energy, so that made it worthwhile to put this up for your review and consideration and further research.
Here is a video to watch first to get the back ground of what you are about to read below. This scientist paid a big price for his work, like Telsar. I wondered if these two men were not dealing with the same energy, teslar on a large outward global basis and Reich on a personal energy level internally. I can't imagine that some corporation would not have grabbed this piece of machinery that worked, and run with it UNLESS it would be healthy for us and that goes against their depopulation agenda. So give this video a watch and then read the experiments done below by others who knew about this technology after the scientists death.
The end of the video was the set up by the FDA drug companies against this man and how effective they were about doing so. It looks like our FDA problem is a lot older than we ever imagined. Additionally, it looks like the powers that be may well have stolen his technology because they are doing exactly with clouds, weather and dissipating those same clouds when done. Listen to how they went after him viciously. The final recording of the scientist about what he went through to maintain his commitment to his science and how difficult it was. This simply tells me he was definitely onto something that we should pursue.
WILHELM REICH - Creator of ORGONE ENERGY machine
uploaded by ZeroSixtyFive
Keep this in mind as you read this below. Its a crime what our leaders have done to us and our planet in the name of PROFITS and control. Corporate and banker leaders should be incarcerated and never released.
by Orgone Africa
Question of proof
From time to time we have to don the white coat of the scientist in order to check if what we intuitively feel to be happening can be proven in an objective and repeatable way.
An inspiring precedentWhen I visited Germany in 2005, I got hold of a copy of the magazine NET (Neue Energie Technologien) where a Dr. Grünberg had published a very convincing Experiment for testing a different (based on tachyonised material, I think) "radiation neutraliser" for cellphones.
In his experiment, 3 samples of water were prepared. 1 was radiated with 2 cellphones calling each other without any protection. One was radiated with 2 cellphones with the device to be tested. The thrid samle was kept seperate and not radiated at all.
3 equal samples of sproutable seeds were then watered with the previously prepared water samples. Interestingly Dr. Grünberg found that the Sample watered with the water that had been radiated with the "protected" cellphones produced better and healthier growth than the totally neutral control sample.
Of course this immediately reminded me of the general observation of all ourl frequent orgone gifters that gifting a cellphone tower (we call them deathforce transmiters) with simple orgonite towerbusters transforms that tower into a source of positive orgone energy (POR) thus creating a situation better than simply eliminating the tower.
Plant growth experiments have also been used by many others to demonstrate the effect of orgonite. The reasoning is simple and straight forward: If Orgonite does indeed strengtehn the life force, this should show measurable results in plant growth and plant health.
Other plant growth experimentsMany others have used plant growth experiments as a means to demonstrate the efficacy of orgonite. The most recent one that got some publicity was conducted by Mr. P Barker from Brighton, England. It was published in Fortean Times, Issue 249, p24, available at www.forteantimes.com. Mr. Parker, an initially sceptical organic farmer conducted several systematic experiments, comparing the growth of veregtables and sproute in the presence of orgonite and without. To his surprise in all cases he found that the samples exposed to orgonite at close range showed much better growth and healthier appearance.
plant growth experiment published in Fortean TimesThe Minishield Experiment
With all these inspiring and encouraging precedents, this is what we did:
14 Nov 2009
Sample 1: 2 cellphiones without Minishield calling each other for more than 30 min
Sample 2: 2 cellphones with orgonite minishield calling each other for more than 30 min
In fact I forgot to switch this one off, so we ended up with some 42 minutes on sample 2.
Duration of radiation exposure for both samples
This little oversight would actually make our argument stronger if sample 2 would produce the better results than sample 1 or the neutral control sample.
Control sample 3: untreated tap water
The amount of unsprouted check peas was measured in a small espresso cup to ensure all 3 samples would start off the same amount of peas
All 3 samples were covered in water, approximately 1inch or a bit more than 1cm of their respective water sample and left over night. This is the normal sprouting procedure
All samples have soaked up water in equal amount. From now on they are being rinsed with their respective water twice daily
Sample 1 is not looking very happy. some of the sprouts have already started rotting abit. The whole sample feels somewhat slimey. Surprisingly, (or not?) the sample with the water radiated with orgonite minishield protected cell phones looks better than the control sample sprouted with tap water.
It also seems to have the highest volume in the glass. many green leaves are ready to unfurl. The control sample looks ok, but not as abundantly healthy as the orgonite minishield one. Interestingly in the beginning sample 1 seemed to sprout fastest. In a way this reminded me of the "fake recovery" often seen in patients under chemotherapy or antiretrovirals.
The 3 samples after 5 days. Sample 2 looks best
Sample 1: notice the many brownish and somewhat rotten sprouts.
Sample 2: healthiest appearance, highest biomass with weight 165g
Sample 3: The spouts look healthy, but not as strong and vitalas the onbes from Sample 2. Weight 150g, just slightly higher than sample 1.
Which sample do you want to be?
I think this is by now a merely rethorical question. ........
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.